干旱胁迫对小麦非结构性碳水化合物代谢的影响及其与抗旱性的关系

doi:10.7668/hbnxb.2015.02.035

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了研究干旱胁迫下,小麦非结构性碳水化合物的改变率与干旱敏感系数的相关性。利用室内水培的方法,以6个抗旱性不同的小麦品种为试验材料,设置15% PEG和20% PEG 2个胁迫水平,以不添加PEG的正常营养液为对照,系统研究了不同干旱胁迫条件下小麦叶片和根系中主要非结构性碳水化合物含量的变化规律。结果表明,干旱胁迫明显降低了各小麦品种干物质量,6个小麦品种在不同干旱水平下的抗旱性均表现为晋麦47 > 矮抗58 > 周麦22 > 洛旱6号 > 郑麦9023 > 西农979;干旱胁迫下6个小麦品种叶片和根系中可溶性总糖、蔗糖、果糖、葡萄糖含量均随着干旱时间的增加呈先增加后降低的趋势,而淀粉和果聚糖含量则呈降低的趋势,复水后各非结构性碳水化合物含量逐渐恢复到对照水平;6个小麦品种中,干旱敏感性越高的品种,在干旱胁迫下其组织中各非结构性碳水化合物含量的改变率越小;干旱敏感系数与干旱胁迫下各非结构性碳水化合物含量的改变率均呈负相关性,其中可溶性总糖、果糖、淀粉、果聚糖含量在干旱胁迫下的改变率与干旱敏感系数的相关性达到显著水平。在干旱胁迫下,淀粉与果聚糖的水解对提高小麦抗旱性有重要作用。

关键词: 小麦, 干旱胁迫, 碳水化合物代谢, 干物质, 抗旱性

Abstract: In order to study the relationship between non-structure carbohydrate and drought sensitive coefficient under drought stress.The variation of non-structure carbohydrate contents in leaves and roots of six wheat varieties were studied under two dought stress treatments (15% PEG and 20% PEG), taking the normal solution management as control (CK).The results displayed that the dry matter weight decreased under drought stress.The drought sensitivity of six wheat varieties was Jinmai 47(JM47) > Aikang 58(AK58) > Zhoumai 22(ZM22) > Luohan No.6 (LH6) > Zhengmai 9023(ZM9023) > Xinong 979(XN979) for both 15% PEG and 20% PEG treatments.The contents of total soluble sugar, glucose, fructose and sucrose increased first and then decreased with the extension of drought stress time, while the contents of starch and fructan decreased all the way.The non-structure carbohydrate contents in leaves and roots approximated the level of CK after rewatering.The varieties with higher drought sensitivity had less change rate of non-structure carbohydrate contents.The drought sensitive coefficient had negative correlation with the change rate of non-structure carbohydrate contents.The correlations of drought sensitive coefficient with the change rate of soluble total sugar, fructose, starch and fructan was significant.The degradation of starch and fructan under drought stress played an important role in improving the drought resistance of wheat.

Key words: Wheat, Drought stress, Carbohydrate metabolism, Dry matter, Drought resistance

中图分类号:

S512.01

郭瑞盼, 辛泽毓, 王志强, 郭晓阳, 张丽婷, 王俊哲, 林同保. 干旱胁迫对小麦非结构性碳水化合物代谢的影响及其与抗旱性的关系[J]. 华北农学报, 2015, 30(2): 202-211. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2015.02.035.

GUO Rui-pan, XIN Ze-yu, WANG Zhi-qiang, GUO Xiao-yang, ZHANG Li-ting, WANG Jun-zhe, LIN Tong-bao. Effect of Drought Stress on Non-structure Carbohydrate Metabolism of Wheat and Its Relationship with Drought Resistance[J]. ACTA AGRICULTURAE BOREALI-SINICA, 2015, 30(2): 202-211. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2015.02.035.

http://www.hbnxb.net/CN/Y2015/V30/I2/202

参考文献

[1] 尹恒,王文霞,赵小明,等.植物糖生物学研究进展[J].植物学报,2010,45(5):521-529.
[2] 雷美玉,李辉亮,刘立元,等.糖在植物中的感知与信号传导研究进展[J].西北植物学报,2007,27(10):2118-2127.
[3] 潘庆民,韩兴国,白永飞,等.植物非结构性贮藏碳水化合物的生理生态学研究进展[J].植物学通报,2002,19(1):30-38.
[4] Price J,Laxmi A,St Martin S K,et al.Global transcription profiling reveals multiple sugar signal transduction mechanisms in Arabidopsis[J].Plant Cell,2004,16(8):2128-2150.
[5] Foyer C L,Noctor G.Photosynthetic Nitrogen assimilation:Inter-pathway control and signaling[M].Dordrecht:kluver academic publishers,2002.
[6] Farooq M,Wahid A,Kobayashi N,et al.Plant drought stress:effects,mechanisms and management[J].Agronomy for Sustainable Development,2009,29(1):185-212.
[7] 邵艳军,山仑,李广敏.干旱胁迫与复水条件下高粱、玉米苗期渗透调节及抗氧化比较研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2006,14(1):68-70.
[8] Zhai P M,Sun A J,Ren F M, et al. Changes of climate extremes in China [J].Weather Climates Extremes,1999,42:203-218.
[9] Chen C,Wang E L,Yu Q.Modelling the effects of climate variability and water management on crop water productivity and water balance in the North China Plain[J].Agricultural Water Management,2010,97(8,SI):1175-1184.
[10] You Q L,Kang S C,Aguilar E,et al.Changes in daily climate extremes in China and their connection to the large scale atmospheric circulation during 1961-2003[J].Climate Dynamics,2011,36(11-12):2399-2417.
[11] Hu Y R,Maskey S,Uhlenbrook S.Trends in temperature and rainfall extremes in the Yellow River source region,China[J].Climatic Change,2012,110(1-2):403-429.
[12] 杨书运,严平,梅雪英.水分胁迫对冬小麦抗性物质可溶性糖与脯氨酸的影响[J].中国农学通报,2007,23(12):229-233.
[13] Praxedes S C,DaMatta F M,Loureiro M E.Effects of long-term soil drought on photosynthesis and carbonhydrate in mature robusta coffee (Coffea canephora Pierre var.kouillou) leaves [J].Environmental and Experimental Botany,2006,56:263-273.
[14] Liu T,Van Staden J.Partitioning of carbohydrates in salt-sensitive and salt-tolerant soybean callus cultures under salinity stress and its subsequent relief[J].Plant Growth Regulation,2001,33(1):13-17.
[15] 许兴,郑国琦,邓西平,等.不同基因型小麦幼苗抗旱抗盐性比较研究[J].西北植物学报,2002,22(5):1122-1135.
[16] 张振清.植物生理学试验手册[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1985:134-138.
[17] 哈森其木格,贺锋嘎.间苯二酚分光光度法测定芥菜多糖中的果糖含量[J].光谱学与光谱分析,2002,3(22):446-448.
[18] 中国科学院上海植物生理研究所,上海市植物生理学会.现代植物生理学实验指南[M].北京:科学出版社,1999:127-128.
[19] 姜东,于振文,李永庚,等.高产小麦营养器官临时贮存物质积运及其对粒重的贡献[J].作物学报,2003,29(1):31-36.
[20] Parry M A J,Andralojc P J,Khan S, et al.Rubisco activity:Effects of drought stress [J].Annals of Botany,2002,89:833-839.
[21] Blasing O E,Gibon Y,Gunther M,et al.Sugars and circadian regulation make major contributions to the global regulation of diurnal gene expression in Arabldopsis[J].Plant Cell,2005,17(12):3257-3281.
[22] Roitsch T,Gonzalez M C.Function and regulation of plant invertases:sweet sensations[J].Trends in Plant Science,2004,9(12):606-613.
[23] Ohto M,Onai K,Furukawa Y,et al.Effects of sugar on vegetative development and floral transition in arabidopsis[J].Plant Physiology,2001,127(1):252-261.
[24] 何俊彦,徐方舟.土壤干旱条件下小麦植株中糖的变化及其与小麦抗旱性的关系[J].植物生理学报,1978,4(1):75-81.
[25] 张玉梅,林琪,刘义国,等.不同抗旱性小麦品种花后旗叶生化特性的研究[J].华北农学报,2006,21(4):43-47.
[26] 詹海仙,畅志坚,魏爱丽,等.干旱胁迫对小麦生理指标的影响[J].山西农业科学,2011,39(10):1049-1051.
[27] 左文博,吴静利,杨奇,等.干旱胁迫对小麦根系活力和可溶性糖含量的影响[J].华北农学报,2010,25(6):191-193.
[28] 王维,蔡一霞,张建华,等.适度土壤干旱对贪青小麦茎贮藏碳水化合物向籽粒运转的调节[J].作物学报,2005,31(3):289-296.
[29] 王维,张建华,杨建昌,等.水分胁迫对贪青迟熟水稻茎贮藏碳水化合物代谢及产量的影响[J].作物学报,2004,30(3):196-204.

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容