Effects of Exogenous Amino Acids on Grape Yield,Growth and Quality

doi:10.7668/hbnxb.20194044

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to explore the effects of amino acid water-soluble fertilizer on grape yield and quality,the full-fruit Zaohebao grape was used as the experimental material,three treatments were set up:conventional fertilization (CK);increased application of organic fertilizer (OPT);organic fertilizer + amino acid water soluble fertilizer treatment (OPT+AA),the effects of exogenous amino acids on grape yield,growth,quality and soil nutrient content were studied.The results showed that compared with CK,grape yield decreased by 14.17% under OPT treatment and 7.50% under OPT+AA treatment,but were not significant.Compared with CK,partial productivity of fertilizer treated with OPT and OPT+AA increased significantly.Partial productivity of N,P₂O₅ and K₂O treated with OPT+AA increased significantly by 73.44%,85.01% and 85.01%,respectively.OPT+AA significantly increased total sugar by 8.09%,soluble solids by 1.32 percentage,sugar-acid ratio by 38.80%,and the titratable acid content by 0.16 percentage.The nutrient content of shoots was significantly increased by 24.73% in OPT+AA,total phosphorus content and total potassium content were significantly increased by 24.73%.In addition,OPT and OPT+AA treatments did not inhibit plant growth,but could effectively reduce the leaching of available nutrients and increase the nutrient content in the root domain.In summary,reducing and increasing the application of organic fertilizer had no significant effect on grape yield,but could reduce the leaching of available nutrients and significantly improve the partial productivity of fertilizer.The application of amino acid water-soluble fertilizer could promote nutrient absorption in plants,improving grape yield and fruit quality.

Key words: Grape, Amino acid water soluble fertilizer, Organic substitution, Yield, Quality

QIN Meimei, ZHAO Qi, LI Qian, HE Yongbo, ZHU Xiaoping, ZHANG Jing, SU Huan, LI Lei. Effects of Exogenous Amino Acids on Grape Yield,Growth and Quality[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2023, 38(5): 112-119. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20194044.

/ / Recommend / Download Citations

URL: http://www.hbnxb.net/EN/10.7668/hbnxb.20194044

http://www.hbnxb.net/EN/Y2023/V38/I5/112

Figures/Tables 9

References 34

[1]	王颖, 荀志丽, 黄丽萍, 王敏, 马小河, 许艺凡, 王环, 赵旗峰. 赤霉素处理对葡萄果实发育及品质的影响[J]. 中国果树, 2023(5):43-49,54.doi:10.16626/j.cnki.issn1000-8047.2023.05.008.
	Wang Y, Xun Z L, Huang L P, Wang M, Ma X H, Xu Y F, Wang H, Zhao Q F. Effects of gibberellin treatment on fruit development and quality of grape[J]. China Fruits, 2023(5):43-49,54.
[2]	陈俊, 唐晓萍, 李登科, 马小河, 董志刚. 早熟大粒优质葡萄新品种-早黑宝[J]. 园艺学报, 2001, 28(3):27.doi:10.3321/j.issn:0513-353X.2001.03.022.
	Chen J, Tang X P, Li D K, Ma X H, Dong Z G. Zaoheibao-An early-maturing,good quality and large berry grape variety[J]. Acta Houticulturae Sinica, 2001, 28(3):27.
[3]	张筠筠, 王竞, 孙权, 张军翔, 王锐. 化肥减施对贺兰山东麓土壤肥力及酿酒葡萄品质的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2019, 32(7):1601-1606.doi:10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2019.7.023.
	Zhang J J, Wang J, Sun Q, Zhang J X, Wang R. Effect of chemical fertilizer reduction on soil fertility and wine grape quality in east piedmont area of Helan Mountain,Ningxia[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 32(7):1601-1606.
[4]	Kipp J A. Thirty years fertilization and irrigation in dutch apple orchards:a review[J]. Fertilizer Research, 1992, 32(2):149-156.doi:10.1007/BF01048777. URL
[5]	程杰山, 蒋爱丽, 奚晓军, 田益华. 不同施肥量对巨玫瑰葡萄生长和果实品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2012, 28(25):167-171.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2012.25.033.
	Cheng J S, Jiang A L, Xi X J, Tian Y H. Study on the effects of growth and fruit quality in response to different fertilizing levels in Jumeigui grapes[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2012, 28(25):167-171.
[6]	李廷亮, 王嘉豪, 黄璐, 王灏滢. 秸秆还田替代化肥对土壤有机碳组分及冬小麦产量的影响[J]. 山西农业科学, 2022, 50(6):771-780.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-2481.2022.06.01.
	Li T L, Wang J H, Huang L, Wang H Y. Effects of straw returning and replacing chemical fertilizer on soil organic carbon fractions and winter wheat yield[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 50(6):771-780.
[7]	杜相革, 董民, 曲再红, 史咏竹. 有机农业和土壤生物多样性[J]. 中国农学通报, 2004, 20(4):80-81,83.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2004.04.027.
	Du X G, Dong M, Qu Z H, Shi Y Z. Organic agriculture and soil biodiversity[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2004, 20(4):80-81,83. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.040480
[8]	夏凡, 李翠芳, 王志刚, 王超, 宋晓彦, 孙晶京, 穆婷婷, 杨武德, 冯美臣. 施用有机肥对谷子产量、品质及经济效益的影响[J]. 山西农业科学, 2023, 51(3):278-284.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-2481.2023.03.07.
	Xia F, Li C F, Wang Z G, Wang C, Song X Y, Sun J J, Mu T T, Yang W D, Feng M C. Effects of organic fertilizer application on yield,quality and economic benefit of foxtail millet[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 51(3):278-284.
[9]	李亚飞, 张翔, 常栋, 李亮, 司贤宗, 索炎炎, 毛家伟, 范艺宽, 李广良, 何雷. 羊粪施用量及施用方式对连作烟田土壤理化性状和经济效益的影响[J]. 山西农业科学, 2020, 48(12):1964-1968,1983.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-2481.2020.12.23.
	Li Y F, Zhang X, Chang D, Li L, Si X Z, Suo Y Y, Mao J W, Fan Y K, Li G L, He L. Effects of fertilization amount and patterns of sheep dung on soil properties and tobacco economic performance in continuous tobacco planting fields[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 48(12):1964-1968,1983.
[10]	邱吟霜. 不同有机肥对土壤理化性质及玉米生长的影响[D]. 银川: 宁夏大学, 2019.doi:10.27257/d.cnki.gnxhc.2019.000829.
	Qiu Y S. Effects of different organic fertilizers on soil physical and chemical properties and corn growth[D]. Yinchuan: Ningxia University, 2019.
[11]	聂胜委, 张巧萍, 潘秀燕, 张玉亭, 郑念, 许纪东. 牛粪秸秆堆肥替代20%全量化肥对小麦产量及品质的影响[J]. 山西农业科学, 2022, 50(10):1408-1413.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-2481.2022.10.08.
	Nie S W, Zhang Q P, Pan X Y, Zhang Y T, Zheng N, Xu J D. Effects of cattle manure and wheat straw compost instead of 20%of total chemical fertilizer on yield and quality of wheat[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 50(10):1408-1413.
[12]	萨日娜, 陈立新, 王娟, 刘力勇, 邹春娇. 不同有机堆肥对番茄产量、品质和土壤性状的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2020(22): 42-47.doi:10.11937/bfyy.20194406.
	Sa R N, Chen L X, Wang J, Liu L Y, Zou C J. Effects of different organic composts on tomato yield and quality and soil characteristics[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2020(22):42-47.
[13]	王蓓, 黄忠阳, 徐明喜, 李伟明, 陈莉莉, 吴旭东, 王东升, 余光辉, 刘庆叶, 李荣, 沈其荣. 含氨基酸水溶肥料在设施辣椒和豇豆上的田间效应研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2017, 48(3):683-691.doi:10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2017.03.25.
	Wang B, Huang Z Y, Xu M X, Li W M, Chen L L, Wu X D, Wang D S, Yu G H, Liu Q Y, Li R, Shen Q R. Effect of root irrigation with water soluble fertilizer containing amino acids on pepper and cowpea growth under facility agriculture[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2017, 48(3):683-691.
[14]	包日在, 戚行江, 郑锡良, 任海英. 氨基酸水溶肥料对大棚杨梅营养生长和果实品质的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2021, 60(23):106-108,113.doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2021.23.023.
	Bao R Z, Qi X J, Zheng X L, Ren H Y. Effects of amino acid water-soluble fertilizer on nutritional growth and fruit quality of Myrica rubra in greenhouse[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 60(23):106-108,113.
[15]	许会会, 陈光, 王春夏, 王秀萍, 盛婷婷. 含氨基酸水溶肥对葡萄产量与质量及经济效益的影响[J]. 现代农业科技, 2018(24):57-57,60.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-5739.2018.24.031.
	Xu H H, Chen G, Wang C X, Wang X P, Sheng T T. Effect of water-soluble fertilizer containing amino acids on grape's yield,quality and economic benefits[J]. XianDai NongYe KeJi, 2018(24):57-57,60.
[16]	刘淑仪, 张劲, 李玮, 陈国品, 谢林君, 李洪艳, 阳仁桂, 文仁德. 不同保鲜剂处理对贮藏期广西巨峰冬葡萄品质的影响[J]. 南方农业学报, 2014, 45(12):2236-2241.doi:10.3969/j:issn.2095-1191.2014.12.2236.
	Liu S Y, Zhang J, Li W, Chen G P, Xie L J, Li H Y, Yang R G, Wen R D. Effects of different fresh-keeping treatments on quality of Guangxi winter Kyoho grapes during storage period[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2014, 45(12):2236-2241.
[17]	王超. 不同叶幕处理对酿酒葡萄果实品质的影响[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2015.
	Wang C. Effects of different leaf curtain treatments on fruit quality of wine grape[D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2015.
[18]	Chiu C J, Taylor A. Nutritional antioxidants and age-related cataract and maculopathy[J]. Experimental Eye Research, 2007, 84(2):229-245.doi:10.1016/j.exer.2006.05.015.
[19]	成果, 周思泓, 黄羽, 张瑛, 管敬喜, 杨莹, 仁德, 张劲. 桂葡6号葡萄花色苷组成特点与基因表达规律解析[J]. 植物生理学报, 2017, 53(1):103-114.doi:10.13414/j.cnki.zwpp.2015.01.006.
	Cheng G, Zhou S H, Huang Y, Zhang Y, Guan J X, Yang Y, Ren D, Zhang J. Analysis of anthocyanin composition characteristics and gene expression patterns of Guipu No.6 grape[J]. Plant Physiology Journal, 2017, 53(1):103-114.
[20]	鲁亚辉. 契斯曼尼番茄果实中可溶固形物含量及β-胡萝卜素含量相关QTL分析[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2012.
	Lu Y H. QTLs analysis of soluble of solid content and β-carotene content in Chismani tomato fruit[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, 2012.
[21]	丁阔, 王雪梅, 陈波浪, 柴仲平, 刘茂, 罗湘. 施用黑炭和羊粪对库尔勒香梨园土壤理化性质与产量的影响[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2015, 32(5):449-455.doi:10.13254/j.jare.2015.0019.
	Ding K, Wang X M, Chen B L, Chai Z P, Liu M, Luo X. Influences of applying black carbon and sheep excrement on soil properties and yield of Korla fragrant pear orchard[J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2015, 32(5):449-455.
[22]	刘茂, 柴仲平, 盛建东, 丁阔, 何传文. 施用有机肥对库尔勒香梨叶片营养元素及果实产量、品质的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2014(10):159-163.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-148X.2008.02.013.
	Liu M, Chai Z P, Sheng J D, Ding K, He C W. Effect of organic fertilizer on the elements of leaves and the yield,quality of Korla fragrant pear[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2014(10):159-163.
[23]	张晓荣. 氨基酸系列叶面肥在温室葡萄上的应用效果分析[J]. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒, 2017(4):84-85.doi:10.13414/j.cnki.zwpp.2017.04.022.
	Zhang X R. Analysis on the application effect of amino acid series foliar fertilizer on greenhouse grapes[J]. Sino-Overseas Grapevine & Wine, 2017(4):84-85.
[24]	王孝, 孙权. 不同有机肥对贺兰山东麓酿酒葡萄产量及品质的影响[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2021, 27(21):106-108.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-7731.2021.21.038.
	Wang X, Sun Q. Effects of different organic fertilizers on the yield and quality of wine grapes in the eastern foot of Helan Mountain[J]. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 27(21):106-108.
[25]	郭帅奇. 两种有机肥对三种土壤类型酿酒葡萄果实品质的影响[D]. 银川: 宁夏大学, 2021.doi:10.27257/d.cnki.gnxhc.2021.001199. URL
	Guo S Q. Effects of two organic fertilizers on fruit quality of wine grapes in three soil types[D]. Yinchuan: Ningxia University, 2021.
[26]	张建斌, 戚行江, 吴世军, 郑锡良, 任海英. 氨基酸水溶肥对复壮杨梅树势和改善果实品质的作用[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2021(5):27-29.doi:10.16498/j.cnki.hnnykx.2021.005.007.
	Zhang J B, Qi X J, Wu S J, Zheng X L, Ren H Y. Effects of amino acid water-soluble fertilizer on tree vigor and fruit quality of waxberry(Myrica rubra)[J]. Hunan Agricultural Sciences, 2021(5):27-29.
[27]	王孝娣, 刘凤之, 谢计蒙, 王宝亮, 何锦兴, 王海波. 设施栽培桃喷施氨基酸系列叶面肥试验[J]. 中国果树, 2012(3):37-40.doi:10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2019.21.035.
	Wang X D, Liu F Z, Xie J M, Wang B L, He J X, Wang H B. Experiment on spraying amino acid series foliar fertilizer on peach in protected cultivation[J]. China Fruits, 2012(3):37-40.
[28]	王玉霞, 李芳东, 张福兴, 孙庆田, 张序, 李延菊, 田长平. 氨基酸叶面肥在大樱桃上的应用初报[J]. 烟台果树, 2018(4):9-10.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-9938.2018.04.005.
	Wang Y X, Li F D, Zhang F X, Sun Q T, Zhang X, Li Y J, Tian C P. Preliminary report on application of amino acid foliar fertilizer on big cherry[J]. Yantai Fruits, 2018(4):9-10.
[29]	申明, 成学慧, 谢荔, 李翠, 孙新娥, 张治平, 汪良驹. 氨基酸叶面肥对砂梨叶片光合作用的促进效应[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2012, 35(2):81-86.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-2481.2009.05.012.
	Shen M, Cheng X H, Xie L, Li C, Sun X E, Zhang Z P, Wang L J. Effects of amino-acid fertilizers on photosynthesis in leaves of pear cultivars[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2012, 35(2):81-86.
[30]	王孝娣, 綦伟, 汪心泉, 翟衡. 有机肥在红地球葡萄上的肥效对比试验[J]. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒, 2005(4):24-27.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-7360.2005.04.007.
	Wang X D, Qi W, Wang X Q, Zhai H. Fertilizer efficiency of three organic manures on Red globe grapevine[J]. Sino-Overseas Grapevine and Wine, 2005(4):24-27.
[31]	胡波. 化肥减量条件下配施生物有机肥及氨基酸水溶肥对甜瓜生长及土壤肥力的影响[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2019.doi:10.27244/d.cnki.gnjnu.2019.001948.
	Hu B. Effects of combined application of bio-organic fertilizer and amino acid water-soluble fertilizer on melon growth and soil fertility under the condition of chemical fertilizer reduction[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2019.
[32]	马宜林, 吴广海, 申洪涛, 王新中, 赵世民, 马君红, 王丽华, 刘领. 羊粪有机肥与化肥配施对烤烟生长及土壤肥力特性的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2021, 35(10):2423-2430.doi:10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2021.10.2423.
	Ma Y L, Wu G H, Shen H T, Wang X Z, Zhao S M, Ma J H, Wang L H, Liu L. Effects of combined application of sheep manure-derived organic fertilizer and chemical fertilizer on tobacco growth and soil fertility[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 35(10):2423-2430. doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2021.10.2423
[33]	崔保伟, 刘全永, 秦广利, 朱俊朋. 发酵羊粪与松土促根剂配施对土壤理化性状及朝天椒品质和产量的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2021, 36(2):182-187.doi:10.7668/hbnxb.20191870.
	Cui B W, Liu Q Y, Qin G L, Zhu J P. Effect of combined application of fermented sheep manure and soil loosening and root promoting agent on soil physical and chemical properties yield and quality of red cluster pepper[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2021, 36(2):182-187. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20191870
[34]	吴红, 刘海霞, 周明夏, 韩大勇. 羊粪还田对巨峰葡萄园土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 广东农业科学, 2018, 45(12):32-37.doi:10.16768/j.issn.1004-874X.2018.12.006.
	Wu H, Liu H X, Zhou M X, Han D Y. Effects of applying sheep manure on soil properties of kyoho vineyard[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 45(12):32-37.

处理 Treatment	N	P₂O₅	K₂O	Ca	Mg	羊粪 Dung	氨基酸水溶肥 Amino acid water soluble fertilizer
CK	225	150	300	90	45.0	45 000	0
OPT	120	75	150	45	22.5	75 000	0
OPT+AA	120	75	150	45	22.5	75 000	3 000

处理 Treatment	N	P₂O₅	K₂O	Ca	Mg	羊粪 Dung	氨基酸水溶肥 Amino acid water soluble fertilizer
CK	225	150	300	90	45.0	45 000	0
OPT	120	75	150	45	22.5	75 000	0
OPT+AA	120	75	150	45	22.5	75 000	3 000

肥料 Fertilizer	萌芽期(2月)比例 Germinating period (February)ratio	花期(3月)比例 Flowering period (March)ratio	果实成熟期(4-6月)比例 Ripening period (April-June)ratio	采后基肥(10月)比例 Postharvest basal fertilizer(October)ratio
N	20.00	15.00	25.00	40.00
P₂O₅	5.00	10.00	5.00	80.00
K₂O	10.00	10.00	60.00	20.00
Ca	0.00	0.00	0.00	100.00
Mg	15.00	15.00	55.00	15.00

肥料 Fertilizer	萌芽期(2月)比例 Germinating period (February)ratio	花期(3月)比例 Flowering period (March)ratio	果实成熟期(4-6月)比例 Ripening period (April-June)ratio	采后基肥(10月)比例 Postharvest basal fertilizer(October)ratio
N	20.00	15.00	25.00	40.00
P₂O₅	5.00	10.00	5.00	80.00
K₂O	10.00	10.00	60.00	20.00
Ca	0.00	0.00	0.00	100.00
Mg	15.00	15.00	55.00	15.00

处理 Treatment	产量/(kg/hm²) Yield	单果质量/g Fruit weigth
CK	34 156.50±2 368.34a	19.31±1.04a
OPT	29 315.56±2 277.48a	18.12±1.00a
OPT+AA	31 595.81±1 874.11a	16.53±0.28a

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export