Effects of Organic Conditioning Agents with Different Compound Ratios on Soybean Growth and Soil Traits in Coastal Salinized Farmland

doi:10.7668/hbnxb.20196463

Abstract

Abstract:

Soil salinization is an important constraint on the improvement of farmland productivity.In view of the poor quality and low productivity of coastal salinized soil,a pot experiment was set up to explore the effects of different dosages and ratios of organic soil conditioners on the growth and soil properties of soybean in coastal salinized farmland.The results showed that the comprehensive analysis of the physiological indicators of salt resistance,such as SOD,CAT,and MDA,showed that T3(lactose peptide 225 kg/ha,lactose peptide:inositol=10:1)and T5(lactose peptide 225 kg/ha,lactose peptide:inositol=20:1)had good improvement effects.Comparing the growth trend in the early and medium stages,T5 treatment showed good growth status,followed by T2(lactose peptide dosage 225 kg/ha,lactose peptide:inositol=5:1).In terms of dry matter accumulation and nutrient uptake,T16(lactose peptide dosage 900 kg/ha,lactose peptide:inositol=15:1),T17(lactose peptide dosage 900 kg/ha,lactose peptide:inositol=20:1)and T2 were better than those of the control treatment.The partial productivity and agronomic efficiency were the highest in T2,which were 1.11,0.87 g/kg,and the compound ratio was 5:1—15:1,which had a better effect on improving soil water-soluble ions.Taken together,the T2 and T3 treatments with a lactose peptide dosage of 225 kg/ha and a lactose peptide and inositol compound ratio of 5:1~10:1 were the best in terms of saving cost and maintaining the improvement effect.

Key words: Soybean, Organic conditioner, Agronomic efficiency, Soil traits, Soil productivity

CLC Number:

S156.2
S153

GUO Liuming, LU Shuchang. Effects of Organic Conditioning Agents with Different Compound Ratios on Soybean Growth and Soil Traits in Coastal Salinized Farmland[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2026, 41(4): 185-192. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20196463.

/ / Recommend / Download Citations

URL: http://www.hbnxb.net/EN/10.7668/hbnxb.20196463

http://www.hbnxb.net/EN/Y2026/V41/I4/185

Figures/Tables 9

References 27

[1]	Lei S H, Jia X X, Zhao C L, Shao M A. A review of saline-alkali soil improvements in China:efforts and their impacts on soil properties[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2025, 317:109617.doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109617. URL
[2]	Ma R, Du F M, Qin Y L, Lyu J P, Xing G Y, Xu Y J, Fu N, Qiao J, Hong G Y, Wang S K. Changes of plant growth and soil physicochemical properties by cultivating different economic plant species in saline-alkali soil of Hetao Oasis,Inner Mongolia[J]. Agriculture, 2025, 15(13):1421.doi:10.3390/agriculture15131421. URL
[3]	赵英, 王丽, 赵惠丽, 陈小兵. 滨海盐碱地改良研究现状及展望[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(3):67-74.doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0255.
	Zhao Y, Wang L, Zhao H L, Chen X B. Research status and prospects of saline-alkali land amelioration in the coastal region of China[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(3):67-74. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0255
[4]	赵维彬, 王松, 刘玲玲, 肖江, 王树凤, 唐丽, 陈光才. 生物炭改良盐碱地效果及其对植物生长的影响研究进展[J]. 土壤通报, 2024, 55(2):551-561.doi:10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2022090803.
	Zhao W B, Wang S, Liu L L, Xiao J, Wang S F, Tang L, Chen G C. Effect of biochar amendment on saline-alkaline soil amelioration and plant growth:a literature review[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2024, 55(2):551-561. doi: 10.1111/ejs.2004.55.issue-3 URL
[5]	Liu L P, Long X H, Shao H B, Liu Z P, Tao Y, Zhou Q S, Zong J Q. Ameliorants improve saline alkaline soils on a large scale in northern Jiangsu Province,China[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2015, 81:328-334.doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.04.032. URL
[6]	姜增明, 费云鹏, 陈佳, 王绪涛. 土壤调理剂在盐碱地改良中的作用[J]. 北方园艺, 2014(20):174-177.
	Jiang Z M, Fei Y P, Chen J, Wang X T. Effect of soil conditioners on modifying saline-alkali soil[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2014(20):174-177.
[7]	Huang X Y, Yin T, Sun W J, Ge G L, Wei W L. Organic amendments enhance maize growth by improving chemical and microbial properties in coastal saline-alkali soils[J]. Plants, 2025, 14(14):2217.doi:10.3390/plants14142217.
[8]	Witzel K, Motos J R A, Atay E, Çiçek N, Mistríková V, Oney-Birol S, Soto S R, Solymosi K, Yücedağ C, Papenbrock J. Leveraging microorganisms and biostimulants:mitigating salinity stress in crops with agricultural biologicals[J]. Plant and Soil, 2026, 523(2):851-873. doi: 10.1007/S11104-025-07578-1.
[9]	Zhao M M, Zhang X Y, Zhang J W, Zhang M X, Chen X, Yang F F, Dai L, Chen Y P, Wang R M. Combining waste biomass with functional microorganisms can effectively ameliorate hardened saline-alkali soil and promote plant growth[J]. Plant and Soil, 2025, 513(1):1557-1577.doi:10.1007/S11104-025-07270-4.
[10]	肖雅寅, 蒲子天, 张瑞芳, 王灿, 侯振军, 王鑫鑫. 不同有机物料对盐碱地改良效果的研究进展[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2024(3):229-239.doi:10.11838/sfsc.1673-6257.23135.
	Xiao Y Y, Pu Z T, Zhang R F, Wang C, Hou Z J, Wang X X. Research progress on the improvement effects of different organic materials on saline soils[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2024(3):229-239.
[11]	Hou J J, Tang J W, Zhang X T, Zhang S D, Zhang Q Z. Combined improvement of coastal saline-alkali soils by biochar and Azotobacter chroococcum:effects and mechanisms[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2025, 212:106214.doi:10.1016/J.APSOIL.2025.106214. URL
[12]	Fang Y H, Huang H Y, Wang X P, Zhao Y, Gao Y, Cui X J. Effects of composite soil conditioner on soil properties and corn yield in a saline alkali soil[J]. Soil Use and Management, 2024, 40(3):e13095.doi:10.1111/sum.13095. URL
[13]	刘国秀, 沈宏. 生物刺激素及其在农业中的应用[J]. 生态产业科学与磷氟工程, 2020, 35(11):22-26.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-6220.2020.11.008.
	Liu G X, Shen H. Biostimulants and their application in agriculture[J]. Eco-Industry Science & Phosphorus Fluorine Engineering, 2020, 35(11):22-26.
[14]	崔萌恩, 卢树昌, 郭刘明, 张静静, 段东雪, 董佩华. 滨海盐渍化土壤生物刺激素抗盐与大豆氮磷养分增效研究[J]. 天津农业科学, 2025, 31(3):43-48.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6500.2025.03.007.
	Cui M E, Lu S C, Guo L M, Zhang J J, Duan D X, Dong P H. Effects of biostimulants on salt resistance and soybean nitrogen & phosphorus nutrients enhancement in coastal salinized Soil[J]. Tianjin Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 31(3):43-48.
[15]	何超. 近30年天津西青区农业气象条件变化特征分析[J]. 农业灾害研究, 2019, 9(6):23-24,79.doi:10.19383/j.cnki.nyzhyj.2019.06.010.
	He C. Analysis of changes in agricultural meteorological conditions in Xiqing District,Tianjin over the past 30 years[J]. Agricultural Disaster Research, 2019, 9(6):23-24,79.
[16]	王学奎, 黄见良. 植物生理生化实验原理与技术[M]. 3版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2015.
	Wang X K, Huang J L. Principles and techniques of plant physiology and biochemistry experiments[M]. 3rd ed. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2015.
[17]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
	Bao S D. Soil and agricultural chemistry analysis[M]. 3rd ed. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000.
[18]	关松荫. 土壤酶及其研究法[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1986.
	Guan S Y. Soil enzymes and their research methods[M]. Beijing: Agricultural Press, 1986.
[19]	陈鹤源, 白钱岳, 胡尚宏, 刘子健, 孙佳阳, 盖婧文, 张卓, 魏健. 大豆耐盐碱机制及育种策略研究进展[J]. 大豆科学, 2025, 44(5):1-8.doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2025.05.0001.
	Chen H Y, Bai Q Y, Hu S H, Liu Z J, Sun J Y, Ge J W, Zhang Z, Wei J. Advances in salinity tolerance mechanisms and breeding strategies in soybean[J]. Soybean Science, 2025, 44(5):1-8.
[20]	Feng D, Gao Q, Liu J, Tang J C, Hua Z T, Sun X A. Categories of exogenous substances and their effect on alleviation of plant salt stress[J]. European Journal of Agronomy, 2023, 142:126656.doi:10.1016/J.EJA.2022.126656. URL
[21]	赫文文, 岳健敏, 王伏琴, 李阳, 马国军, 郭俊驿. 土壤调理剂缓解玉米盐碱胁迫损伤效应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(11):3053-3062.doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202411.013.
	He W W, Yue J M, Wang F Q, Li Y, Ma G J, Guo J Y. Effect of soil conditioner on alleviating saline-alkali stress damage of maize[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2024, 35(11):3053-3062. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202411.013
[22]	Yang M, Ji C X, Chao K, Zhu P F, Yuan X Q, Hao Z H, Wang X L, Shi Y. Enhanced wheat yield and flag leaf physiology in saline-alkali soils using modified straw water-retaining agent[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2025, 307:109264.doi:10.1016/J.AGWAT.2024.109264. URL
[23]	刘盼盼, 褚睿, 刘召梅, 王鑫, 鲁鹏飞, 陈书霞. 不同盐碱水平对黄瓜幼苗生长及生理特性的影响[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2026, 49(3):491-501.doi:10.7685/jnau.202502025.
	Liu P P, Chu R, Liu Z M, Wang X, Lu P F, Chen S X. Effects of different levels of saline-alkali on the growth and physiological characteristics of cucumber seedlings[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2026, 49(3):491-501.
[24]	Liu B, Jia P Y, Zou J S, Ren H X, Xi M, Jiang Z X. Improving soil properties and Sesbania growth through combined organic amendment strategies in a coastal saline-alkali soil[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2025, 374:124041.doi:10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2025.124041. URL
[25]	武晋民, 白小龙, 张恩, 张邦彦, 张百含, 刘盼婷, 田丰, 赵卉, 王彬. 改良物料投入对内蒙盐碱地土壤理化性状、玉米光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2025, 34(8):1467-1475.doi:10.7606/j.issn.1004-1389.2025.08.010.
	Wu J M, Bai X L, Zhang E, Zhang B Y, Zhang B H, Liu P T, Tian F, Zhao H, Wang B. Effects of improved materials on soil physical and chemical properties,photosynthetic characteristics and maize yield in saline-alkali land in Inner Mongolia[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica, 2025, 34(8):1467-1475.
[26]	王莉莉, 谭军利, 陈欣, 王西娜, 田军仓. 土壤调理剂对盐碱地土壤盐分、pH值及麒麟西瓜产量的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2024, 42(4):145-154.doi:10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2024.04.16.
	Wang L L, Tan J L, Chen X, Wang X N, Tian J C. Effects of soil conditioner on soil salinity,pH of saline-alkali soil,and yield of Kirin watermelon[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2024, 42(4):145-154.
[27]	贾艳丽, 张洪发, 刘桂霞, 黄素芳, 屈新月, 岳明强, 韩佳婷, 徐玉鹏, 刘青松. 生物硫调理剂对盐碱地苜蓿产量、品质及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2025(5):86-92.doi:10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2025.05.012.
	Jia Y L, Zhang H F, Liu G X, Huang S F, Qu X Y, Yue M Q, Han J T, Xu Y P, Liu Q S. Effects of biological sulfur regulator on the yield,quality of alfalfa and soil physicochemical properties in saline-alkali land[J]. Crops, 2025(5):86-92.

处理 Treatment	株高/cm Plant height		茎粗/cm Stem thickness		叶绿素相对含量(SPAD值) Relative chlorophyll content(SPAD)		净光合速率/(μmol/(m²·s)) Net photosynthetic rate
处理 Treatment	60 d	90 d	60 d	90 d	60 d	90 d	60 d	90 d
T1	32.80±1.02e	38.00±3.27d	0.37±0.04g	0.55±0.04ab	38.20±0.54cd	40.20±1.17ab	—	13.50±1.90a
T2	50.30±1.64a	53.00±1.73ab	0.50±0.01ab	0.63±0.03a	43.40±1.06a	43.00±0.70a	—	14.60±1.07a
T3	40.00±3.27bcd	53.00±1.73ab	0.45±0.02abcdef	0.44±0.19b	39.60±1.14bc	38.20±0.94ab	—	5.90±0.29b
T4	33.00±1.08e	43.00±1.40cd	0.52±0.02a	0.53±0.01ab	37.20±1.52cdef	40.70±1.33ab	—	1.70±0.06fg
T5	44.00±1.63abc	47.00±2.86abc	0.50±0.00ab	0.60±0.00ab	37.10±0.08cdef	43.60±0.65a	—	7.40±1.06ab
T6	44.70±6.41ab	44.00±3.74cd	0.49±0.01abcd	0.52±0.08ab	37.60±0.29cde	37.40±5.30ab	—	4.70±2.45cd
T7	37.10±1.51cde	37.00±2.62d	0.41±0.04fg	0.57±0.07ab	35.20±0.97efg	33.70±1.43bc	—	4.00±0.98cdef
T8	36.10±3.39de	46.00±5.35bc	0.44±0.05bcdef	0.53±0.06ab	33.30±0.40g	37.80±7.92ab	—	1.60±0.29g
T9	40.00±0.00bcd	48.00±0.41abc	0.42±0.02defg	0.56±0.04ab	37.50±1.33cde	38.30±4.41ab	—	6.30±0.24b
T10	43.00±5.14bcd	42.00±4.90cd	0.51±0.01ab	0.50±0.03ab	38.60±1.18cd	38.60±3.92ab	—	7.40±1.04ab
T11	32.00±1.13e	39.00±2.17d	0.33±0.06g	0.43±0.14b	29.90±0.64h	33.40±1.13bc	—	3.30±1.11defg
T12	41.00±3.17bcd	47.00±7.36abc	0.45±0.04abcdef	0.58±0.07ab	35.30±1.28efg	36.90±2.99ab	—	4.10±1.22cde
T13	44.80±1.59ab	54.00±1.76a	0.42±0.05efg	0.55±0.02ab	36.80±0.57def	41.40±1.01a	—	1.40±0.03g
T14	43.30±1.00bc	44.00±0.41cd	0.47±0.05abcdef	0.55±0.10ab	29.40±1.71h	29.60±2.65c	—	6.00±0.15b
T15	40.30±0.61bcd	41.00±1.22cd	0.48±0.00abcde	0.52±0.01ab	34.50±0.24fg	38.40±0.37ab	—	3.50±0.09defg
T16	38.70±4.71bcde	42.00±4.08cd	0.49±0.00abcd	0.57±0.02ab	33.10±2.10g	36.80±3.53ab	—	2.00±0.94efg
T17	38.50±2.65bcde	37.00±1.63d	0.43±0.02cdefg	0.47±0.05ab	41.80±1.96ab	41.70±1.73a	—	2.30±0.37efg

处理 Treatment	株高/cm Plant height		茎粗/cm Stem thickness		叶绿素相对含量(SPAD值) Relative chlorophyll content(SPAD)		净光合速率/(μmol/(m²·s)) Net photosynthetic rate
处理 Treatment	60 d	90 d	60 d	90 d	60 d	90 d	60 d	90 d
T1	32.80±1.02e	38.00±3.27d	0.37±0.04g	0.55±0.04ab	38.20±0.54cd	40.20±1.17ab	—	13.50±1.90a
T2	50.30±1.64a	53.00±1.73ab	0.50±0.01ab	0.63±0.03a	43.40±1.06a	43.00±0.70a	—	14.60±1.07a
T3	40.00±3.27bcd	53.00±1.73ab	0.45±0.02abcdef	0.44±0.19b	39.60±1.14bc	38.20±0.94ab	—	5.90±0.29b
T4	33.00±1.08e	43.00±1.40cd	0.52±0.02a	0.53±0.01ab	37.20±1.52cdef	40.70±1.33ab	—	1.70±0.06fg
T5	44.00±1.63abc	47.00±2.86abc	0.50±0.00ab	0.60±0.00ab	37.10±0.08cdef	43.60±0.65a	—	7.40±1.06ab
T6	44.70±6.41ab	44.00±3.74cd	0.49±0.01abcd	0.52±0.08ab	37.60±0.29cde	37.40±5.30ab	—	4.70±2.45cd
T7	37.10±1.51cde	37.00±2.62d	0.41±0.04fg	0.57±0.07ab	35.20±0.97efg	33.70±1.43bc	—	4.00±0.98cdef
T8	36.10±3.39de	46.00±5.35bc	0.44±0.05bcdef	0.53±0.06ab	33.30±0.40g	37.80±7.92ab	—	1.60±0.29g
T9	40.00±0.00bcd	48.00±0.41abc	0.42±0.02defg	0.56±0.04ab	37.50±1.33cde	38.30±4.41ab	—	6.30±0.24b
T10	43.00±5.14bcd	42.00±4.90cd	0.51±0.01ab	0.50±0.03ab	38.60±1.18cd	38.60±3.92ab	—	7.40±1.04ab
T11	32.00±1.13e	39.00±2.17d	0.33±0.06g	0.43±0.14b	29.90±0.64h	33.40±1.13bc	—	3.30±1.11defg
T12	41.00±3.17bcd	47.00±7.36abc	0.45±0.04abcdef	0.58±0.07ab	35.30±1.28efg	36.90±2.99ab	—	4.10±1.22cde
T13	44.80±1.59ab	54.00±1.76a	0.42±0.05efg	0.55±0.02ab	36.80±0.57def	41.40±1.01a	—	1.40±0.03g
T14	43.30±1.00bc	44.00±0.41cd	0.47±0.05abcdef	0.55±0.10ab	29.40±1.71h	29.60±2.65c	—	6.00±0.15b
T15	40.30±0.61bcd	41.00±1.22cd	0.48±0.00abcde	0.52±0.01ab	34.50±0.24fg	38.40±0.37ab	—	3.50±0.09defg
T16	38.70±4.71bcde	42.00±4.08cd	0.49±0.00abcd	0.57±0.02ab	33.10±2.10g	36.80±3.53ab	—	2.00±0.94efg
T17	38.50±2.65bcde	37.00±1.63d	0.43±0.02cdefg	0.47±0.05ab	41.80±1.96ab	41.70±1.73a	—	2.30±0.37efg

处理 Treatment	碱性磷酸酶活性/(mg/(g·d)) Alkaline phosphatase activity	脲酶活性/ (mg/(g·d)) Urease activity
T1	3.01±0.11a	0.98±0.13d
T2	2.36±0.04d	1.45±0.18bc
T3	2.41±0.03d	1.31±0.20cd
T4	2.49±0.18bcd	1.22±0.18cd
T5	2.73±0.09bc	1.85±0.23a
T6	2.51±0.16bcd	1.93±0.06a
T7	2.49±0.07bcd	1.92±0.27a
T8	2.35±0.07d	1.68±0.15ab
T9	2.44±0.04cd	1.92±0.04a
T10	2.53±0.03bcd	1.80±0.10ab
T11	2.41±0.03d	1.77±0.07ab
T12	2.43±0.27d	1.84±0.24a
T13	2.61±0.30bcd	1.92±0.10a
T14	2.34±0.10d	1.92±0.24a
T15	2.75±0.05ab	1.97±0.05a
T16	2.42±0.07d	1.74±0.04ab
T17	2.57±0.03bcd	1.86±0.14a

处理 Treatment	碱性磷酸酶活性/(mg/(g·d)) Alkaline phosphatase activity	脲酶活性/ (mg/(g·d)) Urease activity
T1	3.01±0.11a	0.98±0.13d
T2	2.36±0.04d	1.45±0.18bc
T3	2.41±0.03d	1.31±0.20cd
T4	2.49±0.18bcd	1.22±0.18cd
T5	2.73±0.09bc	1.85±0.23a
T6	2.51±0.16bcd	1.93±0.06a
T7	2.49±0.07bcd	1.92±0.27a
T8	2.35±0.07d	1.68±0.15ab
T9	2.44±0.04cd	1.92±0.04a
T10	2.53±0.03bcd	1.80±0.10ab
T11	2.41±0.03d	1.77±0.07ab
T12	2.43±0.27d	1.84±0.24a
T13	2.61±0.30bcd	1.92±0.10a
T14	2.34±0.10d	1.92±0.24a
T15	2.75±0.05ab	1.97±0.05a
T16	2.42±0.07d	1.74±0.04ab
T17	2.57±0.03bcd	1.86±0.14a

处理 Treatment	w(Ca²⁺)	w(Mg²⁺)	w(K⁺)	w(Na⁺)	w(${\mathrm{H}\mathrm{C}\mathrm{O}}_{3}^{-}$)	w(Cl^-)	w(SO₄^2-)
T1	0.20±0.01c	0.15±0.00d	0.03±0.00b	1.13±0.05bcd	0.03±0.00b	0.14±0.01c	0.17±0.01cd
T2	0.19±0.01cd	0.19±0.00b	0.04±0.00ab	1.13±0.05bcd	0.03±0.00b	0.14±0.01c	0.19±0.01ab
T3	0.19±0.01cd	0.12±0.00f	0.03±0.00b	1.07±0.04cde	0.03±0.00b	0.14±0.01c	0.15±0.01ef
T4	0.18±0.01de	0.17±0.00c	0.03±0.00b	1.07±0.04cde	0.03±0.00b	0.14±0.01c	0.14±0.01ef
T5	0.17±0.01ef	0.12±0.00f	0.04±0.00ab	1.05±0.04cde	0.03±0.00b	0.11±0.00f	0.16±0.01de
T6	0.17±0.01ef	0.07±0.00h	0.03±0.00b	0.87±0.04g	0.03±0.00b	0.09±0.00g	0.11±0.01g
T7	0.22±0.01b	0.11±0.00g	0.04±0.00ab	1.13±0.05bcd	0.03±0.00b	0.15±0.01c	0.16±0.01de
T8	0.22±0.01b	0.11±0.00g	0.03±0.00b	1.16±0.05bc	0.03±0.00b	0.13±0.01d	0.16±0.01de
T9	0.17±0.01ef	0.16±0.00c	0.04±0.00ab	1.12±0.05bcd	0.04±0.00a	0.12±0.01e	0.18±0.01bc
T10	0.22±0.01b	0.11±0.00g	0.03±0.00b	0.93±0.04fg	0.03±0.00b	0.10±0.00g	0.15±0.01eg
T11	0.26±0.01a	0.14±0.00e	0.04±0.00ab	1.21±0.05b	0.03±0.00b	0.15±0.01c	0.18±0.01bc
T12	0.18±0.01de	0.11±0.00g	0.04±0.00ab	1.06±0.04cde	0.03±0.00b	0.12±0.00e	0.14±0.01ef
T13	0.23±0.01b	0.16±0.00c	0.05±0.00a	1.33±0.05a	0.03±0.00b	0.18±0.01a	0.17±0.01cd
T14	0.18±0.01de	0.16±0.00c	0.03±0.00b	0.97±0.04ef	0.03±0.00b	0.12±0.00e	0.18±0.01bc
T15	0.19±0.01cd	0.20±0.00a	0.03±0.00b	1.09±0.04cd	0.03±0.00b	0.16±0.01b	0.20±0.01a
T16	0.22±0.01b	0.16±0.00c	0.04±0.00ab	1.15±0.04bc	0.02±0.00c	0.11±0.00f	0.16±0.01de
T17	0.19±0.01cd	0.15±0.00d	0.03±0.00b	1.09±0.04cd	0.03±0.00b	0.13±0.01d	0.19±0.01ab

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export