QTL Preliminary Mapping of Agronomic and Yield Traits in Sorghum&times;Sudan grass Progeny Population

doi:10.7668/hbnxb.20195052

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to further explore the genetic rule of grain and stalk yield of sorghum,grain sorghum Xinliang 52 and Sudan grass TS 185 were hybridized as parents to obtain F₂ and F_2∶3 populations,115 pairs of polymorphic primers were used to construct the genetic linkage map of 430 F₂ progeny populations by interval mapping.A total of 86 QTLs were detected for 12 agronomic traits,including number of tillers, number of blades, stem diameter, panicle length, plant height, stem fresh weight, whole plant fresh weight, shelling rate, panicle weigh, thousand kernels weight, grain weight per panicle and grain number per panicle, with LOD value as the threshold value.The QTL of stem fresh weight was located between sam17164-sam15397 on chromosome 1.On chromosome 2,the QTL of number of tillers was located in Xcup64-Xcup26 region,leaf was located in Xtxp019-sam01138 region,and stem fresh weight was located in Xcup26-Xtxp080 region.Panicle length QTL was located between sam44791 and sam33751 on chromosome 3.The QTL of shelling rate was located at sam39622-sam43980 on chromosome 7.The QTL for whole plant fresh weight located in sam10491-sam17740 on chromosome 8 and the QTL for number of tillers located in sam710901b-sam59778 on chromosome 10 were all newly detected loci.

Key words: Sorghum, SSR marker, Quantitative trait loci, QTL mapping

SUN Andong, GAO Jianming, LÜ Peng, PEI Zhongyou, YANG Tingjin, LUO Feng. QTL Preliminary Mapping of Agronomic and Yield Traits in Sorghum×Sudan grass Progeny Population[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2024, 39(5): 15-23. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20195052.

/ / Recommend / Download Citations

URL: http://www.hbnxb.net/EN/10.7668/hbnxb.20195052

http://www.hbnxb.net/EN/Y2024/V39/I5/15

Figures/Tables 4

References 23

[1]	Silva T N, Thomas J B, Dahlberg J, Rhee S Y, Mortimer J C. Progress and challenges in sorghum biotechnology,a multipurpose feedstock for the bioeconomy[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2022, 73(3):646-664.doi:10.1093/jxb/erab450.
[2]	李资文, 周伟, 李岩, 余忠浩, 罗巍, 王振国, 周亚星. 199份高粱种质资源农艺性状综合分析[J]. 种子, 2023, 42(1):70-78.doi:10.16590/j.cnki.1001-4705.2023.01.070.
	Li Z W, Zhou W, Li Y, Yu Z H, Luo W, Wang Z G, Zhou Y X. Comprehensive analysis on agronomic traits of 199 sorghum germplasm resources[J]. Seed, 2023, 42(1):70-78.
[3]	张旷野, 王佳旭, 柯福来, 张飞, 朱凯, 李志华, 段有厚, 邹剑秋, 王艳秋. 不同高粱F₂群体的株型相关性状的遗传分析[J]. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 42(3):43-53.doi:10.13842/j.cnki.issn1671-8151.202112050.
	Zhang K Y, Wang J X, Ke F L, Zhang F, Zhu K, Li Z H, Duan Y H, Zou J Q, Wang Y Q. Genetic analysis of plant type related traits in different sorghum F₂ populations[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 2022, 42(3):43-53.
[4]	刘苗, 孙建, 李立军, 刘景辉. 不同施肥处理对粮饲兼用玉米品质及产量的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2010, 25(6):225-228.doi:10.7668/hbnxb.2010.06.044.
	Liu M, Sun J, Li L J, Liu J H. The effect of different fertilization treatments on soil fertility and yield of forage crops[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2010, 25(6):225-228. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2010.06.044
[5]	王瑞, 程庆军, 王绘艳, 巨岚, 平俊爱, 张福耀. 调控高粱分蘖高度的基因及表达分析[J]. 华北农学报, 2023, 38(2):43-50.doi:10.7668/hbnxb.20193558.
	Wang R, Cheng Q J, Wang H Y, Ju L, Ping J A, Zhang F Y. Gene for tiller height regulation and its expression analysis in sorghum[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2023, 38(2):43-50. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20193558
[6]	Hart G E, Schertz K F, Peng Y, Syed N H. Genetic mapping of Sorghum bicolor(L.) Moench QTLs that control variation in tillering and other morphological characters[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2001, 103(8):1232-1242.doi:10.1007/s001220100582.
[7]	Wondimu Z, Dong H X, Paterson A H, Worku W, Bantte K. Genome-wide association study reveals genomic loci influencing agronomic traits in Ethiopian sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) landraces[J]. Molecular Breeding, 2023, 43(5):32.doi:10.1007/s11032-023-01381-5.
[8]	Shehzad T, Okuizumi H, Kawase M, Okuno K. Development of SSR-based sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) diversity research set of germplasm and its evaluation by morphological traits[J]. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 2009, 56(6):809-827.doi:10.1007/s10722-008-9403-1.
[9]	Feltus F A, Hart G E, Schertz K F, Casa A M, Kresovich S, Abraham S, Klein P E, Brown P J, Paterson A H. Alignment of genetic maps and QTLs between inter-and intra-specific sorghum populations[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2006, 112(7):1295-1305.doi:10.1007/s00122-006-0232-3. pmid: 16491426
[10]	Shiringani A L, Frisch M, Friedt W. Genetic mapping of QTLs for sugar-related traits in a RIL population of Sorghum bicolor L.Moench[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2010, 121(2):323-336.doi:10.1007/s00122-010-1312-y. pmid: 20229249
[11]	Takai T, Yonemaru J I, Kaidai H, Kasuga S. Quantitative trait locus analysis for days-to-heading and morphological traits in an RIL population derived from an extremely late flowering F₁ hybrid of sorghum[J]. Euphytica, 2012, 187(3):411-420.doi:10.1007/s10681-012-0727-8.
[12]	Takele A, Feyissa T, Disasa T. Quantitative trait loci mapping of stem sugar content and stem diameter in sorghum recombinant inbred lines using genotyping-by-sequencing[J]. Molecular Biology Reports, 2022, 49(4):3045-3054.doi:10.1007/s11033-022-07131-8.
[13]	Guindo D, Teme N, Vaksmann M, Doumbia M, Vilmus I, Guitton B, Sissoko A, Mestres C, Davrieux F, Fliedel G, Kouressy M, Courtois B, Rami J F. Quantitative trait loci for sorghum grain morphology and quality traits:toward breeding for a traditional food preparation of West-Africa[J]. Journal of Cereal Science, 2019, 85:256-272.doi:10.1016/j.jcs.2018.11.012.
[14]	Rami J F, Dufour P, Trouche G, Fliedel G, Mestres C, Davrieux F, Blanchard P, Hamon P. Quantitative trait loci for grain quality,productivity,morphological and agronomical traits in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.Moench)[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 1998, 97(4):605-616.doi:10.1007/s001220050936.
[15]	Klein R R, Rodriguez-Herrera R, Schlueter J A, Klein P E, Yu Z H, Rooney W L. Identification of genomic regions that affect grain-mould incidence and other traits of agronomic importance in sorghum[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2001, 102(2):307-319.doi:10.1007/s001220051647.
[16]	郭泽西, 马海燕, 马亚飞, 袁雪. 水稻穗粒数遗传基础研究进展[J]. 天津农业科学, 2017, 23(7):94-98.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6500.2017.07.025.
	Guo Z X, Ma H Y, Ma Y F, Yuan X. Basal research progresses on the genetics of grains number per panicle in rice[J]. Tianjin Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 23(7):94-98.
[17]	M.R.格林, (美)J.萨姆布鲁克. 分子克隆实验指南[M].贺福初. 北京: 科学出版社, 2017.
	Green M R, Sambrook J. Molecular cloning:a laboratory manual[M]. He F C.Beijing: Science Press, 2017.
[18]	Chiluwal A, Perumal R, Poudel H P, Muleta K, Ostmeyer T, Fedenia L, Pokharel M, Bean S R, Sebela D, Bheemanahalli R, Oumarou H, Klein P, Rooney W L, Krishna Jagadish S V. Genetic control of source sink relationships in grain sorghum[J]. Planta, 2022, 255(2):40.doi:10.1007/s00425-022-03822-5. pmid: 35038036
[19]	Ji G S, Wang J P, Zhang Z Y, Shi Y N, Du R H, Jiang Y M, Liu S X, Wang X D, Sun A D, Wang X Y, Zhang N N, Niu J T, Wu L Y, Lü P. Identification of QTLs associated with multiple agronomic traits in sorghum[J]. Euphytica, 2022, 218(10):140.doi:10.1007/s10681-022-03089-7.
[20]	逯晓萍, 云锦凤, 肖宇红, 米福贵, 李美娜, 尹利. 高丹草(高粱×苏丹草)产量及其构成因素的QTL定位与分析[J]. 华北农学报, 2007, 22(4):80-85.doi:10.7668/hbnxb.2007.04.019.
	Lu X P, Yun J F, Xiao Y H, Mi F G, Li M N, Yin L. QTL localization and analysis on yield and related factors of Sorghum×Sudan grass[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2007, 22(4):80-85. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2007.04.019
[21]	Dweikat I, Braun D, Benjamin B, Teingtham K. Detection of reproducible QTL associated with bioenergy traits in sorghum across several growing environments[J]. Euphytica, 2023, 219(7):70.doi:10.1007/s10681-023-03194-1.
[22]	Takele A, Feyissa T, Disasa T. High-density linkage map and QTL map for yield and yield components of sorghum recombinant inbreed lines developed from Gambella×Sorcoll 163/07 using GBS[J]. Cereal Research Communications, 2024, 52(2):383-396.doi:10.1007/s42976-023-00427-w.
[23]	Techale B, Dong H, Mihrete G, Aregash G, Paterson A H, Kassahun B. QTL analysis in multiple sorghum mapping populations facilitates dissection of the genetic control of agronomic and yield-related traits in sorghum[Sorghum bicolor(Moench)][J]. Euphytica, 2022, 218(3):24.doi:10.1007/s10681-022-02968-3.

性状 Trait	均值 Mean value	标准差 s	方差 Variance	变幅 Range	偏度 Skewness	峰度 Kurtosis
分蘖数/(个/株) Number of tillers	2.52	1.25	1.56	1.00~8.00	1.13	1.96
叶片数/(片/株) Number of blades	10.59	1.35	1.83	7.00~14.00	-0.04	0.05
茎粗/mm Stem diameter	14.61	2.72	7.39	5.96~24.42	0.05	0.59
穗长/cm Panicle length	30.47	4.83	23.35	17.40~24.42	-0.10	0.00
株高/cm Plant height	311.96	69.11	4 775.95	135.40~472.50	-0.41	-0.30
穗质量/g Panicle weight	51.21	28.11	790.21	5.06~136.71	0.74	-0.07
整株鲜质量/g Whole plant fresh weight	927.64	533.27	284 381.19	118.10~2 672.60	0.91	0.41
茎秆鲜质量/g Stem fresh weight	878.26	490.48	240 569.46	111.78~2 672.60	0.87	0.30
着壳率/% Shelling rate	53.75	23.59	5.00	0.00~100.00	-0.11	-0.32
千粒质量/g Thousand kernels weight	25.63	4.71	22.16	12.68~37.57	-0.24	0.32
单穗粒质量/g Grain weight per panicle	33.55	16.78	281.63	7.60~78.20	0.63	-0.33
单穗粒数 Grain number per panicle	1 347.29	530.38	281 308.19	223.00~3 469.00	0.37	0.32

性状 Trait	均值 Mean value	标准差 s	方差 Variance	变幅 Range	偏度 Skewness	峰度 Kurtosis
分蘖数/(个/株) Number of tillers	2.52	1.25	1.56	1.00~8.00	1.13	1.96
叶片数/(片/株) Number of blades	10.59	1.35	1.83	7.00~14.00	-0.04	0.05
茎粗/mm Stem diameter	14.61	2.72	7.39	5.96~24.42	0.05	0.59
穗长/cm Panicle length	30.47	4.83	23.35	17.40~24.42	-0.10	0.00
株高/cm Plant height	311.96	69.11	4 775.95	135.40~472.50	-0.41	-0.30
穗质量/g Panicle weight	51.21	28.11	790.21	5.06~136.71	0.74	-0.07
整株鲜质量/g Whole plant fresh weight	927.64	533.27	284 381.19	118.10~2 672.60	0.91	0.41
茎秆鲜质量/g Stem fresh weight	878.26	490.48	240 569.46	111.78~2 672.60	0.87	0.30
着壳率/% Shelling rate	53.75	23.59	5.00	0.00~100.00	-0.11	-0.32
千粒质量/g Thousand kernels weight	25.63	4.71	22.16	12.68~37.57	-0.24	0.32
单穗粒质量/g Grain weight per panicle	33.55	16.78	281.63	7.60~78.20	0.63	-0.33
单穗粒数 Grain number per panicle	1 347.29	530.38	281 308.19	223.00~3 469.00	0.37	0.32

性状 Trait		染色体 Chromosome	标记区间 Marker interval	距离/cM Distance	LOD	加性效应 Additive effect	显性效应 Dominance effect	显性势 Dominance potential	贡献率/% PVE
分蘖数	F₂	2	Xcup64-Xcup26	4.2	4.012	-3.861	-0.023	0.006	9.6
Number of tillers		10	sam710901b-sam59778	8.4	5.967	0.784	0.658	0.839	10.7
	F_2∶3	2	Xcup64-Xcup26	4.2	5.567	1.294	-0.819	0.633	6.2
		7	sam34510-sam41840	8.7	4.769	2.514	-0.516	0.205	5.4
		8	sam32873-sam23503	3.5	3.458	2.654	-0.367	0.138	3.9
		10	sam710901b-sam59778	8.4	5.111	4.411	-0.249	0.056	5.7
叶片数	F₂	2	Xtxp019-sam01138	7.0	3.502	1.943	-0.473	0.243	7.6
Number of blades		6	sam24115-sam28726	12.8	3.502	4.075	0.284	0.070	8.6
	F_2∶3	2	Xtxp019-sam01138	7.0	4.085	-5.318	-0.152	0.029	4.6
		6	sam24115-sam28726	12.8	4.978	2.537	-0.648	0.255	5.6
		8	sam23850-sam14077	16.4	3.781	4.221	0.003	0.001	4.3
		9	sam79029-sam57208	2.3	3.078	4.468	-0.124	0.028	3.5
茎粗	F₂	1	sam15397-Xtxp284	10.7	3.689	4.027	0.721	0.179	7.6
Stem diameter		2	Xtxp019-sam01138	7.0	5.610	6.657	0.928	0.139	4.8
		4	sam00186-sam37422	3.5	3.995	-5.915	0.854	0.144	3.4
		6	sam24529-sam27218	11.2	3.026	3.107	1.085	0.349	6.1
		8	sam14077-sam47223	4.7	5.984	-5.816	1.447	0.249	10.8
		9	sam36089-sam43268	7.7	4.182	-7.946	1.561	0.196	3.6
	F_2∶3	1	Xtxp011-sam12415	18.7	3.800	2.451	0.722	0.295	4.3
		6	sam24529-sam27218	11.2	3.059	-1.238	0.762	0.616	3.5
		9	sam36089-sam43268	7.7	3.021	-3.329	-0.451	0.135	7.0
		8	sam14077-sam47223	4.7	5.073	-3.619	0.792	0.219	5.7
穗长	F₂	2	sam03897-sam77877	5.7	5.831	-5.891	1.871	0.318	5.0
Panicle length		3	sam44791-sam33751	9.5	6.443	1.359	1.771	1.303	11.9
		5	sam42264-sam42213	12.3	5.610	-1.461	0.434	0.297	4.8
		6	sam55781-sam21960	8.6	3.111	8.942	0.911	0.102	10.3
		8	sam07583-Xcup47	12.8	6.358	1.562	0.418	0.268	5.4
	F_2∶3	3	sam44791-sam33751	9.5	5.776	1.577	0.381	0.242	6.4
		5	sam23603-sam42249	4.6	3.040	-1.326	0.672	0.507	8.2
		6	sam55781-sam21960	8.6	6.840	1.753	-0.782	0.446	7.6
		7	sam47407-sam39622	8.1	3.097	1.158	-0.772	0.667	3.5
株高	F₂	1	Xcup25-sam08721	3.5	4.794	3.189	-0.279	0.087	8.3
Plant height		2	Xtxp019-sam01138	7.0	3.774	-2.087	-3.413	1.635	3.3
		3	sam42025-sam49059	11.9	3.417	-7.428	1.791	0.241	8.0
		5	sam48103-sam39915	9.7	3.502	-1.602	-1.661	1.037	6.9
		8	sam78341-sam27756	1.4	3.264	-1.846	-6.096	3.302	2.8
		9	sam51141-sam79029	2.5	3.145	1.844	-5.765	3.126	2.7
		10	sam51585-sam71091b	12.9	4.012	1.421	1.642	1.156	3.5
	F_2∶3	1	Xcup25-sam08721	3.5	3.762	-2.142	-1.906	0.890	4.2
		3	Xtxp285-sam25318	7.3	4.465	4.686	-2.189	0.467	5.0
		5	sam48103-sam39915	9.7	3.439	5.568	2.282	0.410	3.9
		9	sam51141-sam79029	2.5	3.097	1.288	-4.162	3.231	10.2
穗质量	F₂	1	sam17164-sam15397	9.4	5.627	1.573	-0.095	0.060	4.7
Panicle weight		2	Xcup26-Xtxp080	4.7	6.018	-1.281	-1.807	1.411	5.2
		3	sam68695-sam27790b	5.0	4.573	5.954	1.906	0.320	3.9
		8	sam17740-sam32873	23.6	3.315	2.651	2.231	0.842	2.9
	F_2∶3	9	sam60345b-sam07805c	7.1	6.004	3.055	-3.271	1.071	6.7
		10	xtxp258-sam58413	6.2	3.515	2.025	-1.876	0.926	4.0
整株鲜质量	F₂	1	sam18657-Xgap036	6.8	3.944	3.864	1.447	0.374	3.4
Whole plant		2	sam01138-Xcup74	5.9	4.165	-1.652	0.914	0.553	8.7
fresh weight		5	sam42264-sam42213	12.3	4.284	-3.872	1.039	0.268	3.7
		6	sam22243-sam00891	8.5	3.383	-6.014	-0.911	0.151	2.9
		7	sam47407-sam39622	8.1	3.088	6.197	-1.941	0.313	2.4
		8	sam10491-sam17740	9.4	6.069	-2.154	1.343	0.623	5.2
		9	sam36089-sam43268	7.7	4.369	-6.418	0.971	0.151	3.8
		10	Xtxp129-sam48932	9.7	3.026	-3.748	7.607	2.030	2.6
	F_2∶3	3	sam40933-Xisep0107	6.7	3.097	-3.814	9.498	2.490	3.5
		8	sam10491-sam17740	9.4	3.458	4.625	9.894	2.139	9.1
茎秆鲜质量	F₂	1	sam17164-sam15397	9.4	5.542	15.293	-2.012	0.132	4.8
Stem fresh weight		2	Xcup26-Xtxp080	4.7	6.001	-1.317	-1.788	1.358	5.1
		3	sam68695-sam27790b	5.0	4.454	5.858	1.916	0.327	3.8
	F_2∶3	7	sam47407-sam39622	8.1	3.211	6.266	-6.905	1.102	3.6
		8	gpsb069-sam78341	4.7	3.287	7.102	-0.940	0.132	3.7
		9	sam79029-sam57208	2.3	7.923	1.172	-1.421	1.212	8.7
		10	xtxp258-sam58413	6.2	4.351	7.266	-0.844	0.116	4.9
着壳率	F₂	2	Xtxp080-sam39365	7.9	4.216	3.425	0.118	0.034	7.1
Shelling rate	F_2∶3	2	Xtxp080-sam39365	7.9	4.216	3.425	0.118	0.034	7.1
		2	sam03897-sam77877	5.7	3.287	0.887	0.095	0.107	3.7
		7	sam39622-sam43980	12.7	4.712	0.766	-0.138	0.180	5.3
		8	sam32873-sam23503	3.5	3.116	0.981	0.157	0.160	3.5
		9	sam79029-sam57208	2.3	3.515	0.227	-0.191	0.841	4.0
千粒质量	F₂	4	sam56450-sam70236	9.5	6.001	6.488	2.502	0.386	4.8
Thousand kernels		8	sam10491-sam17740	9.4	3.978	-3.819	1.841	0.482	6.9
weight	F_2∶3	1	sam18657-Xgap036	6.9	3.781	7.754	7.633	0.984	4.3
		8	sam10491-sam17740	9.4	3.287	-2.696	-0.832	0.309	3.7
单穗粒质量	F₂	1	sam12415-sam16218	8.4	3.655	3.511	6.546	1.864	7.3
Grain weight		5	sam39915-sam33386	8.0	6.069	4.175	5.875	1.407	4.9
per panicle		6	sam22243-sam00891	8.5	4.284	-4.012	6.986	1.741	3.5
		8	sam10491-sam17740	9.4	5.916	-1.463	0.993	0.679	4.8
	F_2∶3	1	sam12415-sam16218	8.4	3.819	-8.365	5.527	0.661	4.3
		7	sam47407-sam39622	8.1	4.066	3.548	-4.032	1.136	4.6
		8	sam23850-sam14077	16.4	3.230	8.564	4.574	0.534	8.5
单穗粒数	F₂	1	Xqap036-Xtxp011	8.5	4.403	-8.135	2.875	0.353	3.7
Grain number		5	sam42264-sam42213	12.3	5.015	4.339	3.432	0.791	4.2
per panicle		8	sam07583-Xcup47	12.8	3.230	-9.534	3.255	0.341	6.7
		9	sam36089-sam43268	7.7	3.587	-1.462	1.985	1.358	3.0
	F_2∶3	8	sam07583-Xcup47	12.8	3.002	2.026	-1.872	0.924	4.0

性状 Trait		染色体 Chromosome	标记区间 Marker interval	距离/cM Distance	LOD	加性效应 Additive effect	显性效应 Dominance effect	显性势 Dominance potential	贡献率/% PVE
分蘖数	F₂	2	Xcup64-Xcup26	4.2	4.012	-3.861	-0.023	0.006	9.6
Number of tillers		10	sam710901b-sam59778	8.4	5.967	0.784	0.658	0.839	10.7
	F_2∶3	2	Xcup64-Xcup26	4.2	5.567	1.294	-0.819	0.633	6.2
		7	sam34510-sam41840	8.7	4.769	2.514	-0.516	0.205	5.4
		8	sam32873-sam23503	3.5	3.458	2.654	-0.367	0.138	3.9
		10	sam710901b-sam59778	8.4	5.111	4.411	-0.249	0.056	5.7
叶片数	F₂	2	Xtxp019-sam01138	7.0	3.502	1.943	-0.473	0.243	7.6
Number of blades		6	sam24115-sam28726	12.8	3.502	4.075	0.284	0.070	8.6
	F_2∶3	2	Xtxp019-sam01138	7.0	4.085	-5.318	-0.152	0.029	4.6
		6	sam24115-sam28726	12.8	4.978	2.537	-0.648	0.255	5.6
		8	sam23850-sam14077	16.4	3.781	4.221	0.003	0.001	4.3
		9	sam79029-sam57208	2.3	3.078	4.468	-0.124	0.028	3.5
茎粗	F₂	1	sam15397-Xtxp284	10.7	3.689	4.027	0.721	0.179	7.6
Stem diameter		2	Xtxp019-sam01138	7.0	5.610	6.657	0.928	0.139	4.8
		4	sam00186-sam37422	3.5	3.995	-5.915	0.854	0.144	3.4
		6	sam24529-sam27218	11.2	3.026	3.107	1.085	0.349	6.1
		8	sam14077-sam47223	4.7	5.984	-5.816	1.447	0.249	10.8
		9	sam36089-sam43268	7.7	4.182	-7.946	1.561	0.196	3.6
	F_2∶3	1	Xtxp011-sam12415	18.7	3.800	2.451	0.722	0.295	4.3
		6	sam24529-sam27218	11.2	3.059	-1.238	0.762	0.616	3.5
		9	sam36089-sam43268	7.7	3.021	-3.329	-0.451	0.135	7.0
		8	sam14077-sam47223	4.7	5.073	-3.619	0.792	0.219	5.7
穗长	F₂	2	sam03897-sam77877	5.7	5.831	-5.891	1.871	0.318	5.0
Panicle length		3	sam44791-sam33751	9.5	6.443	1.359	1.771	1.303	11.9
		5	sam42264-sam42213	12.3	5.610	-1.461	0.434	0.297	4.8
		6	sam55781-sam21960	8.6	3.111	8.942	0.911	0.102	10.3
		8	sam07583-Xcup47	12.8	6.358	1.562	0.418	0.268	5.4
	F_2∶3	3	sam44791-sam33751	9.5	5.776	1.577	0.381	0.242	6.4
		5	sam23603-sam42249	4.6	3.040	-1.326	0.672	0.507	8.2
		6	sam55781-sam21960	8.6	6.840	1.753	-0.782	0.446	7.6
		7	sam47407-sam39622	8.1	3.097	1.158	-0.772	0.667	3.5
株高	F₂	1	Xcup25-sam08721	3.5	4.794	3.189	-0.279	0.087	8.3
Plant height		2	Xtxp019-sam01138	7.0	3.774	-2.087	-3.413	1.635	3.3
		3	sam42025-sam49059	11.9	3.417	-7.428	1.791	0.241	8.0
		5	sam48103-sam39915	9.7	3.502	-1.602	-1.661	1.037	6.9
		8	sam78341-sam27756	1.4	3.264	-1.846	-6.096	3.302	2.8
		9	sam51141-sam79029	2.5	3.145	1.844	-5.765	3.126	2.7
		10	sam51585-sam71091b	12.9	4.012	1.421	1.642	1.156	3.5
	F_2∶3	1	Xcup25-sam08721	3.5	3.762	-2.142	-1.906	0.890	4.2
		3	Xtxp285-sam25318	7.3	4.465	4.686	-2.189	0.467	5.0
		5	sam48103-sam39915	9.7	3.439	5.568	2.282	0.410	3.9
		9	sam51141-sam79029	2.5	3.097	1.288	-4.162	3.231	10.2
穗质量	F₂	1	sam17164-sam15397	9.4	5.627	1.573	-0.095	0.060	4.7
Panicle weight		2	Xcup26-Xtxp080	4.7	6.018	-1.281	-1.807	1.411	5.2
		3	sam68695-sam27790b	5.0	4.573	5.954	1.906	0.320	3.9
		8	sam17740-sam32873	23.6	3.315	2.651	2.231	0.842	2.9
	F_2∶3	9	sam60345b-sam07805c	7.1	6.004	3.055	-3.271	1.071	6.7
		10	xtxp258-sam58413	6.2	3.515	2.025	-1.876	0.926	4.0
整株鲜质量	F₂	1	sam18657-Xgap036	6.8	3.944	3.864	1.447	0.374	3.4
Whole plant		2	sam01138-Xcup74	5.9	4.165	-1.652	0.914	0.553	8.7
fresh weight		5	sam42264-sam42213	12.3	4.284	-3.872	1.039	0.268	3.7
		6	sam22243-sam00891	8.5	3.383	-6.014	-0.911	0.151	2.9
		7	sam47407-sam39622	8.1	3.088	6.197	-1.941	0.313	2.4
		8	sam10491-sam17740	9.4	6.069	-2.154	1.343	0.623	5.2
		9	sam36089-sam43268	7.7	4.369	-6.418	0.971	0.151	3.8
		10	Xtxp129-sam48932	9.7	3.026	-3.748	7.607	2.030	2.6
	F_2∶3	3	sam40933-Xisep0107	6.7	3.097	-3.814	9.498	2.490	3.5
		8	sam10491-sam17740	9.4	3.458	4.625	9.894	2.139	9.1
茎秆鲜质量	F₂	1	sam17164-sam15397	9.4	5.542	15.293	-2.012	0.132	4.8
Stem fresh weight		2	Xcup26-Xtxp080	4.7	6.001	-1.317	-1.788	1.358	5.1
		3	sam68695-sam27790b	5.0	4.454	5.858	1.916	0.327	3.8
	F_2∶3	7	sam47407-sam39622	8.1	3.211	6.266	-6.905	1.102	3.6
		8	gpsb069-sam78341	4.7	3.287	7.102	-0.940	0.132	3.7
		9	sam79029-sam57208	2.3	7.923	1.172	-1.421	1.212	8.7
		10	xtxp258-sam58413	6.2	4.351	7.266	-0.844	0.116	4.9
着壳率	F₂	2	Xtxp080-sam39365	7.9	4.216	3.425	0.118	0.034	7.1
Shelling rate	F_2∶3	2	Xtxp080-sam39365	7.9	4.216	3.425	0.118	0.034	7.1
		2	sam03897-sam77877	5.7	3.287	0.887	0.095	0.107	3.7
		7	sam39622-sam43980	12.7	4.712	0.766	-0.138	0.180	5.3
		8	sam32873-sam23503	3.5	3.116	0.981	0.157	0.160	3.5
		9	sam79029-sam57208	2.3	3.515	0.227	-0.191	0.841	4.0
千粒质量	F₂	4	sam56450-sam70236	9.5	6.001	6.488	2.502	0.386	4.8
Thousand kernels		8	sam10491-sam17740	9.4	3.978	-3.819	1.841	0.482	6.9
weight	F_2∶3	1	sam18657-Xgap036	6.9	3.781	7.754	7.633	0.984	4.3
		8	sam10491-sam17740	9.4	3.287	-2.696	-0.832	0.309	3.7
单穗粒质量	F₂	1	sam12415-sam16218	8.4	3.655	3.511	6.546	1.864	7.3
Grain weight		5	sam39915-sam33386	8.0	6.069	4.175	5.875	1.407	4.9
per panicle		6	sam22243-sam00891	8.5	4.284	-4.012	6.986	1.741	3.5
		8	sam10491-sam17740	9.4	5.916	-1.463	0.993	0.679	4.8
	F_2∶3	1	sam12415-sam16218	8.4	3.819	-8.365	5.527	0.661	4.3
		7	sam47407-sam39622	8.1	4.066	3.548	-4.032	1.136	4.6
		8	sam23850-sam14077	16.4	3.230	8.564	4.574	0.534	8.5
单穗粒数	F₂	1	Xqap036-Xtxp011	8.5	4.403	-8.135	2.875	0.353	3.7
Grain number		5	sam42264-sam42213	12.3	5.015	4.339	3.432	0.791	4.2
per panicle		8	sam07583-Xcup47	12.8	3.230	-9.534	3.255	0.341	6.7
		9	sam36089-sam43268	7.7	3.587	-1.462	1.985	1.358	3.0
	F_2∶3	8	sam07583-Xcup47	12.8	3.002	2.026	-1.872	0.924	4.0

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export

QTL Preliminary Mapping of Agronomic and Yield Traits in Sorghum×Sudan grass Progeny Population

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Cited

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 4

References 23

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	LIN Haihong, LU Jiannong, YIN Xuegui, HUANG Guanrong, ZHANG Liuqin, ZHANG Xiaoxiao, LIU Chaoyu, ZUO Jinying. Mapping QTLs Conferring Seed Yield Per Spike and Spike Axis Dry Weight in Castor [J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2024, 39(6): 94-105.
[2]	HUANG Huanhuan, AN Hongzhou, LI Kuiying, WANG Yanbing, GU Yi, QIAO Yake, GAO Zengyu. QTL Mapping of Silk Coloring Characteristics of Anthocyanins in Maize [J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2024, 39(4): 31-36.
[3]	ZHANG Xiaoxiao, YIN Xuegui, LU Jiannong, HUANG Guanrong, ZHANG Liuqin, LIU Chaoyu, LIN Haihong, ZUO Jinying. QTL Mapping and Candidate Gene Analysis for Harvest Index and Related Traits in Castor [J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2024, 39(3): 77-87.
[4]	WANG Huizhen, ZHANG Chaozheng, HUANG Yiming, LI Yaoxin, CHENG Ziyang, YUE Chaoyin. *Cloning and Expression Analysis of Disease Resistance Gene SbRPM1* in Sorghum** [J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2024, 39(2): 153-160.
[5]	LI Haiquan, JIANG Yanmiao, LIU Yanan, GENG Lingling, HAN Xiaojie, LIU Guoqing, DONG Li. Establishment of Molecular Identity in 94 Foxtail Millet Varieties [J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2023, 38(S1): 18-25.
[6]	HUANG Guanrong, YIN Xuegui, LU Jiannong, ZHANG Liuqin, LIU Chaoyu, ZHANG Xiaoxiao, LIN Haihong, ZUO Jinying. *QTL Mapping and Candidate Gene Identification of Effective Spike Number in Ricinus communis* L.** [J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2023, 38(6): 36-44.
[7]	TANG Bin, GENG Cunjuan, ZENG Qiang, GUO Huanle, LI Han, CAO Zhongyang, DENG Lichao, PENG Ming, ZHOU Hong, CHEN Zhihui. Kernel Transcriptome Analysis of Maize Inbred Lines in Response to High Temperature Stress [J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2023, 38(4): 11-19.
[8]	ZHANG Fuyan, ZHU Baolei, CHEN Xiaojie, WANG Jiahuan, CHENG Zhongjie, FAN Jialin, ZHANG Jianwei. Grain Phenotype Analysis and Authenticity Identification of Space Induced Wheat Mutants [J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2023, 38(3): 61-68.
[9]	YUE Xiangqing, ZHONG Xionghui, CUI Jian, HAN Rui, SONG Xumeng, XIE Jianming, KANG Jungen. Construction of a Genetic Linkage Map and QTL Mapping for Black Rot Resistance in Cabbage [J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2023, 38(3): 167-175.
[10]	WANG Tao, ZHANG Yi, ZHAO Xiaoxue, CHEN Can, SI Hongqi, MA Chuanxi, LU Jie. Morphological Indexes and QTL Analysis of Stem Lodging Resistance in Wheat [J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2023, 38(2): 99-105.
[11]	WANG Rui, CHENG Qingjun, WANG Huiyan, JU Lan, PING Jun'ai, ZHANG Fuyao. Gene for Tiller Height Regulation and Its Expression Analysis in Sorghum [J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2023, 38(2): 43-50.
[12]	LI Guang, SHI Lijuan, CUI Xudong, ZHAO Xuefeng, BAI Wenbin. Effect of Tillage Methods on Yield and Soil Water and Organic Carbon Content of Continuous Cropping Sorghum [J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2023, 38(2): 170-178.
[13]	ZHANG Dehua, XU Xin, WANG Yujie, ZHANG Ziyang, LI Xiaojun. Mapping of Quantitative Trait Loci for Quality Traits Using Recombinant Inbred Line Population Derived from Bainong AK58/Bima 4 in Wheat [J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2023, 38(1): 23-31.
[14]	HUANG Juan, ZHOU Yu, ZHANG Yaqin, LI Zebi, WU Yu, XI Jiang. Effects of Nitrogen Reduction and Densification on Grain Yield and Dry Matter Production of Hybrid Waxy Sorghum [J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2022, 37(S1): 154-160.
[15]	LIANG Junchao, ZHAO Yunyan, WANG Zhiqi, SUN Jian, YAN Tingxian, YAN Xiaowen, RAO Yueliang, ZHOU Hongying, LE Meiwang. Identification of QTL for Aluminum Tolerance Related Traits at the Early Seedling Stage in Sesame [J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2022, 37(6): 124-131.

模态框（Modal）标题

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export

QTL Preliminary Mapping of Agronomic and Yield Traits in Sorghum×Sudan grass Progeny Population

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Cited

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 4

References 23

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments