华北农学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5): 208-217. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20196538

所属专题: 小麦; 植物保护; 生物技术;

• 资源环境·植物保护 • 上一篇    下一篇

06Dn23/河农5290的RIL群体中小麦抗叶锈病基因的鉴定和定位

王炎刚1, 魏岳1, 董瑞1, 李嘉望1, 张振欣1, 李亚宁1, 张培培1, 张业伦2, 李在峰1   

  1. 1 河北省农作物病虫害生物防治工程技术研究中心, 河北农业大学 植物保护学院, 河北 保定 071001
    2 河北省农林科学院 粮油作物研究所, 河北省作物遗传育种重点实验室, 河北 石家庄 050031
  • 出版日期:2026-11-04
  • 通讯作者:
    李在峰(1975—),男,河南卫辉人,教授,博士,博士生导师,主要从事分子植物病理学研究。
    张业伦(1979—),男,安徽合肥人,研究员,博士,主要从事小麦种质资源研究。
  • 作者简介:

    王炎刚(2000—),男,河北邢台人,硕士,主要从事分子植物病理学研究。

  • 基金资助:
    河北省农林科学院科技创新专项(2022KJCXZX-LYS-3); 国家重点研发计划项目(2023YFD1201002-02); 国家自然科学基金项目(32161143007)

Identification and Mapping of Wheat Leaf Rust Resistance Gene in 06Dn23/Henong 5290 RIL Population

WANG Yangang1, WEI Yue1, DONG Rui1, LI Jiawang1, ZHANG Zhenxin1, LI Yaning1, ZHANG Peipei1, ZHANG Yelun2, LI Zaifeng1   

  1. 1 Biological Control Center of Plant Diseases and Pests of Hebei Province, College of Plant Protection,Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071001, China
    2 Institute of Cereal and Oil Crops, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences,Hebei Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Breeding, Shijiazhuang 050031, China
  • Published:2026-11-04

摘要:

小麦叶锈病是影响我国小麦生产的一种重要病害,河北小麦品种河农5290对小麦叶锈病表现出良好抗性。以06Dn23与河农5290杂交后经连续自交获得的190个重组自交系(RIL)为试验材料,开展抗叶锈病基因定位研究。首先采用人工接菌法对该RIL群体进行苗期抗病性鉴定,结合分子标记检测与小麦55K芯片扫描技术进行连锁分析,挖掘苗期抗叶锈病基因;随后在成株期进行多环境叶锈病抗性调查,整合田间表型数据和基因型数据,完成该RIL群体苗期及成株期抗叶锈病数量性状位点(QTL)定位。结果显示,该群体中鉴定出苗期抗叶锈病已知基因Lr1、Lr13及1个新基因LrHN52。成株期QTL定位结果显示,在小麦1B、5A和7D染色体上共定位到4个抗叶锈病QTL,暂定名为QLr.hbau-1B、QLr.hbau-5A、QLr.hbau-7D.1和 QLr.hbau-7D.2。其中,QLr.hbau-1B在所有环境中均能稳定检测,与已报道的QLr-WorldAdult-1BS.2位点相近,推测为同一个QTL。QLr.hbau-5A在所有环境中稳定表达,推测为新的抗叶锈病QTL。QLr.hbau-7D.1仅在单个环境中被检测到,可能为新位点。经标记检测及连锁SNP标记的物理位置分析,确认QLr.hbau-7D.2为已知抗叶锈病基因Lr34。

关键词: 小麦, 抗叶锈病基因, 分子标记检测, QTL定位

Abstract:

Wheat leaf rust is a significant disease affecting wheat production in China.The Hebei wheat cultivar Henong 5290 exhibits good resistance to wheat leaf rust.190 recombinant inbred lines(RILs)derived from a cross between 06Dn23 and Henong 5290 through consecutive selfing were used as experimental materials for mapping leaf rust resistance genes.Seedling-stage resistance identification was first conducted on this RIL population using artificial inoculation.Combined with molecular marker detection and wheat 55K SNP array scanning,linkage analysis was performed to mine seedling-stage leaf rust resistance genes.Subsequently,multi-environment investigations of leaf rust resistance at the adult plant stage were carried out.By integrating field phenotypic data and genotypic data,quantitative trait locus(QTL)mapping for leaf rust resistance at both seedling and adult plant stages was completed in this RIL population.The results showed that the known seedling resistance genes Lr1 and Lr13,and one novel gene,temporarily designated LrHN52,were identified in the population.QTL mapping at the adult plant stage revealed four leaf rust resistance QTLs located on wheat chromosomes 1B,5A,and 7D,temporarily named QLr.hbau-1B,QLr.hbau-5A,QLr.hbau-7D.1,and QLr.hbau-7D.2.Among them,QLr.hbau-1B was stably identified across all environments and was close to the previously reported QLr-WorldAdult-1BS.2 locus,suggesting it may be the same QTL.QLr.hbau-5A was stably expressed in all environments and was proposed to be a novel leaf rust resistance QTL.QLr.hbau-7D.1 was detected in only a single environment and may represent a novel locus.Through marker detection and analysis of the physical positions of linked SNP markers,QLr.hbau-7D.2 was confirmed to be the known leaf rust resistance gene Lr34.

Key words: Wheat, Leaf rust resistance gene, Molecular marker detection, QTL mapping

中图分类号: 

引用本文

王炎刚, 魏岳, 董瑞, 李嘉望, 张振欣, 李亚宁, 张培培, 张业伦, 李在峰. 06Dn23/河农5290的RIL群体中小麦抗叶锈病基因的鉴定和定位[J]. 华北农学报, 2026, 41(5): 208-217. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20196538.

WANG Yangang, WEI Yue, DONG Rui, LI Jiawang, ZHANG Zhenxin, LI Yaning, ZHANG Peipei, ZHANG Yelun, LI Zaifeng. Identification and Mapping of Wheat Leaf Rust Resistance Gene in 06Dn23/Henong 5290 RIL Population[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2026, 41(5): 208-217. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20196538.