Effects of Water Stress on Soluble Protein and Free Proline Content of Different Boll Weight Genotypes in Cotton

doi:10.7668/hbnxb.2008.05.036

Abstract

Abstract: The waterproof installations were carried out to deal with the content of soluble protein and free proline of different boll weight genotypes and inner positions in cotton under water stress.The results showed that the content of soluble protein at different positions appeared different trends for these genotypes under the two treatments,it illustrate that different position had different capacities of adaptation to drought stress.Under water stress,the soluble protein content which in each positions were decreased in these genotypes at the whole stage,the big-boll and small-boll varieties in lower branch leaves showed less accumulation of soluble protein content,the change of the content of soluble content in middle branch leaves was smaller than the lower one for each genotype which showed that the physiological characters of the branch leaves was more stable in the boll development.Under drought stress,the free proline content at each branch leaves showed more accumulation than the CK,the big-boll variety had more accumulation of the content of free proline in each poison.The free proline content in the lower branch leaves was the most,and then the middle ones,the upper ones was the least.Different varieties had different regulation mechanism in the condition of drought,so free proline can be considered as a physiological index nearly correlative to drought of cotton.

Key words: Cotton, Genotype, Water stress, Soluble protein, Proline

CLC Number:

S562.01

LIU Ling-di, LI Cun-dong, GAO Xue-fei. Effects of Water Stress on Soluble Protein and Free Proline Content of Different Boll Weight Genotypes in Cotton[J]. ACTA AGRICULTURAE BOREALI-SINICA, 2008, 23(5): 165-169. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2008.05.036.

/ / Recommend / Download Citations

URL: http://www.hbnxb.net/EN/10.7668/hbnxb.2008.05.036

http://www.hbnxb.net/EN/Y2008/V23/I5/165

References

[1] 陈善福,舒庆尧.植物耐干旱胁迫的生物学机理及其基因工程研究进展[J].植物学通报,1999,16(5):555-556.
[2] 南建福,刘恩科,王计平,等.苗期干旱和施肥对棉花生长发育的影响[J].棉花学报,2005,17(6):339-342.
[3] 李少昆,肖璐,黄文华,等.不同时期干旱胁迫对棉花生长和产量的影响Ⅱ棉花生长发育及生理特性的变化[J].石河子大学学报:自然科学版,1999,3(3):259-263.
[4] 肖俊夫,刘祖贵,孙景生,等.不同生育期干旱对棉花生长发育及产量的影响[J].灌溉排水,1999,18(1):23-27.
[5] 董合忠,李维江,李振怀,等.旱地与水浇地棉花生长发育特点比较研究[J].山东农业科学,1998(6):20-22.
[6] 程林海,张原根.干旱和复水对棉花叶片几种生理指标的影响[J].华北农学报,1995,10(4):82-85.
[7] 董合忠,李维江,唐薇,等.干旱和淹水对棉苗某些生理特性的影响[J].西北植物学报,2003,23(10):1695-1699.
[8] 马富裕,杨建荣,李蒙春,等.花铃期土壤含水量对棉花群体生理和产量影响研究[J].石河子大学学报:自然科学版,1998,2(2):93-98.
[9] Read S M,Northcote D H.Minimization of variation in the response to different protein of the Coomassic Blue G dye dinding assay for protein[J].Anal Biochem,1981,116:53-64.
[10] 邹琦.植物生理学实验指导[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000:72-75.
[11] Longstreth D J.Nutrient influence on leaf photosynthesis effects on nitrogen phosphorus and potassium for Gossypium hirsutrumL[J].Plant Physiology,1980,65(3):541-543.
[12] 白景文,罗承德,李西,等.两种野生岩生植物的抗旱适应性研究[J].四川农业大学学报,2005,23(3):290-294.
[13] 康俊梅,杨青川,樊奋成.干旱对苜蓿叶片可溶性蛋白的影响[J].草地学报,2005,13(3):199-202.
[14] 王保莉,杨春,曲东.环境因素对小麦苗期SOD、MDA及可溶性蛋白的影响[J].西北农业大学学报,2000,28(6):72-75.
[15] 李德全,邹琦.土壤干旱下不同抗旱性小麦品种的渗透调节和渗透调节物质[J].植物生理学报,1992,18(1):37-44.
[16] 张明生,谢波,谈锋.甘薯可溶性蛋白、叶绿素及ATP含量变化与品种抗旱性关系的研究[J].中国农业科学,2003,36(1):13-16.
[17] Tang Z C.The accumulation of free proline and its role in water stressed Sorghum seeding[J].Act Phytophysl Sinica,1989,15(1):105-110.
[18] Chetti M b.Genotypic variation in osmoregulants and their relationship with bioproductivity and grain yield in wheat[J].Annals of Plant Physiology,1996,10(2):118-123.
[19] Sundaresan S.Effect of water deficit stress on proline accumulation in two varieties ocassva(Manihot esculenta crants)differing in their tolerance to drought[J].Indian Journal of Experimental Biology,1996,34(2):159-162.
[20] Christine G.Water deficit-induced changes in concentrations in proline and some other amino acids in the phloem sap of alfalfa[J].Plant Physiol,1996,111:109-113.
[21] Smirnoff N,Cumbes Q J.Hydroxyl radical scavenging activity of compatible solutes[J].Phytochem,1989,28(4):1057-1060.
[22] 斐英杰,郑家岭,瘐红.用于玉米品种抗旱性鉴定的生理生化指标[J].华北农学报,1992,7(1):31-35.
[23] Bouchereau A,Aziz A,Larher F,et al.Polyamines and environmental challenges:recent development[J].Plant Science,1999,140(2):103-125.
[24] 汪洪鹰,揭雨成,肖爱平,等.不同基因型苎麻叶片脯氨酸积累差异研究[J].中国苎麻,1999,21:27-29.
[25] 王朝云,揭雨成.水分胁迫对红麻生理特性和产量的影响[J].作物学报,1999,21(6):746-749.
[26] 韩永华,郑易之,李甜,等.高温、渗透双重胁迫对大豆某些生理反应具有累加效应的初报[J].大豆科学,2001,20(1):41-44.
[27] 张美云,钱吉,郑师章.渗透胁迫下野生大豆游离脯氨酸和可溶性糖的变化[J].复旦学报,2001,40(5):558-561.
[28] Hanson A D,Nelsen C F,Everson E H.Evaluation of free proline accumulation as an index of drought using to contracting barely cultivars[J].Crop Sci,1977,17:720-726.
[29] 王邦锡,黄久常,王辉.不同植物在水分胁迫条件下脯氨酸的累积与抗旱性的关系[J].植物生理学报,1989,15(1):46-51.
[30] 高浦新.玉米在水分胁迫条件下脯氨酸的积累与抗旱性的研究探讨[J].江西农业学报,1997,9(4):73-76.
[31] Singh T N,Aspinall D,Paley L G.Proline accumulation and varietal adaptability to drought in barley:A potential metabolie measure of drought resistance[J].Nature New Biol,1972,236:188-190.
[32] 张成军,解恒才,郭佳秋,等.干旱对4种木本植物幼苗脯氨酸含量的影响[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2005,29(5):34-36.
[33] 王启明,徐心诚,吴诗光,等.干旱胁迫对不同大豆品种苗期叶片渗透调节物质含量和细胞膜透性的影响[J].种子,2005,24(8):9-12.
[34] 揭雨成,黄丕生,李宗道,等.苎麻抗旱性基因型差异及其生理生化机理研究[J].中国麻作,1998,20(1):1-6.
[35] 张明生,杜建厂,谢波,等.水分胁迫下甘薯叶片渗透调节物质含量与品种抗旱性的关系[J].南京农业大学学报,2004,27(4):123-125.
[36] 罗音,孙明高.干旱胁迫对5树种叶片中脯氨酸含量的影响[J].山东林业科技,1999(4):1-3.

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export