Effects of Trehalose Alcohol Combined with Trace Elements and Microbial Agents on the Growth and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco

doi:10.7668/hbnxb.20195406

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to clarify the synergistic effect of trehalose alcohol,phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms and trace elements on the yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco,a field experiment was carried out with Yunyan 87 as the test material.The control(S1),trehalose alcohol(S2),trehalose alcohol+compound phosphate-solubilizing bacteria(S3),trehalose alcohol+compound phosphate-solubilizing bacteria+compound trace elements(S4)were set up to study the effects of different fertilization treatments on agronomic traits,conventional chemical components and aroma substances of flue-cured tobacco.The results showed that compared with S1,S3 and S4 could improve the effective leaf number and leaf width of flue-cured tobacco.S4 treatment was more helpful to coordinate the chemical composition of cured tobacco leaves.The contents of total sugar,total nitrogen and nicotine were increased by 12.18%,70.00% and 20.30%,respectively,and the contents of aroma substances such as carotenoids,phenylalanines and brown-reacting species.The results of comprehensive index analysis showed that the comprehensive indexes of S1-S4 treatments were 21.06,23.22,24.66 and 27.08,respectively,and the comprehensive indexes were ranked as S4>S3>S2>S1,indicating that the comprehensive performance of flue-cured tobacco under the treatment of trehalose alcohol combined with trace elements and microbial agents was the best,indicating that the synergistic effect between trehalose alcohol,phosphate-solubilizing bacteria and compound trace elements was obvious,which could be used as the optimal formula of trace elements and microbial special fertilizer for tobacco leaves.

Key words: Flue-cured tobacco, Trehalitol, Double micro fertilizer, Quality, Aroma substances

CLC Number:

S572

SUN Jingguo, LIU Yining, LIU Aihui, MA Junfeng, LI Hao, TIAN Huiwen, CHEN Tao, CHAI Liguang, SUN Yuxiao, WU Yong, SUN Xuecheng. Effects of Trehalose Alcohol Combined with Trace Elements and Microbial Agents on the Growth and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2025, 40(S1): 205-212. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20195406.

/ / Recommend / Download Citations

URL: http://www.hbnxb.net/EN/10.7668/hbnxb.20195406

http://www.hbnxb.net/EN/Y2025/V40/IS1/205

Figures/Tables 5

References 35

[1]	Su J E, Chen Y J, Zhu Y M, Xiang J L, Chen Y, Hu B B, Zhu M L, Xu A C, Li F L, Ren K, Zou C M. The response of Hongda,a flue-cured tobacco cultivar,to nitrogen fertilizer rate[J]. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 2021, 67(4):536-550.doi:10.1080/03650340.2020.1739658. URL
[2]	王勇乾, 胡瑞文, 周清明, 向德明, 田明慧, 陈甜, 周启运, 李强, 黎娟. 解磷细菌肥对烤烟磷素吸收和磷肥利用率的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2020, 41(4):7-12.doi:10.13496/j.issn.1007-5119.2020.00.005.
	Wang Y Q, Hu R W, Zhou Q M, Xiang D M, Tian M H, Chen T, Zhou Q Y, Li Q, Li J. Effects of phosphate-resolving bacterial fertilizer on phosphorus absorption and phosphorus fertilizer utilization rate of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2020, 41(4):7-12.
[3]	刘晓倩, 杜杏蓉, 谭玉娇, 罗奇, 王娜. 增施不同配比解磷菌、解钾菌生物菌肥对烤烟生长发育和根际土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2019, 34(5):845-851.doi:10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).201803046.
	Liu X Q, Du X R, Tan Y J, Luo Q, Wang N. The effects of different ratios between phosphate-solubilizing bacteria and potassium-solubilizing bacteria fertilizers on the flue-cured tobacco growth and the enzyme activities in the rhizospheric soil[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University(Natural Science), 2019, 34(5):845-851.
[4]	朱毅, 赵杰, 赵学通, 段志超, 尚海丽, 盘文政. 不同微生物肥料对烤烟生长及产质量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(26):37-41.doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb17080119.
	Zhu Y, Zhao J, Zhao X T, Duan Z C, Shang H L, Pan W Z. Effects of microbial fertilizers on growth and quality of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(26):37-41. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb17080119
[5]	宋泽民, 李余湘, 李章海, 唐兴贵, 时宏书, 周明, 张永兴, 莫有清, 武丽, 黄义德. 黔南烟区烤烟钼肥适用量研究[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2014, 35(4):41-47.doi:10.13496/j.issn.1007-5119.2014.04.008.
	Song Z M, Li Y X, Li Z H, Tang X G, Shi H S, Zhou M, Zhang Y X, Mo Y Q, Wu L, Huang Y D. Optimum molybdenum rate for flue-cured tobacco in Qiannan tobacco area[J]. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2014, 35(4):41-47.
[6]	任志广, 张勇刚, 项波卡, 刘化冰, 程昌合, 张晓兵, 刘建国. 植烟土壤有效硼、锌及其交互作用对烟叶硼、锌及品质的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2022(7):197-205.doi:10.11838/sfsc.1673-6257.21238.
	Ren Z G, Zhang Y G, Xiang B K, Liu H B, Cheng C H, Zhang X B, Liu J G. Effects of interaction between soil available boron and available zinc on B and Zn contents and quality of tobacco leaves[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2022(7):197-205.
[7]	李钊, 鄢敏, 张月华, 刘海兵, 肖文洋, 刘勇, 陈佛源, 景延秋. 硼钼配施对烤烟生长及烤后烟化学品质的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2023, 55(5):134-140.doi:10.14083/j.issn.1001-4942.2023.05.020.
	Li Z, Yan M, Zhang Y H, Liu H B, Xiao W Y, Liu Y, Chen F Y, Jing Y Q. Effects of boron and molybdenum combined application on growth and chemical quality after roasted of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 55(5):134-140.
[8]	Chernane H, Latique S, Mansori M, Kaoua M E. Salt stress tolerance and antioxidative mechanisms in wheat plants(Triticum durum L.) by seaweed extracts application[J]. IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science, 2015, 8(3):36-44.doi:10.9790/2380-08313644.
[9]	Hamouda M M, Saad-Allah K M, Gad D. Potential of seaweed extract on growth,physiological,cytological and biochemical parameters of wheat(Triticum aestivum L.) seedlings[J]. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2022, 22(2):1818-1831.doi:10.1007/s42729-022-00774-3.
[10]	Battacharyya D, Babgohari M Z, Rathor P, Prithiviraj B. Seaweed extracts as biostimulants in horticulture[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2015, 196:39-48.doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.012. URL
[11]	任志广, 杨立均, 龚治翔, 赵佳佳, 黄海棠, 魏壮状, 许自成. 不同小分子有机物对烤烟生理特性、碳氮代谢及烟叶品质的影响[J]. 植物生理学报, 2017, 53(7):1225-1233.doi:10.13592/j.cnki.ppj.2017.0013.
	Ren Z G, Yang L J, Gong Z X, Zhao J J, Huang H T, Wei Z Z, Xu Z C. Effects of different small molecular organics on physiological characteristics,carbon and nitrogen metabolism and quality of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Plant Physiology Journal, 2017, 53(7):1225-1233.
[12]	李松伟, 王发展, 陈彪, 谢俊明, 史久长. 生物炭配施海藻肥对连作植烟土壤理化特性及烤烟生长的影响[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2021, 55(5):852-861.doi:10.16445/j.cnki.1000-2340.20210804.001.
	Li S W, Wang F Z, Chen B, Xie J M, Shi J C. Effects of biochar combined with seaweed fertilizer on the physicochemical characteristics of continuous tobacco planting soil and flue-cured tobacco growth[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural University, 2021, 55(5):852-861.
[13]	邹焱, 苏以荣. 植物生长调节剂对烟草生长及营养代谢的调节作用[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2006(5):10-14.doi:10.11838/sfsc.20060503.
	Zou Y, Su Y R. Effects of plant growth regulators on tobacco growing and metabolizing[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2006(5):10-14.
[14]	徐晓玲, 曹建敏, 庞雪莉, 林樱楠, 曹鹏云, 刘贯山, 孔芳芳, 王大海, 王德勋, 范志勇, 邱军. HS-SPME arrow-GC/MS结合化学计量学分析烟草香气突变体中特征香气成分[J]. 烟草科技, 2020, 53(9):33-39,61.doi:10.16135/j.issn1002-0861.2019.0520.
	Xu X L, Cao J M, Pang X L, Lin Y N, Cao P Y, Liu G S, Kong F F, Wang D H, Wang D X, Fan Z Y, Qiu J. Analysis of characteristic aroma components in tobacco aroma mutant by HS-SPME arrow-GC/MS combined with chemometrics[J]. Tobacco Science & Technology, 2020, 53(9):33-39,61.
[15]	舒佳惠, 邹明民, 马柱文, 伍彩云, 陈桢禄, 谭宇劲, 余安, 李章晓, 李集勤, 潘晓英, 黄振瑞. 广东湛江烟区不同雪茄品种综合性状评价[J]. 广东农业科学, 2024, 51(4):79-88.doi:10.16768/j.issn.1004-874X.2024.04.007.
	Shu J H, Zou M M, Ma Z W, Wu C Y, Chen Z L, Tan Y J, Yu A, Li Z X, Li J Q, Pan X Y, Huang Z R. Evaluation on comprehensive traits of different cigar tobacco varieties in Zhanjiang,Guangdong[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 51(4):79-88.
[16]	王小彦, 韩小斌, 贾芳曌, 罗玉英, 金维环, 王潇然, 石永春. 叶面喷施海藻糖对烟草抗病性和产质量的影响[J]. 分子植物育种, 2019, 17(13):4488-4494.doi:10.13271/j.mpb.017.004488.
	Wang X Y, Han X B, Jia F Z, Luo Y Y, Jin W H, Wang X R, Shi Y C. The effects of foliar spraying of trehalose on disease resistance,yield and quality of tobacco[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2019, 17(13):4488-4494.
[17]	张鑫, 胡希好, 胡志明, 刘浩, 王越茂, 赵福彬, 程昌新, 李贵忠, 褚德朋, 尹绍静, 程亚东, 尤祥伟, 李义强. 施用海藻肥和大豆海藻肥对烤烟生长与土壤微生物的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2023, 51(3):81-88.doi:10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2023.03.012.
	Zhang X, Hu X H, Hu Z M, Liu H, Wang Y M, Zhao F B, Cheng C X, Li G Z, Chu D P, Yin S J, Cheng Y D, You X W, Li Y Q. Effects of application of seaweed fertilizer and soybean seaweed fertilizer on flue-cured tobacco growth and soil microorganisms[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 51(3):81-88.
[18]	刘昭伟, 邹佳怡, 黄子彧, 张阳, 薛建业, 张洪波, 黄琼慧, 王新月, 全柯颖, 夏冰, 邓小华. 氮肥减量配施微生物菌剂对烤烟生长发育的影响[J]. 作物研究, 2023, 37(5):503-510,534.
	Liu Z W, Zou J Y, Huang Z Y, Zhang Y, Xue J Y, Zhang H B, Huang Q H, Wang X Y, Quan K Y, Xia B, Deng X H. Effects of reducing amount of nitrogen fertilizer with microbial agents on the growth and development of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Crop Research, 2023, 37(5):503-510,534.
[19]	梁永进, 尚海丽, 盘文政, 赵学通, 李德文, 李建云, 张琪. 微生物菌肥对K326烤烟生长发育及产质量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(23):45-51.doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0661.
	Liang Y J, Shang H L, Pan W Z, Zhao X T, Li D W, Li J Y, Zhang Q. Effects of microbial fertilizer on growth and quality of flue-cured tobacco K326[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(23):45-51.
[20]	龚治翔, 黄元炯, 任志广, 谢利丽, 陈征, 许自成. 不同氮水平下施钼对烤烟生理特性及烟叶品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2018, 20(1):113-120.doi:10.13304/j.nykjdb.2017.0147.
	Gong Z X, Huang Y J, Ren Z G, Xie L L, Chen Z, Xu Z C. Influence of spraying Mo under different nitrogen levels on physiological characteristics and quality of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018, 20(1):113-120. doi: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2017.0147
[21]	王林, 周红审, 王昊, 周平, 李少鹏, 陈海清, 王爱国, 郭建华, 宋纪真. 烟叶中微量元素差异及其与外观品质关联分析[J]. 烟草科技, 2021, 54(3):9-16.doi:10.16135/j.issn1002-0861.2020.0328.
	Wang L, Zhou H S, Wang H, Zhou P, Li S P, Chen H Q, Wang A G, Guo J H, Song J Z. Medium to trace element contents in tobacco leaves and their correlations with leaf appearance quality[J]. Tobacco Science & Technology, 2021, 54(3):9-16.
[22]	胡蓉花, 王俊, 沈雪婷, 王子璇, 李亚纯, 尼金玉, 段史江, 郑云, 杨祥飞, 郑九洲, 朱肖文, 刘齐元. 增施锌肥对烤烟品质的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2022, 50(11):76-82.doi:10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2022.11.010.
	Hu R H, Wang J, Shen X T, Wang Z X, Li Y C, Ni J Y, Duan S J, Zheng Y, Yang X F, Zheng J Z, Zhu X W, Liu Q Y. Effect of zinc fertilizer on flue-cured tobacco quality[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 50(11):76-82.
[23]	邓小华. 湖南烤烟区域特征及质量评价指标间关系研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2007.
	Deng X H. Study on the relationship between regional characteristics and quality evaluation indexes of flue-cured tobacco in Hunan Province[D]. Changsha: Hunan Agricultural University, 2007.
[24]	易克, 张锦韬, 刘建峰, 杨文蛟, 孙康, 吴宗海, 李川保, 高兴秀, 李强. 施用功能微生物菌剂对烤烟生长及烟叶产质量的影响[J]. 作物研究, 2019, 33(3):215-219.doi:10.16848/j.cnki.issn.1001-5280.2019.03.12.
	Yi K, Zhang J T, Liu J F, Yang W J, Sun K, Wu Z H, Li C B, Gao X X, Li Q. Effects of functional microbial bacteria on growth,yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Crop Research, 2019, 33(3):215-219.
[25]	韩丹, 熊双莲, 许自成, 涂书新, 邵惠芳, 黄五星, 郝三辉. 硒对烤烟生长、化学指标及矿质营养元素含量的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2017, 31(10):2072-2079.doi:10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2017.10.2072.
	Han D, Xiong S L, Xu Z C, Tu S X, Shao H F, Huang W X, Hao S H. Effects of selenium on growth,chemical index and mineral nutrition contents of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 31(10):2072-2079.
[26]	孙子隽, 钟国兴, 张少搏, 杨欣, 彭金良, 郭维, 梁耀星, 李淮源, 白云峰, 陈建军, 邓世媛. 化肥减量配施有机肥对植烟土壤理化特性和微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2024, 39(3):146-158.doi:10.7668/hbnxb.20194778.
	Sun Z J, Zhong G X, Zhang S B, Yang X, Peng J L, Guo W, Liang Y X, Li H Y, Bai Y F, Chen J J, Deng S Y. Effects of fertilizer reduction combined with organic fertilizer on physicochemical properties and microbial community structure of tobacco-planting soil[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2024, 39(3):146-158. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20194778
[27]	Ruan Y N, Tang Z X, Chen Z B, Xia T Y. Effects of combined application of chemical fertilizer and microbial fertilizer on the chemical components contents of flue-cured tobacco leaves[J]. IOP Conference Series:Earth and Environmental Science, 2021, 792(1):012048.doi:10.1088/1755-1315/792/1/012048.
[28]	陈雨峰, 叶晓青, 周国荣, 邹勇, 余志虹, 王维, 陈建军. 增施锰、硼微肥对烤烟农艺性状及产质量的影响[J]. 广东农业科学, 2013, 40(14):75-77.doi:10.16768/j.issn.1004-874x.2013.14.053.
	Chen Y F, Ye X Q, Zhou G R, Zou Y, Yu Z H, Wang W, Chen J J. Effect of boron-manganese on agronomical character,yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 40(14):75-77.
[29]	齐永杰, 徐茂华, 潘武宁, 李群岭, 梁伟. 硼锌钼肥及其配施对烤烟上部叶香气物质含量的影响[J]. 天津农业科学, 2015, 21(6):116-119.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6500.2015.06.027.
	Qi Y J, Xu M H, Pan W N, Li Q L, Liang W. Effects of B,Zn and Mo fertilizers and combining application on content of aroma components of upper-leaves in flue-cured tobacco[J]. Tianjin Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 21(6):116-119.
[30]	周昆, 周清明, 胡晓兰. 烤烟香气物质研究进展[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2008, 29(2):58-61.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-5119.2008.02.014.
	Zhou K, Zhou Q M, Hu X L. Advance in aroma substances in flue-cured tobacco[J]. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2008, 29(2):58-61.
[31]	Wu X, Hu Y Q, Wang Q, Liu J, Fang S, Huang D W, Pang X L, Cao J M, Gao Y M, Ning Y. Study on the correlation between the dominant microflora and the main flavor substances in the fermentation process of cigar tobacco leaves[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2023, 14:1267447.doi:10.3389/fmicb.2023.1267447. URL
[32]	徐秀红, 喻奇伟, 孙光军, 姜超英, 刘金亮, 熊晶, 夏忠文, 王兴, 刘仁祥. 贵州毕节烟区5个烤烟新品种的综合性状评价[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2021, 42(1):7-13.doi:10.13496/j.issn.1007-5119.2021.01.002.
	Xu X H, Yu Q W, Sun G J, Jiang C Y, Liu J L, Xiong J, Xia Z W, Wang X, Liu R X. Comprehensive trait evaluation of 5 new flue-cured tobacco varieties in Bijie,Guizhou[J]. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2021, 42(1):7-13.
[33]	余顺平, 熊于斌, 廖涛, 张诗卿, 汤利, 李少明. 连续化肥减量配施有机肥提升植烟土壤肥力质量的综合评价[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2024(1):70-78.doi:10.11838/sfsc.1673-6257.22786.
	Yu S P, Xiong Y B, Liao T, Zhang S Q, Tang L, Li S M. Comprehensive evaluation of continuous chemical fertilizer reduction with organic fertilizer application to improve soil fertility quality of planted tobacco[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2024(1):70-78.
[34]	李先才, 夏贤仁, 蔡宪杰, 潘义宏, 周玉思, 马爱国, 陈彪, 王瑞宝, 闫鼎. 生物炭与复合肥混施对植烟土壤及烤烟生长的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2021, 49(9):66-75.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3601.2021.09.010.
	Li X C, Xia X R, Cai X J, Pan Y H, Zhou Y S, Ma A G, Chen B, Wang R B, Yan D. Effects of biochar+compound fertilizer mixed application on physical and chemical properties of tobacco growing soil and growth of tobacco[J]. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 49(9):66-75.
[35]	王鹏, 郑学博, 梁洪波, 宋文静, 季璇, 徐艳丽, 况帅, 董建新. 不同施肥模式对植烟棕壤活性有机碳组分和酶活性的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2021, 36(1):187-196. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20191407
	Wang P, Zheng X B, Liang H B, Song W J, Ji X, Xu Y L, Kuang S, Dong J X. Effects of different fertilization models on active organic carbon components and enzyme activities of tobacco-growing brown soil[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-sinica, 2021, 36(1):187-196. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20191407

处理 Treatment	株高/cm Plant height	有效叶数 Effective leaves number	最大叶长/cm Maximum leaf length	最大叶宽/cm Maximum leaf width	SPAD	叶片厚度/cm Leaf thickness
S1	97.33±1.33d	17.00±0.58b	71.67±0.88c	22.00±0.58b	42.53±0.34b	0.33±0.01b
S2	107.67±0.88b	19.00±0.58ab	74.33±1.67ab	26.67±0.88a	43.37±0.62b	0.35±0.02ab
S3	111.00±2.52a	19.33±0.33ab	80.00±2.65a	23.00±0.58b	48.93±1.07a	0.39±0.01a
S4	102.00±1.00c	20.33±0.67a	81.67±1.20a	23.67±0.67b	48.17±0.18a	0.36±0.00ab

处理 Treatment	株高/cm Plant height	有效叶数 Effective leaves number	最大叶长/cm Maximum leaf length	最大叶宽/cm Maximum leaf width	SPAD	叶片厚度/cm Leaf thickness
S1	97.33±1.33d	17.00±0.58b	71.67±0.88c	22.00±0.58b	42.53±0.34b	0.33±0.01b
S2	107.67±0.88b	19.00±0.58ab	74.33±1.67ab	26.67±0.88a	43.37±0.62b	0.35±0.02ab
S3	111.00±2.52a	19.33±0.33ab	80.00±2.65a	23.00±0.58b	48.93±1.07a	0.39±0.01a
S4	102.00±1.00c	20.33±0.67a	81.67±1.20a	23.67±0.67b	48.17±0.18a	0.36±0.00ab

处理 Treatment	病株数 Number of diseased plants	调查总数 Survey total	发病率/% Morbidity
S1	13	144	9.03
S2	12	144	8.33
S3	10	144	6.94
S4	7	144	4.86

处理 Treatment	病株数 Number of diseased plants	调查总数 Survey total	发病率/% Morbidity
S1	13	144	9.03
S2	12	144	8.33
S3	10	144	6.94
S4	7	144	4.86

处理 Treatment	总氮/ (mg/g) Total nitrogen	全钾/ (mg/g) Total potassium	烟碱/ (mg/g) Nicotine	总糖/ (mg/g) Total sugar	还原性糖/ (mg/g) Reducing sugar	淀粉/ (mg/g) Starch	糖碱比 Sugar-base ratio	氮碱比 Nitro-base ratio
S1	14.0±0.0d	19.6±0.6b	19.7±0.7b	245.0±2.9c	217.1±11.7b	36.8±0.4b	12.31±0.53a	0.70±0.02c
S2	17.2±0.6c	23.2±1.1a	22.1±0.3a	244.3±7.8c	218.1±4.3b	39.6±0.8ab	12.26±0.31a	0.78±0.03bc
S3	19.5±0.1b	26.0±0.5a	23.0±0.5a	267.0±1.8b	246.1±7.5ab	36.7±1.2b	10.64±0.37b	0.85±0.02b
S4	23.8±0.4a	25.6±1.7a	23.7±0.5a	271.2±3.2a	257.4±4.8a	40.8±0.4a	12.48±0.20a	1.01±0.06a

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export