Effects of Rice-straw Application Combined with Decomposing Agent on the Tobacco's Growth,Yields and Quality

doi:10.7668/hbnxb.20194116

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to understand the application effect of rice-straw application combined with decomposing agent on tobacco.The pot culture experiment was conducted to analyze the variation of the tobacco's growth,yield,chemical composition and coordination after the rice-straw application combined with chemical fertilizer and decaying agent containing different microbial dominant strains respectively,the research object was to explore the effects of rice-straw application combined with decomposing agent on the tobacco's growth,yield and quality.The results showed that the rice-straw application combined with decaying agent significantly increased the stem circumference,maximum leaf area,biomass,yields and the ratio of medium & superior grade of tobacco.The rice-straw application combined with decaying agent significantly lowered nicotine content of the upper tobacco,and increased its' total sugar content,reducing sugar content and total sugar-nicotine ratio,which resulted in reducing the irritability,bitterness and pungency of the upper tobacco and improving its' smoking quality;meanwhile,the rice-straw application combined with decaying agent significantly raised the content of total nitrogen,total sugar and reducing sugar in central tobacco,but there were no obvious variations for the ratio of total nitrogen to nicotine,reducing sugar total nitrogen and reducing sugar to nicotine,which meant the effect of rice-straw application combined with decaying agent on the central tobacco's chemical coordination was not significant;moreover,the rice-straw application combined with decaying agent increased the content of total sugar and reduced sugar in lower tobacco,and raised its' ratio of reducing sugar to total nitrogen and sugar to nicotine,which was beneficial to increase the aroma of lower tobacco and reduce its' impurity.According to the results of principal component regions between tobacco's agronomic characters and biomass,chemical composition and coordination indexes of different parts of cured tobacco,the rice-straw application combined with the decomposing agent containing dominant microorganism of bacteria+fungi or bacteria+fungi+actinomycetes had no significant difference in promoting tobacco's growth,yield and quality.Therefore,the rice-straw application combined with the decomposing agent containing different types of dominant microorganism could promote tobacco's growth,rationalize the chemical composition of upper and lower tobacco,and be beneficial to improve its sensory quality and increase tobacco's yield and quality.

Key words: Tobacco, Straw, Decomposing agent, Yield and quality

CHEN Zhifeng, LIU Wei, XIAO Hanqian, XIAO Zhipeng, XIANG Penghua, MU Tingting, SHAN Xuehua, LIAO Chaolin, DING Jianbing. Effects of Rice-straw Application Combined with Decomposing Agent on the Tobacco's Growth,Yields and Quality[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2023, 38(S1): 292-299. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20194116.

/ / Recommend / Download Citations

URL: http://www.hbnxb.net/EN/10.7668/hbnxb.20194116

http://www.hbnxb.net/EN/Y2023/V38/IS1/292

Figures/Tables 4

References 23

[1]	于建光, 常志州, 黄红英, 叶小梅, 马艳, 钱玉婷. 秸秆腐熟剂对土壤微生物及养分的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2010, 29(3):563-570.doi:10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2007.01.018.
	Yu J G, Chang Z Z, Huang H Y, Ye X M, Ma Y, Qian Y T. Effect of microbial inoculants for straw decomposing on soil microorganisms and the nutrients[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2010, 29(3):563-570.
[2]	张舒予, 金梦灿, 马超, 柴如山, 高时凤, 郜红建. 秸秆还田配施腐熟剂对水稻产量及钾肥利用率的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2018(1):49-55.doi:10.11838/sfsc.20180109.
	Zhang S Y, Jin M C, Ma C, Chai R S, Gao S F, Gao H J. Effect of straw returning with decomposing inoculants on grain yield and potassium fertilizer utilization efficiency of rice[J]. Soils and Fertilizers Sciences in China, 2018(1):49-55.
[3]	匡恩俊, 迟凤琴, 宿庆瑞, 张久明, 高中超, 朱宝国. 3种腐熟剂促进玉米秸秆快速腐解特征[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2014, 31(5):432-436.doi:10.13254/j.jare.2014.0176.
	Kuang E J, Chi F Q, Su Q R, Zhang J M, Gao Z C, Zhu B G. Characteristics of three decomposer accelerators on maize straw decomposition[J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2014, 31(5):432-436.
[4]	陈帅民, 梁晓斐, 李阳阳, 范作伟, 徐铭鸿, 刘方明, 侯中华, 王学文, 刘慧涛, 吴海燕. 秸秆还田配施腐解菌剂对土壤团聚体及其有机碳固持的影响. 玉米科学, 2022, 30(6):10-117.doi:10.13597/j.cnki.maize.science.20220615.
	Chen S M, Liang X F, Li Y Y, Fan Z W, Xu M H, Liu F M, Hou Z H, Wang X W, Liu H T, Wu H Y. Effects of straw returning combined with microbialinoculum on soil aggregates distribution and organic carbon sequestration[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2022, 30(6):10-117.
[5]	Li M H, Tang C G, Chen X, Huang S W, Zhao W W, Cai D Q, Wu Z Y, Wu L F. High performance bacteria anchored by nanoclay to boost straw degradation[J]. Materials, 2019, 12(7):1148.doi:10.3390/ma12071148. URL
[6]	张莹莹, 曹慧英. 秸秆腐熟剂对玉米秸秆腐解及下茬小麦生长的影响[J]. 中国农技推广, 2019, 35(5):57-59.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-381X.2019.05.028.
	Zhang Y Y, Cao H Y. Effect of straw decomposition agent on corn straw decomposition and the growth of wheat in the next cropping[J]. China Agricultural Technology Extension, 2019, 35(5):57-59.
[7]	勉有明, 李荣, 侯贤清, 李培富, 王西娜. 秸秆还田配施腐熟剂对砂性土壤性质及滴灌玉米生长的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2020, 34(10):2343-2351.doi:10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2020.10.2343.
	Mian Y M, Li R, Hou X Q, Li P F, Wang X N. Effects of straw returning combined with decomposition agents on sandy soil properties and growth of maize under drip irrigation[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 34(10):2343-2351. doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2020.10.2343
[8]	杨欣润, 许邶, 何治逢, 吴婧, 庄睿花, 马超, 柴如山, Yusef Kianpoor Kalkhajeh, 叶新新, 朱林. 整合分析中国农田腐秆剂施用对秸秆腐解和作物产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(7):1359-1367.doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.07.006.
	Yang X R, Xu B, He Z F, Wu J, Zhuang R H, Ma C, Chai R S, Kalkhajeh Y, Ye X X, Zhu L. Impacts of decomposing microorganism inoculum on straw decomposition and crop yield in China:a meta-analysis[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(7):1359-1367.
[9]	廖超林, 杨振宇, 陈治锋, 肖汉乾, 肖志鹏, 向鹏华, 肖孟宇, 母婷婷, 单雪华. 基于盆栽试验分析3种品牌稻草秸秆腐熟剂对植烟土壤有机碳组分的影响[J]. 烟草科技, 2022, 55(6):12-18.doi:10.16135/j.issn1002-0861.2021.0418.
	Liao C L, Yang Z Y, Chen Z F, Xiao H Q, Xiao Z P, Xiang P H, Xiao M Y, Mu T T, Shan X H. Effects of application of rice straw combined with decomposition agents of three brands on organic carbon fractions in tobacco-planting soil based on pot experiment[J]. Tobacco Science & Technology, 2022, 55(6):12-18.
[10]	国家烟草专卖局. 烟草农艺性状调查测量方法:YC/T 142—2010[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2010.
	China Tobacco Monopoly Bureau. Methods for investigation and measurement of agronomic traits of tobacco: YC/T 142—2010[S]. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2010.
[11]	肖和友, 朱伟, 王海军, 刘旭, 张赐喜, 唐涛, 陈立军, 陈雯韵, 曾钰, 戴勇强, 邹凯. 连续施用不同生物质炭对植烟土壤特性和烤烟品质的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2021, 42(3):19-25.doi:10.13496/j.issn.1007-5119.2021.03.004.
	Xiao H Y, Zhu W, Wang H J, Liu X, Zhang C X, Tang T, Chen L J, Chen W Y, Zeng Y, Dai Y Q, Zou K. Effects of continuous application of different biochar on tobacco-planting soil,flue-cured tobacco leaf quality[J]. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2021, 42(3):19-25.
[12]	王子阳, 陈婉华, 袁伟, 马贤超, 周正萍, 刘世平. 双季稻地区不同类型水稻秸秆与还田深度对还田秸秆腐解进程的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2022(2):170-174.doi:10.11838/sfsc.1673-6257.20618.
	Wang Z Y, Chen W H, Yuan W, Ma X C, Zhou Z P, Liu S P. Effects of different types of rice straw and returning depth on decomposition course of straw in double cropping rice region[J]. Soils and Fertilizers Sciences in China, 2022(2):170-174.
[13]	李冬, 陈蕾, 夏阳, 宋晓娜, 刘旻慧, 郑浩. 生物炭改良剂对小白菜生长及低质土壤氮磷利用的影响[J]. 环境科学学报, 2014, 34(9):2384-2391.doi:10.13671/j.hjkxxb.2014.0550.
	Li D, Chen L, Xia Y, Song X N, Liu M H, Zheng H. The effects of biochar on growth and uptake of nitrogen and phosphorus for Chinese cabbage in poor quality soil in Ningxia[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2014, 34(9):2384-2391.
[14]	李方杰, 时明坤, 庞海芳, 连延浩, 任永哲, 王志强, 辛泽毓, 林同保. 松土促根剂和秸秆腐熟剂对砂姜黑土农田夏玉米生长及产量的影响[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2021, 55(2):234-242.doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2020.09.008.
	Li F J, Shi M K, Pang H F, Lian Y H, Ren Y Z, Wang Z Q, Xin Z Y, Lin T B. Effects of soil loosening and root promoting agent and straw decomposing inoculants on growth and yield of summer maize in lime concretion black soil[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural University, 2021, 55(2):234-242.
[15]	黄玲, 张自阳, 赵若含, 郭好娟, 张璐瑶, 李冰洁, 卢奎, 武忠伟. 秸秆配施腐熟剂对土壤细菌群落及养分状况的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2019, 50(6):1361-1369.doi:10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2019.06.14.
	Huang L, Zhang Z Y, Zhao R H, Guo H J, Zhang L Y, Li B J, Lu K, Wu Z W. Effects of straw decomposing inoculants on soil bacterial communities and nutrients[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2019, 50(6):1361-1369.
[16]	廖超林, 黎丽娜, 谢丽华, 孙钰翔, 邹炎, 戴齐, 尹力初. 增减施有机肥对红壤性水稻土团聚体稳定性及胶结物的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2021, 58(4):978-988.doi:10.11766/trxb201912040540.
	Liao C L, Li L N, Xie L H, Sun Y X, Zou Y, Dai Q, Yin L C. Effect of increased or decreased application of organic manure on aggregates stability and soil cement in red paddy soil[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2021, 58(4):978-988.
[17]	张电学, 韩志卿, 刘微, 高书国, 候东军, 李国舫, 常连生. 不同促腐条件下玉米秸秆直接还田的生物学效应研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2005, 11(6):742-749.doi:10.11674/zwyf.2005.0606.
	Zhang D X, Han Z Q, Liu W, Gao S G, Hou D J, Li G F, Chang L S. Biological effect of maize stalk return to field directly under different accretion decay conditions[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2005, 11(6):742-749.
[18]	王津, 魏赛金, 魏丽梅. 秸秆腐熟剂对水稻秧苗素质及育秧基质微生物的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2021, 35(10):2413-2422.doi:10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2021.10.2413.
	Wang J, Wei S J, Wei L M. Effect of straw decomposition agent on rice seedling quality and the substrate microorganism[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 35(10):2413-2422. doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2021.10.2413
[19]	de Vries F T, Griffiths R I, Knight C G, Nicolitch O, Williams A. Harnessing rhizosphere microbiomes for drought-resilient crop production[J]. Science, 2020, 368(6488):270-274.doi:10.1126/science.aaz5192. pmid: 32299947
[20]	闫铁军, 马晓寒, 庞哲, 张豫丹, 许自成, 周红审, 周平, 刘文锋, 邵惠芳. 我国主产烟区烟叶化学成分与感官舒适性关系分析[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2021, 42(6):60-65.doi:10.13496/j.issn.1007-5119.2021.06.009.
	Yan T J, Ma X H, Pang Z, Zhang Y D, Xu Z C, Zhou H S, Zhou P, Liu W F, Shao H F. Analysis of the relationship between chemical composition and sensory comfort of tobacco leaves in the main tobacco-producing areas in China[J]. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2021, 42(6):60-65.
[21]	杜咏梅, 郭承芳, 张怀宝. 水溶性糖、烟碱、总氮含量与烤烟吃味品质的关系研究[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2000, 21(1):7-10.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-5119.2000.01.008.
	Du Y M, Guo C F, Zhang H B. Study on the relationship between the contents of water-soluble sugar,nicotine and total nitrogen and the taste quality of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2000, 21(1):7-10.
[22]	周米良, 邓小华, 田峰, 李海林, 巢进, 张明发, 张黎明. 玉米秸秆促腐还田的腐解及对烤烟生长与产质量的影响[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2016, 22(2):67-74.doi:10.16472/j.chinatobacco.2015.386.
	Zhou M L, Deng X H, Tian F, Li H L, Chao J, Zhang M F, Zhang L M. Decomposition of maize stalk in field under different decay conditions and its effect on growth,yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Acta Tabacaria Sinica, 2016, 22(2):67-74.
[23]	贾宏昉, 陈红丽, 黄化刚, 杨永霞, 崔红, 刘国顺. 施用腐熟秸秆肥对烤烟成熟期碳代谢途径影响的初报[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2014, 20(4):48-52.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-5708.2014.04.010.
	Jia H F, Chen H L, Huang H G, Yang Y X, Cui H, Liu G S. Preliminary report on effect of applying rotten straw fertilizer on carbon metabolism in maturing lfue-cured tobacco[J]. Acta Tabacaria Sinica, 2014, 20(4):48-52.

处理 Treatments	株高/cm Height
处理 Treatments	团棵期 Rosette stage	旺长期 Rapid growth stage	现蕾期 Squaring stage	采收期 Harvest stage
CK	55.20±2.82b	73.13±9.87b	113.33±24.66a	120.33±24.66a
T1	38.72±5.73c	57.70±11.16c	133.92±14.76a	137.17±13.29a
T2	51.43±6.13b	76.52±8.92b	117.00±14.26a	120.00±10.17a
T3	46.15±7.24b	73.83±18.27b	113.83±24.43a	124.63±25.08a
T4	65.92±5.59a	95.30±10.58a	119.08±7.75a	132.60±6.43a
处理 Treatments	茎围/cm Stem circumference
处理 Treatments	团棵期 Rosette stage	旺长期 Rapid growth stage	现蕾期 Squaring stage	采收期 Harvest stage
CK	4.03±0.25d	4.23±0.21c	4.63±0.15c	4.83±0.15c
T1	4.33±0.28cd	4.70±0.37b	5.22±0.27b	5.40±0.00b
T2	4.57±0.27bc	5.13±0.19a	5.77±0.46a	6.15±0.30a
T3	4.73±0.27b	5.15±0.32a	5.98±0.20a	6.13±0.22a
T4	5.18±0.33a	5.52±0.30a	6.03±0.37a	6.18±0.15a
处理 Treatments	最大叶面积/cm² Maximum leaf area
处理 Treatments	团棵期 Rosette stage	旺长期 Rapid growth stage	现蕾期 Squaring stage	采收期 Harvest stage
CK	341.14±82.00d	428.30±33.60b	466.99±18.75c	489.03±21.03d
T1	484.52±89.23c	552.24±120.30b	614.33±85.30b	703.97±53.35c
T2	672.78±104.70b	775.23±107.60a	920.20±116.66a	933.70±85.10ab
T3	650.70±149.09b	730.49±138.48a	876.96±43.92a	888.07±78.11b
T4	797.44±123.73a	844.73±109.62a	951.46±50.38a	1 005.87±100.11a

处理 Treatments	株高/cm Height
处理 Treatments	团棵期 Rosette stage	旺长期 Rapid growth stage	现蕾期 Squaring stage	采收期 Harvest stage
CK	55.20±2.82b	73.13±9.87b	113.33±24.66a	120.33±24.66a
T1	38.72±5.73c	57.70±11.16c	133.92±14.76a	137.17±13.29a
T2	51.43±6.13b	76.52±8.92b	117.00±14.26a	120.00±10.17a
T3	46.15±7.24b	73.83±18.27b	113.83±24.43a	124.63±25.08a
T4	65.92±5.59a	95.30±10.58a	119.08±7.75a	132.60±6.43a
处理 Treatments	茎围/cm Stem circumference
处理 Treatments	团棵期 Rosette stage	旺长期 Rapid growth stage	现蕾期 Squaring stage	采收期 Harvest stage
CK	4.03±0.25d	4.23±0.21c	4.63±0.15c	4.83±0.15c
T1	4.33±0.28cd	4.70±0.37b	5.22±0.27b	5.40±0.00b
T2	4.57±0.27bc	5.13±0.19a	5.77±0.46a	6.15±0.30a
T3	4.73±0.27b	5.15±0.32a	5.98±0.20a	6.13±0.22a
T4	5.18±0.33a	5.52±0.30a	6.03±0.37a	6.18±0.15a
处理 Treatments	最大叶面积/cm² Maximum leaf area
处理 Treatments	团棵期 Rosette stage	旺长期 Rapid growth stage	现蕾期 Squaring stage	采收期 Harvest stage
CK	341.14±82.00d	428.30±33.60b	466.99±18.75c	489.03±21.03d
T1	484.52±89.23c	552.24±120.30b	614.33±85.30b	703.97±53.35c
T2	672.78±104.70b	775.23±107.60a	920.20±116.66a	933.70±85.10ab
T3	650.70±149.09b	730.49±138.48a	876.96±43.92a	888.07±78.11b
T4	797.44±123.73a	844.73±109.62a	951.46±50.38a	1 005.87±100.11a

处理 Treatments	烟叶质量/g Tobacco leaf weight	烟秆质量/g Tobacco stem weight	烟根质量/g Tobacco root weight	生物量/g Biomass	中上部烟叶占生物量比率/% Ratio of middle and upper tobacco leaves to biomass	中上等烟叶比率/% Ratio of medium and high quality tobacco
CK	20.56±0.52d	20.23±2.63d	6.54±1.19c	47.33±2.10c	34.50±1.48bc	79.36±0.50c
T1	34.31±1.66c	30.07±1.87c	11.55±1.01b	79.04±4.81b	33.54±1.05c	77.21±0.80c
T2	45.01±3.74ab	34.53±2.05b	16.64±1.14a	96.18±1.95a	38.27±3.24ab	81.79±1.75b
T3	47.85±1.75a	37.69±3.94b	16.43±1.49a	98.86±9.10a	41.46±3.47a	85.26±2.08a
T4	43.27±2.96b	45.13±2.34a	14.51±1.60a	102.91±3.40a	35.11±1.00bc	83.59±0.70ab

处理 Treatments	烟叶质量/g Tobacco leaf weight	烟秆质量/g Tobacco stem weight	烟根质量/g Tobacco root weight	生物量/g Biomass	中上部烟叶占生物量比率/% Ratio of middle and upper tobacco leaves to biomass	中上等烟叶比率/% Ratio of medium and high quality tobacco
CK	20.56±0.52d	20.23±2.63d	6.54±1.19c	47.33±2.10c	34.50±1.48bc	79.36±0.50c
T1	34.31±1.66c	30.07±1.87c	11.55±1.01b	79.04±4.81b	33.54±1.05c	77.21±0.80c
T2	45.01±3.74ab	34.53±2.05b	16.64±1.14a	96.18±1.95a	38.27±3.24ab	81.79±1.75b
T3	47.85±1.75a	37.69±3.94b	16.43±1.49a	98.86±9.10a	41.46±3.47a	85.26±2.08a
T4	43.27±2.96b	45.13±2.34a	14.51±1.60a	102.91±3.40a	35.11±1.00bc	83.59±0.70ab

部位 Position	处理 Treatments	总氮/(g/kg) Total N	总糖/(g/kg) Total sugar	还原糖/(g/kg) Reducing sugar	烟碱/(g/kg) Nicotine	氯/(g/kg) Chlorine	氮碱比 Ratio of total nitrogen to nicotine	糖氮比 Ratio of reducing sugar to total nitrogen	糖碱比 Ratio of reducing sugar to nicotine
上部	CK	34.51±1.57a	172.00±10.61c	153.10±2.40c	39.90±1.48a	3.26±0.06c	0.87±0.01a	5.00±0.53b	4.32±0.22c
Upper leaf	T1	32.24±1.06ab	194.00±7.37bc	160.96±6.55c	39.27±1.35a	3.92±0.54bc	0.82±0.01b	6.03±0.40a	4.95±0.35b
	T2	31.11±1.07b	212.00±25.43ab	172.51±24.77b	36.85±1.19b	4.37±0.49ab	0.83±0.01b	6.81±0.74a	5.65±0.32a
	T3	31.75±1.25b	222.67±7.59a	192.40±4.68a	35.33±1.28b	4.72±0.18a	0.83±0.01b	7.02±0.49a	5.82±0.38a
	T4	31.24±1.61b	205.62±6.68ab	190.40±26.54a	36.14±1.11b	4.47±0.15ab	0.82±0.02b	6.59±0.19a	5.39±0.10a
中部	CK	20.54±1.29b	207.48±0.25b	185.65±0.22b	26.17±0.75a	2.57±0.52 b	0.79±0.02b	10.12±0.62a	7.94±0.22b
middle leaf	T1	20.85±1.62b	210.90±16.65b	188.70±14.81b	22.40±1.54b	4.03±0.30a	0.93±0.03a	10.14±0.90a	9.45±0.98a
	T2	24.22±0.89a	241.17±12.19a	215.64±10.85a	26.01±0.35a	3.63±0.51ab	0.93±0.02a	9.96±0.50a	9.27±0.43a
	T3	24.84±0.81a	235.98±3.49a	211.03±3.11a	26.97±0.86a	4.19±0.81a	0.92±0.00a	9.51±0.44a	8.76±0.40ab
	T4	23.13±0.96a	238.54±1.96a	213.30±1.75a	26.14±2.06a	4.36±0.48a	0.89±0.04a	10.32±0.36a	9.16±0.67ab
下部	CK	20.87±1.43a	178.74±3.30b	161.86±2.98b	25.67±1.24a	3.55±0.20b	0.81±0.01b	8.58±0.42c	6.97±0.21c
Bottom leaf	T1	21.47±2.88a	209.23±10.78a	189.65±9.16a	24.72±2.99a	4.02±0.35ab	0.87±0.01a	9.88±0.64b	8.56±0.32b
	T2	21.69±0.53a	224.70±12.52a	203.23±11.27a	25.16±0.38a	3.92±0.60ab	0.86±0.01a	10.37±0.83ab	8.94±0.61ab
	T3	20.01±1.17a	221.04±3.95a	199.94±3.55a	23.68±1.16a	4.50±0.52a	0.84±0.01a	11.08±0.79a	9.35±0.58a
	T4	18.93±0.42a	227.39±13.79a	205.65±12.41a	22.22±0.95a	4.32±0.24a	0.85±0.02a	12.01±0.54a	10.23±0.31a

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export