Effects of Yield and Light Use of Basic Seedling and Row Spacing on Shannong 38

doi:10.7668/hbnxb.20193245

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to perfect the cultivation technique of the new variety Shannong 38 for large-scale promotion.The experiment set a total of 15 processes that including 5 basic seedlings and 3 row spacing.This study analysed effects of yield,photosynthetic index and light use efficiency on wheat.The results showed that: the basic seedling treatment had great influence on each index,the difference was significant,the row spacing was next.The yield of 225×10⁴ plants/ha basic seedlings and 23 cm row spacing was reasonable and high yield was obtained.In the same period,the population photosynthetic rate increased with the increase of basic seedlings and row spacing,and decreased gradually with the increase of basic seedlings and row spacing.GS was consistent with transpiration rate,and contrary to intercellular CO₂ concentration.That with the growth period showed a first increase and then a decrease trend,with the increase of the basic seedlings gradually increased.Fv/Fm decreased significantly only in high density treatment of B5,and other treatments had no significant difference.The effective radiation amount and the interception rate of light radiation increased with the increase of basic seedlings and decreased with the increase of row spacing,there was no significant difference in effective radiation quantity and light interception rate under high density treatment,and no significant difference in row spacing treatment under high density treatment.

Key words: Wheat, Yield, Utilization of light, Basic seedling, Row spacing

ZHUANG Wenfeng, ZHAI Jun, LIU Chao, LI Dezheng, KONG Lingrang, LI Anfei, YANG Meng. Effects of Yield and Light Use of Basic Seedling and Row Spacing on Shannong 38[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2023, 38(S1): 95-101. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20193245.

/ / Recommend / Download Citations

URL: http://www.hbnxb.net/EN/10.7668/hbnxb.20193245

http://www.hbnxb.net/EN/Y2023/V38/IS1/95

Figures/Tables 8

References 22

[1]	赵广才, 常旭虹, 王德梅, 陶志强, 王艳杰, 杨玉双, 朱英杰. 小麦生产概况及其发展[J]. 作物杂志, 2018(4): 1-7.doi:10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2018.04.001.
	Zhao G C, Chang X H, Wang D M, Tao Z Q, Wang Y J, Yang Y S, Zhu Y J. General situation and development of wheat production[J]. Crops, 2018(4): 1-7.
[2]	孔令英, 赵俊晔, 骆兰平, 石玉, 于振文. 宽幅播种条件下基本苗密度对小麦耗水特性和籽粒产量的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2020, 52(4):27-31.doi: 10.14083/j.issn.1001-4942.2020.04.005.
	Kong L Y, Zhao J Y, Luo L P, Shi Y, Yu Z W. Effects of basic seedling density on water consumption characteristics and grain yield of wheat under wide sowing[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 52(4):27-31.
[3]	田欣, 孙敏, 高志强, 张娟, 林文, 薛建福, 杨珍平, 莫非. 播期播量对旱地小麦土壤水分消耗和植株氮素运转的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(10): 3443-3451.doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.201910.028.
	Tian X, Sun M, Gao Z Q, Zhang J, Lin W, Xue J F, Yang Z P, Mo F. Effects of sowing date and seeding rate on soil water consumption and plant nitrogen translocation in dryland wheat[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(10): 3443-3451.
[4]	Yi Z H, Cui J J, Fu Y M, Liu H. Effect of different light intensity on physiology,antioxidant capacity and photosynthetic characteristics on wheat seedlings under high CO₂ concentration in a closed artificial ecosystem[J]. Photosynthesis Research, 2020, 144(1): 23-34.doi:10.1007/s11120-020-00726-x.
[5]	董树亭, 高荣岐. 玉米花粒期群体光合性能与高产潜力研究[J]. 作物学报, 1997(3): 318-325.doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.1997.03.010.
	Dong S T, Gao R Q. Study on photosynthetic performance and high yield potential of maize population at flowering and grain stage[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 1997(3): 318-325.
[6]	吴玉娥, 薛香, 郜庆炉, 段爱旺, 杨文平. 行距对超高产小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2004, 24(3): 84-86.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-1041.2004.03.022.
	Wu Y E, Xue X, Gao Q L, Duan A W, Yang W P. Effect of row spacing on grain yield and quality of super-high yielding wheat[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2004, 24(3): 84-86.
[7]	柴芳梅, 高甜甜, 柴守玺, 程宏波, 宋亚丽, 鲁清林. 种植密度对甘肃不同生态区小麦产量形成的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2020(3): 154-160.doi:10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2020.03.024.
	Chai F M, Gao T T, Chai S X, Cheng H B, Song Y L, Lu Q L. Effects of planting density on wheat yield formation in different ecological regions of Gansu Province[J]. Crops, 2020(3): 154-160.
[8]	卢杰, 董连生, 常成, 司红起, 马传喜. 种植密度对不同小麦品种产量构成及抗倒伏性的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2021, 41(1):81-87.doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1009-1041.2021.01.10.
	Lu J, Dong L S, Chang C, Si H Q, Ma C X. Effect of planting density on yield composition and lodging resistance of different wheat varieties[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2021, 41(1):81-87.
[9]	师日鹏, 上官宇先, 李娜, 周芳, 韩坤, 王林权. 播种量和施氮量对垄沟覆膜栽培冬小麦花后生理性状的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23(3): 758-764.
	Shi R P, Shangguan Y X, Li N, Zhou F, Han K, Wang L Q. Effects of seeding rate and nitrogen fertilization rate on physiological traits of winter wheat after anthesis in a field with plastic mulched rides and unmulched furrows[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2012, 23(3): 758-764.
[10]	张向前, 杜世州, 曹承富, 乔玉强, 赵竹, 张耀兰. 烟农19叶绿素荧光、光合特性及产量对播期和密度的响应[J]. 华北农学报, 2014, 29(2): 133-140.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7601.2013.01.004.
	Zhang X Q, Du S Z, Cao C F, Qiao Y Q, Zhao Z, Zhang Y L. Response of chlorophyll fluorescence,photosynthetic characteristics and yield of Yannong 19 to sowing date and density[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2014, 29(2): 133-140.
[11]	Maddonni G A, Otegui M E, Cirilo A G. Plant population density,row spacing and hybrid effects on maize canopy architecture and light attenuation[J]. Field Crops Research, 2001, 71(3): 183-193.doi:10.1016/S0378-4290(01)00158-7. URL
[12]	Andrade F H,Calviño P,Cirilo A,Barbieri P. Yield responses to narrow rows depend on increased radiation interception[J]. Agronomy Journal,2002,94(5): 975-980.doi:10.2134/agronj2002.9750.
[13]	Sharratt B S, McWilliams D A. Microclimatic and rooting characteristics of narrow-row versus conventional-row corn[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2005, 97(4): 1129-1135.doi:10.2134/agronj2004.0292. URL
[14]	毕常锐, 白志英, 杨訸, 李存东, 郑金风, 李东晓, 唐光雷. 种植密度对小麦群体光能资源利用的调控效应[J]. 华北农学报, 2010, 25(5):171-176.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2009.26.040.
	Bi C R, Bai Z Y, Yang H, Li C D, Zheng J F, Li D X, Tang G L. Effects of planting densities on radiation resource utilization of the wheat colony[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2010, 25(5):171-176. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2010.05.035
[15]	张明伟, 王梦尧, 马泉, 丁锦峰, 朱敏, 李春燕, 朱新开, 封超年, 郭文善. 密度对稻茬晚播小麦¹⁵N积累、分配与利用特征的影响[J]. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2021, 42(1): 92-97.doi:10.16872/j.cnki.1671-4652.2021.01.017.
	Zhang M W, Wang M Y, Ma Q, Ding J F, Zhu M, Li C Y, Zhu X K, Feng C N, Guo W S. Effects of density on characteristics of ¹⁵N accumulation,distribution and utilization of late-sowing wheat in rice-wheat rotation[J]. Journal of Yangzhou University (Agricultural and Life Science Edition), 2021, 42(1): 92-97.
[16]	Widdicombe W D, Thelen K D. Row width and plant density effects on corn grain production in the Northern corn belt[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2002, 94(5): 1020-1023.doi:10.2134/agronj2002.1020. URL
[17]	董二伟, 王劲松, 焦晓燕, 武爱莲, 南江宽, 郭珺, 王立革. 栽培模式对晋杂34产量及氮素吸收利用的调控效应[J]. 华北农学报, 2019, 34(1): 196-203.doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.201751208.
	Dong E W, Wang J S, Jiao X Y, Wu A L, Nan J K, Guo J, Wang L G. Effects of cultivation patterns on yield and nitrogen uptake and utilization of Jinza 34[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2019, 34(1): 196-203. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.201751208
[18]	何冬冬, 杨恒山, 张玉芹. 扩行距、缩株距对春玉米冠层结构及产量的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2018, 26(3):397-408.doi: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.170623.
	He D D, Yang H S, Zhang Y Q. Effects of line-spacing expansion and row-spacing shrinkage on canopy structure and yield of spring corn[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2018, 26(3):397-408.
[19]	殷复伟, 王文鑫, 谷淑波, 王东. 株行距配置对宽幅播种小麦产量形成的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2018, 38(6): 710-717.doi:10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.170623.
	Yin F W, Wang W X, Gu S B, Wang D. Effect of planting distance configuration repression on wheat yield formation with wide planting[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2018, 38(6): 710-717.
[20]	田文仲, 张媛菲, 马雯, 张少澜, 冯伟森, 张园, 蒋桂花, 段国辉, 温红霞, 杨洪强, 高海涛. 行距和播量配比对高产小麦品种洛麦23群体质量及产量的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2018, 27(3): 347-353.doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1004-1389.2018.03.007.
	Tian W Z, Zhang Y F, Ma W, Zhang S L, Feng W S, Zhang Y, Jiang G H, Duan G H, Wen H X, Yang H Q, Gao H T. Effect of ratio of row spacing to seeding rate on quality and yield of high yield wheat Luomai 23[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica, 2018, 27(3): 347-353.
[21]	马韫韬, 郭焱, 李保国. 应用三维数字化仪对玉米植株叶片方位分布的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2006, 32(6):791-798.doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2006.06.001.
	Ma Y T, Guo Y, Li B G. Azimuthal distribution of maize plant leaves determined by 3D digitizer[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2006, 32(6):791-798.
[22]	赵海新, 杨丽敏, 陈书强, 姜树坤, 黄晓群, 单莉莉, 潘国君. 行距对两个不同类型水稻品种冠层结构与产量的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2011, 25(5): 488-494.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2011.05.006.
	Zhao H X, Yang L M, Chen S Q, Jiang S K, Huang X Q, Shan L L, Pan G J. Effects of row-spacing on canopy structure and yield in different type rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2011, 25(5): 488-494.

行距 Line space	基本苗 Basic seedling	越冬期 Over-wintering	返青期 Revival	拔节期 Jointing	开花期 Anthesis	成熟期 Maturity
A1	B1	546.9±50.3e	673.9±68.0e	968.7±93.5d	566.6±52.1c	539.1±52.7c
	B2	615.3±59.4cd	862.2±84.6d	1 070.6±98.6c	586.5±54.3c	584.3±56.3c
	B3	732.9±65.3c	1 026.0±92.4bc	1 131.2±103.6c	718.8±73.2a	704.6±70.0a
	B4	891.9±84.9b	1 177.3±112.2ab	1 312.7±124.1b	727.0±69.5a	708.1±70.6a
	B5	1 093.8±102.5a	1 215.0±114.6a	1 478.0±135.9a	739.2±72.6a	712.8±69.9a
A2	B1	549.6±52.6e	667.0±58.4e	940.4±92.7d	562.6±54.3c	537.4±54.4c
	B2	599.3±58.3cd	857.1±79.1d	1 028.5±96.8cd	604.1±59.6c	587.6±57.6c
	B3	694.3±65.2c	953.0±92.6c	1 143.6±106.3c	713.6±69.8a	702.6±75.1a
	B4	872.1±89.6b	1 124.3±104.3b	1 349.1±114.5b	722.5±70.4a	704.6±70.9a
	B5	1 055.9±96.2a	1 230.6±115.5a	1 476.7±132.4a	727.2±71.3a	711.5±72.4a
A3	B1	539.7±60.1e	650.8±60.7e	980.9±92.4d	514.6±50.9d	508.6±50.8d
	B2	599.2±59.5cd	875.3±86.6d	990.4±93.6d	556.0±52.4d	530.2±51.6c
	B3	683.6±69.7c	943.1±90.6c	1 100.7±99.2c	659.4±63.8b	655.4±62.1b
	B4	881.3±90.6b	1 084.1±102.9bc	1 301.0±114.7b	687.7±64.2b	677.2±64.3b
	B5	1 078.7±100.4a	1 151.1±114.6ab	1 381.3±126.4b	694.3±67.2b	675.2±69.1b

行距 Line space	基本苗 Basic seedling	越冬期 Over-wintering	返青期 Revival	拔节期 Jointing	开花期 Anthesis	成熟期 Maturity
A1	B1	546.9±50.3e	673.9±68.0e	968.7±93.5d	566.6±52.1c	539.1±52.7c
	B2	615.3±59.4cd	862.2±84.6d	1 070.6±98.6c	586.5±54.3c	584.3±56.3c
	B3	732.9±65.3c	1 026.0±92.4bc	1 131.2±103.6c	718.8±73.2a	704.6±70.0a
	B4	891.9±84.9b	1 177.3±112.2ab	1 312.7±124.1b	727.0±69.5a	708.1±70.6a
	B5	1 093.8±102.5a	1 215.0±114.6a	1 478.0±135.9a	739.2±72.6a	712.8±69.9a
A2	B1	549.6±52.6e	667.0±58.4e	940.4±92.7d	562.6±54.3c	537.4±54.4c
	B2	599.3±58.3cd	857.1±79.1d	1 028.5±96.8cd	604.1±59.6c	587.6±57.6c
	B3	694.3±65.2c	953.0±92.6c	1 143.6±106.3c	713.6±69.8a	702.6±75.1a
	B4	872.1±89.6b	1 124.3±104.3b	1 349.1±114.5b	722.5±70.4a	704.6±70.9a
	B5	1 055.9±96.2a	1 230.6±115.5a	1 476.7±132.4a	727.2±71.3a	711.5±72.4a
A3	B1	539.7±60.1e	650.8±60.7e	980.9±92.4d	514.6±50.9d	508.6±50.8d
	B2	599.2±59.5cd	875.3±86.6d	990.4±93.6d	556.0±52.4d	530.2±51.6c
	B3	683.6±69.7c	943.1±90.6c	1 100.7±99.2c	659.4±63.8b	655.4±62.1b
	B4	881.3±90.6b	1 084.1±102.9bc	1 301.0±114.7b	687.7±64.2b	677.2±64.3b
	B5	1 078.7±100.4a	1 151.1±114.6ab	1 381.3±126.4b	694.3±67.2b	675.2±69.1b

年度 Year	基本苗 Basic seedling	行距 Line space	穗数/(穗/hm²) Spike number	穗粒数/(粒/穗) Kernels per spike	千粒质量/g Thousand kernel	产量/(kg/hm²) Yield
2019	A1	B1	463.5±30.6f	39.3±1.3bc	48.1±0.3a	8 345.40±361.2f
		B2	497.5±25.3ef	37.7±1.1c	47.3±0.2ab	8 451.90±427.5ef
		B3	610.4±43.9c	36.5±2.6d	45.4±0.3c	9 609.20±435.9a
		B4	630.8±40.6b	35.6±1.8de	43.9±0.2d	9 616.50±462.1a
		B5	634.5±41.2b	34.8±2.6i	43.8±0.2d	8 730.80±340.5e
	A2	B1	448.3±31.1f	41.3±2.1b	48.5±0.3a	8 563.30±411.8de
		B2	483.1±25.6ef	42.4±1.3a	46.5±0.4b	9 105.10±443.7c
		B3	567.1±36.4de	40.6±1.2bc	46.2±0.2b	10 110.70±621.4a
		B4	613.2±37.2c	37.3±1.4c	44.9±0.4c	9 750.20±521.6a
		B5	616.4±41.6c	35.8±2.1h	43.8±0.3d	8 547.93±432.1ef
	A3	B1	422.5±22.4g	42.8±1.6a	48.5±0.4a	8 384.03±349.5ef
		B2	459.3±26.7f	42.7±1.4a	47.5±0.2ab	8 797.51±460.2de
		B3	533.2±36.7e	41.8±1.6b	45.7±0.3c	9 456.86±438.2b
		B4	586.7±39.2d	37.2±1.2c	44.9±0.3c	9 291.97±533.7b
		B5	585.0±38.7d	33.2±1.7g	44.4±0.5cd	8 583.24±507.5g
2020	A1	B1	539.1±31.4de	34.2±1.1f	41.9±0.3ef	7 895.52±461.3gh
		B2	584.3±40.6d	32.8±0.6h	41.2±0.2f	7 768.80±558.3gh
		B3	704.6±55.4a	31.8±1.1i	39.6±0.4g	8 841.29±310.7d
		B4	708.1±56.1a	31.2±1.2i	39.2±0.3g	8 403.72±219.8ef
		B5	712.8±52.4a	29.7±0.9j	38.5±0.4g	7 716.66±360.4i
	A2	B1	537.4±33.7de	35.9±1.3de	42.2±0.3ef	7 870.66±338.7g
		B2	587.6±32.1d	36.9±1.7cd	42.0±0.6ef	8 324.30±395.2f
		B3	702.6±59.7a	35.3±0.5e	40.3±0.4f	9 288.12±462.2b
		B4	704.6±50.8a	32.5±1.4h	39.0±0.4g	8 737.89±472.9de
		B5	711.5±61.3a	29.5±1.2j	39.0±0.3g	7 852.20±326.1h
	A3	B1	508.6±42.6ef	37.2±3.1c	42.2±0.4ef	7 692.46±428.1gh
		B2	530.2±36.5e	37.1±1.2c	42.8±0.3e	7 747.57±466.2gh
		B3	655.4±39.6b	36.4±0.8d	40.7±0.2f	9 106.18±561.3c
		B4	677.2±50.7b	32.4±0.9h	39.0±0.3g	8 556.61±508.7de
		B5	675.2±47.2b	29.8±1.1j	38.9±0.4g	7 729.90±516.8i

年度 Year	基本苗 Basic seedling	行距 Line space	穗数/(穗/hm²) Spike number	穗粒数/(粒/穗) Kernels per spike	千粒质量/g Thousand kernel	产量/(kg/hm²) Yield
2019	A1	B1	463.5±30.6f	39.3±1.3bc	48.1±0.3a	8 345.40±361.2f
		B2	497.5±25.3ef	37.7±1.1c	47.3±0.2ab	8 451.90±427.5ef
		B3	610.4±43.9c	36.5±2.6d	45.4±0.3c	9 609.20±435.9a
		B4	630.8±40.6b	35.6±1.8de	43.9±0.2d	9 616.50±462.1a
		B5	634.5±41.2b	34.8±2.6i	43.8±0.2d	8 730.80±340.5e
	A2	B1	448.3±31.1f	41.3±2.1b	48.5±0.3a	8 563.30±411.8de
		B2	483.1±25.6ef	42.4±1.3a	46.5±0.4b	9 105.10±443.7c
		B3	567.1±36.4de	40.6±1.2bc	46.2±0.2b	10 110.70±621.4a
		B4	613.2±37.2c	37.3±1.4c	44.9±0.4c	9 750.20±521.6a
		B5	616.4±41.6c	35.8±2.1h	43.8±0.3d	8 547.93±432.1ef
	A3	B1	422.5±22.4g	42.8±1.6a	48.5±0.4a	8 384.03±349.5ef
		B2	459.3±26.7f	42.7±1.4a	47.5±0.2ab	8 797.51±460.2de
		B3	533.2±36.7e	41.8±1.6b	45.7±0.3c	9 456.86±438.2b
		B4	586.7±39.2d	37.2±1.2c	44.9±0.3c	9 291.97±533.7b
		B5	585.0±38.7d	33.2±1.7g	44.4±0.5cd	8 583.24±507.5g
2020	A1	B1	539.1±31.4de	34.2±1.1f	41.9±0.3ef	7 895.52±461.3gh
		B2	584.3±40.6d	32.8±0.6h	41.2±0.2f	7 768.80±558.3gh
		B3	704.6±55.4a	31.8±1.1i	39.6±0.4g	8 841.29±310.7d
		B4	708.1±56.1a	31.2±1.2i	39.2±0.3g	8 403.72±219.8ef
		B5	712.8±52.4a	29.7±0.9j	38.5±0.4g	7 716.66±360.4i
	A2	B1	537.4±33.7de	35.9±1.3de	42.2±0.3ef	7 870.66±338.7g
		B2	587.6±32.1d	36.9±1.7cd	42.0±0.6ef	8 324.30±395.2f
		B3	702.6±59.7a	35.3±0.5e	40.3±0.4f	9 288.12±462.2b
		B4	704.6±50.8a	32.5±1.4h	39.0±0.4g	8 737.89±472.9de
		B5	711.5±61.3a	29.5±1.2j	39.0±0.3g	7 852.20±326.1h
	A3	B1	508.6±42.6ef	37.2±3.1c	42.2±0.4ef	7 692.46±428.1gh
		B2	530.2±36.5e	37.1±1.2c	42.8±0.3e	7 747.57±466.2gh
		B3	655.4±39.6b	36.4±0.8d	40.7±0.2f	9 106.18±561.3c
		B4	677.2±50.7b	32.4±0.9h	39.0±0.3g	8 556.61±508.7de
		B5	675.2±47.2b	29.8±1.1j	38.9±0.4g	7 729.90±516.8i

行距 Line space	基本苗 Basic seedling	有效辐射/(μmol/(m²·s)) Canopy photo synthetically active radiation interception				光辐射截获率/% Canopy light interception rate
行距 Line space	基本苗 Basic seedling	0	10	20	30	0	10	20	30
A1	B1	1 288±114.5d	1 322±124.5d	1 146±104.4e	1 037±99.6d	0.79±0.062d	0.82±0.079c	0.71±0.068d	0.64±0.053c
	B2	1 361±125.3c	1 394±127.4c	1 229±118.3d	1 109±102.4c	0.84±0.069c	0.86±0.074c	0.76±0.069c	0.68±0.061c
	B3	1 507±146.4a	1 568±149.1a	1 437±139.6a	1 321±122.5a	0.93±0.084a	0.97±0.096a	0.89±0.082a	0.81±0.074a
	B4	1 516±143.2a	1 587±152.8a	1 429±142.7a	1 334±135.4a	0.93±0.086a	0.98±0.095a	0.88±0.080a	0.82±0.072a
	B5	1 519±150.6a	1 588±159.6a	1 419±140.1a	1 306±120.3a	0.93±0.081a	0.98±0.096a	0.87±0.083a	0.81±0.075a
A2	B1	1 267±116.3d	1 306±123.7d	1 109±110.2e	1 029±100.5d	0.78±0.064d	0.81±0.075c	0.68±0.059d	0.63±0.059c
	B2	1 352±124.6c	1 329±130.6d	1 228±118.6d	1 104±103.4c	0.83±0.075c	0.82±0.078c	0.76±0.072c	0.68±0.063c
	B3	1 460±138.7b	1 496±144.9b	1 328±124.9b	1 301±121.9a	0.90±0.083b	0.92±0.083b	0.82±0.076b	0.80±0.071a
	B4	1 491±139.2b	1 523±150.4b	1 321±126.2b	1 295±114.8a	0.92±0.080a	0.94±0.091b	0.81±0.074b	0.80±0.072a
	B5	1 488±150.1b	1 527±150.4b	1 307±128.2b	1 287±120.7b	0.92±0.092a	0.94±0.093b	0.81±0.075b	0.79±0.078b
A3	B1	1 253±113.9d	1 302±126.7d	1 132±107.7e	1 005±98.2d	0.77±0.068d	0.80±0.072c	0.70±0.063d	0.62±0.060c
	B2	1 367±131.8c	1 386±135.1c	1 237±116.5d	1 069±99.3d	0.84±0.081c	0.85±0.080c	0.76±0.061c	0.66±0.065c
	B3	1 495±150.6a	1 506±146.3b	1 340±124.3b	1 238±123.7b	0.92±0.087a	0.93±0.089b	0.83±0.074b	0.76±0.069b
	B4	1 496±148.2a	1 527±151.6b	1 349±130.6b	1 266±130.2b	0.92±0.094a	0.94±0.092b	0.83±0.078b	0.78±0.074b
	B5	1 497±145.9a	1 509±147.5b	1 300±128.8c	1 251±124.6b	0.92±0.093a	0.93±0.090b	0.80±0.071b	0.78±0.070b

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export