Regulation of 80% Diethyl Aminoethyl Hexanoate and Mepiquat Chloride on the Physiological and Biochemical Character in Soybean Roots

doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-7091.2007.01.011

Abstract

Abstract: Field experiments were conducted in 2004 at Changping Experiment Station of China Agricultural University to examine the effect of PGR SHK-6 (80% Diethyl aminoethyl hexanoate and Mepiquat chloride, its ratio is 1:5) on the physiological and biochemical character in soybean (Glycine max L. cv. Zhonghuang 13) roots. SHK-6 was foliar applied in V₇stage at 100 mg/L, with water controlled. The results were showed: SHK-6 treatment significantly increased root physiological activity. The root activity and the volume of bleeding sap were markedly improved by SHK-6. Furthermore, the flow capacity of nitrite, NH4⁺, amino acids, P, K, Ca, Mg and Mo in bleeding sap were significantly promoted by SHK-6. In whole growth stages, SHK-6 treatment significantly promoted the content of IAA (auxin) and GAs (gibberellin, except for R₁ and R₂ stage) and CTKs (cytokinins) in root, but markedly decreased the flow capacity of ABA, expect for R₇ stages. At the same time, SHK-6 treatment significantly promoted the flow capacity of IAA and GAs (except for R₁ and R₂ stage) and CTKs in bleeding sap, but markedly decreased the flow capacity of ABA, expect for R₇ and R₇ stages.

Key words: Plant growth regulator, SHK-6, Soybean, Root, Hormone

CLC Number:

S565.1

ZHANG Ming-cai, ZHAI Zhi-xi, HE Zhong-pei, DUAN Liu-sheng, LI Zhao-hu. Regulation of 80% Diethyl Aminoethyl Hexanoate and Mepiquat Chloride on the Physiological and Biochemical Character in Soybean Roots[J]. ACTA AGRICULTURAE BOREALI-SINICA, 2007, 22(1): 44-49. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-7091.2007.01.011.

/ / Recommend / Download Citations

URL: http://www.hbnxb.net/EN/10.3321/j.issn:1000-7091.2007.01.011

http://www.hbnxb.net/EN/Y2007/V22/I1/44

References

[1] 傅金民. 大豆根系生长及其与产量的关系[J]. 大豆科学, 1987, 6(4): 626-270.
[2] 杨秀红, 吴宗璞, 张国栋. 大豆根系的研究[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2002, 33(2): 203-208.
[3] 董钻. 大豆产量生理[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
[4] 王晓光, 曹敏建, 王伟, 等. 钾对大豆根系形态与生理特性的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2005, 24(2): 126-130.
[5] 金剑, 刘晓光, 王光华, 等. 大豆生殖生长期根系形态性状与产量关系研究[J]. 大豆科学, 2004, 23(4): 253-257.
[6] 杨守萍, 陈加敏, 何小红, 等. 大豆苗期耐旱性与部分根系性状的遗传[J]. 大豆科学, 2005, 24(4): 275-280.
[7] 杨秀红, 吴宗璞, 张国栋. 无限结荚习性与亚有限结荚习性大豆品种根系性状的比较研究[J]. 大豆科学, 2001, 20(3): 231-234.
[8] 孙广玉, 张荣华, 黄忠文. 大豆根系在土层中分布特点的研究[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2002, 24(1): 45-47.
[9] De J A GER A. Effects of localized supply of H2PO4, KNO3, Ca and K on the production and distribution of dry matter in young maize plants[J]. Neth J Agric Sci, 1982, 30: 193-203.
[10] De JA GER A. Effects of localized supply of H2PO4, KNO3, Ca and K on the concentration of that nutrient in the plant and the rate of uptake by roots in young maize plants in solution culture[J]. Neth J Agric Sci, 1984, 32: 43-56.
[11] 陈伟, 马国瑞, 李春九. 植物激素对离子吸收运输和分布的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 1997, 3(3): 193-200.
[12] Butcher D N, Appleford N E J, Hedden P, et al. Plant growth substances in root cultures of lycopersicon esculenttm[J]. Phytochemistry, 1988, 27: 1575-1578.
[13] Ko1er J, Kozinka Ⅴ. Physiology of the plant root system[M]. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992: 132-145.
[14] 田晓莉, 杨培珠, 何钟佩, 等. 棉花根-冠关系研究-根系伤流液及叶片中内源激素激素的变化[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 1999, 4(5): 92-97.
[15] 董学会, 段留生, 李召虎, 等. 30%己乙水剂对玉米根系伤流液及其组分的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2005, 25(3): 587-591.
[16] 董志强, 何钟佩, 翟学军. PPC处理对棉株侧根组织中激素变化动态的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2000, 15(2): 95-99.
[17] 韩建会, 张福墁, 徐淑贞. 日光温室低温室照逆境对黄瓜内源激素水平的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 1999, 14(增刊): 76-78.
[18] 韩田夫, 马凤呜, 马秀峰, 等. ABT生根粉对大豆内源激素含量和农艺性状的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 1994, 13(2): 121-124.
[19] 齐志广, 赵俊霞. 油菜素内酯对大豆苗期生长及硝酸还原酶活性的影响[J]. 河北师范大学学报(自然科学版), 1999, 23(2): 271-273.
[20] 张明才, 何钟佩, 李召虎, 等. 新型植物生长调节剂SHK-6对大豆产量与蛋白品质的化学调控[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2004, 9(1): 26-30.
[21] 张明才, 何钟佩, 李召虎, 等. SHK-6对干旱胁迫下大豆叶片生理功能的作用[J]. 作物学报, 2005, 31(9): 1215-1220.
[22] 张明才, 何钟佩, 段留生, 等. 北农化控6号对大豆根瘤和叶片蛋白含量的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2000, 20(6): 1225-1228.
[23] 张明才, 何钟佩, 李召虎, 等. 植物生长调节剂BR和SHK-6对大豆生物产量和根瘤固氮活性的激素调控研究[J]. 大豆科学, 2004, 23(2): 96-100.
[24] 何钟佩. 农作物化学控制实验指导[M]. 北京: 北京农业大学出版社, 1993: 32-35.
[25] 白宝璋, 汤学军. 植物生理学测试技术[M]. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社, 1993: 103.
[26] Gataldo D A, Harsoon M, Schrader L E. Rapid colorrmetric determination of nitrate in plant tissue[J]. Commun Soil Sci and Plant Anal, 1975, 1: 47-49.
[27] 朱广廉, 钟海文, 张爱琴. 植物生理学实验[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 1990: 120-123.
[28] 何钟佩. 农作物化学控制实验指导[M]. 北京: 北京农业大学出版社, 1993: 60-68.
[29] 贾彦博, 杨肖峨, 刘建祥. 植物根系对养分缺乏和毒害的适应及其与养分吸收效率的关系[J]. 土壤通报, 2005, 36(4): 610-616.
[30] Marschner H. Mineral Hutrition of Higher Plants[M]. 2nd Edition. Lodon: Academic press, 1995.
[31] Abelson P H. A potential phosphate crisis[J]. Science, 1999, 283: 2015-2021.
[32] 郭再华, 贺立源, 徐才国. 低磷胁迫时植物根系的形态学变化[J]. 土壤通报, 2005, 36(5): 760-764.
[33] 王丽, 戚金亮, 黄勤妮, 等. 镁素营养研究进展[J]. 首都师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 25(2): 46-51.
[34] 吴明才, 肖昌珍. 大豆钼素研究[J]. 大豆科学, 1994, 13(3): 245-251.
[35] 曹宗巽. 植物生长调节物质概论[M] //余叔文, 汤章城. 植物生理与分子生物学. 北京: 科技出版社, 1999: 421-425.
[36] 董志强, 何钟佩, 翟学军. DPC处理对转Bt基因棉伤流中激素运输量的动态影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 1998, 3(增刊): 44-47.

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export