Effects of Different Fertilizer Formulations on Fruit Quality of Sunshine Rose Grape

doi:10.7668/hbnxb.20195053

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to optimize the fertilizer application amount and proportion of high-quality grapes,the effects of different nitrogen(N),phosphorus(P),potassium(K),calcium(Ca)and magnesium(Mg)treatments on external quality index(including spike length,longitudinal diameter,transverse diameter,berry shape index,cluster weight and single grain weight),color indicators(including L^*,a^*,b^*,C,color index),internal quality indicators(including total soluble solid content,fruit firmness,titratable acid content,vitamin C)of Sunshine rose grapes were studied by L16(4⁵)incomplete orthogonal experimental design.The results of comprehensive fruit quality evaluation showed that T10 treatment had a strong effect on the improvement of transverse diameter,cluster weight,a^* and color index,and the cluster weight of T10 treatment was 844.3 g,which was significantly increased by 10.5%(T15)-55.8%(T4)compared with other treatments except of T11 and T12 treatments.T1 treatment had a strong effect on the increase of longitudinal diameter,and its longitudinal diameter is the largest(31.27 mm).T16 treatment had a strong effect on improving titrable acid content,vitamin C and fruit firmness,among which T16 treatment had the highest fruit firmness(4.93 N).Based on the comprehensive quality of fruits,the optimal theoretical formulation of N,P,K,Ca and Mg was N3P3K4Ca1Mg1,and the optimal dosage of N,P₂O₅,K₂O,CaO and MgO were 6.8,6.3,14.2,0,0 kg for producing 2 000 kg fruits,respectively.In production practice,the optimal fertilization scheme should be determined according to the soil fertility status.

Key words: Grape, Fertilizer ratio, Quality

CLC Number:

S663.1

WANG Xiaolong, SHI Xiangbin, JI Xiaohao, LI Yinping, LIU Fengzhi, WANG Haibo. Effects of Different Fertilizer Formulations on Fruit Quality of Sunshine Rose Grape[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2025, 40(S1): 197-204. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20195053.

/ / Recommend / Download Citations

URL: http://www.hbnxb.net/EN/10.7668/hbnxb.20195053

http://www.hbnxb.net/EN/Y2025/V40/IS1/197

Figures/Tables 7

References 36

[1]	史祥宾, 王孝娣, 王宝亮, 王志强, 冀晓昊, 王小龙, 刘凤之, 王海波. 巨峰葡萄不同生育期植株矿质元素需求规律[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(15):2686-2694.doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.15.012.
	Shi X B, Wang X D, Wang B L, Wang Z Q, Ji X H, Wang X L, Liu F Z, Wang H B. Requirement characteristics of mineral elements in different developmental phases of kyoho grapevine[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(15):2686-2694. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.15.012
[2]	史祥宾, 王孝娣, 王宝亮, 王志强, 冀晓昊, 王小龙, 刘凤之, 王海波. 红地球葡萄氮、磷、钾、钙、镁的年需求特性研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2021, 48(11):2146-2160.doi:10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2020-0785.
	Shi X B, Wang X D, Wang B L, Wang Z Q, Ji X H, Wang X L, Liu F Z, Wang H B. Requirement rule of nitrogen,phosphorus,potassium,calcium and magnesium of Red globe grapevine[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2021, 48(11):2146-2160.
[3]	王小龙, 王志强, 刘畅, 张艺灿, 王宝亮, 冀晓昊, 史祥宾, 王海波. 基于5416配方施肥的赤霞珠葡萄品质分析与施肥建议[J]. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒, 2023(4):32-39.doi:10.13414/j.cnki.zwpp.2023.04.005.
	Wang X L, Wang Z Q, Liu C, Zhang Y C, Wang B L, Ji X H, Shi X B, Wang H B. Quality analysis and fertilization recommendations of Cabernet sauvignon grapevine based on 5416 formula fertilization[J]. Sino-Overseas Grapevine & Wine, 2023(4):32-39.
[4]	王小龙, 史祥宾, 王志强, 王宝亮, 冀晓昊, 张艺灿, 刘畅, 王海波. 配方施肥对设施87-1 葡萄植株矿质元素含量及果实品质的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2023(8):152-160.doi:10.11838/sfsc.1673-6257.22426.
	Wang X L, Shi X B, Wang Z Q, Wang B L, Ji X H, Zhang Y C, Liu C, Wang H B. Effects of formula fertilizers on mineral elements content and fruit quality in facility 87-1 grape[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2023(8):152-160.
[5]	刘迎雪, 范书田, 杨义明, 张宝香, 秦红艳, 路文鹏. 不同施肥量对北冰红葡萄营养元素积累及产量、品质的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2023(7):46-51.doi:10.11937/bfyy.20223079.
	Liu Y X, Fan S T, Yang Y M, Zhang B X, Qin H Y, Lu W P. Effects of different fertilization amounts on nutrient elements accumulation,yield and quality of Beibinghong grape[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2023(7):46-51.
[6]	董华芳, 安珍珠, 许延波, 张旭东, 刘永碧, 杨军. 不同施肥配方对克瑞森葡萄园艺性状的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2022, 50(13):153-157.doi:10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2022.13.041.
	Dong H F, An Z Z, Xu Y B, Zhang X D, Liu Y B, Yang J. Effect of different fertilization formula on agronomic properties of creson grape[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 50(13):153-157.
[7]	王小龙, 史祥宾, 王志强, 王宝亮, 冀晓昊, 张艺灿, 刘畅, 王海波. 基于5416配方施肥对北醇葡萄果实品质影响的主成分分析[J]. 中国果树, 2023(2):83-87,96.doi:10.16626/j.cnki.issn1000-8047.2023.02.015.
	Wang X L, Shi X B, Wang Z Q, Wang B L, Ji X H, Zhang Y C, Liu C, Wang H B. Effect of 5416 formula fertilization on fruit quality of Beicol grape[J]. China Fruits, 2023(2):83-87,96.
[8]	谷艳蓉, 闫晓志, 李书艳, 毛朋举, 张健. 测土配方施肥技术在平谷大桃生产上的试验示范[J]. 南方农业, 2023, 17(11):119-121.doi:10.19415/j.cnki.1673-890x.2023.11.030.
	Gu Y R, Yan X Z, Li S Y, Mao P J, Zhang J. Experimental demonstration of soil testing and formula fertilization technology in Pinggu peach production[J]. South China Agriculture, 2023, 17(11):119-121.
[9]	王海波, 王孝娣, 李莉, 史祥宾, 王小龙, 宣景宏, 王莹莹, 刘凤之. 果树5416测土配方施肥技术的研究与应用[J]. 中国果树, 2022(2):1-6.doi:10.16626/j.cnki.issn1000-8047.2022.02.001.
	Wang H B, Wang X D, Li L, Shi X B, Wang X L, Xuan J H, Wang Y Y, Liu F Z. Research and application of soil testing and formulated fertilization by 5416 in fruit tree[J]. China Fruits, 2022(2):1-6.
[10]	孙杰. 测土配方施肥技术的农户需求与企业供给行为研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2020.doi:10.27244/d.cnki.gnjnu.2020.002344.
	Sun J. A study on farmers' demand and enterprises' supply behavior of soil testing and formulated fertilization technology[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2020.
[11]	Li Z G, Zhang R H, Xia S J, Wang L, Liu C, Zhang R Q, Fan Z H, Chen F, Liu Y. Interactions between N,P and K fertilizers affect the environment and the yield and quality of satsumas[J]. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2019,19:e00663.doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00663.
[12]	Deng S X, Shi K K, Ma J, Zhang L L, Ma L Y, Jia Z K. Effects of fertilization ratios and frequencies on the growth and nutrient uptake of Magnolia wufengensis(Magnoliaceae)[J]. Forests, 2019, 10(1):65.doi:10.3390/f10010065. URL
[13]	安萌萌, 王敬民, 程栋, 石瑜, 乔峰, 李敬华, 于桂芳. 山东地区葡萄产业发展现状[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2019(9):208-210.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6400.2019.09.074.
	An M M, Wang J M, Cheng D, Shi Y, Qiao F, Li J H, Yu G F. Development status of grape industry in Shandong Province[J]. Bulletin of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019(9):208-210.
[14]	罗政成, 缐旭林, 李彩龙, 王延秀, 吴玉霞. 不同施肥处理对阳光玫瑰葡萄品质的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2023(8):161-167.doi:10.11838/sfsc.1673-6257.22411.
	Luo Z C, Xian X L, Li C L, Wang Y X, Wu Y X. Effects different fertilization treatments on quality of Shine muscat grape[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2023(8):161-167.
[15]	尹国强. 不同复合处理对设施延迟栽培葡萄生长、产量和品质的影响研究[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2019.doi:10.27025/d.cnki.ggsnu.2019.000070.
	Yin G Q. Effects of different compound treatments on the delayed cultivation grape with growth,yield and quality in the vineyard of plastic greenhouse[D]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2019.
[16]	Muhammed M, Qayyum M F, Alotaibi F, Alharbi S F. Organic nitrogen fertilization minimizes requirement of inorganic fertilizers and improves growth and yield attributes of superior grapevines[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 2023, 46(17):4171-4187.doi:10.1080/01904167.2023.2222148. URL
[17]	Shi H M, Zhu X X, Lu L X, Ye J R. Effect of microbial inoculants endowed with multifarious plant growth-promoting traits on grape growth and fruit quality under organic fertilization scenarios[J]. Agronomy, 2024, 14(3):491.doi:10.3390/agronomy14030491. URL
[18]	许丽, 刘永刚. 钾肥对民勤无核白鸡心葡萄果实品质的影响[J]. 甘肃林业科技, 2022, 47(1):44-46.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-0960.2022.01.010.
	Xu L, Liu Y G. Effects of potassium fertilizer on fruit quality of Minqin Thompson seedless grape[J]. Journal of Gansu Forestry Science and Technology, 2022, 47(1):44-46.
[19]	黎宪纪, 韦美玉. 氮磷钾肥对不同品种葡萄产量及品质的影响[J]. 乡村科技, 2020, 11(24):95-97.doi:10.19345.j.cnki.1674-7909.2020.24.048.
	Li X J, Wei M Y. Effects of nitrogen,phosphorus and potassium fertilizer on yield and quality of different grape varieties[J]. Rural Science and Technology, 2020, 11(24):95-97.
[20]	石美娟, 杨凯, 续海红, 郭华, 窦彦鑫, 王芸芸, 何美美. 矮砧富士果树滴灌配施氮磷钾肥料效应研究[J]. 天津农业科学, 2020, 26(10):75-80.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6500.2020.10.014.
	Shi M J, Yang K, Xu H H, Guo H, Dou Y X, Wang Y Y, He M M. Study on the effect of nitrogen,phosphorus and potassium fertilizer on Fuji drip irrigation with dense planting on dwarf anvil[J]. Tianjin Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 26(10):75-80.
[21]	郭宇航, 邢琳, 叶振风, 李维林, 张长青, 李广平. 不同追肥对基质栽培蓝莓生长、产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国南方果树, 2023, 52(5):184-187,195.doi:10.13938/j.issn.1007-1431.20230049.
	Guo Y H, Xing L, Ye Z F, Li W L, Zhang C Q, Li G P. Effects of different topdressing on growth,yield and quality of blueberry cultiured in substrate[J]. South China Fruits, 2023, 52(5):184-187,195.
[22]	Zhao Z, Chu C B, Zhou D P, Sha Z M, Wu S H. Soil nutrient status and the relation with planting area,planting age and grape varieties in urban vineyards in Shanghai[J]. Heliyon, 2019, 5(8):e02362.doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02362. URL
[23]	魏志峰, 李秋利, 高登涛, 刘丽, 刘军伟. 不同颜色果袋对阳光玫瑰葡萄果实品质及香气物质的影响[J]. 经济林研究, 2019, 37(4):35-43.doi:10.14067/j.cnki.1003-8981.2019.04.005.
	Wei Z F, Li Q L, Gao D T, Liu L, Liu J W. Effects of different colors of fruit bags on berry quality and aromatic components of Shine muscat grape[J]. Non-wood Forest Research, 2019, 37(4):35-43.
[24]	黄婉莉, 张朝坤, 康仕成, 李辉. 氮磷钾配比施肥对番石榴生长发育和果实品质的影响[J]. 南方农业学报, 2022, 53(5):1288-1295.doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2022.05.011.
	Huang W L, Zhang C K, Kang S C, Li H. Effects of nitrogen,phosphorus and potassium ratio of fertilization on the growth and development and fruit quality of Psidium guajava L.[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2022, 53(5):1288-1295.
[25]	李天乐, 支金虎. 我国梨主产区氮磷钾配比施肥与产量的关系研究[J]. 寒旱农业科学, 2024, 3(1):84-90.doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-2172.2024.01.015.
	Li T L, Zhi J H. Study on the relationship between nitrogen,phosphorus and potassium proportional fertilization and yields in the main pear production areas in China[J]. Journal of Cold-Arid Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 3(1):84-90.
[26]	王小龙, 张正文, 邵学东, 钟晓敏, 王福成, 史祥宾, 张艺灿, 王海波. 5416配方施肥对梅乐葡萄矿质元素和果实酚类物质含量的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2022, 37(5):105-113.doi:10.7668/hbnxb.20192999.
	Wang X L, Zhang Z W, Shao X D, Zhong X M, Wang F C, Shi X B, Zhang Y C, Wang H B. Effects of 5416 formula fertilization on the content of mineral elements and fruit polyphenols in merlot grapes[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2022, 37(5):105-113.
[27]	郝鹏, 王紫. 不同氮肥施用量对茉莉王葡萄果实品质的影响[J]. 园艺与种苗, 2021, 41(4):33-34.doi:10.16530/j.cnki.cn21-1574/s.2021.04.013.
	Hao P, Wang Z. Effects of different nitrogen application rates on quality of king jasmine grape[J]. Horticulture & Seed, 2021, 41(4):33-34.
[28]	于淑霞, 赵庆东. 施氮水平对京亚葡萄产量、品质及根际自生固氮菌的影响[J]. 吉林农业科技学院学报, 2010, 19(1):13-14.
	Yu S X, Zhao Q D. Effect of fertilizing N levels on the yield,quality and self-rhizosphere nitrogen-fixing bacteria of Jingya grape[J]. Journal of Jilin Agricultural Science and Technology College, 2010, 19(1):13-14.
[29]	Lester G E, Jifon J L, Rogers G. Supplemental foliar potassium applications during muskmelon fruit development can improve fruit quality,ascorbic acid,and beta-carotene contents[J]. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 2005, 130(4):649-653.doi:10.21273/jashs.130.4.649. URL
[30]	Lobos T E, Retamales J B, Luengo Escobar A, Hanson E J. Timing of foliar calcium sprays improves fruit firmness and antioxidants in Liberty blueberries[J]. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2021, 21(1):426-436.doi:10.1007/s42729-020-00371-2.
[31]	郭傲. 不同施钾水平对无花果果实品质及糖代谢的影响[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2019.doi:10.27018/d.cnki.gfjnu.2019.000049.
	Guo A. Effects of different potassium application levels on fruit quality and sugar metabolism of Fig fruit[D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2019.
[32]	Ho L C, White P J. A cellular hypothesis for the induction of blossom-end rot in tomato fruit[J]. Annals of Botany, 2005, 95(4):571-581.doi:10.1093/aob/mci065. pmid: 15642726
[33]	Sturião W P, Martinez H E P, Oliveira L A, Jezler C N, de Jesus Pereira L, Ventrella M C, do Carmo Milagres C. Deficiency of calcium affects anatomical,biometry and nutritional status of cherry tomato[J]. South African Journal of Botany, 2020, 132:346-354.doi:10.1016/j.sajb.2020.05.003. URL
[34]	陈文龙, 赵昶灵, 支伟特, 陈中坚, 缪康汝, 王文亚, 翁晨. 高等植物花色苷生物合成调控的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2013, 29(33):271-276.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2013.33.047.
	Chen W L, Zhao C L, Zhi W T, Chen Z J, Miao K R, Wang W Y, Weng C. Progress of regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis in higher plants[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2013, 29(33):271-276. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2012-3826
[35]	韩艳婷. 葡萄镁营养生理机制研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2011.
	Han Y T. Study on physiological mechanism of grape magnesium nutrition[D]. Changsha: Hunan Agricultural University, 2011.
[36]	李青军, 张炎, 胡伟, 齐桂红. 硫酸钾镁肥在葡萄上施用效果研究[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2014, 51(11):2009-2013.doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2014.11.008.
	Li Q J, Zhang Y, Hu W, Qi G H. Study of the effects of applying sulphate-potassium magnesium fertilizer on grape[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 51(11):2009-2013.

处理 Treatment	N	P₂O₅	K₂O	CaO	MgO
T1	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
T2	0.0	48.0	70.5	60.0	12.0
T3	0.0	94.5	142.5	121.5	25.5
T4	0.0	142.5	213.0	181.5	37.5
T5	51.0	0.0	70.5	121.5	37.5
T6	51.0	48.0	0.0	181.5	25.5
T7	51.0	94.5	213.0	0.0	12.0
T8	51.0	142.5	142.5	60.0	0.0
T9	102.0	0.0	142.5	181.5	12.0
T10	102.0	48.0	213.0	121.5	0.0
T11	102.0	94.5	0.0	60.0	37.5
T12	102.0	142.5	70.5	0.0	25.5
T13	153.0	0.0	213.0	60.0	25.5
T14	153.0	48.0	142.5	0.0	37.5
T15	153.0	94.5	70.5	181.5	0.0
T16	153.0	142.5	0.0	121.5	12.0

处理 Treatment	N	P₂O₅	K₂O	CaO	MgO
T1	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
T2	0.0	48.0	70.5	60.0	12.0
T3	0.0	94.5	142.5	121.5	25.5
T4	0.0	142.5	213.0	181.5	37.5
T5	51.0	0.0	70.5	121.5	37.5
T6	51.0	48.0	0.0	181.5	25.5
T7	51.0	94.5	213.0	0.0	12.0
T8	51.0	142.5	142.5	60.0	0.0
T9	102.0	0.0	142.5	181.5	12.0
T10	102.0	48.0	213.0	121.5	0.0
T11	102.0	94.5	0.0	60.0	37.5
T12	102.0	142.5	70.5	0.0	25.5
T13	153.0	0.0	213.0	60.0	25.5
T14	153.0	48.0	142.5	0.0	37.5
T15	153.0	94.5	70.5	181.5	0.0
T16	153.0	142.5	0.0	121.5	12.0

处理 Treatment	果穗长度/mm Spike length	纵径/mm Longitudinal diameter	横径/mm Transverse diameter	果形指数 Berry shape index	单穗质量/g Cluster weight	单粒质量/g Single grain weight
T1	192.5±7.5def	31.27±0.17a	25.53±1.14ab	1.23±0.05a	732.5±16.2cd	12.06±0.66ab
T2	205.6±3.1ab	26.55±0.83fg	23.03±1.13cde	1.15±0.03ab	658.2±28.6ef	10.01±0.07fgh
T3	190.7±3.2def	27.64±1.03ef	22.59±1.29de	1.22±0.03a	568.0±22.7gh	10.01±0.64fgh
T4	190.2±3.6def	26.61±1.23fg	23.36±1.11cde	1.14±0.02b	541.8±18.1h	9.37±0.26hij
T5	185.5±3.1f	25.38±1.49g	22.12±1.16e	1.15±0.02ab	581.3±20.8gh	8.57±0.07j
T6	194.6±0.0cde	27.27±0.19efg	22.82±1.42de	1.20±0.06ab	589.0±11.6gh	8.54±0.29j
T7	202.0±3.5abc	30.27±1.66ab	24.89±1.35abc	1.22±0.03a	762.8±32.8bc	10.70±0.65def
T8	189.9±7.6def	26.82±0.73efg	23.22±1.38cde	1.16±0.04ab	565.3±36.0gh	9.09±0.26ij
T9	207.7±4.5a	27.35±1.04ef	23.91±0.89bcde	1.14±0.05b	680.3±35.4e	10.20±0.31efg
T10	206.4±5.0a	30.03±0.30abc	25.96±0.20a	1.16±0.02ab	844.3±3.9a	11.69±0.49abc
T11	205.7±3.8ab	28.17±1.82cdef	24.06±0.70abcde	1.17±0.04ab	831.2±39.0a	10.83±0.94def
T12	197.5±2.2bcd	29.86±0.39abcd	25.50±0.60ab	1.17±0.02ab	810.8±8.4ab	11.46±0.47bcd
T13	187.6±0.9ef	27.93±1.29def	23.33±0.88cde	1.20±0.03ab	615.8±29.0fg	9.69±0.39ghi
T14	186.9±8.4ef	28.68±0.44bcde	25.48±1.11ab	1.13±0.04b	692.2±52.1de	12.45±0.20a
T15	175.9±2.6g	28.52±0.56bcdef	24.12±0.32abcd	1.18±0.04ab	764.3±35.9bc	10.98±0.26cde
T16	174.3±5.3g	28.42±1.31bcdef	24.08±0.06abcde	1.18±0.05ab	660.5±33.2ef	11.85±0.42abc

处理 Treatment	果穗长度/mm Spike length	纵径/mm Longitudinal diameter	横径/mm Transverse diameter	果形指数 Berry shape index	单穗质量/g Cluster weight	单粒质量/g Single grain weight
T1	192.5±7.5def	31.27±0.17a	25.53±1.14ab	1.23±0.05a	732.5±16.2cd	12.06±0.66ab
T2	205.6±3.1ab	26.55±0.83fg	23.03±1.13cde	1.15±0.03ab	658.2±28.6ef	10.01±0.07fgh
T3	190.7±3.2def	27.64±1.03ef	22.59±1.29de	1.22±0.03a	568.0±22.7gh	10.01±0.64fgh
T4	190.2±3.6def	26.61±1.23fg	23.36±1.11cde	1.14±0.02b	541.8±18.1h	9.37±0.26hij
T5	185.5±3.1f	25.38±1.49g	22.12±1.16e	1.15±0.02ab	581.3±20.8gh	8.57±0.07j
T6	194.6±0.0cde	27.27±0.19efg	22.82±1.42de	1.20±0.06ab	589.0±11.6gh	8.54±0.29j
T7	202.0±3.5abc	30.27±1.66ab	24.89±1.35abc	1.22±0.03a	762.8±32.8bc	10.70±0.65def
T8	189.9±7.6def	26.82±0.73efg	23.22±1.38cde	1.16±0.04ab	565.3±36.0gh	9.09±0.26ij
T9	207.7±4.5a	27.35±1.04ef	23.91±0.89bcde	1.14±0.05b	680.3±35.4e	10.20±0.31efg
T10	206.4±5.0a	30.03±0.30abc	25.96±0.20a	1.16±0.02ab	844.3±3.9a	11.69±0.49abc
T11	205.7±3.8ab	28.17±1.82cdef	24.06±0.70abcde	1.17±0.04ab	831.2±39.0a	10.83±0.94def
T12	197.5±2.2bcd	29.86±0.39abcd	25.50±0.60ab	1.17±0.02ab	810.8±8.4ab	11.46±0.47bcd
T13	187.6±0.9ef	27.93±1.29def	23.33±0.88cde	1.20±0.03ab	615.8±29.0fg	9.69±0.39ghi
T14	186.9±8.4ef	28.68±0.44bcde	25.48±1.11ab	1.13±0.04b	692.2±52.1de	12.45±0.20a
T15	175.9±2.6g	28.52±0.56bcdef	24.12±0.32abcd	1.18±0.04ab	764.3±35.9bc	10.98±0.26cde
T16	174.3±5.3g	28.42±1.31bcdef	24.08±0.06abcde	1.18±0.05ab	660.5±33.2ef	11.85±0.42abc

处理 Treatment	L^*	a^*	b^*	C	色泽指数 CIRG
T1	57.09±0.48a	-6.98±0.64bc	23.92±0.68abc	25.27±1.61abcd	0.90±0.06cdef
T2	54.96±1.08abcd	-6.30±0.37ab	21.80±1.05de	22.74±1.71def	0.97±0.04abc
T3	57.08±1.57a	-8.47±0.83cdef	25.56±1.10a	26.95±1.84ab	0.86±0.03ef
T4	55.30±1.79abc	-9.69±0.86f	25.61±0.49a	27.39±1.64a	0.84±0.01f
T5	56.04±1.27ab	-7.49±0.65cd	24.11±0.96abc	25.37±1.31abcd	0.89±0.04cdef
T6	55.59±0.44abc	-8.16±0.62d	23.72±0.48bc	25.11±2.40abcd	0.88±0.05def
T7	53.67±1.38cde	-6.86±0.79bc	23.63±0.79bc	24.61±2.00abcdef	0.97±0.02abc
T8	56.86±1.07a	-5.60±0.48a	24.18±0.91abc	24.89±0.78abcde	0.95±0.01abcd
T9	52.29±1.63e	-6.04±0.75ab	20.55±0.80e	21.43±1.05f	1.01±0.05a
T10	52.95±0.36de	-5.81±0.56ab	20.81±1.04e	21.63±1.78ef	1.00±0.04ab
T11	55.34±1.04abc	-6.90±0.43bc	22.79±0.17cd	23.83±1.37bcdef	0.93±0.02bcde
T12	53.60±1.26cde	-6.08±0.61ab	21.84±1.20de	22.68±2.37def	0.94±0.06abcde
T13	57.09±1.31a	-7.69±0.74cd	24.94±0.79ab	26.14±0.78abc	0.88±0.04def
T14	54.12±0.99bcde	-6.67±0.19abc	23.44±0.97bcd	24.40±2.50abcdef	0.95±0.03abcd
T15	55.61±1.41abc	-9.44±0.52ef	24.70±0.75ab	26.38±0.34abc	0.84±0.06f
T16	53.51±1.28cde	-5.83±0.39ab	22.54±1.43cd	23.30±2.18cdef	0.99±0.05ab

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export