Effects of Different Long-term Fertilizer Managements on Soil Acid Neutralizing Capacity in the Double-cropping Rice Field of Southern China

doi:10.7668/hbnxb.20193175

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to explore the effects of different long-term (36 a)fertilizer treatments on characteristics of soil acid buffering capacity at different soil layers (0—10 cm and 10—20 cm)under the double-cropping rice field in Southern of China,four different fertilizer treatments were set up:without any fertilizer input as a control(CK),chemical fertilizer alone (MF),rice straw and chemical fertilizer (RF),and 30% organic manure and 70% chemical fertilizer (OM).Soil acid neutralizing capacity(ANC),acid buffering capacity(ABC),instant acid buffering capacity(IAC),ammonium nitrogen($\text{NH}_{4}^{+}$-N),nitrate nitrogen($\text{NO}_{3}^{-}$-N)contents,and its relationship between soil acid buffering capacity and soil physicochemical properties were analysis.This result indicated that soil ANC,ABC and IAC at soil 0—10 cm and 10—20 cm layer in the double-cropping rice field with MF,RF and OM treatments were increased.The order of soil ANC,ABC and IAC at soil 0—10 cm and 10—20 cm layer in paddy field with all fertilizer treatments showed OM>RF>MF>CK.Compared with CK treatment,soil ANC and ABC at 0—10 cm and 10—20 cm layer in paddy field with OM treatment increased by 36.78%,33.18% and 18.67%,17.84%,respectively.Soil IAC at 0—10 cm and 10—20 cm layer in paddy field with OM treatment increased by 15.22% and 14.02%,compared with CK treatment,respectively.This result indicated that soil $\text{NH}_{4}^{+}$-N content at 0—10 cm and 10—20 cm layer in paddy field with MF treatment were significantly higher than that of RF,OM and CK treatments.Soil $\text{NH}_{4}^{+}$-N content at 0—10 cm and 10—20 cm layer in paddy field with MF treatment increased by 48.15% and 51.09%,compared with CK treatment,respectively.This result showed that soil $\text{NO}_{3}^{-}$-N content at 0—10 cm and 10—20 cm layer in paddy field with OM treatment were significantly higher than that of MF,RF and CK treatments.Soil $\text{NO}_{3}^{-}$-N content at 0—10 cm and 10—20 cm layer in paddy field with OM treatment increased by 204.73% and 161.94%,compared with CK treatment,respectively.Soil ANC,ABC,IAC,$\text{NH}_{4}^{+}$-N and $\text{NO}_{3}^{-}$-N contents at 0—10 cm layer were obvious higher than that of 10—20 cm layer in paddy field under the same fertilizer treatment condition.It had significantly positive correlation between soil ANC,ABC,IAC and soil organic carbon,total nitrogen contents,electrical conductivity in paddy field.Meanwhile,there had extremely significantly positive correlation between soil ANC,ABC,IAC and soil pH,cation exchange capacity in paddy field.As a result,it was effective practices for increasing soil acid buffering capacity at plough layer under the double-cropping rice field in Southern of China by combined application of rice straw or 30% organic manure with chemical fertilizer managements.

Key words: Double-cropping rice field, Long-term fertilizer, Soil acidification, Soil acid buffering capacity

SHI Lihong, SUN Mei, TANG Haiming, LONG Zedong, SUN Geng, WEN Li, LI Chao, LUO Zunchang. Effects of Different Long-term Fertilizer Managements on Soil Acid Neutralizing Capacity in the Double-cropping Rice Field of Southern China[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2022, 37(6): 159-165. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20193175.

/ / Recommend / Download Citations

URL: http://www.hbnxb.net/EN/10.7668/hbnxb.20193175

http://www.hbnxb.net/EN/Y2022/V37/I6/159

Figures/Tables 4

Fig.1 Characteristic of soil acid buffering capacity at different soil depth in the double-cropping rice field with different long-term fertilizer treatments Different small letters in the bar indicated significant difference at P<0.05 level.

Tab.1 Characteristic of soil ammonium nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen contents at different soil depth in the double-cropping rice field with different long-term fertilizer treatments mg/kg

处理 Treatments	铵态氮$\text{NH}_{4}^{+}$-N		硝态氮$\text{NO}_{3}^{-}$-N
处理 Treatments	0~10 cm	10~20 cm	0~10 cm	10~20 cm
MF	3.60±0.05a	2.78±0.03a	1.95±0.07c	1.89±0.04c
RF	2.50±0.03b	2.33±0.02b	3.32±0.11b	2.51±0.06b
OM	2.59±0.03b	2.41±0.02b	5.15±0.14a	3.51±0.07a
CK	2.43±0.02c	1.84±0.01c	1.69±0.05d	1.34±0.04d

Tab.2 Correlation between soil acid neutralizing capacity,acid buffering capacity and soil physicochemical properties in the double-cropping rice field

项目 Items	pH	土壤有机碳 SOC	全氮 TN	碱解氮 AHN	阳离子交换量 CEC	交换性盐基离子 BI	电导率 EC
酸中和容量ANC	0.654^**	0.505^*	0.573^*	0.345	0.602^**	-0.758^**	0.586^*
酸缓冲容量ABC	0.685^**	0.562^*	0.538^*	0.401	0.615^**	-0.806^**	0.542^*
酸瞬时缓冲容量IAC	0.716^**	0.523^*	0.516^*	0.386	0.594^**	-0.763^**	0.538^*

Fig.2 Redundancy analysis between soil acidification indexes and environmental factors with different fertilizer treatments in the double-cropping rice field

References 26

[1]	Mockeviciene I, Repsiene R, Amaleviciute-Volunge K, Karcauskiene D, Slepetiene A, Lepane V. Effect of long-term application of organic fertilizers on improving organic matter quality in acid soil[J]. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 2021, 67:1-13.doi:10.1080/03650340.2021.1875130. doi: 10.1080/03650340.2021.1875130 URL
[2]	Ma S Q, Fan J H, Chen Y C, Lu X Y. Studying greenhouse gas emissions through interactions between phospholipid fatty acid content and soil properties of alpine grassland soil in Northern Tibet,China[J]. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2022, 68(9):1192-1204.doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01558. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01558
[3]	Palanivell P, Ahmed O H, Omar L, Abdul Majid N M. Nitrogen,phosphorus,and potassium adsorption and desorption improvement and soil buffering capacity using clinoptilolite zeolite[J]. Agronomy, 2021, 11(2):379.doi:10.3390/agronomy11020379. doi: 10.3390/agronomy11020379 URL
[4]	Mumbach G L, Gatiboni L C, Dall'Orsoletta D J, Schmitt D E, Grando D L, de Souza A A, Brignoli F M, Iochims D A. Refining phosphorus fertilizer recommendations based on buffering capacity of soils from Southern Brazil[J]. Revista Brasileira DeêCi ncia Do Solo, 2021, 45:e0200113.doi:10.36783/18069657rbcs20200113. doi: 10.36783/18069657rbcs20200113
[5]	Doi R, Tanikawa T, Wada R, Hirano Y. Morphological traits of Chamaecyparis obtusa fine roots are sensitive to soil acid buffering capacity[J]. Plant and Soil, 2020, 452(1/2):73-85.doi:10.1007/s11104-020-04561-w. doi: 10.1007/s11104-020-04561-w URL
[6]	Blake D, Boyce M C, Stock W D, Horwitz P. Fire in organic-rich wetland sediments:Inorganic responses in porewater[J]. Water,Air,& Soil Pollution, 2021, 232(3):1-16.doi:10.1007/s11270-021-05013-6. doi: 10.1007/s11270-021-05013-6
[7]	蔡泽江, 孙楠, 王伯仁, 徐明岗, 张会民, 张璐, 李冬初, 卢昌艾. 几种施肥模式对红壤氮素形态转化和pH的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(14):2877-2885.doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.14.010. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.14.010
	Cai Z J, Sun N, Wang B R, Xu M G, Zhang H M, Zhang L, Li D C, Lu C A. Experimental research on effects of different fertilization on nitrogen transformation and pH of red soil[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(14):2877-2885.
[8]	Cai Z J, Wang B R, Xu M G, Zhang H M, Zhang L, Gao S D. Nitrification and acidification from urea application in red soil(Ferralic Cambisol)after different long-term fertilization treatments[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2014, 14(9):1526-1536.doi:10.1007/s11368-014-0906-4. doi: 10.1007/s11368-014-0906-4 URL
[9]	毛妍婷, 刘宏斌, 陈安强, 杜彩艳, 郭树芳, 雷宝坤. 长期施用有机肥对减缓菜田耕层土壤酸化的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2020, 29(9):1784-1791.doi:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2020.09.010. doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2020.09.010
	Mao Y T, Liu H B, Chen A Q, Du C Y, Guo S F, Lei B K. Effects of long-term application of organic fertilizers on reducing soil acidification of plough layer in vegetable fields[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2020, 29(9):1784-1791.
[10]	李源环, 邓小华, 张仲文, 周米良, 江智敏, 田峰, 张明发, 石楠. 湘西典型植烟土壤酸碱缓冲特性及影响因素[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2019, 27(1):109-118.doi:10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.180643. doi: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.180643
	Li Y H, Deng X H, Zhang Z W, Zhou M L, Jiang Z M, Tian F, Zhang M F, Shi N. Characteristics and driving factors of acid-base buffer of typical tobacco-planting soils in Western Hunan Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2019, 27(1):109-118.
[11]	Tang H M, Xiao X P, Tang W G, Li C, Wang K, Li W Y, Cheng K K, Pan X C. Long-term effects of NPK fertilizers and organic manures on soil organic carbon and carbon management index under a double-cropping rice system in Southern China[J]. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2018, 49(16):1976-1989.doi:10.1080/00103624.2018.1492600. doi: 10.1080/00103624.2018.1492600 URL
[12]	Tang H M, Li C, Shi L H, Wen L, Cheng K K, Li W Y, Xiao X P. Functional soil organic matter fractions in response to long-term fertilizer management in a double-cropping paddy field of Southern China[J]. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 2020, 158(8/9):730-738.doi:10.1017/s0021859621000125. doi: 10.1017/s0021859621000125 URL
[13]	Li C, Shi L H, Tang H M, Cheng K K, Wen L, Li W Y, Xiao X P, Wang K. Organic manure management increases soil microbial community structure and diversity in the double-cropping rice paddy field of Southern China[J]. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2021, 52(11):1224-1235.doi:10.1080/00103624.2021.1879120. doi: 10.1080/00103624.2021.1879120 URL
[14]	石丽红, 李超, 唐海明, 程凯凯, 李微艳, 文丽, 肖小平. 长期不同施肥措施对双季稻田土壤活性有机碳组分和水解酶活性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(3):921-930.doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202103.023. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202103.023
	Shi L H, Li C, Tang H M, Cheng K K, Li W Y, Wen L, Xiao X P. Effects of long-term fertilizer management on soil labile organic carbon fractions and hydrolytic enzyme activity under a double-cropping rice system of Southern China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(3):921-930. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202103.023
[15]	徐一兰, 唐海明, 肖小平, 郭立君, 李微艳, 孙继民. 长期施肥对双季稻田土壤微生物学特性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(18):5847-5855.doi:10.5846/stxb201504080708. doi: 10.5846/stxb201504080708
	Xu Y L, Tang H M, Xiao X P, Guo L J, Li W Y, Sun J M. Effects of different long-term fertilization regimes on the soil microbiological properties of a paddy field[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(18):5847-5855.
[16]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000:23-107.
	Bao S D. Soil and agrochemistry analysis[M]. 3 rd edition. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000:23-107.
[17]	Cai J P, Luo W T, Liu H Y, Feng X, Zhang Y Y, Wang R Z, Xu Z W, Zhang Y G, Jiang Y. Precipitation-mediated responses of soil acid buffering capacity to long-term nitrogen addition in a semi-arid grassland[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2017, 170:312-318.doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.09.054. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.09.054 URL
[18]	孟亚妮, 李天鹏, 施展, 蔡江平, 徐柱文, 姜勇. 施肥和增水对弃耕草地土壤酸中和容量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(5):1579-1586.doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202005.010. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202005.010
	Meng Y N, Li T P, Shi Z, Cai J P, Xu Z W, Jiang Y. Effects of fertilization and water addition on soil acid neutralizing capacity in an old-field grassland[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(5):1579-1586.
[19]	Lauricella D, Weng Z, Clark G J, Butterly C R, Li G D, Gazey C, Sale P W G, Tang C X. Biochars and their feedstocks differ in their short-term effects in ameliorating acid soils grown with aluminium-sensitive wheat[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2021, 21(8):2805-2816.doi:10.1007/s11368-021-03001-1. doi: 10.1007/s11368-021-03001-1 URL
[20]	汪吉东, 戚冰洁, 张永春, 张爱君, 宁运旺, 许仙菊, 张辉, 马洪波. 长期施肥对砂壤质石灰性潮土土壤酸碱缓冲体系的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23(4):1031-1036.doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.2012.0139. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2012.0139
	Wang J D, Qi B J, Zhang Y C, Zhang A J, Ning Y W, Xu X J, Zhang H, Ma H B. Effects of long-term fertilization on pH buffer system of sandy loam calcareous fluvor-aquic soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2012, 23(4):1031-1036.
[21]	张学军, 赵营, 陈晓群, 吴礼树, 胡承孝. 氮肥施用量对设施番茄氮素利用及土壤$\text{NO}_{3}^{-}$-N累积的影响[J]. 生态学报,2007,27(9):3761-3768.doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2007.09.026. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2007.09.026
	Zhang X J, Zhao Y, Chen X Q, Wu L S, Hu C X. Nitrogen fertilizer effects on N recovery and residual soil $\text{NO}_{3}^{-}$-N for greenhouse-grown tomato[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2007,27(9):3761-3768.
[22]	Xiong Z Q, Huang T Q, Ma Y C, Xing G X, Zhu Z L. Nitrate and ammonium leaching in variable-and permanent-charge paddy soils[J]. Pedosphere, 2010, 20(2):209-216.doi:10.1016/S1002-0160(10)60008-2. doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(10)60008-2 URL
[23]	陈淼, 李小娟, 陈歆, 李宁, 杨桂生, 彭黎旭, 李玮. 不同施肥处理下热带土壤硝态氮累积特征及与土壤pH值、辣椒产量的关系[J]. 西南农业学报, 2018, 31(5):1045-1050.doi:10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2018.5.027. doi: 10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2018.5.027
	Chen M, Li X J, Chen X, Li N, Yang G S, Peng L X, Li W. Characteristics of nitrate nitrogen accumulation in tropical soil and its relationship with pH and chilli yield under different fertilization treatments[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 31(5):1045-1050.
[24]	张永春, 汪吉东, 沈明星, 沈其荣, 许仙菊, 宁运旺. 长期不同施肥对太湖地区典型土壤酸化的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2010, 47(3):465-472.doi:10.11766/trxb200909230427. doi: 10.11766/trxb200909230427
	Zhang Y C, Wang J D, Shen M X, Shen Q R, Xu X J, Ning Y W. Effects of long-term fertilization on soil acidification in Taihu Lake region,China[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2010, 47(3):465-472.
[25]	张宗祥, 黄峥嵘, 吴雪凡, 刘楠楠, 李笑笑, 董召荣, 宋贺. 土壤酸化对玉米产量、氮代谢及相关基因表达的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2022, 37(3): 94-103. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20192847. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20192847
	Zhang Z X, Huang Z R, Wu X F, Liu N N, Li X X, Dong Z R, Song H. Effects of soil acidification on yield,nitrogen metabolism, and related gene expression of maize[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2022, 37(3):94-103. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20192847
[26]	李正涛, 樊帆, 李世钰, 山云辉, 黄家雄, 吕玉兰, 何飞飞. 咖啡园土壤酸缓冲能力及其影响因素[J]. 云南大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(1):194-200.doi:10.7540/j.ynu.20190295. doi: 10.7540/j.ynu.20190295
	Li Z T, Fan F, Li S Y, Shan Y H, Huang J X, Lü Y L, He F F. Soil acid buffer capacity and the affecting factors of coffee planting field[J]. Journal of Yunnan University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2020, 42(1):194-200.

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export