Effects of Different Kinds of Manure Combination with Chemical Fertilizer on Yield, Quality and Soil Nutrient Content in Greenhouse Tomato

doi:10.7668/hbnxb.2011.S2.033

Abstract

Abstract: Effect of different manure on yield,quality,soil nitrogen and soil electric conductivity was conducted in a greenhouse tomato with double season.The result showed that high yield of 90-125t/ha could be got in the three treatments.And the tomato yield of pig manure(DM) treament was the highest,then chicken manure and dairy manure treatment,but no significant difference.For the quality of tomato,the soluble solid content was highest and water content were lower in the treatment of diary manure(DM) than chicken manure(CM) and pig manure(PM).But the soluble sugar content and VC content were improved in the treatment of chicken manure(CM) than others,but no significant difference in the three treatents.Soil mineral nitrogen content in root zone were kept lower and stable in the treatment of diary manure treatment than other treatments.No more nitrogen was accumulated after two seasons' planting.The soil electric conductivity(EC) kept smoothly in root zone in the treatment of diary manure during the two seasons.Soil EC kept higher content in the chicken manure and pig manure treatments than dairy manure,and exceeded the critical endurance value of most crops.So,this management of manure combination with chemical nitrogen top-dressing were optimal nitrogen management for greenhouse tomato,which were N 200 kg/hm2 manrue as basal fertilization with N 130 kg/ha and N 200 kg/ha top-dressing fertilization,respectively in autumn-winter season and winter-spring season.But,the management of diary manrue with chemical fertilizer was more safe to greenhouse vegetable production than chicken manure and pig manure.

Key words: Manure, Yield, Quality, Soil mineral nitrogen, Soil electric conductivity , Tomato

CLC Number:

S141

WANG Li-ying, ZHANG Yan-cai, CHEN Li-li, LI Ruo-nan, ZHAI Cai-xia, LI Qiao-yun. Effects of Different Kinds of Manure Combination with Chemical Fertilizer on Yield, Quality and Soil Nutrient Content in Greenhouse Tomato[J]. ACTA AGRICULTURAE BOREALI-SINICA, 2011, 26(S2): 152-156. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2011.S2.033.

/ / Recommend / Download Citations

URL: http://www.hbnxb.net/EN/10.7668/hbnxb.2011.S2.033

http://www.hbnxb.net/EN/Y2011/V26/IS2/152

References

[1] 苑亚茹.我国有机废弃物的时空分布及农用现状[D].北京:中国农业大学,2008.
[2] 张彦才,李巧云,翟彩霞,等.河北省大棚蔬菜施肥状况分析与评价[J].河北农业科学,2005,9(3):61-67.
[3] 刘兆辉,江丽华,张文君,等.山东省设施蔬菜施肥量演变及土壤养分变化规律[J].土壤通报,2008,45(2):296-303.
[4] 王丽英,张彦才,翟彩霞,等.平衡施肥对连作日光温室黄瓜产量、品质及土壤理化性状的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2008,16(6):1375-1383.
[5] 王婷婷,王俊,赵牧秋,等.有机肥对设施菜地土壤磷素状况的影响[J].土壤通报,2011,42(1):132-145.
[6] 武深树,谭美英,黄璜,等.湖南洞庭湖区农地畜禽粪便承载量估算及其风险评价[J].中国生态农业学报,2009,17 (6):1245-1251.
[7] 李祖章,谢金防,蔡华东,等.农田土壤承载畜禽粪便能力研究[J].江西农业学报,2010,22(8):140-145.
[8] 中华人民共和国农业部.农产品安全质量无公害蔬菜安全要求《GB18406.1-2001》[M].中华人民共和国国家标准,2001.8.6.
[9] 李晓磊.绿色食品黄瓜生产肥料运筹效应研究[D].吉林:吉林农业大学,2004.
[10] 惠云芝.有机肥对番茄产量、品质及土壤培肥效果的影响研究[D].吉林:吉林农业大学,2003.
[11] 霍建勇,刘静,冯辉.鲜食粉果番茄可溶性固形物含量及遗传分析[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2005,36(2):152-154.
[12] Tao Ren,Peter Christie,Jingguo Wang,et al,Root zone soil nitrogen management to maintain high tomato yields and minimum nitrogen losses to the environment[J].Scientia Horticulturae,2010,125:25-33.
[13] 吴建繁.北京市无公害蔬菜诊断施肥与环境效应研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2001.
[14] 罗颖,薛琳,黄帅,等.番茄果实可溶性固形物含量与果实指标的相关性研究[J].石河子大学学报:自然科学版,2010,28(1):23-27.
[15] 中华人民共和国农业部.畜禽粪便还田技术规范《GBT25246-2010》[M].中华人民共和国国家标准,2010.9.26.
[16] 崔崧,韩晓日,邹国元.不同有机肥用量对黄瓜生长和养分吸收的影响[J].华北农学报,2006,21(1):125-128.

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export