Response of Double Ear Type Waxy New Maize Variety Wancainuo 88 to Planting Density

doi:10.7668/hbnxb.20192683

Abstract

Abstract:

The aim of this research was to screen the appropriate planting density for double ear type waxy new maize variety Wancainuo 88 and explore the potential to achieve increased yield,field experiment was carried out to study the important plant traits,double ear rate,yield and yield component traits of Wancainuo 88 compared under the different planting densities.The study results showed that as planting density increased,the plant height,ear height,dual fruits silking interval and second ear silkingx-anthesis interval all increased,while the first ear silking-anthesis interval and double ear rate decreased.The planting density indirectly or directly affected to the double ear rate by changing the dual fruits silking interval,first ear silking-anthesis interval and second ear silking-anthesis interval.There were significant or highly significant responses of yield and its component traits for the first ear and second ear to planting density,except for the ear rows and ear length of first ear.With the planting density increased from 30 000 to 60 000 plants/ha,the first fresh ear yield,overall fresh ear yield,first fresh grain yield,overall fresh grain yield were increased 5 366.10,3 465.98,3 302.85,2 165.60 kg/ha,respectively.The second fresh ear yield and fresh ear yield were decreased 1 900.12,1 137.25 kg/ha,respectively.There was not significant for overall fresh ear yield and overall fresh grain yield among the 48 000,54 000,60 000 plants/ha,but extremely significant higher than the other planting density.Based on the above research results,the optimal planting density for new variety Wancainuo 88 was 48 000 plants/ha could be initially used for field planting.

Key words: Waxy maize, Planting density, Double ear rate, Yield, Response

FENG Yunchao, YANG Lian, HUO Shiping, YAN Qingjiu, ZHANG Fangkui, XIANG Zhenfan, YANG Guo. Response of Double Ear Type Waxy New Maize Variety Wancainuo 88 to Planting Density[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2022, 37(S1): 103-109. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20192683.

/ / Recommend / Download Citations

URL: http://www.hbnxb.net/EN/10.7668/hbnxb.20192683

http://www.hbnxb.net/EN/Y2022/V37/IS1/103

Figures/Tables 6

References 26

[1]	卢柏山, 徐丽, 赵久然, 史亚兴, 樊艳丽, 席胜利, 张翠芬, 史亚民, 张小继. 京科糯2000等系列鲜食糯玉米品种选育及应用[J]. 玉米科学, 2019, 27(5):1-4,14. doi:10.13597/j.cnki.maize.science.20190501. doi: 10.13597/j.cnki.maize.science.20190501
	Lu B S, Xu L, Zhao J R, Shi Y X, Fan Y L, Xi S L, Zhang C F, Shi Y M, Zhang X J. Breeding and application of Jingkenuo 2000 series of waxy corn varieties[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2019, 27(5):1-4,14.
[2]	卢媛, 艾为大, 韩晴, 王义发, 李宏杨, 瞿玉玑, 施标, 沈雪芳. 糯玉米自交系SSR标记遗传多样性及群体遗传结构分析[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(2):214-224. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.83008. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.83008
	Lu Y, Ai W D, Han Q, Wang Y F, Li H Y, Qu Y J, Shi B, Shen X F. Genetic diversity and population structure analysis by SSR markers in waxy maize[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2019, 45(2):214-224. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.83008
[3]	卢媛, 韩晴, 艾为大, 施标, 王义发, 潘春丹, 沈雪芳. 基于SNP标记的糯玉米种质资源遗传多样性分析[J]. 玉米科学, 2020, 28(3):44-51. doi:10.13597/j.cnki.maize.science.20200305. doi: 10.13597/j.cnki.maize.science.20200305
	Lu Y, Han Q, Ai W D, Shi B, Wang Y F, Pan C D, Shen X F. Genetic diversity of waxy maize germplasm revealed by SNP-chips[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2020, 28(3):44-51.
[4]	杨舒添, 杜天庆, 翟红梅, 李宇航, 龚芮, 崔福柱, 孙敏, 高志强. 叶面喷硒对糯玉米生理特性及子粒硒含量的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2020, 28(1):117-123. doi:10.13597/j.cnki.maize.science.20200118. doi: 10.13597/j.cnki.maize.science.20200118
	Yang S T, Du T Q, Zhai H M, Li Y H, Gong R, Cui F Z, Sun M, Gao Z Q. Effects of foliar spraying selenium on physiological characteristics and grain selenium content of waxy corn[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2020, 28(1):117-123.
[5]	徐丽, 赵久然, 卢柏山, 史亚兴, 樊艳丽. 我国鲜食玉米种业现状及发展趋势[J]. 中国种业, 2020(10):14-18. doi:10.19462/j.cnki.1671-895x.2020.10.005. doi: 10.19462/j.cnki.1671-895x.2020.10.005
	Xu L, Zhao J R, Lu B S, Shi Y X, Fan Y L. Current situation and development trend of fresh corn seed industry in China[J]. China Seed Industry, 2020(10):14-18.
[6]	李青超, 王立达, 赵秀梅, 韩业辉, 刘洋, 王宇先, 杨莹. 不同种植密度对糯玉米相关性状及产量的影响[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2020(8):22-25. doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2020.08.0022. doi: 10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2020.08.0022
	Li Q C, Wang L D, Zhao X M, Han Y H, Liu Y, Wang Y X, Yang Y. Effects of different planting densities on related traits and yield of waxy corn[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020(8):22-25.
[7]	石海春, 柯永培, 傅体华, 余学杰, 周国昌. 玉米分蘖和多穗性的配合力与遗传分析[J]. 核农学报, 2013, 27(10):1441-1448. doi:10.11869/hnxb.2013.10.1441. doi: 10.11869/hnxb.2013.10.1441
	Shi H C, Ke Y P, Fu T H, Yu X J, Zhou G C. Analyses of inheritance and combining ability of tillering and prolificacy in maize[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 27(10):1441-1448.
[8]	Hallauer A R. Heritability of prolificacy in maize[J]. Journal of Heredity, 1974, 65(3):163-168. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a108490. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a108490 URL
[9]	Anderson E L, Kamprath E J, Moll R H, Jackson W A. Effect of N fertilization on silk synchrony,ear number,and growth of semiprolific maize genotypes[J]. Crop Science, 1984, 24(4):663-666. doi:10.2135/cropsci1984.0011183x002400040009x. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1984.0011183x002400040009x URL
[10]	郭平仲, Gardner C O, Obaidi M. 玉米单株穗数及其它数量性状的基因效应与遗传变异分析[J]. 遗传学报, 1986, 13(1):35-42.
	Guo P Z, Gardner C O, Obaidi M. Genetic variations and gene effects controlling prolificacy and other traits in corn(Zea mays L.)[J]. Acta Genetica Sinica, 1986, 13(1):35-42.
[11]	Durieux R P, Kamprath E J, Moll R H. Yield contribution of apical and subapical ears in prolific and nonprolific corn[J]. Agronomy Journal, 1993, 85(3):606-610. doi:10.2134/agronj1993.00021962008500030016x. doi: 10.2134/agronj1993.00021962008500030016x URL
[12]	王巍. 双穗型玉米穗发育特点及其调节的研究[J]. 玉米科学, 2002, 10(2):71-75,77. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-0906.2002.02.021. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0906.2002.02.021
	Wang W. Studies on the fruit's growth and regulating means of dual fruits genre maize[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2002, 10(2):71-75,77.
[13]	张旭, 郝学景, 赵明, 张永江, 李连禄, 王美云. 高寒地区饲用玉米双穗发育的同步性研究[J]. 作物学报, 2004, 30(4):388-392. doi:10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2004.04.016. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2004.04.016
	Zhang X, Hao X J, Zhao M, Zhang Y J, Li L L, Wang M Y. Synchrony of double-ear development of forage maize in cold upland[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2004, 30(4):388-392.
[14]	李莹, 石海春, 柯永培, 杨重云. 玉米分蘖性和多穗性的遗传研究进展[J]. 玉米科学, 2009, 17(2):56-59. doi:10.13597/j.cnki.maize.science.2009.02.016. doi: 10.13597/j.cnki.maize.science.2009.02.016
	Li Y, Shi H C, Ke Y P, Yang C Y. Advancement of genetic studies on tillering and prolificacy in maize[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2009, 17(2):56-59.
[15]	樊金娟, 王楠, 朱延姝, 崔震海, 阮燕晔, 张立军. 玉米多穗现象研究进展[J]. 玉米科学, 2012, 20(5):143-146. doi:10.13597/j.cnki.maize.science.2012.05.031. doi: 10.13597/j.cnki.maize.science.2012.05.031
	Fan J J, Wang N, Zhu Y S, Cui Z H, Ruan Y Y, Zhang L J. Research progress on prolificacy in maize[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2012, 20(5):143-146.
[16]	张欣, 张宝石, 赵明, 李连禄, 王美云, 张旭. 生态因子对玉米多育性的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2010, 25(S1):128-132. doi:10.7668/hbnxb.2010.S1.029. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2010.S1.029
	Zhang X, Zhang B S, Zhao M, Li L L, Wang M Y, Zhang X. The effects of ecological elements on maize prolificacy[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2010, 25(S1):128-132. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2010.S1.029
[17]	于爱忠, 柴强, 殷文, 赵财, 胡发龙, 樊志龙. 绿洲灌区玉米产量形成及水分利用特征对地膜覆盖方式及行距的响应[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2020, 28(5):662-670. doi:10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.190828. doi: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.190828
	Yu A Z, Chai Q, Yin W, Zhao C, Hu F L, Fan Z L. Responses of grain yield formation and water use characteristic of maize to plastic film mulching pattern and row spacing in oasis irrigation area in Northwest China[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2020, 28(5):662-670.
[18]	杨封科, 何宝林, 张立功, 高应平. 膜下秸秆还田双垄种植对土壤养分平衡及玉米产量的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2015, 32(11):1892-1901. doi:10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2015-0061. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2015-0061
	Yang F K, He B L, Zhang L G, Gao Y P. Effects of double mulched furrow-ridge cropping with film and straw on soil nutrients balance and maize yield in semiarid area of China[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2015, 32(11):1892-1901.
[19]	胡月秋, 徐开未, 龙玲, 蒋帆, 周元, 邱传志, 李建兵, 陈远学. 玉米正红6号的密植效应[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(7):154-162. doi:10.11686/cyxb2019431. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2019431
	Hu Y Q, Xu K W, Long L, Jiang F, Zhou Y, Qiu C Z, Li J B, Chen Y X. Effect of high plant density on yield of maize variety Zhenghong No.6[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(7):154-162.
[20]	明博, 谢瑞芝, 侯鹏, 李璐璐, 王克如, 李少昆. 2005-2016年中国玉米种植密度变化分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(11):1960-1972. doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.11.002. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.11.002
	Ming B, Xie R Z, Hou P, Li L L, Wang K R, Li S K. Changes of maize planting density in China[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(11):1960-1972.
[21]	葛均筑, 徐莹, 袁国印, 李淑娅, 曹凑贵, 展茗, 赵明. 气象因素对玉米果穗建成影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2017, 25(2):86-93. doi:10.13597/j.cnki.maize.science.20170215. doi: 10.13597/j.cnki.maize.science.20170215
	Ge J Z, Xu Y, Yuan G Y, Li S Y, Cao C G, Zhan M, Zhao M. Effects of dry matter accumulation and meteorological factors on maize ear establishments[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2017, 25(2):86-93.
[22]	李文兰, 李文才, 孙琦, 于彦丽, 赵勐, 鲁守平, 李艳娇, 孟昭东. 生长素响应及转运信号在玉米不同节位腋芽发育过程中的分布模式分析[J]. 玉米科学, 2020, 28(4):22-25. doi:10.13597/j.cnki.maize.science.20200404. doi: 10.13597/j.cnki.maize.science.20200404
	Li W L, Li W C, Sun Q, Yu Y L, Zhao M, Lu S P, Li Y J, Meng Z D. Distribution pattern analysis of auxin response and transport signal in the development of axillary buds at different nodes of maize[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2020, 28(4):22-25.
[23]	曹改萍, 董红建, 侯波, 曹计云, 张正. 密度对不同玉米品种产量及其构成因素的影响[J]. 山西农业科学, 2021, 49(11):1290-1294. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-2481.2021.11.08. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2481.2021.11.08
	Cao G P, Dong H J, Hou B, Cao J Y, Zhang Z. Effects of density on yield and its components of different density-tolerant maize varieties[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 49(11):1290-1294.
[24]	张元红, 王瑞, 徐宗贵, 李军. 不同降水年型下旱地玉米产量性状对种植密度和品种的响应[J]. 农业工程学报, 2021, 37(22):136-144. doi:10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2021.22.015. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2021.22.015
	Zhang Y H, Wang R, Xu Z G, Li J. Responses of yield traits to planting density and cultivar of spring maize in drylands under different rainfall types[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2021, 37(22):136-144.
[25]	李俊宏, 王云东, 杨胜伟, 辛德财. 氮密互作对糯玉米淀粉含量和食味品质的影响[J]. 天津农林科技, 2021(2):8-11. doi:10.16013/j.cnki.1002-0659.2021.0021. doi: 10.16013/j.cnki.1002-0659.2021.0021
	Li J H, Wang Y D, Yang S W, Xin D C. Effects of interaction between nitrogen and density on starch content and eating quality of waxy corn[J]. Science and Technology of Tianjin Agriculture and Forestry, 2021(2):8-11.
[26]	曹庆军, 姜晓莉, 杨粉团, 毛刚, 王富刚, 曹欣欣, 孔凡丽, 李刚. 种植密度对甜玉米与鲜食糯玉米产量与品质性状的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2018, 26(6):94-98. doi:10.13597/j.cnki.maize.science.20180616. doi: 10.13597/j.cnki.maize.science.20180616
	Cao Q J, Jiang X L, Yang F T, Mao G, Wang F G, Cao X X, Kong F L, Li G. Effect of planting density on grain yield and quality of fresh sweet corn and waxy corn[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2018, 26(6):94-98.

密度/(株/hm²) Density	株高/cm Plant height	穗位高/cm Ear height	穗位高系数/% Ear height coefficient
30 000	229.33±6.43Ab	87.33±3.53Ab	38.07±0.48Aa
36 000	230.22±6.34Ab	86.44±4.29Ab	37.54±0.94Aa
42 000	233.11±1.54Ab	89.56±0.38Ab	38.42±0.42Aa
48 000	233.11±2.52Ab	90.22±3.08Ab	38.70±1.23Aa
54 000	234.89±6.30Ab	90.44±1.39Ab	38.53±1.41Aa
60 000	244.00±4.81Aa	95.56±2.14Aa	39.17±0.91Aa

密度/(株/hm²) Density	株高/cm Plant height	穗位高/cm Ear height	穗位高系数/% Ear height coefficient
30 000	229.33±6.43Ab	87.33±3.53Ab	38.07±0.48Aa
36 000	230.22±6.34Ab	86.44±4.29Ab	37.54±0.94Aa
42 000	233.11±1.54Ab	89.56±0.38Ab	38.42±0.42Aa
48 000	233.11±2.52Ab	90.22±3.08Ab	38.70±1.23Aa
54 000	234.89±6.30Ab	90.44±1.39Ab	38.53±1.41Aa
60 000	244.00±4.81Aa	95.56±2.14Aa	39.17±0.91Aa

密度/(株/hm²) Density	双穗抽丝间隔期/d Dual fruits silking-interval	第1穗抽丝散粉间隔期/d First ear silking-anthesis interval	第2穗抽丝散粉间隔期/d Second ear silking-anthesis interval	双穗率/% Dual ear rate
30 000	1.76±0.04Bb	1.71±0.40Aa	0.71±0.21Bc	80.00±6.61Aa
36 000	1.86±0.26Bb	1.95±0.36Aa	0.95±0.04Bc	68.75±2.08Bb
42 000	1.60±0.52Bb	1.86±0.26Aa	0.74±0.11Bc	63.69±6.76Bb
48 000	1.88±0.08Bb	1.50±0.21Aa	0.76±0.53Bbc	59.40±3.25Bb
54 000	2.86±0.63Aa	1.64±0.26Aa	1.40±0.58ABb	40.74±8.14Cc
60 000	3.33±0.32Aa	1.26±0.08Aa	2.07±0.31Aa	31.67±2.89Cd

密度/(株/hm²) Density	双穗抽丝间隔期/d Dual fruits silking-interval	第1穗抽丝散粉间隔期/d First ear silking-anthesis interval	第2穗抽丝散粉间隔期/d Second ear silking-anthesis interval	双穗率/% Dual ear rate
30 000	1.76±0.04Bb	1.71±0.40Aa	0.71±0.21Bc	80.00±6.61Aa
36 000	1.86±0.26Bb	1.95±0.36Aa	0.95±0.04Bc	68.75±2.08Bb
42 000	1.60±0.52Bb	1.86±0.26Aa	0.74±0.11Bc	63.69±6.76Bb
48 000	1.88±0.08Bb	1.50±0.21Aa	0.76±0.53Bbc	59.40±3.25Bb
54 000	2.86±0.63Aa	1.64±0.26Aa	1.40±0.58ABb	40.74±8.14Cc
60 000	3.33±0.32Aa	1.26±0.08Aa	2.07±0.31Aa	31.67±2.89Cd

性状 Characters	双穗抽丝间隔期 Dual ear silking interval	第1穗抽丝散粉间隔期 First ear silking-anthesis interval	第2穗抽丝散粉间隔期 Second ear silking-anthesis interval	双穗率 Dual ear rate
密度Density	0.762^**	-0.538^*	0.696^**	-0.943^**
双穗抽丝间隔期		-0.481^*	0.896^**	-0.847^**
Dual ear silking interval
第1穗抽丝散粉间隔期			-0.562^*	0.522^*
First ear silking-anthesis interval
第2穗抽丝散粉间隔期				-0.780^**
Second ear silking-anthesis interval

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export