Effects of Different Rootstocks on Wine Quality in Wine Grapes Marselan

doi:10.7668/hbnxb.20192881

Abstract

Abstract:

The aim of this study was to investigate effects of wine quality in wine grapes Marselan on different rootstocks and provided theoretical reference for cultivation regulation.Wine grape Marselan grafted was used as experimental material in 2018,rootstocks were SO4,5BB,3309M and 101-14,respectively,own-rooted grape was used the control.The fruit was harvested when ripe in 2020 and 2021,bunch character and wine quality were measured.The results showed that density, bunch weight, average berry weight, berry length and berry width, maximum berry weight and No. of shriveling berry decreased,however,length and width and average berry weight of CK increased.Length and width,average berry weight and average seed number increased by grafting,the coefficient of variation of berry quality was small in 2 years.The berry weight of M/SO4,M/5BB and M/3309M mainly ranged from 1.01 to 1.25 g,M/101-14 mainly ranged from 0.76 to 1.00 g in 2020.The berry weight of M/5BB,M/3309M and M/101-14 mainly ranged from 0.76 to 1.00 g,M/SO4 mainly ranged from 1.01 to 1.25 g in 2021.Soluble solids decreased,however total acid mass concentration increased by grafting.Component and content of anthocyanins in peel were measured by LCMS/MS,the results showed that malvidins content was the highest,the second was delphinidins,pelargonidin was the least.Anthocyanins contents of M/5BB significantly increased by 26.62% compared with CK,anthocyanins contents of M/3309M and M/101-14 increased,but there was no difference with CK,anthocyanins contents of M/SO4 significantly decreased by 11.87% compared with CK.

Key words: Marselan, Rootstock, Wine quality

HU Jinge, BAI Shijian, PAN Xubing, CHEN Guang, ZHAO Ronghua, CAI Junshe. Effects of Different Rootstocks on Wine Quality in Wine Grapes Marselan[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2022, 37(4): 141-150. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20192881.

/ / Recommend / Download Citations

URL: http://www.hbnxb.net/EN/10.7668/hbnxb.20192881

http://www.hbnxb.net/EN/Y2022/V37/I4/141

Figures/Tables 7

References 48

[1]	王安妮, 慈志娟, 刘万好, 张超杰, 张振英, 唐美玲. 马瑟兰葡萄在烟台产区的引种表现及发展前景[J]. 烟台果树, 2018(2):30. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9938.2018.02.016. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9938.2018.02.016
	Wang A N, Ci Z J, Liu W H, Zhang C J, Zhang Z Y, Tang M L. Introduction performance and development prospect of Maserlan grape in Yantai[J]. Yantai Fruits, 2018(2):30.
[2]	赵胜建, 郭紫娟, 马爱红, 刘长江, 袁军伟, 韩斌. 酿酒葡萄新品种马瑟兰引种栽培及酿酒特性简介[J]. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒, 2012(3):38-40. doi: 10.13414/j.cnki.zwpp.2012.03.009. doi: 10.13414/j.cnki.zwpp.2012.03.009
	Zhao S J, Guo Z J, Ma A H, Liu C J, Yuan J W, Han B. New wine grape variety Marselan was introduced and cultivated and wine-making characteristics[J]. Sino-Overseas Grapevine & Wine, 2012(3):38-40.
[3]	Dai Z W, Ollat N, Gomès E, Decroocq S, Tandonnet J P, Bordenave L, Pieri P, Hilbert G, Kappel C, van Leeuwen C, Vivin P, Delrot S. Ecophysiological,genetic,and molecular causes of variation in grape berry weight and composition:A review[J]. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 2011, 62(4):413-425. doi: 10.5344/ajev.2011.10116. doi: 10.5344/ajev.2011.10116 URL
[4]	Kontoudakis N, Esteruelas M, Fort F, Canals J M, de Freitas V, Zamora F. Influence of the heterogeneity of grape phenolic maturity on wine composition and quality[J]. Food Chemistry, 2011, 124(3):767-774. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.06.093. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.06.093 URL
[5]	高展, 彭媛媛, 董凯向, 周龙. 不同砧木对马瑟兰葡萄生长及果实品质的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2019, 34(5):170-176. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.201751612. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.201751612
	Gao Z, Peng Y Y, Dong K X, Zhou L. Effects of different rootstocks on the growth and fruit quality of marselan grapes[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2019, 34(5):170-176.
[6]	沈碧薇, 魏灵珠, 崔鹏飞, 程建徽, 向江, 吴江. 不同砧木对瑞都红玉葡萄生长结果与果实品质的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2020, 37(3):350-361. doi: 10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.20190346. doi: 10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.20190346
	Shen B W, Wei L Z, Cui P F, Cheng J H, Xiang J, Wu J. Effects of different rootstocks on the growth and berry quality in Ruidu Hongyu grapevines[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2020, 37(3):350-361.
[7]	李超, 白世践, 耿新丽, 陈光, 赵荣华, 蔡军社. 赤霞珠在不同砧木生生长发育研究[J]. 果树学报, 2016, 33(10):1241-1250. doi: 10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.20150550. doi: 10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.20150550
	Li C, Bai S J, Geng X L, Chen G, Zhao R H, Cai J S. The study of rootstocks on growing development of Cabernet Sauvignon grape[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2016, 33(10):1241-1250.
[8]	翟晨, 赵宝龙, 潘立忠, 孙军利, 张二震, 章智钧. 不同抗性砧木对2年生赤霞珠葡萄生长发育的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2017, 46(10):104-109. doi: 10.15933/j.cnki.1004-3268.2017.10.019. doi: 10.15933/j.cnki.1004-3268.2017.10.019
	Zhai C, Zhao B L, Pan L Z, Sun J L, Zhang E Z, Zhang Z J. Effect of different resistant rootstocks on growth and development of biennial cabernet sauvignon[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 46(10):104-109.
[9]	张彪. 不同砧穗组合对戈壁区酿酒葡萄生长和品质的影响[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2014.
	Zhang B. Effect of different rootstock-scion combination on growth and fruit quality of wine grapes in desert area[D]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2014.
[10]	牛冬青, 卫颖, 张小军, 温鹏飞, 郝燕燕. SO4砧木对赤霞珠葡萄果实品质的影响[J]. 山西农业科学, 2019, 47(2):200-202. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2481.2019.02.13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2481.2019.02.13
	Niu D Q, Wei Y, Zhang X J, Wen P F, Hao Y Y. Effects of SO4 rootstock on the berry quality of cabernet sauvignon grape[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 47(2):200-202.
[11]	郑秋玲, 刘万好, 刘笑宏, 谭洋洋, 肖慧琳, 王建萍, 宋志忠, 宫磊, 唐美玲, 卢建声. 4种砧木对赤霞珠葡萄果实品质及抗氧化活性的影响[J]. 中国果树, 2021(9):36-41. doi: 10.16626/j.cnki.issn1000-8047.2021.09.008. doi: 10.16626/j.cnki.issn1000-8047.2021.09.008
	Zheng Q L, Liu W H, Liu X H, Tan Y Y, Xiao H L, Wang J P, Song Z Z, Gong L, Tang M L, Lu J S. Effects of four rootstocks on fruit quality and antioxidant activity of Cabernet Sauvignon grape[J]. China Fruits, 2021(9):36-41.
[12]	郑秋玲, 谭玉超, 肖慧琳, 贺长映, 刘万好, 王建萍, 刘笑宏, 唐美玲, 杜远鹏, 宫磊, 宋志忠, 卢建声, 徐维华. 不同砧木对赤霞珠干红葡萄酒花色苷及其抗氧化活性的影响[J]. 中国酿造, 2021, 40(8):105-109. doi: 10.11882/j.issn.0254-5071.2021.08.019. doi: 10.11882/j.issn.0254-5071.2021.08.019
	Zheng Q L, Tan Y C, Xiao H L, He C Y, Liu W H, Wang J P, Liu X H, Tang M L, Du Y P, Gong L, Song Z Z, Lu J S, Xu W H. Effects of different rootstocks on anthocyanins and antioxidant activity of Cabernet Sauvignon dry red wine[J]. China Brewing, 2021, 40(8):105-109.
[13]	白世践, 户金鸽, 蔡军社, 赵荣华, 陈光. 砧木对极端干旱区马瑟兰葡萄光合及酿酒特性的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 49(3):129-137. doi: 10.13207/j.cnki.jnwafu.2021.03.015. doi: 10.13207/j.cnki.jnwafu.2021.03.015
	Bai S J, Hu J G, Cai J S, Zhao R H, Chen G. Effects of rootstocks on photosynthesis and vinification characteristics of Marselan grape in extreme arid region[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University(Natural Science Edition), 2021, 49(3):129-137.
[14]	李敏敏, 袁军伟, 刘长江, 韩斌, 黄家珍, 郭紫娟, 赵胜建. 砧木对河北昌黎产区赤霞珠葡萄生长和果实品质的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(1):59-63. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201601.003. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201601.003
	Li M M, Yuan J W, Liu C J, Han B, Huang J Z, Guo Z J, Zhao S J. Effects of rootstocks on the growth and berry quality of Vitis vinifera cv.Cabernet Sauvignon grapevine in Changli zone,Hebei Province,China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(1):59-63.
[15]	李敏敏, 袁军伟, 刘长江, 韩斌, 孙艳, 尹勇刚, 郭紫娟, 赵胜建. 不同砧木对小味多葡萄生长和果实品质的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2017, 32(3):139-143. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2017.03.26. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2017.03.26
	Li M M, Yuan J W, Liu C J, Han B, Sun Y, Yin Y G, Guo Z J, Zhao S J. Effects of different rootstocks on the growth and berry quality of Vitis vinifera cv.Petit verdot grapevine[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2017, 32(3):139-143.
[16]	王婷, 王安妮, 陈景辉, 唐美玲, 肖慧琳, 郑秋玲, 张超杰, 卢建声. 不同砧木对马瑟兰葡萄及葡萄酒品质的影响[J]. 中国酿造, 2019, 38(10):101-104. doi: 10.11882/j.issn.0254-5071.2019.10.020. doi: 10.11882/j.issn.0254-5071.2019.10.020
	Wang T, Wang A N, Chen J H, Tang M L, Xiao H L, Zheng Q L, Zhang C J, Lu J S. Effects of different rootstocks on Marselan grape and wine quality[J]. China Brewing, 2019, 38(10):101-104.
[17]	邢婷婷, 杨航宇, 王雯染, 杨晓慧, 王军. 14个欧亚种红色酿酒葡萄品种(品系)的花色苷组成和含量分析[J]. 果树学报, 2018, 35(2):147-157. doi: 10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.20170200. doi: 10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.20170200
	Xing T T, Yang H Y, Wang W R, Yang X H, Wang J. The compositions and contents of anthocyanins of 14 red wine grape varieties or clones(Vitis vinifera)[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2018, 35(2):147-157.
[18]	Shi P B, Yue T X, Ai L L, Cheng Y F, Meng J F, Li M H, Zhang Z W. Phenolic compound profiles in grape skins of cabernet sauvignon,merlot,Syrah and marselan cultivated in the Shacheng area(China)[J]. South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 2016, 37(2):132-138. doi: 10.21548/37-2-898. doi: 10.21548/37-2-898
[19]	杨晓慧, 陈为凯, 何非, 王军. 5个红色酿酒葡萄品种花色苷组成差异分析[J]. 西北农业学报, 2017, 26(11):1648-1654. doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1004-1389.2017.11.011. doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1004-1389.2017.11.011
	Yang X H, Chen W K, He F, Wang J. Varietal differentiation of five Vitis vinifera red winegrapes based on their anthocyanic composition[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica, 2017, 26(11):1648-1654.
[20]	刘崇怀, 沈育杰, 陈俊, 郭景南. 葡萄种质资源描述规范和数据标准[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006.
	Liu C H, Shen Y J, Chen J, Guo J N. Descriptors and data standard for grape(Vitis L.)[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2006.
[21]	Sabbatini P, Howell G S. Effects of early defoliation on yield,fruit composition,and harvest season cluster rot complex of grapevines[J]. HortScience, 2010, 45(12):1804-1808. doi: 10.21273/hortsci.45.12.1804. doi: 10.21273/hortsci.45.12.1804 URL
[22]	Winter E, Whiting J, Rousseau J. Winegrape berry sensory assessment in Australia[M]. Adelaide: Winetietles Pty Ltd., 2009.
[23]	孙晓文, 高登涛, 魏志峰, 郭景南, 曹锰. 茉莉酸酯类对圣诞玫瑰葡萄果实着色及品质的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2016, 33(1):43-51. doi: 10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.20150305. doi: 10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.20150305
	Sun X W, Gao D T, Wei Z F, Guo J N, Cao M. Effect of jasmonates on coloration and quality of the Christmas rose grape berry[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2016, 33(1):43-51.
[24]	王学奎, 黄见良. 植物生理生化实验原理与技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000.
	Wang X K, Huang J L. Experimental principles and techniques of plant physiology and biochemistry[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2000.
[25]	Tian S F, Wang Y, Du G, Li Y X. Changes in contents and antioxidant activity of phenolic compounds during gibberellin-induced development in Vitis vinifera L.Muscat[J]. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2011, 33(6):2467-2475. doi: 10.1007/s11738-011-0791-z. doi: 10.1007/s11738-011-0791-z URL
[26]	Pagay V, Cheng L L. Variability in berry maturation of concord and Cabernet franc in a cool climate[J]. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 2010, 61:61-67.
[27]	Conde C, Silva P, Fontes N, Dias A, Tavares R, Sousa M, Agasse A, Delrot S, Gerós H. Biochemical changes throughout grape berry development and fruit and wine quality[J]. Food, 2007, 1:1-22. doi: 10.5923/j.food.20110101.01 URL
[28]	Roby G, Harbertson J F, Adams D A, Matthews M A. Berry size and vine water deficits as factors in winegrape composition:Anthocyanins and tannins[J]. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 2004, 10(2):100-107. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0238.2004.tb00012.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0238.2004.tb00012.x URL
[29]	Matthews M, Anderson M M. Fruit ripening in Vitis vinifera l.:Responses to seasonal water deficits[J]. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 1988, 39:313-320.
[30]	王晶, 万智博, 许超丽, 张轲, 王文璇, 张珍珍. 新疆产区酿酒葡萄果实中有机酸的比较分析[J]. 现代食品科技, 2020, 36(2):249-254,69. doi: 10.13982/j.mfst.1673-9078.2020.2.035. doi: 10.13982/j.mfst.1673-9078.2020.2.035
	Wang J, Wan Z B, Xu C L, Zhang K, Wang W X, Zhang Z Z. Comparative analysis of organic acids in wine grape fruits from Xinjiang[J]. Modern Food Science and Technology, 2020, 36(2):249-254,69.
[31]	孙磊, 樊秀彩, 张颖, 姜建福, 孙海生, 刘崇怀. 部分中国野生葡萄果皮花色苷组分分析[J]. 果树学报, 2015, 32(6):1143-1151. doi: 10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.20150140. doi: 10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.20150140
	Sun L, Fan X C, Zhang Y, Jiang J F, Sun H S, Liu C H. Analysis of anthocyanin composition in berry skin of Chinese wild grape[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2015, 32(6):1143-1151.
[32]	Cui P F, Wei L Z, Cheng J H, Xiang J, Li M S, Wu J. Effects of different root stocks on growth and fruit quality of Tiangong Cuiyu grape[J]. Acta Agriculture Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(1):52-61. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.01.07. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.01.07
[33]	黄家珍. 不同砧木对马瑟兰和赤霞珠葡萄生长发育的影响[D]. 秦皇岛: 河北科技师范学院, 2015. doi: 10.7666/d.Y2858.465. doi: 10.7666/d.Y2858.465
	Huang J Z. Effects of the root stocks on the growth and development of Marselan and Cabernet Sauvignon grapes[D]. Qinhuangdao: Hebei Normal University of Science and Technology, 2015.
[34]	Castellarin S D, Matthews M A, di Gaspero G, Gambetta G A. Water deficits accelerate ripening and induce changes in gene expression regulating flavonoid biosynthesis in grape berries[J]. Planta, 2007, 227(1):101-112. doi: 10.1007/s00425-007-0598-8. doi: 10.1007/s00425-007-0598-8 pmid: 17694320
[35]	He F, Liang N N, Mu L, Pan Q H, Wang J, Reeves M J, Duan C Q. Anthocyanins and their variation in red wines I.Monomeric anthocyanins and their color expression[J]. Molecules, 2012, 17(2):1571-1601. doi: 10.3390/molecules17021571. doi: 10.3390/molecules17021571 URL
[36]	唐传核, 彭志英. 天然花色苷类色素的生理功能及应用前景[J]. 冷饮与速冻食品工业, 2000, 6(1):26-28.
	Tang C H, Peng Z Y. Physiological function and application prospect of natural anthocyanin pigments[J]. Beverage & Fast Frozen Food Industry, 2000, 6(1):26-28.
[37]	孙建霞, 张燕, 胡小松, 吴继红, 廖小军. 花色苷的结构稳定性与降解机制研究进展[J]. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(3):996-1008. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2009.03.031. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2009.03.031
	Sun J X, Zhang Y, Hu X S, Wu J H, Liao X J. Structural stability and degradation mechanisms of anthocyanins[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2009, 42(3):996-1008.
[38]	Escribano-Bailón M T, Santos-Buelga C, Rivas-Gonzalo J C. Anthocyanins in cereals[J]. Journal of Chromatography A, 2004, 1054(1/2):129-141. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2004.08.152. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2004.08.152 URL
[39]	孙明霞, 王宝增, 范海, 赵可夫. 叶片中的花色素苷及其对植物适应环境的意义[J]. 植物生理学通讯, 2003, 39(6):688-694. doi: 10.13592/j.cnki.ppj.2003.06.051. doi: 10.13592/j.cnki.ppj.2003.06.051
	Sun M X, Wang B Z, Fan H, Zhao K F. Anthocyanins of leaves and their enviromental significance in plant stress responses[J]. Plant Physiology Communications, 2003, 39(6):688-694.
[40]	Liang Z C, Wu B H, Fan P G, Yang C X, Duan W, Zheng X B, Liu C Y, Li S H. Anthocyanin composition and content in grape berry skin in Vitis germplasm[J]. Food Chemistry, 2008, 111(4):837-844. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.04.069. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.04.069 URL
[41]	Carreño J, Martínez A, Almela L, Fernández-López J A. Proposal of an index for the objective evaluation of the colour of red table grapes[J]. Food Research International, 1995, 28(4):373-377. doi: 10.1016/0963-9969(95)00008-A. doi: 10.1016/0963-9969(95)00008-A URL
[42]	刘笑宏, 郭淑华, 牛彦杰, 杜远鹏, 翟衡. 8个葡萄品种的花色苷组分及含量分析[J]. 果树学报, 2017, 34(4):444-453. doi: 10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.20160346. doi: 10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.20160346
	Liu X H, Guo S H, Niu Y J, Du Y P, Zhai H. Analysis of anthocyanin compositions and contents in eight grape cultivars[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2017, 34(4):444-453.
[43]	Boss P K, Davies C, Robinson S P. Analysis of the expression of anthocyanin pathway genes in developing Vitis vinifera L.cv Shiraz grape berries and the implications for pathway regulation[J]. Plant Physiology, 1996, 111(4):1059-1066. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.4.1059. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.4.1059 pmid: 12226348
[44]	Fanzone M, Zamora F, Jofré V, Assof M, Peña-Neira Á. Phenolic composition of Malbec grape skins and seeds from Valle de Uco(Mendoza,Argentina)during ripening.Effect of cluster thinning[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2011, 59(11):6120-6136. doi: 10.1021/jf200073k. doi: 10.1021/jf200073k pmid: 21520971
[45]	于聪, 李艳. 3种酿酒葡萄花色苷及其稳定性研究[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2021, 42(10):37-43. doi: 10.12161/j.issn.1005-6521.2021.10.006. doi: 10.12161/j.issn.1005-6521.2021.10.006
	Yu C, Li Y. Study on anthocyanins in three wine grapes and their stability[J]. Food Research and Development, 2021, 42(10):37-43.
[46]	Dimitrovska M, Bocevska M, Dimitrovski D, Murkovic M. Anthocyanin composition of Vranec,Cabernet Sauvignon,Merlot and Pinot Noir grapes as indicator of their varietal differentiation[J]. European Food Research and Technology, 2011, 232(4):591-600. doi: 10.1007/s00217-011-1425-9. doi: 10.1007/s00217-011-1425-9 URL
[47]	Núñez V, Monagas M, Gomez-Cordovés M C, Bartolomé B. Vitis vinifera L.cv.Graciano grapes characterized by its anthocyanin profile[J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2004, 31(1):69-79. doi: 10.1016/S0925-5214(03)00140-6. doi: 10.1016/S0925-5214(03)00140-6 URL
[48]	程建徽, 梅军霞, 郑婷, 魏灵珠, 吴江. 不同砧木对欧亚种葡萄红亚历山大产量和品质的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2015, 29(8):1607-1616. doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2015.08.1607. doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2015.08.1607
	Cheng J H, Mei J X, Zheng T, Wei L Z, Wu J. Influences of different rootstocks on yield and quality in Vitis vinifera L.Red Alexandria[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 29(8):1607-1616.

年份 Year	砧穗组合 Rootstock- scion	果穗性状Bunch character				种子Seed				萎蔫果粒数/个 No. of shriveling berry
年份 Year	砧穗组合 Rootstock- scion	果穗质量/g Bunch weight	果粒数/粒 Berry number	果穗紧密度 Compactness index density	果穗紧密度 Bunch density	种子数/个 Seed number	鲜质量/g Fresh weight	干质量/g Dry weight	种子失重率/% Weightlessness rate	萎蔫果粒数/个 No. of shriveling berry
2020	CK	133.95±10.36Dd	203±7.51Bc	15.74±1.12BCb	紧	332±8.99Dd	9.38±0.53Ee	7.09±0.12Ee	24.41±0.03Dd	1±1.00bBc
	M/SO4	247.78±6.30Aa	224±7.00Ab	18.06±0.99ABa	极紧	482±17.51Ab	15.10±1.14Aa	11.38±0.32Aa	24.64±0.02Cc	2±1.00Bb
	M/5BB	202.69±7.00Bb	203±7.51Bc	18.67±1.01Aa	极紧	457±20.50Cc	13.34±1.10Cc	9.85±0.21Cc	26.16±0.02Bb	7±1.00Aa
	M/3309M	240.96±7.53Aa	239±7.51Aa	13.90±1.00CDc	紧	517±18.00Aa	14.77±0.71Bb	10.76±0.02Bb	27.15±0.03Aa	0±0.00Bc
	M/101-14	154.97±7.00Cc	167±3.00Cd	12.56±0.60Dc	中	341±11.50Dd	9.75±0.40Dd	7.40±0.06Dd	24.10±0.04Ee	0±0.00Bc
2021	CK	162.97±2.50Bb	190±10.50Aa	15.45±1.03Aa	紧	365±12.50Bb	12.30±1.10Bb	9.11±0.22Aa	25.93±0.03Dd	0±0.00Bb
	M/SO4	127.57±3.24De	128±10.00Cc	10.08±0.68Bb	中	331±12.00Cc	10.04±2.01Dd	7.17±0.23Dd	28.59±0.03Bb	0±0.00Bb
	M/5BB	138.74±4.23Cc	147±10.00BCb	10.43±0.82Bb	中	357±13.05BCb	12.40±1.12Bb	8.92±0.22Bb	28.06±0.04Cc	0±0.00Bb
	M/3309M	185.50±4.52Aa	191±11.00Aa	14.36±1.23Aa	紧	430±15.46Aa	14.12±1.21Aa	8.88±0.33Bb	37.11±0.04Aa	0±0.00Bb
	M/101-14	132.94±2.39CDd	156±5.51Bb	13.81±1.08Aa	紧	371±20.01Bb	10.44±1.20Cc	7.74±0.35Cc	25.86±0.03De	2±1.00Aa

年份 Year	砧穗组合 Rootstock- scion	果穗性状Bunch character				种子Seed				萎蔫果粒数/个 No. of shriveling berry
年份 Year	砧穗组合 Rootstock- scion	果穗质量/g Bunch weight	果粒数/粒 Berry number	果穗紧密度 Compactness index density	果穗紧密度 Bunch density	种子数/个 Seed number	鲜质量/g Fresh weight	干质量/g Dry weight	种子失重率/% Weightlessness rate	萎蔫果粒数/个 No. of shriveling berry
2020	CK	133.95±10.36Dd	203±7.51Bc	15.74±1.12BCb	紧	332±8.99Dd	9.38±0.53Ee	7.09±0.12Ee	24.41±0.03Dd	1±1.00bBc
	M/SO4	247.78±6.30Aa	224±7.00Ab	18.06±0.99ABa	极紧	482±17.51Ab	15.10±1.14Aa	11.38±0.32Aa	24.64±0.02Cc	2±1.00Bb
	M/5BB	202.69±7.00Bb	203±7.51Bc	18.67±1.01Aa	极紧	457±20.50Cc	13.34±1.10Cc	9.85±0.21Cc	26.16±0.02Bb	7±1.00Aa
	M/3309M	240.96±7.53Aa	239±7.51Aa	13.90±1.00CDc	紧	517±18.00Aa	14.77±0.71Bb	10.76±0.02Bb	27.15±0.03Aa	0±0.00Bc
	M/101-14	154.97±7.00Cc	167±3.00Cd	12.56±0.60Dc	中	341±11.50Dd	9.75±0.40Dd	7.40±0.06Dd	24.10±0.04Ee	0±0.00Bc
2021	CK	162.97±2.50Bb	190±10.50Aa	15.45±1.03Aa	紧	365±12.50Bb	12.30±1.10Bb	9.11±0.22Aa	25.93±0.03Dd	0±0.00Bb
	M/SO4	127.57±3.24De	128±10.00Cc	10.08±0.68Bb	中	331±12.00Cc	10.04±2.01Dd	7.17±0.23Dd	28.59±0.03Bb	0±0.00Bb
	M/5BB	138.74±4.23Cc	147±10.00BCb	10.43±0.82Bb	中	357±13.05BCb	12.40±1.12Bb	8.92±0.22Bb	28.06±0.04Cc	0±0.00Bb
	M/3309M	185.50±4.52Aa	191±11.00Aa	14.36±1.23Aa	紧	430±15.46Aa	14.12±1.21Aa	8.88±0.33Bb	37.11±0.04Aa	0±0.00Bb
	M/101-14	132.94±2.39CDd	156±5.51Bb	13.81±1.08Aa	紧	371±20.01Bb	10.44±1.20Cc	7.74±0.35Cc	25.86±0.03De	2±1.00Aa

年份 Year	穗质量和果粒数 Bunch weight and berry number	果粒数和种子数 Berry number and seed number	种子鲜质量和种子粒数 Fresh seed weight and seed number
2020	Y=1.42X-98.14	Y=0.41X+28.38	Y=30.26X+48.46
2021	Y=0.80X+19.92	Y=0.59X-53.38	Y=17.94X+158.02

年份 Year	穗质量和果粒数 Bunch weight and berry number	果粒数和种子数 Berry number and seed number	种子鲜质量和种子粒数 Fresh seed weight and seed number
2020	Y=1.42X-98.14	Y=0.41X+28.38	Y=30.26X+48.46
2021	Y=0.80X+19.92	Y=0.59X-53.38	Y=17.94X+158.02

年份 Year	砧穗组合 Rootstock-scion	果粒质量/g Berry weight				可溶性固形物/% Soluble solids				单粒种子 Per seed
年份 Year	砧穗组合 Rootstock-scion	均值 Average	最大值 Max.	最小值 Min.	变异系数 /% CV	均值 Average	最大值 Max.	最小值 Min.	变异系数 /% CV	平均鲜质量/g Average fresh mass	平均干质量/g Average dry mass
2020	CK	0.63	0.99	0.15	0.24	25.00	28.00	21.20	0.06	0.03	0.02
	M/SO4	1.09	1.54	0.19	0.19	24.94	26.00	23.60	0.03	0.03	0.02
	M/5BB	0.98	1.65	0.45	0.19	25.58	27.80	24.00	0.04	0.03	0.02
	M/3309M	0.98	1.42	0.61	0.18	24.94	26.20	24.00	0.03	0.03	0.02
	M/101-14	0.91	1.70	0.47	0.19	22.61	24.20	15.40	0.09	0.03	0.02
2021	CK	0.83	1.25	0.25	0.23	26.20	28.00	24.60	0.04	0.03	0.02
	M/SO4	0.97	1.32	0.49	0.18	25.45	26.20	24.10	0.03	0.03	0.02
	M/5BB	0.92	1.35	0.25	0.21	24.90	26.30	23.20	0.04	0.03	0.02
	M/3309M	0.94	1.37	0.36	0.19	25.48	26.20	24.70	0.02	0.03	0.02
	M/101-14	0.83	1.35	0.41	0.19	25.47	25.80	25.00	0.01	0.03	0.02

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export