华北农学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (3): 91-106. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20195864

所属专题: 玉米 油料作物 热点论文 栽培生理

• 耕作栽培•生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同边行优势玉米品种与大豆间作的优势带型配置

陈银银1,2, 高意帆1,2, 张学林1,2,3, 周琳1,2,4, 汤继华1,2,3, 李慧5, 李鸿萍1,2,3, 刘天学1,2,3   

  1. 1 河南农业大学 农学院, 河南 郑州 450046
    2 小麦玉米两熟高效生产全国重点实验室, 河南 郑州 450046
    3 作物生长发育调控教育部重点实验室, 河南 郑州 450046
    4 河南农业大学 植物保护学院, 河南 郑州 450046
    5 河南心连心化学工业集团股份有限公司, 河南 新乡 453700
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-24 出版日期:2026-06-28
  • 通讯作者:
    刘天学(1965-),男,河南商水人,教授,博士,主要从事玉米栽培学理论与实践研究。
    李鸿萍(1988-),女,河南鹿邑人,副教授,博士,主要从事玉米生理生态研究。
  • 作者简介:
    陈银银(1998-),女,甘肃岷县人,在读硕士,主要从事大豆玉米高产高效复合种植研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFD2300904); 河南省科技攻关项目(252102111076)

Optimum Strip Configuration for Intercropping of Maize Varieties with Different Border-row Advantages and Soybeans

CHEN Yinyin1,2, GAO Yifan1,2, ZHANG Xuelin1,2,3, ZHOU Lin1,2,4, TANG Jihua1,2,3, LI Hui5, LI Hongping1,2,3, LIU Tianxue1,2,3   

  1. 1 College of Agronomy, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450046, China
    2 State Key Laboratory of High-Efficiency Production of Wheat-Maize Double Cropping, Zhengzhou 450046, China
    3 Key Laboratory of Regulating and Controlling Crop Growth and Development, Ministry of Education, Zhengzhou 450046, China
    4 College of Plant Protection, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450046, China
    5 Henan Xinlianxin Chemical Industry Group Company Limited, Xinxiang 453700, China
  • Received:2025-02-24 Published:2026-06-28

摘要:

为确定不同边行优势玉米品种与大豆复合种植的优势带型,在河南省许昌市建安区和周口市商水县2个不同生态区开展试验,以前期筛选出的边行优势强的玉米品种MC121和登海3206(DH3206)、边行优势弱的玉米品种豪玉16(HY16)和MY73,及大豆品种金豆99(JD99)为试验材料,设置大豆玉米6∶4(6S4M)和4∶2(4S2M)2种带型模式,以单作大豆(CKS)及玉米(CKM)为对照,研究边行优势不同的玉米品种在不同带型模式下各行植株农艺性状、单株干质量、产量及其构成因素的变化,比较土地当量比(LER)的差异。结果表明,两生态区4个玉米品种在2种带型配置构成的16个处理中,12个处理的LER大于1,玉米品种HY16和MY73在各试验点各带型配置下的LER均大于1。边行优势强的品种MC121和DH3206的LER在4S2M带型配置下高于6S4M带型配置,边行优势弱的品种HY16的LER在6S4M带型配置下高于4S2M,而MY73相反。在两试验点6S4M模式下,边行优势强的玉米品种DH3206,茎粗、冠层透光率、穗位叶和穗下叶的叶绿素a和叶绿素b含量随边行增加而降低;MC121底层透光率、穗位叶和穗下叶的叶绿素b含量随边行增加而降低。建安区和商水县两试验点边行优势强的玉米品种MC121、DH3206边2行产量较边1行分别降低23.71%,27.00%和20.03%,9.05%,边2行单株干质量较边1行分别显著下降15.87%,19.93%和13.82%,24.56%;边行优势弱的玉米品种边1行产量及单株干质量与边2行均无显著差异。综上,相同带型配置下边行优势弱的品种LER均值高于边行优势强的品种,复合种植中玉米产量与单作的差异受玉米品种类型影响较大。筛选和搭配适宜玉米品种对提升大豆玉米带状复合种植产量和效益至关重要。

关键词: 玉米, 大豆, 带状复合种植, 带型配置, 边行优势

Abstract:

To determine the optimum strip configuration for the intercropping of soybean and maize with different border-row advantages,the field experiments were carried out in two distinct ecological regions,Jian'an District of Xuchang City and Shangshui County of Zhoukou City,Henan Province.The experimental materials included two maize varieties with strong border-row advantage(MC121 and Denghai 3206(DH3206)),and two with weak border-row advantage(Haoyu 16(HY16)and MY73),previously screened,and one soybean variety Jindou 99(JD99).Two strip intercropping patterns were established∶6 rows of soybeans alternating with 4 rows of maize(6S4M)and 4 rows of soybeans alternating with 2 rows of maize(4S2M).Sole cropping of soybeans(CKS)and maize(CKM)were set as the controls.This study investigated the variations in maize agronomic traits,dry shoot weight,yield and its components of each row under different strip patterns,and compared the differences of land equivalent ratio(LER).The results showed that the LER was greater than 1 in 12 of the 16 treatments formed by two strip configurations for four maize varieties in the two ecological regions,and the LER of maize varieties HY16 and MY73 was greater than 1 under each strip configuration at two sites.The LER of MC121 and DH3206,with strong border-row advantage,was higher in strip type of 4S2M than that of 6S4M.In contrast,the LER of HY16,with weak border-row advantage,was higher in strip type of 6S4M than that of 4S2M,while it was opposite for MY73.Under 6S4M planting pattern,stem diameter,canopy light transmittance,chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b contents in ear leaf and leaf below the ear of maize variety DH3206 decreased with the increase of border row order;bottom light transmittance,chlorophyll b content in ear leaf and leaf below the ear of maize variety MC121 decreased with the increase of border row order in two experimental sites.The yield of maize varieties MC121 and DH3206 with strong border-row advantage in Jian'an District and Shangshui County decreased by 23.71%,27.00% and by 20.03%,9.05%,respectively.The dry shoot weight per plant of the edge row-2 at maturity decreased by 15.87%,19.93% and by 13.82%,24.56%,respectively,compared with the edge row-1.In contrast,there was no significant change in yield and dry shoot weight per plant at maturity between the edge row-1 and the edge row-2 of maize varieties with weak border-row advantage.In conclusion,the average LER of varieties with weak border-row advantage is higher than those with strong border-row advantage under the same strip configuration,and maize yield difference between intercropping and monoculture is seriously affected by variety type.Therefore,screening and matching suitable maize varieties is essential for improving the yield and benefit of soybean-maize strip intercropping system.

Key words: Maize, Soybean, Strip composite planting, Strip configuration, Border-row advantages

中图分类号: 

引用本文

陈银银, 高意帆, 张学林, 周琳, 汤继华, 李慧, 李鸿萍, 刘天学. 不同边行优势玉米品种与大豆间作的优势带型配置[J]. 华北农学报, 2026, 41(3): 91-106. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20195864.

CHEN Yinyin, GAO Yifan, ZHANG Xuelin, ZHOU Lin, TANG Jihua, LI Hui, LI Hongping, LIU Tianxue. Optimum Strip Configuration for Intercropping of Maize Varieties with Different Border-row Advantages and Soybeans[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2026, 41(3): 91-106. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20195864.