Effects of Nitrogen Reduction Combined with Coated Urea on Photosynthetic Characteristics,Yield and Quality of Shine muscat

doi:10.7668/hbnxb.20193552

Abstract

Abstract:

To reveal the application effect of controlled release urea in table grape(Shine muscat),and screen out the optimum application amount,a field experiment(2018-2019)was conducted to study the effects of nitrogen(N)reduction combined with polyurethane coated urea on the yield,photosynthetic characteristics and quality of table grapes,and to explore the relationship between chlorophyll content at different leaf positions and quality traits.The results of this study can provide scientific theoretical basis for the cost-saving and efficient utilization of N fertilizer in the cultivation of table grape.The results showed that:compared with the conventional fertilization treatment,the yield of table grape were increased by 10.67%-32.91%,under 0-30% N reduction combined with coated urea treatment,while reduced by 5.79% under 40% N reduction combined with coated urea treatment.Among them,suitable N reduction combined with controlled release fertilizer for table grape had better effect on yield and income increase than conventional fertilization.With the decrease of N application rate combined with coated urea,the yield and net photosynthetic rate of table grapes increased first and then decreased.Correlation analysis showed that there was a significant positive correlation between the mean value of SPAD of functional leaves at the expansion stage and the quality traits(soluble solid,total sugar,vitamin C,sugar-acid ratio and solid-acid ratio),but a significant negative correlation between SPAD value and total acid.In general,N reduction combined with coated urea treatment was beneficial to the formation of yield component,increased SPAD value and net photosynthetic rate of functional leaves at the puffing stage,effectively expand fruit grains,promoted the increase production,saved fertilizer and increased efficiency of table grapes,and improved the food quality of table grapes.The N reduction of 10%-20% combined with coated urea treatment had the best effect.

Key words: Table grape, Shine muscat, Coated urea, Photosynthetic characteristics, Yield, Quality

HU Wenfeng, ZHOU Xuan, HUANG Yuelin, XU Zhangqian, ZHANG Huiru, YANG Xiangdong, PENG Jianwei. Effects of Nitrogen Reduction Combined with Coated Urea on Photosynthetic Characteristics,Yield and Quality of Shine muscat[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2023, 38(2): 179-187. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20193552.

/ / Recommend / Download Citations

URL: http://www.hbnxb.net/EN/10.7668/hbnxb.20193552

http://www.hbnxb.net/EN/Y2023/V38/I2/179

Figures/Tables 6

References 38

[1]	时晓芳, 林玲, 白先进, 郭荣荣, 谢林君, 白扬, 韩佳宇, 张瑛, 林玲, 曹雄军. 阳光玫瑰葡萄果实生长发育及品质对不同光质的响应[J]. 南方农业学报, 2021, 52(6):1641-1647.doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2021.06.024. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2021.06.024
	Shi X F, Lin L, Bai X J, Guo R R, Xie L J, Bai Y, Han J Y, Zhang Y, Lin L, Cao X J. Response of berries development and quality of Shine muscat grape to different light qualities[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2021, 52(6):1641-1647.
[2]	魏建林, 崔荣宗, 张玉凤, 杨果, 于淑芳, 李春茂. 不同用量控释氮肥在葡萄生产上的施用效果[J]. 北方园艺, 2012(20):156-158.
	Wei J L, Cui R Z, Zhang Y F, Yang G, Yu S F, Li C M. Effects of different application amount of controlled-release fertilizer on grape[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2012(20):156-158.
[3]	柴有忠, 张圆圆. 葡萄阳光玫瑰氮肥减量试验[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2021, 62(11):2157-2158,2220.doi:10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20211114. doi: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20211114
	Chai Y Z, Zhang Y Y. Nitrogen fertilizer reduction experiment on grape variety Shine muscat[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 62(11):2157-2158,2220.
[4]	吴月燕, 李培民, 吴秋峰. 氮磷钾对大棚葡萄产量与品质的影响[J]. 中国南方果树, 2002, 31(6):69-70.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-1431.2002.06.043. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-1431.2002.06.043
	Wu Y Y, Li P M, Wu Q F. Effects of nitrogen and potassium on yield and quality of grape in greenhouse[J]. South China Fruits, 2002, 31(6):69-70.
[5]	陈一帆, 沈建生, 刘健, 陈邦君. 控释肥和水溶性冲施肥对葡萄品质的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2011, 39(5):174-175.doi:10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2011.05.167. doi: 10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2011.05.167
	Chen Y F, Shen J S, Liu J, Chen B J. Effects of controlled release fertilizer and water-soluble irrigation fertilizer on grape quality[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 39(5):174-175.
[6]	张磊, 王甲辰, 王学霞, 陈延华, 曹兵, 周哲哲. 控释氮肥及减氮对设施番茄产量及土壤呼吸的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2021(11):90-96.doi:10.11937/bfyy.20203445. doi: 10.11937/bfyy.20203445
	Zhang L, Wang J C, Wang X X, Chen Y H, Cao B, Zhou Z Z. Effects of controlled release nitrogen fertilizer and nitrogen reduction on greenhouse tomato yield and soil respiration[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2021(11):90-96.
[7]	刘慧颖, 韩晓日, 娄春荣, 董环. 包膜肥料在葡萄上的应用效果研究[J]. 辽宁农业科学, 2006(2):28-31.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-1728.2006.02.008. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1728.2006.02.008
	Liu H Y, Han X R, Lou C R, Dong H. Study on the application effect of coated fertilizer on grapes[J]. Liaoning Agricultural Sciences, 2006(2):28-31.
[8]	樊小林, 刘芳, 廖照源, 郑祥洲, 喻建刚. 我国控释肥料研究的现状和展望[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2009, 15(2):463-473.doi:10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.2009.02.032. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.2009.02.032
	Fan X L, Liu F, Liao Z Y, Zheng X Z, Yu J G. The status and outlook for the study of controlled-release fertilizers in China[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2009, 15(2):463-473.
[9]	张军瑞, 戴子林, 涂伟萍, 李桂英. 高性能透明聚氨酯的研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2013, 27(17):91-94,104.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-023X.2013.17.019. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-023X.2013.17.019
	Zhang J R, Dai Z L, Tu W P, Li G Y. Progress of high-performance transparent polyurethanes[J]. Materials Review, 2013, 27(17):91-94,104.
[10]	陈杰, 程锐, 曲均峰, 田少勇. 聚氨酯包膜控释尿素制备工艺与养分释放特性研究[J]. 化肥工业, 2014, 41(2):11-15.
	Chen J, Cheng R, Qu J F, Tian S Y. Study of preparation technology and nutrient release characteristics of polyurethane coated controlled release urea[J]. Chemical Fertilizer Industry, 2014, 41(2):11-15.
[11]	Cao S, Zhou Y Z, Zhou Y Y, Zhou X, Zhou W J. Soil organic carbon and soil aggregate stability associated with aggregate fractions in a chrono sequence of citrus orchards plantations[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2021, 293:112847.doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112847. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112847 URL
[12]	李文杨, 岳建华, 孟岩, 孙耀清, 申洁梅, 谷绿玉, 杜艳灵. 葡萄叶片SPAD值与测定位置及光合色素含量的关系[J]. 经济林研究, 2019, 37(2):67-72,81.doi:10.14067/j.cnki.1003-8981.2019.02.010. doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1003-8981.2019.02.010
	Li W Y, Yue J H, Meng Y, Sun Y Q, Shen J M, Gu L Y, Du Y L. Correlation between SPAD value and photosynthetic pigment content in Vitis vinifera leaves[J]. Non-Wood Forest Research, 2019, 37(2):67-72,81.
[13]	杨顺林, 郭淑萍, 李佛莲. 云南鲜食葡萄产业概况与发展对策[J]. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒, 2019(2):3-6.doi:10.13414/j.cnki.zwpp.2019.02.001. doi: 10.13414/j.cnki.zwpp.2019.02.001
	Yang S L, Guo S P, Li F L. General situation and development countermeasures of table grape industry in Yunnan region[J]. Sino-Overseas Grapevine & Wine, 2019(2):3-6.
[14]	陈景蕊, 潘静. 不同品种葡萄叶片SPAD值与叶绿素含量相关性分析[J]. 北方园艺, 2015(19):42-46.doi:10.11937/bfyy.201519012. doi: 10.11937/bfyy.201519012
	Chen J R, Pan J. Analysis on correlation between leaf SPAD value and chlorophyll content of different grape varieties[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2015(19):42-46.
[15]	周旋, 康兴蓉, 彭建伟, 杨相东, 钟雪梅, 胡文峰, 龙俊佑. 聚氨酯包膜氮肥减施对双季早稻生长、产量及经济效益的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(7):153-161.doi:10.13304/j.nykjdb.2020.0094. doi: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2020.0094
	Zhou X, Kang X R, Peng J W, Yang X D, Zhong X M, Hu W F, Long J Y. Effects of reduction application of polyurethane coated urea on growth,yield and economic benefit of double-cropping early rice[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(7):153-161.
[16]	孙九胜, 胡伟, 王新勇, 祁通, 刘易. 控释氮肥在新疆葡萄上的肥效及其施肥优化研究[J]. 北方园艺, 2013(5):169-171.
	Sun J S, Hu W, Wang X Y, Qi T, Liu Y. Fertilization effect as well as optimize fertilize of controlled release N fertilizer on grape in Xinjiang[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2013(5):169-171.
[17]	段永华, 李娟, 李军, 张钟, 张军云, 普进东, 李晓亮, 王文智. 红提葡萄叶片叶绿素含量的变化规律研究[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2017(4):116-118.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6400.2017.04.040. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6400.2017.04.040
	Duan Y H, Li J, Li J, Zhang Z, Zhang J Y, Pu J D, Li X L, Wang W Z. Study on the change law of chlorophyll content in red grape leaves[J]. Bulletin of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2017(4):116-118.
[18]	王敏, 苏聪聪, 石雪晖, 杨国顺, 钟晓红, 刘昆玉, 徐丰, 金燕, 白描. 不同葡萄类型光合特性的对比研究初报[J]. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒, 2017(4):28-31.doi:10.13414/j.cnki.zwpp.2017.04.005. doi: 10.13414/j.cnki.zwpp.2017.04.005
	Wang M, Su C C, Shi X H, Yang G S, Zhong X H, Liu K Y, Xu F, Jin Y, Bai M. Preliminary study on photosynthetic characteristics of different types of grapes[J]. Sino-Overseas Grapevine & Wine, 2017(4):28-31.
[19]	黎冰, 侍朋宝, 栾雪涛, 霍素芳, 惠竹梅. 硝铵态氮不同配比对葡萄新梢生长和叶片光合特性的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 46(2):73-83.doi:10.13207/j.cnki.jnwafu.2018.02.010. doi: 10.13207/j.cnki.jnwafu.2018.02.010
	Li B, Shi P B, Luan X T, Huo S F, Xi Z M. Effects of different N O 3 --N/N H 4 +-N ratios on shoot growth and leaf photosynthetic characteristics of Cabernet Sauvignon (Vitis vinifera)[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Natural Science Edition), 2018, 46(2):73-83.
[20]	迟丽华, 郑永春. 控释肥在设施葡萄栽培上的应用研究[J]. 北方园艺, 2013(19):171-173.
	Chi L H, Zheng Y C. Study on the application of controlled release fertilizer in facilitv grape cultivation[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2013(19):171-173.
[21]	刘慧颖, 韩晓日, 娄春荣, 董环, 王玲莉. 包膜肥料对巨峰葡萄光合特性及产量品质的影响[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2006, 37(6):826-830.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1700.2006.06.006. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1700.2006.06.006
	Liu H Y, Han X R, Lou C R, Dong H, Wang L L. Effects of coated fertilizer on photosynthetic properties,yield and quality of Kyoho grapes[J]. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University, 2006, 37(6):826-830.
[22]	Jiang J Y, Comar A, Weiss M, Baret F. FASPECT:A model of leaf optical properties accounting for the differences between upper and lower faces[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2021, 253:112205.doi:10.1016/j.rse.2020.112205. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2020.112205 URL
[23]	程杰山, 蒋爱丽, 奚晓军, 田益华. 不同施肥量对巨玫瑰葡萄生长和果实品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2012, 28(25):167-171.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2012.25.033. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2012.25.033
	Cheng J S, Jiang A L, Xi X J, Tian Y H. Study on the effects of growth and fruit quality in response to different fertilizing levels in Jumeigui grapes[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2012, 28(25):167-171.
[24]	李磊, 王锐, 纪立东, 孙权, 许晓瑞, 蒋鹏. 氮肥施用量对酿酒葡萄初果期生长及产量品质的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2016(21):32-36.doi:10.11937/bfyy.201621008. doi: 10.11937/bfyy.201621008
	Li L, Wang R, Ji L D, Sun Q, Xu X R, Jiang P. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer application on beginning growth,yield and quality of wine grape[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2016(21):32-36.
[25]	王贵芳, 姚元涛, 魏树伟, 张勇. 果树营养与肥料高效利用技术研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2020, 48(5):14-17.doi:10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2020.05.004. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2020.05.004
	Wang G F, Yao Y T, Wei S W, Zhang Y. Research progress on fruit tree nutrition and fertilizer efficient utilization technology[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 48(5):14-17.
[26]	吴建平, 朱梅芳, 阎学秀, 陈秀清, 李惠其, 陆明福, 严其明, 邵敏芳, 秦彪, 须顺第, 严杰, 金德龙. 葡萄氮磷钾适宜用量初探[J]. 上海农业科技, 2010(5):92-94.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0106.2010.05.065. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0106.2010.05.065
	Wu J P, Zhu M F, Yan X X, Chen X Q, Li H Q, Lu M F, Yan Q M, Shao M F, Qin B, Xu S D, Yan J, Jin D L. Preliminary study on suitable dosage of nitrogen,phosphorus and potassium in grape[J]. Shanghai Agricultural Science and Technology, 2010(5):92-94.
[27]	刘助生, 李顺辉, 黄志琼, 杨艺玲, 黄丽秀, 邱巧玲. 不同施肥水平对夏黑葡萄生长性状的影响[J]. 南方农业学报, 2015, 46(2):228-231.doi:10.3969/jissn.2095-1191.2015.2.228. doi: 10.3969/jissn.2095-1191.2015.2.228
	Liu Z S, Li S H, Huang Z Q, Yang Y L, Huang L X, Qiu Q L. Effects of different fertilization levels on the growth traits of Summer black grape[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2015, 46(2):228-231.
[28]	刘慧颖, 娄春荣, 董环, 李纪柏. 一次性施肥对巨峰葡萄产量品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2007, 23(9):339-343.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2007.09.073. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2007.09.073
	Liu H Y, Lou C R, Dong H, Li J B. Effects of one-off applying fertilizer on Kyoho grapes[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2007, 23(9):339-343.
[29]	车俊峰. 缓控释肥对北疆红提葡萄产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农垦科技, 2016, 39(9):42-43.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-361X.2016.09.027. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-361X.2016.09.027
	Che J F. Effect of slow-release fertilizer on yield and quality of Red grape in Northern Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Farm Research of Science and Technology, 2016, 39(9):42-43.
[30]	王佳武, 赵贺新. 金正大控释肥在葡萄上的应用效果研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2014(20):204-205.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5739.2014.20.125. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5739.2014.20.125
	Wang J W, Zhao H X. Study on application effect of kingenta slow/controlled release fertilizer on grape[J]. Xiandai Nongye Keji, 2014(20):204-205.
[31]	姜姗, 王明明, 王辉, 闫姣, 曹君正. 饲地稳多控肥对巨峰葡萄产量与品质的影响[J]. 落叶果树, 2018, 50(5):15-16.doi:10.13855/j.cnki.lygs.2018.05.005. doi: 10.13855/j.cnki.lygs.2018.05.005
	Jiang S, Wang M M, Wang H, Yan J, Cao J Z. Effect of stable feeding and multiple fertilizer control on the yield and quality of Kyoho grape[J]. Deciduous Fruits, 2018, 50(5):15-16.
[32]	Xie Y, Tang L, Han Y L, Yang L, Xie G X, Peng J W, Tian C, Zhou X, Liu Q, Rong X M, Zhang Y P. Reduction in nitrogen fertilizer applications by the use of polymer-coated urea:Effect on maize yields and environmental impacts of nitrogen losses[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2019, 99(5):2259-2266.doi:10.1002/jsfa.9421. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.9421 URL
[33]	张拥兵, 黄军保, 李卓, 吕英忠. 限根栽培下不同施肥方式对葡萄果实品质的影响[J]. 山西农业科学, 2021, 49(9):1110-1113.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-2481.2021.09.17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2481.2021.09.17
	Zhang Y B, Huang J B, Li Z, Lü Y Z. Effects of different fertilizer treatments on grape fruit quality under root restriction cultivation[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 49(9):1110-1113.
[34]	曾庆华, 徐峰, 郑文才, 周凯, 周前艳. 不同施氮量对北玫葡萄品质和经济效益的影响[J]. 耕作与栽培, 2018(3):21-22, 30.doi:10.13605/j.cnki.52-1065/s.2018.03.007. doi: 10.13605/j.cnki.52-1065/s.2018.03.007
	Zeng Q H, Xu F, Zheng W C, Zhou K, Zhou Q Y. Effects of different nitrogen application rates on quality and economic benefits of Beimei grape[J]. Tillage and Cultivation, 2018(3):21-22,30.
[35]	杨焕焕, 杨占平, 吕中伟, 和爱玲, 杜君, 薛广原. 不同施氮措施对巨玫瑰葡萄生长发育及品质的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2021, 33(4):39-45,51.doi:10.19386/j.cnki.jxnyxb.2021.04.07. doi: 10.19386/j.cnki.jxnyxb.2021.04.07
	Yang H H, Yang Z P, Lü Z W, He A L, Du J, Xue G Y. Effects of different nitrogen fertilizer application measures on growth,development and quality of Giant rose grape[J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2021, 33(4):39-45,51.
[36]	Neilsen G, Neilsen D, Bowen P, Bogdanoff C, Usher K. Effect of timing,rate,and form of N fertilization on nutrition,vigor,yield,and berry yeast-assimilable N of grape[J]. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 2010, 61(3):327-336.doi:10.5344/ajev.2010.61.3.327. doi: 10.5344/ajev.2010.61.3.327 URL
[37]	史祥宾, 王孝娣, 王宝亮, 王志强, 冀晓昊, 王小龙, 刘凤之, 王海波. 红地球葡萄氮、磷、钾、钙、镁的年需求特性研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2021, 48(11):2146-2160.doi:10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2020-0785. doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2020-0785
	Shi X B, Wang X D, Wang B L, Wang Z Q, Ji X H, Wang X L, Liu F Z, Wang H B. Requirement rule of nitrogen,phosphorus,potassium,calcium and magnesium of Red globe grapevine[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2021, 48(11):2146-2160.
[38]	熊丙全. 不同施肥方案对夏黑葡萄生长结果的影响[J]. 中国南方果树, 2018, 47(3):124-126,129.doi:10.13938/j.issn.1007-1431.20170680. doi: 10.13938/j.issn.1007-1431.20170680
	Xiong B Q. Effects of different application of fertilization on growth and fruiting of Xiahei grape[J]. South China Fruits, 2018, 47(3):124-126,129.

处理 Treatment	氮肥类型 N type	基肥 Base	萌芽肥 Bud	花前肥 Before flower	膨果肥 Swelling	总计 Total
CF	包膜尿素	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
	尿素	155.32	72.11	62.79	174.85	465.06
1.0N+CU	包膜尿素	144.01	0.00	0.00	0.00	144.01
	尿素	11.32	72.11	62.79	174.85	321.06
0.9N+CU	包膜尿素	144.01	0.00	0.00	0.00	144.01
	尿素	11.32	55.89	55.89	151.66	274.76
0.8N+CU	包膜尿素	144.01	0.00	0.00	0.00	144.01
	尿素	11.32	39.61	48.92	128.41	228.25
0.7N+CU	包膜尿素	144.01	0.00	0.00	0.00	144.01
	尿素	11.32	23.32	41.95	105.16	181.75
0.6N+CU	包膜尿素	144.01	0.00	0.00	0.00	144.01
	尿素	11.32	7.04	34.98	81.90	135.24
CK	包膜尿素	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
	尿素	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00

处理 Treatment	氮肥类型 N type	基肥 Base	萌芽肥 Bud	花前肥 Before flower	膨果肥 Swelling	总计 Total
CF	包膜尿素	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
	尿素	155.32	72.11	62.79	174.85	465.06
1.0N+CU	包膜尿素	144.01	0.00	0.00	0.00	144.01
	尿素	11.32	72.11	62.79	174.85	321.06
0.9N+CU	包膜尿素	144.01	0.00	0.00	0.00	144.01
	尿素	11.32	55.89	55.89	151.66	274.76
0.8N+CU	包膜尿素	144.01	0.00	0.00	0.00	144.01
	尿素	11.32	39.61	48.92	128.41	228.25
0.7N+CU	包膜尿素	144.01	0.00	0.00	0.00	144.01
	尿素	11.32	23.32	41.95	105.16	181.75
0.6N+CU	包膜尿素	144.01	0.00	0.00	0.00	144.01
	尿素	11.32	7.04	34.98	81.90	135.24
CK	包膜尿素	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
	尿素	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00

生育期 Growth stages	处理 Treatment	第一叶 +1	第二叶 +2	第三叶 +3	平均值 Average
萌芽期	CF	49.09±0.25a	48.73±2.27a	48.09±0.57a	48.64±0.29a
Germination	1.0N+CU	48.13±0.72a	48.22±1.55a	48.66±1.51a	48.34±0.16ab
	0.9N+CU	48.91±1.34a	48.71±0.92a	47.80±1.24a	48.47±0.34ab
	0.8N+CU	48.17±0.69a	47.67±0.16a	47.66±2.26a	47.83±0.17bc
	0.7N+CU	47.95±0.42a	47.19±0.84a	47.54±1.00a	47.56±0.22cd
	0.6N+CU	47.19±1.04a	47.16±0.53a	46.59±1.53a	46.98±0.20de
	CK	47.18±0.57a	46.95±0.82a	45.34±0.85a	46.49±0.58e
花期	CF	44.79±0.32a	43.17±0.50a	40.18±0.22b	42.71±1.35ab
Flowering	1.0N+CU	43.58±0.17a	42.37±1.34a	40.83±1.57ab	42.26±0.79ab
	0.9N+CU	44.38±1.09a	43.02±0.23a	41.27±1.29ab	42.89±0.90ab
	0.8N+CU	44.24±1.42a	43.16±0.27a	42.82±0.23a	43.41±0.43a
	0.7N+CU	43.60±2.40a	42.08±1.93a	41.07±0.98ab	42.25±0.74ab
	0.6N+CU	42.57±0.99a	42.05±0.78a	40.30±0.54b	41.64±0.69ab
	CK	41.91±0.53a	41.74±0.71a	40.05±0.31b	41.23±0.59b
膨大期	CF	48.65±0.23a	46.63±4.35a	46.78±0.27b	47.36±0.65bc
Puffing	1.0N+CU	47.67±0.89a	47.33±0.37a	48.81±1.36a	47.94±0.45abc
	0.9N+CU	48.91±1.34a	48.42±0.68a	49.07±0.27a	48.80±0.19a
	0.8N+CU	48.17±0.69a	48.04±1.51a	48.85±0.71a	48.35±0.25ab
	0.7N+CU	47.93±0.43a	47.95±0.44a	48.18±0.74ab	48.02±0.08abc
	0.6N+CU	47.42±1.22a	47.98±0.94a	47.53±0.61ab	47.64±0.17bc
	CK	47.34±0.35a	47.12±0.97a	46.75±1.06b	47.07±0.17c

生育期 Growth stages	处理 Treatment	第一叶 +1	第二叶 +2	第三叶 +3	平均值 Average
萌芽期	CF	49.09±0.25a	48.73±2.27a	48.09±0.57a	48.64±0.29a
Germination	1.0N+CU	48.13±0.72a	48.22±1.55a	48.66±1.51a	48.34±0.16ab
	0.9N+CU	48.91±1.34a	48.71±0.92a	47.80±1.24a	48.47±0.34ab
	0.8N+CU	48.17±0.69a	47.67±0.16a	47.66±2.26a	47.83±0.17bc
	0.7N+CU	47.95±0.42a	47.19±0.84a	47.54±1.00a	47.56±0.22cd
	0.6N+CU	47.19±1.04a	47.16±0.53a	46.59±1.53a	46.98±0.20de
	CK	47.18±0.57a	46.95±0.82a	45.34±0.85a	46.49±0.58e
花期	CF	44.79±0.32a	43.17±0.50a	40.18±0.22b	42.71±1.35ab
Flowering	1.0N+CU	43.58±0.17a	42.37±1.34a	40.83±1.57ab	42.26±0.79ab
	0.9N+CU	44.38±1.09a	43.02±0.23a	41.27±1.29ab	42.89±0.90ab
	0.8N+CU	44.24±1.42a	43.16±0.27a	42.82±0.23a	43.41±0.43a
	0.7N+CU	43.60±2.40a	42.08±1.93a	41.07±0.98ab	42.25±0.74ab
	0.6N+CU	42.57±0.99a	42.05±0.78a	40.30±0.54b	41.64±0.69ab
	CK	41.91±0.53a	41.74±0.71a	40.05±0.31b	41.23±0.59b
膨大期	CF	48.65±0.23a	46.63±4.35a	46.78±0.27b	47.36±0.65bc
Puffing	1.0N+CU	47.67±0.89a	47.33±0.37a	48.81±1.36a	47.94±0.45abc
	0.9N+CU	48.91±1.34a	48.42±0.68a	49.07±0.27a	48.80±0.19a
	0.8N+CU	48.17±0.69a	48.04±1.51a	48.85±0.71a	48.35±0.25ab
	0.7N+CU	47.93±0.43a	47.95±0.44a	48.18±0.74ab	48.02±0.08abc
	0.6N+CU	47.42±1.22a	47.98±0.94a	47.53±0.61ab	47.64±0.17bc
	CK	47.34±0.35a	47.12±0.97a	46.75±1.06b	47.07±0.17c

处理 Treatment	净光合速率/ (μmol/(m²·s)) Pn	气孔导度/ (mol/(m²·s)) Gs	胞间CO₂浓度/ (μmol/mol) Ci	蒸腾速率/ (mmol/(m²·s)) Tr
CF	13.47±0.29de	0.35±0.01a	315.37±9.66a	7.81±0.34b
1.0N+CU	14.47±0.40bc	0.37±0.01a	312.36±7.65a	8.04±0.31b
0.9N+CU	14.65±0.30b	0.38±0.03a	310.73±2.62a	9.65±0.37a
0.8N+CU	15.67±0.09a	0.38±0.01a	309.42±6.27a	9.39±0.65a
0.7N+CU	14.01±0.28bcd	0.38±0.02a	308.82±13.03a	9.53±0.53a
0.6N+CU	13.56±0.27cde	0.37±0.01a	302.02±9.74a	10.07±0.36a
CK	12.59±0.48e	0.37±0.00a	301.29±7.25a	9.46±0.32a

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export