A Study on the Response of Soybean Growth,Yield,and Quality to Different Fertilization Models

doi:10.7668/hbnxb.20195164

Abstract

Abstract:

Improper application of soybean fertilizer can lead to late ripening,lodging,worsening of diseases and pests,and a decrease in fertilizer and yield benefits,to improve fertilizer efficiency and fully tap into the potential of soybean yield and quality,therefore,this article investigates the effects of seven fertilization modes F1(basic application of 3 000 kg/ha organic fertilizer+300 kg/ha chemical fertilizer),F2(basic application of 3 000 kg/ha organic fertilizer+150 kg/ha chemical fertilizer+topdressing 150 kg/ha chemical fertilizer),F3(basic application of 3 000 kg/ha organic fertilizer+225 kg/ha chemical fertilizer+topdressing 75 kg/ha chemical fertilizer),F4(basic application of 1 500 kg/ha organic fertilizer+75 kg/ha chemical fertilizer+topdressing 225 kg/ha chemical fertilizer),F5(basic application of 300 kg/ha chemical fertilizer),F6(basic application of 150 kg/ha chemical fertilizer+topdressing 150 kg/ha chemical fertilizer)and F7(basic application of 225 kg/ha chemical fertilizer+topdressing 75 kg/ha chemical fertilizer)on soybean growth,development,photosynthesis,yield,and quality through field experiments using a single factor experimental design.The results showed that increasing the application of organic fertilizer significantly enhanced the dry weight of soybean roots when compared to applying chemical fertilizer alone,applying chemical fertilizer alone with a base to top dressing ratio of 3∶1 was the most beneficial for increasing root dry weight.The combination of organic fertilizer and chemical fertilizer resulted in higher fresh leaf weight,dry leaf weight,fresh stem weight,dry stem weight per plant,as well as higher fresh weight and dry weight per plant when compared to single application of chemical fertilizer,and there were no significant differences in the above indicators among the treatments treated with single application of chemical fertilizer.The combination of organic fertilizer and chemical fertilizer increased the number of leaves per plant and leaf area index of soybean at pod bearing stage and filling stage,under the condition of no organic fertilizer application,the base to top dressing ratio of 3∶1 of chemical fertilizer was beneficial for improving the number of leaves and leaf area index of soybean.Compared to single application of chemical fertilizer,combined application of organic fertilizer and chemical fertilizer increased the photosynthetic rate at flowering and filling stages by 16.69%—21.66% and 14.99%—30.66%,respectively,unreasonable base to top dressing ratio of chemical fertilizer or reducing organic fertilizer dosage could affect the chlorophyll content and photosynthetic rate of soybean in the middle and later stages of growth and development.Increasing organic fertilizer application amount could increase soybean yield and protein content,while reduce fat content,applying chemical fertilizer alone with a base to top dressing ratio of 3∶1 was the most conducive to increasing yield.Therefore,it can be concluded that the combination of organic fertilizer and chemical fertilizer is significantly better than that of single application of chemical fertilizer in improving soybean growth and development,photosynthesis,yield,and quality,in addition,single application of chemical fertilizer performs better with a base to top dressing ratio of 3∶1.

Key words: Soybean, Root dry weight, Leaf area index, Chlorophyll content, Photosynthetic rate, Protein content

ZHANG Xiangqian, DU Shizhou, QIAO Yuqiang, CAO Chengfu, LI Wei, ZHAO Zhu, CHEN Huan, DING Yonggang, SHANG Yunqiu. A Study on the Response of Soybean Growth,Yield,and Quality to Different Fertilization Models[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2024, 39(6): 186-192. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20195164.

/ / Recommend / Download Citations

URL: http://www.hbnxb.net/EN/10.7668/hbnxb.20195164

http://www.hbnxb.net/EN/Y2024/V39/I6/186

Figures/Tables 8

References 25

[1]	Jiang L G, Shi J S, Guo L, Ren Y L, Pan L J, Wang L Y. Effects of different N,P,K levels on yield and quality of summer soybean[J]. Soybean Science, 2023, 42(2):220-227.
[2]	赵景云, 许海涛, 刘志强, 王建立, 仇永康, 宋晓朋. 不同肥水供给模式对高蛋白大豆干物质累积、氮素代谢、产量及品质的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2023, 42(4):432-440.doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2023.04.0432.
	Zhao J Y, Xu H T, Liu Z Q, Wang J L, Qiu Y K, Song X P. Effects of different fertilizer water supply patterns on involvement of high-protein soybean dry matter,nitrogen metabolism,yield and quality[J]. Soybean Science, 2023, 42(4):432-440.
[3]	姬月梅, 罗瑞萍, 赵志刚, 连金番. 不同施氮量及施氮方式对大豆根瘤生长及产量的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2017, 36(6):887-893.doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2017.06.0887.
	Ji Y M, Luo R P, Zhao Z G, Lian J F. Effects of different nitrogen application and methods on nodule growth and yield of soybean(Glycine max L.)[J]. Soybean Science, 2017, 36(6):887-893.
[4]	张小明, 曾宪楠, 孙羽. 土壤有效磷含量对大豆植株磷素含量和土壤有效N、P、K含量的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2016, 35(4):691-695.doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2016.04.0691.
	Zhang X M, Zeng X N, Sun Y. Effect of soil olsen-P on P content in soybean plant and soil N,P,K content[J]. Soybean Science, 2016, 35(4):691-695.
[5]	李玉影. 大豆需钾特性及钾肥效应[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 1998(4):414-418. doi:10.11674/zwyf.1998.0414.
	Li Y Y. Characteristics of potassium requirement by soybean and the effect of potash fertilization[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 1998(4):414-418.
[6]	杜明, 李彦生, 张秋英, 谷思玉, 刘晓冰. 钾肥对菜用大豆生殖生长期叶片叶绿素含量的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2012, 31(6):941-946.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2012.06.018.
	Du M, Li Y S, Zhang Q Y, Gu S Y, Liu X B. Effects of potassium fertilizer on chlorophyll content of vegetable soybean in reproductive stages[J]. Soybean Science, 2012, 31(6):941-946.
[7]	Adekiya A O, Ejue W S, Olayanju A, Dunsin O, Aboyeji C M, Aremu C, Adegbite K, Akinpelu O. Different organic manure sources and NPK fertilizer on soil chemical properties,growth,yield and quality of okra[J]. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10(1):16083.doi:10.1038/s41598-020-73291-x.
[8]	Makinde E A, Tijani E H, Fagbola O. Effect of organic,organomineral and NPK fertilizers on soil pH,organic matter and micronutirent content in two soil types in Nigeria[J]. Research on Crops, 2009, 10(1):77-85.doi:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2008.10.001.
[9]	Hua W, Luo P Y, An N, Cai F F, Zhang S Y, Chen K, Yang J F, Han X R. Manure application increased crop yields by promoting nitrogen use efficiency in the soils of 40-year soybean-maize rotation[J]. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10(1):14882.doi:10.1038/s41598-020-71932-9. pmid: 32913265
[10]	Bandyopadhyay K K, Misra A K, Ghosh P K, Hati K M. Effect of integrated use of farmyard manure and chemical fertilizers on soil physical properties and productivity of soybean[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2010, 110(1):115-125.doi:10.1016/j.still.2010.07.007.
[11]	刘沥阳, 华伟, 张诗雨, 彭启超, 戴健, 韩晓日. 东北棕壤长期不同施肥处理轮作大豆氮素吸收和土壤硝态氮特征[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(1):10-18.doi:10.11674/zwyf.19017.
	Liu L Y, Hua W, Zhang S Y, Peng Q C, Dai J, Han X R. Nitrogen uptake of soybean and soil nitrate nitrogen under long-term rotation and different fertilization in a brown soil of Northeast China[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2020, 26(1):10-18.
[12]	高阳, 楚光红, 傅积海, 张艳伟, 章建新. 施氮量对滴灌高产春大豆根系生长及产量的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2018, 36(4):46-52.doi:10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2018.04.07.
	Gao Y, Chu G H, Fu J H, Zhang Y W, Zhang J X. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer amount on root growth and yield of spring soybean in drip irrigation[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2018, 36(4):46-52.
[13]	王小林, 张盼盼, 张静, 纪晓玲, 张雄, 梁鸡保. 黄土塬区施肥模式对大豆根系形态构建及产量形成的调控作用[J]. 大豆科学, 2021, 40(6):813-820.doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2021.06.0813.
	Wang X L, Zhang P P, Zhang J, Ji X L, Zhang X, Liang J B. Regulating effects of fertilizing models on root morphological restructure and yield formation of soybean in Loess arid region of China[J]. Soybean Science, 2021, 40(6):813-820.
[14]	刘楚华, 刘瑜, 纪晓玲, 张雄, 王小林. 施肥方式对大豆不同生育期生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2023, 69(1):51-58.doi:10.3969/j.issn.0488-5368.2023.01.012.
	Liu C H, Liu Y, Ji X L, Zhang X, Wang X L. Effects of fertilization patterns on growth and yield of soybean at different growth stages[J]. Shaanxi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 69(1):51-58.
[15]	张永杰, 符小文, 杜孝敬, 厍润祥, 安崇霄, 房彦飞, 徐文修. 有机肥和氮肥周年组合对麦豆轮作中复播大豆生长及产量的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(10):2975-2981.doi:10.13292/j.1000-4890.201910.031.
	Zhang Y J, Fu X W, Du X J, She R X, An C X, Fang Y F, Xu W X. Effects of annual combination of organic fertilizer and nitrogen fertilizer on growth and yield of re-sowing soybean in wheat-bean rotation[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2019, 38(10):2975-2981.
[16]	Saleque M A, Abedin M J, Bhuiyan N I, Zaman S K, Panaullah G M. Long-term effects of inorganic and organic fertilizer sources on yield and nutrient accumulation of lowland rice[J]. Field Crops Research, 2004, 86(1):53-65.doi:10.1016/s0378-4290(03)00119-9.
[17]	Makinde E, Ayoola O T. Maize growth,yield and soil nutrient changes with N-enriched organic fertilizers[J]. African Journal of Food,Agriculture,Nutrition and Development, 2009, 9(1):580-592.doi:10.4314/ajfand.v9i1.19214.
[18]	Gai Z J, Zhang J T, Li C F. Effects of starter nitrogen fertilizer on soybean root activity,leaf photosynthesis and grain yield[J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(4):e0174841.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0174841.
[19]	胡志辉, 汪艳杰, 张丽琴. 菜用大豆施肥后荧光、光谱、光合等参数对产量的预测[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(8):1355-1362.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2018.08.12.
	Hu Z H, Wang Y J, Zhang L Q. Prediction of vegetable soybean yield with fluorescence,spectra,photosynthetic parameters after fertilization[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2018, 30(8):1355-1362.
[20]	谭春燕, 朱星陶, 陈佳琴, 杨春杰, 娄利娇, 徐熙, 龚锡震. 不同氮钾水平对大豆光合生理及产量的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2020, 48(10):5-9.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3601.2020.10.002.
	Tan C Y, Zhu X T, Chen J Q, Yang C J, Lou L J, Xu X, Gong X Z. Effects of different nitrogen and potassium levels on photosynthetic physiology and yield of soybean[J]. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 48(10):5-9.
[21]	王玉莲, 杨克军, 任海祥, 童淑媛, 宗春美. 不同施肥和栽培密度对双高大豆品种牡丰7号光合特性的影响[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2011(9):13-16.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-2767.2011.09.007.
	Wang Y L, Yang K J, Ren H X, Tong S Y, Zong C M. Effects of fertilization level and planting density on the photosynthetic characteristics of double-high soybean variety Mufeng No.7[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2011(9):13-16.
[22]	Efthimiadou A, Bilalis D, Karkanis A, Froud-Williams B. Combined organic/inorganic fertilization enhance soil quality and increased yield,photosynthesis and sustainability of sweet maize crop[J]. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 2010, 4(9):722-729.
[23]	魏丹, 李艳, 李玉梅, 金梁, 王伟, 蔡姗姗, 李婧. 氮磷钾元素对黑龙江不同地区大豆产量和品质的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2017, 36(1):87-91.doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2017.01.0087.
	Wei D, Li Y, Li Y M, Jin L, Wang W, Cai S S, Li J. Effect of N,P,K fertilization on yield and quality of soybean in Heilongjiang Province[J]. Soybean Science, 2017, 36(1):87-91.
[24]	张鑫. 施肥对小麦-大豆轮作体系产量可持续性与温室气体排放的影响[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2019.
	Zhang X. Effects of fertilization on yield sustainability and greenhouse gas emissions of wheat-soybean rotation system[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2019.
[25]	朱宝国, 于忠和, 贾会彬, 张春峰, 孟庆英, 王囡囡. 不同种类肥料对大豆生理特性和品质的影响[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2011(10):36-38.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-2767.2011.10.015.
	Zhu B G, Yu Z H, Jia H B, Zhang C F, Meng Q Y, Wang N N. Effect of different kinds of fertilizer on soybean physiological characteristics and quality[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2011(10):36-38.
[1]	蒋龙刚, 史建硕, 郭丽, 任燕利, 潘丽佳, 王丽英. 不同氮磷钾水平对夏大豆产量与品质的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2023, 42(2):220-227.doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2023.02.0220.

施肥模式 Fertilization mode	单株鲜叶质量 Fresh leaf weight per plant	单株干叶质量 Dry leaf weight per plant	单株鲜茎质量 Fresh stem weight per plant	单株干茎质量 Dry stem weight per plant	单株鲜质量 Fresh weight per plant	单株干质量 Dry weight per plant
F1	34.43±2.31ab	8.56±1.23abc	51.77±4.23ab	10.20±1.23bc	86.20±4.32bc	18.77±0.68abc
F2	39.83±1.42a	9.87±1.06a	56.87±5.12a	11.91±2.35a	96.70±5.12a	21.80±2.12a
F3	36.87±3.01ab	9.05±2.01ab	54.20±3.69a	10.97±1.89ab	91.07±3.69ab	20.00±1.69ab
F4	31.50±2.04bc	8.25±1.35bc	49.70±4.21abc	9.63±1.35cd	81.20±4.56c	17.87±2.06bcd
F5	26.09±1.36cd	7.40±1.12c	44.83±3.36bc	8.41±1.36de	70.93±2.98d	15.80±2.36cd
F6	25.23±2.25d	7.23±0.98c	42.70±2.24c	7.78±1.56e	67.93±3.69d	15.00±1.31d
F7	28.04±2.39cd	7.67±0.87bc	46.32±2.65bc	8.67±1.42de	74.37±5.36d	16.37±1.65cd

施肥模式 Fertilization mode	单株鲜叶质量 Fresh leaf weight per plant	单株干叶质量 Dry leaf weight per plant	单株鲜茎质量 Fresh stem weight per plant	单株干茎质量 Dry stem weight per plant	单株鲜质量 Fresh weight per plant	单株干质量 Dry weight per plant
F1	34.43±2.31ab	8.56±1.23abc	51.77±4.23ab	10.20±1.23bc	86.20±4.32bc	18.77±0.68abc
F2	39.83±1.42a	9.87±1.06a	56.87±5.12a	11.91±2.35a	96.70±5.12a	21.80±2.12a
F3	36.87±3.01ab	9.05±2.01ab	54.20±3.69a	10.97±1.89ab	91.07±3.69ab	20.00±1.69ab
F4	31.50±2.04bc	8.25±1.35bc	49.70±4.21abc	9.63±1.35cd	81.20±4.56c	17.87±2.06bcd
F5	26.09±1.36cd	7.40±1.12c	44.83±3.36bc	8.41±1.36de	70.93±2.98d	15.80±2.36cd
F6	25.23±2.25d	7.23±0.98c	42.70±2.24c	7.78±1.56e	67.93±3.69d	15.00±1.31d
F7	28.04±2.39cd	7.67±0.87bc	46.32±2.65bc	8.67±1.42de	74.37±5.36d	16.37±1.65cd

施肥模式 Fertilization mode	单株荚数 Number of pods per plant	单株粒数 Number of grains per plant	单株粒质量/g Grains weight per plant	单株质量/g Weight per plant	产量/ (kg/hm²) Yield
F1	77.00±4.23ab	178.00±6.89a	38.39±2.23a	59.86±3.46bc	3 100.0±120.15c
F2	83.67±4.56a	187.00±7.56a	41.37±2.34a	67.75±4.56a	3 483.1±89.66a
F3	80.67±3.67ab	181.33±6.54a	40.07±3.12a	63.87±5.36ab	3 275.7±103.23b
F4	75.67±4.56b	167.33±6.69b	37.47±1.45ab	56.00±6.12cd	3 049.3±88.65c
F5	65.00±3.21c	149.33±7.12c	32.84±4.12c	48.40±3.36e	2 830.8±95.37d
F6	64.27±3.56c	146.00±6.98c	31.50±2.13c	46.20±3.45e	2 785.9±88.76d
F7	66.33±4.41c	152.67±5.78c	33.37±1.32bc	50.58±4.12de	2 898.8±102.32d

施肥模式 Fertilization mode	单株荚数 Number of pods per plant	单株粒数 Number of grains per plant	单株粒质量/g Grains weight per plant	单株质量/g Weight per plant	产量/ (kg/hm²) Yield
F1	77.00±4.23ab	178.00±6.89a	38.39±2.23a	59.86±3.46bc	3 100.0±120.15c
F2	83.67±4.56a	187.00±7.56a	41.37±2.34a	67.75±4.56a	3 483.1±89.66a
F3	80.67±3.67ab	181.33±6.54a	40.07±3.12a	63.87±5.36ab	3 275.7±103.23b
F4	75.67±4.56b	167.33±6.69b	37.47±1.45ab	56.00±6.12cd	3 049.3±88.65c
F5	65.00±3.21c	149.33±7.12c	32.84±4.12c	48.40±3.36e	2 830.8±95.37d
F6	64.27±3.56c	146.00±6.98c	31.50±2.13c	46.20±3.45e	2 785.9±88.76d
F7	66.33±4.41c	152.67±5.78c	33.37±1.32bc	50.58±4.12de	2 898.8±102.32d

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export