青海柴达木盆地藜麦品质表现及营养成分聚类分析

doi:10.7668/hbnxb.20191509

华北农学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (S1): 209-219. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20191509

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇下一篇

青海柴达木盆地藜麦品质表现及营养成分聚类分析

李想^1,2, 朱丽丽^1,2, 李小飞³, 王其才³, 杨学贵⁴, 甘淑萍⁵, 毛小锋⁵, 陈志国^1,6,7

1. 中国科学院西北高原生物研究所, 青海西宁 810008;
2. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
3. 海西州农业技术综合服务中心, 青海德令哈 817000;
4. 青海省小寨良种试验站, 青海西宁 810016;
5. 青海省种子管理站, 青海西宁 810016;
6. 中国科学院, 高原生物适应与进化重点实验室, 青海西宁 810008;
7. 青海省作物分子育种重点实验室, 青海西宁 810008

收稿日期:2020-06-23 出版日期:2020-12-28
通讯作者: 陈志国(1963-),男,吉林公主岭人,研究员,硕士,博士生导师,主要从事作物遗传育种研究。
作者简介:李想(1996-),女,河南开封人,在读硕士,主要从事作物遗传育种研究。
基金资助:
中国科学院种子创新研究院（INASEED）；海西州财政支持农业项目（HXNM-001）；青海省种子工程项目（2019016）；青海省重点研发与转化计划项目（2020-NK-122）

Quinoa Quality Performance and Nutrient Content Clustering Analysis in Qaidam Basin, Qinghai

LI Xiang^1,2, ZHU Lili^1,2, LI Xiaofei³, WANG Qicai³, YANG Xuegui⁴, GAN Shuping⁵, MAO Xiaofeng⁵, CHEN Zhiguo^1,6,7

1. Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining 810008, China;
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
3. Haixi Prefecture Agricultural Technology Comprehensive Service Center, Delingha 817000, China;
4. Qinghai Xiaozhai Fine Seed Testing Station, Xining 810016, China;
5. Qinghai Seed Management Station, Xining 810016, China;
6. Key Laboratory of Adaptation and Evolution of Plateau Blota, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining 810008, China;
7. Qinghai Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Molecular Breeding, Xining 810008, China

Received:2020-06-23 Published:2020-12-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了解柴达木盆地藜麦品质现状，应用多元统计学分析方法，对都兰地区种植的12份藜麦品种（系）的水分、灰分、淀粉、脂肪、粗纤维、总糖、蛋白质、β-葡聚糖、微量元素和氨基酸含量进行了检测和系统分析。结果表明：受遗传和环境的共同影响，同一品种（系）各微量元素之间存在显著的相关关系；藜麦品种（系）间微量元素含量差异较大，水分、脂肪、蛋白质、氨基酸含量差异较小。主成分分析结果显示，建立模型时要正向选择淀粉、脂肪和总糖含量，负向选择水分、蛋白质含量。综合评分后发现适宜柴达木盆地（都兰地区）种植的藜麦品种（系）有7个，其适宜度依次为：rell > 天马HX > QLM01 > 614915HX > 1591 > 青藜1号 > 西宁藜麦；贡杂3号、4号、5号、6号和三江2号等品种（系）不适宜都兰地区种植。聚类分析结果显示，可将12个藜麦品种（系）聚成3类，第一大类不适合都兰地区种植，包括贡杂3号、4号、5号和6号；第二大类营养品质居中，包括天马HX、QLM01、614915HX、1591、青藜1号、西宁藜麦、三江2号，可根据实际情况有选择地在都兰种植；第三类只有rell一个品系，在都兰地区品质表现最好。综合微量元素、氨基酸含量等分析结果，QML01与1591两品系综合性状最优。

关键词: 藜麦, 柴达木盆地, 营养品质, 主成分分析, 聚类分析

Abstract: In order to understand the current status of quinoa quality in the Qaidam Basin.The contents of moisture,ash,starch,fat,crude fiber,total sugar,protein,β-glucan,trace elements and amino acids of 12 quinoa varieties (lines) planted in Dulan area were tested and systematically analyzed by means of multivariate statistical analysis method. The results showed that under the common influence of genetics and environment,there was a significant correlation between trace elements in the same variety (line); and the content of trace elements in quinoa varieties (line) varied greatly.The differences in moisture,fat,protein and amino acid contents were small.The results of principal component analysis showed that when building the model,the content of starch,fat and total sugar should be positively selected,and moisture and protein should be negatively selected. After comprehensive scoring,7 quinoa varieties (line) suitable for planting in the Qaidam Basin(Dulan area) were found. The suitability was:rell > Tianma HX > QLM01 > 614915HX > 1591 > Qingli No.1 > Xining Quinoa; Gongza No.3,Gongza No.4,Gongza No.5,Gongza No.6 and Sanjiang No.2 were not suitable for cultivation in Dulan area. Cluster analysis results showed that 12 quinoa varieties (line) could be clustered into 3 categories,the first category was not suitable for planting in Dulan area,including Gongza No.3,Gongza No.4,Gongza No.5,Gongza No.6; The second category of nutritional quality was in the middle,including Tianma HX,QLM01,614915HX,1591,Qingli No.1,Xining Quinoa,Sanjiang No.2,and could be selectively planted in Dulan according to the actual situation; The third category had only rell strain,which was the most suitable for planted in the Dulan area. Comprehensive analysis of trace elements and amino acid content showed that QML01 and 1591 strains were the best comprehensive characters.

Key words: Quinoa, Qaidam Basin, Nutritional quality, Principal component analysis, Cluster analysis

中图分类号:

S3
S512.01

李想, 朱丽丽, 李小飞, 王其才, 杨学贵, 甘淑萍, 毛小锋, 陈志国. 青海柴达木盆地藜麦品质表现及营养成分聚类分析[J]. 华北农学报, 2020, 35(S1): 209-219. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20191509.

LI Xiang, ZHU Lili, LI Xiaofei, WANG Qicai, YANG Xuegui, GAN Shuping, MAO Xiaofeng, CHEN Zhiguo. Quinoa Quality Performance and Nutrient Content Clustering Analysis in Qaidam Basin, Qinghai[J]. ACTA AGRICULTURAE BOREALI-SINICA, 2020, 35(S1): 209-219. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20191509.

http://www.hbnxb.net/CN/Y2020/V35/IS1/209

参考文献

[1] 庞春花,华艳宏,张永清,贺笑,薛蓉.不同磷水平下施加腐植酸对藜麦生理特性及产量的影响[J].中国农业科技导报,2019,21(4):143-150.doi:10.13304/j.nykjdb.20180486.
Pang C H,Hua Y H,Zhang Y Q,He X,Xue R. Influences of humic acid on physiological characteristics and yield of quinoa under different phosphorus levels[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology,2019,21(4):143-150.
[2] 刘文瑜,杨发荣,黄杰,魏玉明,金茜.NaCl胁迫对藜麦幼苗生长和抗氧化酶活性的影响[J].西北植物学报,2017,37(9):1797-1804.doi:10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.2017.09.1797.
Liu W Y,Yang F R,Huang J,Wei Y M,Jin Q. Response of seedling growth and the activities of antioxidant enzymes of Chenopodium quinoa to salt stress[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica,2017,37(9):1797-1804.
[3] 岳凯,魏小红,刘文瑜,韩厅,辛夏青,赵颖.PEG胁迫下不同品系藜麦抗旱性评价[J].干旱地区农业研究,2019,37(3):52-59.doi:10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2019.03.06.
Yue K,Wei X H,Liu W Y,Han T,Xin X Q,Zhao Y. Evaluation of drought tolerance of various quinoa species under PEG stress[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas,2019,37(3):52-59.
[4] 赵颖,魏小红,赫亚龙,赵枭飞,韩厅,岳凯,辛夏青,宿梅飞,马文静,骆巧娟.混合盐碱胁迫对藜麦种子萌发和幼苗抗氧化特性的影响[J].草业学报,2019,28(2):156-167.doi:10.11686/cyxb2018181.
Zhao Y,Wei X H,He Y L,Zhao X F,Han T,Yue K,Xin X Q,Su M F,Ma W J,Luo Q J. Effects of complex saline-alkali stress on seed germination and seedling antioxidant characteristics of Chenopodium quinoa[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2019,28(2):156-167.
[5] Matiacevich S B,Castellión M L,Maldonado S B,Buera M P. Water-dependent thermal transitions in quinoa embryos[J]. Thermochimica Acta,2006,448(2):117-122.doi:10.1016/j.tca.2006.06.016.
[6] 崔纪菡,魏志敏,刘猛,赵宇,宋世佳,李海鹏,夏雪岩,李顺国.不同品系菜用藜麦的品质及产量[J]. 河北农业科学,2019,23(3):62-65.doi:10.12148/hbnykx.20190071.
Cui J H,Wei Z M,Liu M,Zhao Y,Song S J,Li H P,Xia X Y,Li S G. Quality and yield of different vegetable quinoat stains[J]. Journal of Hebei Agricultural Sciences,2019,23(3):62-65.
[7] 古桑德吉,林长彬,杰布.基于西藏不同藜麦资源营养成分的研究[J].西藏科技,2019(7):10-12. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-3403.2019.07.004.
Cu S D J,Lin C B,Jie B. Study on the nutritional components of different quinoa resources in Tibet[J]. Tibet' s Science and Technology,2019(7):10-12.
[8] Jacobsen S E,Mujica A,Jensen C R. The resistance of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to adverse abiotic factors[J]. Food reviews international,2003,19(1-2):99-109.doi:10.1010.81/FRI-120018872.
[9] Wilson C,Read J J,Abo-Kassem E. Effect of mixed-salt salinity on growth and ion relations of a Quinoa and a wheat variety[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition,2002,25(12):2689-2704.doi:10.1081/PLN-120015532.
[10] 顾娴,黄杰,魏玉明,金茜,杨发荣.藜麦研究进展及发展前景[J].中国农学通报,2015,31(30):201-204.doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb15060023.
Gu X,Huang J,Wei Y M,Jin Q,Yang F R. Development prospect and research progress of Chenopodium quinoa[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin,2015,31(30):201-204.
[11] 王晨静,赵习武,陆国权,毛前.藜麦特性及开发利用研究进展[J].浙江农林大学学报,2014,31(2):296-301.doi:10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2014.02.020.
Wang C J,Zhao X W,Lu G Q,Mao Q. A review of characteristics and utilization of Chenopodium quinoa[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A & F University,2014,31(2):296-301.
[12] 贡布扎西,旺姆,张崇玺,杨庆寿.南美藜在西藏的生物学特性表现[J].西南农业学报,1994,7(3):54-62.doi:10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.1994.03.012.
Gong B Z X,Wang M,Zhang C X,Yang Q S. South American quinoa's biological characteristics in Tibet[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences,1994,7(3):54-62.
[13] 任贵兴,杨修仕,么杨.中国藜麦产业现状[J].作物杂志,2015(5):1-5.doi:10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2015.05.001.
Ren G X,Yang X S,Yao Y. Current situation of quinoa industry in China[J]. Crops,2015(5):1-5.
[14] 刘景丽,孙长礼,王春兰,张宇卫,祁生源.民和县藜麦种植试验报告[J].青海农技推广,2015(1):59-60. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-7117.2015.01.035.
Liu J L,Sun C L,Wang C L,Zhang Y W,Qi S Y. A report of quinoa planting experiment in Minhe County[J]. Qinghai Agro-Technology Extension,2015(1):59-60.
[15] 李成祖.格尔木市藜麦引种栽培技术试验研究[J].农业科技通讯,2015(6):94-96.
Li C Z. Experimental study on introduction and cultivation techniques of quinoa in Golmud City[J]. Agricultural Science and Technology Newsletter,2015(6):94-96.
[16] 雷加容,余敖,任勇,李生荣,周强,陶军,欧俊梅,杜小英,何员江.小麦品质性状的主成分分析[J].大麦与谷类科学,2015(2):45-48. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-6486.2015.02.013.
Lei J R,Yu A,Ren Y,Li S R,Zhou Q,Tao J,Ou J M,Du X Y,He Y J. Principal components analysis of qualitative traits in wheat[J]. Barley and Cereal Sciences,2015(2):45-48.
[17] 邹德堂.黑龙江省稻米品质性状的主成分分析[J].东北农业大学学报,2008,39(3):17-21.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-9369.2008.03.005.
Zou D T. Principal component analysis of rice quality traits in Heilongjiang Province[J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University,2008,39(3):17-21.
[18] 吴建忠,李绥艳,林红,马延华,潘丽艳,李东林,孙德全.青贮玉米品质性状遗传变异及主成分分析[J].作物杂志,2019(3):42-48. doi:10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2019.03.008.
Wu J Z,Li S Y,Lin H,Ma Y H,Pan L Y,Li D L,Sun D Q. Genetic variation and principal component analysis of quality characters in silage maize[J]. Crops,2019(3):42-48.
[19] Nowak V,Du J U, Charrondière U R. Assessment of the nutritional composition of quinoa(Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)[J]. Food Chemistry,2016,193(15):47-54.doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.02.111.
[20] Ogungbenle H N. Nutritional evaluation and functional properties of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) flour[J]. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition,2003,54(2):153-158.doi:10. 1080/0963748031000084106.
[21] 姚有华,白羿雄,吴昆仑.亏缺灌溉对藜麦光合特性、营养品质和产量的影响[J].西北农业学报,2019,28(5):713-722.doi:10.7606/j.issn.1004-1389.2019.05.005.
Yao Y H,Bai Y X,Wu K L. Effects of deficit irrigation on photosynthetic characteristics,nutritional quality and yield of quinoa[J]. Acta Agriculture Boreali-occidentalis Sinica,2019,28(5):713-722.
[22] 张玉.SPSS软件和主成分分析法在牧草营养价值评价中的应用[J].安徽农业科学,2012,40(12):7186-7188.doi:10.13989/j.cnki.0517-6611.2012.12.227.
Zhang Y. Application of SPSS software and principal component analysis method in forage nutrition value evaluation[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences,2012,40(12):7186-7188.
[23] Vega-Gálvez A,Miranda M,Vergara J,Uribe E,Puente L,Mart nez Enrique A. Nutrition facts and functional potential of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd.),an ancient Andean grain:a review[J]. Journal of the Science of Food & Agriculture,2010,90(15):2541-2547.doi:10.1002/jsfa.4158.
[24] Vilcacundo R, Hernández-Ledesma B. Nutritional and biological value of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)[J]. Current Opinion in Food Science,2017,14:1-6.doi:10.1016 j.cofs.2016.11.007.
[25] 李珊珊,张爱霞,王桂荣,张新仕,师志刚,王慧军.石家庄地区11个谷子品种的品质相关及聚类分析[J].湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2012,38(6):580-586.doi:10.3724/SP.J.1238.2012.00580.
Li S S,Zhang A X,Wang G R,Zhang X S,Shi Z G,Wang H J. Correlation and cluster analysis of quality traits in planted millets from Shijiazhuang[J]. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University(Natural Sciences),2012,38(6):580-586.
[26] 赵亚东,党斌,杨希娟,刘洋,姚有华,迟德钊.青海藜麦皂苷超声提取工艺及抗氧化活性[J].食品工业科技,2017,38(19):45-51,62.doi:10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2017.19.009.
Zhao Y D,Dang B,Yang X J,Liu Y,Yao Y H,Chi D Z. Ultrasonic extraction technology of saponins and its antioxidant activity in quinoa from Qinghai[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry,2017,38(19):45-51,62.

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

青海柴达木盆地藜麦品质表现及营养成分聚类分析

Quinoa Quality Performance and Nutrient Content Clustering Analysis in Qaidam Basin, Qinghai

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	高彦龙, 张德, 张瑞, 张仲兴, 赵婷, 王双成, 王延秀. 外源CaCl₂对盐胁迫下苹果砧木T337生理特性的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2021, 36(5): 118-126.
[2]	朱满喜, 张玉荣, 杨雅舒, 杨小兰, 王创云, 邓妍, 赵丽, 张丽光, 秦丽霞, 杨利艳. 藜麦NLP转录因子家族的鉴定及表达分析[J]. 华北农学报, 2021, 36(4): 37-46.
[3]	张永平, 潘佳楠, 郭占斌, 吴强, 白羽. 不同种植密度对藜麦群体抗倒伏性能及产量的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2021, 36(4): 108-115.
[4]	权有娟, 刘博, 袁飞敏, 李想, 陈志国. 不同籽粒颜色藜麦品种的核型分析[J]. 华北农学报, 2020, 35(S1): 72-77.
[5]	刘明, 李洪民, 张爱君, 陈晓光, 靳容, 蒋薇, 唐忠厚. 不同氮肥与密度水平对鲜食甘薯产量和品质的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2020, 35(1): 122-130.
[6]	陈映, 刘彬, 曾仰双, 李强, 廖坤, 谭娅, 张顺华, 朱砺. 利用肉质综合评分模型对不同日龄青峪猪肉质性状的综合评价[J]. 华北农学报, 2019, 34(S1): 352-357.
[7]	何海锋, 吴娜, 刘吉利, 常雯雯, 张永乾, 蔡明, 陈娟, 杨亚亚. 盐碱地不同柳枝稷品种生物质产量及氮素吸收利用特性研究[J]. 华北农学报, 2019, 34(S1): 273-280.
[8]	高展, 彭媛媛, 董凯向, 周龙. 不同砧木对马瑟兰葡萄生长及果实品质的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2019, 34(5): 170-176.
[9]	董艳辉, 于宇凤, 温鑫, 王亦学, 聂园军, 侯丽媛, 李亚莉, 刘江, 任元, 王育川, 曹秋芬, 吴慎杰, 王斌, 秦永军. 基于高通量测序的藜麦连作根际土壤微生物多样性研究[J]. 华北农学报, 2019, 34(2): 205-211.
[10]	郭丽芬, 张跃, 胡尊红, 胡学礼, 高梅, 王沛琦, 杨谨, 代梦媛, 李文昌, 刘旭云. 云南红花地方种质资源品质特性与农艺性状的聚类分析及评价[J]. 华北农学报, 2018, 33(S1): 22-28.
[11]	胡卫国, 曹廷杰, 王西成, 张玉娥, 常萍, 赵虹. 小麦品种抗倒伏能力定性定量研究[J]. 华北农学报, 2018, 33(5): 160-167.
[12]	史宏. 不同生态类型大豆农艺性状与产量关系的研究[J]. 华北农学报, 2018, 33(1): 150-159.
[13]	马振勇, 杜虎林, 刘荣国, 牛金帅, 刘超. 施锌肥对旱作马铃薯植株锌含量及块茎品质的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2017, 32(1): 201-207.
[14]	刘辉, 査日扬, 马永周, 叶玉秀. H₂S处理下对小麦根蛋白质组表达谱分析的研究[J]. 华北农学报, 2016, 31(S1): 328-334.
[15]	徐守俊, 孙学成, 胡承孝, 谭启玲. 不同大豆品种钼富集因素的主成分分析和聚类分析[J]. 华北农学报, 2016, 31(S1): 399-404.

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

青海柴达木盆地藜麦品质表现及营养成分聚类分析

Quinoa Quality Performance and Nutrient Content Clustering Analysis in Qaidam Basin, Qinghai

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价