华北农学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 125-134. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2017.01.020

所属专题: 水稻

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同栽培模式下水稻各生育期光合生理指标的比较研究

王志军1, 叶春秀1, 李有忠1, 董永梅1, 陈林2, 孙国清3, 谢宗铭1   

  1. 1. 新疆农垦科学院 生物技术研究所, 作物种质创新与基因资源利用兵团重点实验室, 新疆 石河子 832000;
    2. 新疆天业(集团)有限公司, 新疆 石河子 832000;
    3. 中国农业科学院 生物技术研究所, 北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2016-11-07 出版日期:2017-02-28
  • 通讯作者: 谢宗铭(1971-),男,甘肃民勤人,研究员,博士,主要从事棉花分子育种及植物逆境生物学研究。
  • 作者简介:王志军(1985-),男,内蒙古巴彦淖尔人,助理研究员,硕士,主要从事作物种质资源保存与创新研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家高技术研究发展计划("863"计划)项目(2011AA100508);新疆生产建设兵团"十二五"项目(2012BD046);新疆农垦科学院青年基金项目(YQJ201504)

Study on Photosynthetic Physiological Indexes at Different Periods of Rice under Different Cultivation Patterns

WANG Zhijun1, YE Chunxiu1, LI Youzhong1, DONG Yongmei1, CHEN Lin2, SUN Guoqing3, XIE Zongming1   

  1. 1. Biotechnology Research Institute, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Science, Xinjiang Production & Construction Group Key Laboratory of Crop Germplasm Enhancement and Gene Resources Utilization, Shihezi 832000, China;
    2. Xinjiang Tianye(Group) Co., Ltd, Shihezi 832000, China;
    3. Biotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2016-11-07 Published:2017-02-28

摘要: 为明确膜下滴灌与常规水作栽培的光合生理差异。通过对膜下滴灌和淹灌2种栽培模式下,4个水稻品系(T-04、T-43、T-66、T-69)在分蘖、孕穗、抽穗、乳熟、蜡熟期倒一叶的光合色素含量、光合-叶绿素荧光参数、抗氧化酶活性以及渗透调节物质含量等光合生理指标的测定分析。结果表明:滴灌模式下,4个参试材料在5个关键生育期的蒸腾速率(Tr)、气孔导度(Gs)、光合速率(Pn)均低于淹灌,胞间CO2浓度(Ci)总体上略低于淹灌,大部分时期差异不显著(P>0.05);叶绿素荧光参数、光系统Ⅱ有效量子产量(ΦPSⅡ)、最大荧光(Fm)、暗适应光系统Ⅱ最大量子产量(Fv/Fm)总体上低于淹灌,大部分时期差异不显著,最小荧光(Fo)高于淹灌,荧光淬灭系数(qP、NPQ)在2种栽培模式下差异不大,叶绿素含量、类胡萝卜素含量、过氧化氢酶(CAT)活性、过氧化物酶(POD)活性总体上低于淹灌,超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)活性在2种栽培模式下差异不显著,丙二醛(MDA)、脯氨酸(Pro)含量总体上高于淹灌,可溶性蛋白(SP)含量总体上低于淹灌,可溶性糖(SS)含量差异不显著。水稻膜下滴灌栽培整个生育期均无水层覆盖,可能受到水分胁迫,导致其整个生育期大部分光合生理指标均低于淹灌。

关键词: 不同栽培模式, 水稻, 不同生育期, 光合, 生理指标

Abstract: In order to illustrate the possible differences in photosynthetic physiology, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in response to drip irrigation under mulch film and continuous flooding, photosynthetic pigment contents, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, activities of protective enzymes, osmolyte contents of flag leaves at tillering stage, booting stage, heading stage, milky stage, dough stage under those two cultivation models of four rice lines named T-04,T-43,T-66 and T-69 were collected and analyzed, respectively.The results obtained were as follows:Chlorophyll and carotenoid content of all four accessions at five growth periods under drip irrigation with plastic film mulching reduced compared with continuous flooding, stomatal conductance(GS),transpiration rate(Tr),net photosynthetic rate(Pn)reduced compared with continuous flooding,CO2concentration(Ci) were lower than continuous flooding on the whole,most of differences were not significant; The chlorophyll fluorescence parameters such as ΦPSⅡ,Fm,Fv/Fm were lower than continuous flooding on the whole,most of the differences were not significant, Fo higher than continuous flooding, the difference of qP and NPQ were not significantly, CAT activity, POD activity,SOD activity were difference not significantly. The content of MDA and Pro were higher than continuous flooding.Content of soluble protein was lower than continuous flooding,soluble sugar content was not difference significantly. Considering most of photosynthetic parameters in whole growth period of rice in responsive to drip irrigation under film which suffer from water stress were lower than that under flooding one.

Key words: Different cultivation patterns, Rice, Different growth stages, Photosynthetic, Physiological index

中图分类号: 

引用本文

王志军, 叶春秀, 李有忠, 董永梅, 陈林, 孙国清, 谢宗铭. 不同栽培模式下水稻各生育期光合生理指标的比较研究[J]. 华北农学报, 2017, 32(1): 125-134. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2017.01.020.

WANG Zhijun, YE Chunxiu, LI Youzhong, DONG Yongmei, CHEN Lin, SUN Guoqing, XIE Zongming. Study on Photosynthetic Physiological Indexes at Different Periods of Rice under Different Cultivation Patterns[J]. ACTA AGRICULTURAE BOREALI-SINICA, 2017, 32(1): 125-134. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2017.01.020.

使用本文

0
    /   /   推荐 /   导出引用

链接本文: http://www.hbnxb.net/CN/10.7668/hbnxb.2017.01.020

               http://www.hbnxb.net/CN/Y2017/V32/I1/125