干旱胁迫对嫁接烤烟生长及生理特性的影响

doi:10.7668/hbnxb.2017.06.024

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究干旱胁迫对嫁接烤烟生理特性的影响，以KRK26为接穗，KRK26、K326和Anyan 2为砧木，采取盆栽方式，分析了不同处理根系形态、植株形态、抗性生理指标。结果表明，在前期干旱条件下，烟株的叶绿素相对含量（SPAD值）降低，脯氨酸含量、超氧化物歧化酶（SOD）活性、过氧化氢酶（CAT）活性以及过氧化物酶（POD）活性升高。随着干旱胁迫的加剧，嫁接烟株的根系长度、表面积、株高、茎围、节距、LAI等呈降低趋势，Pro含量持续升高；随着生长发育，SPAD值、SOD活性、CAT活性、POD活性则呈现下降趋势，但降幅不同，异根嫁接苗降幅较低。KRK26/Anyan 2受到干旱胁迫的影响小于KRK26/K326、KRK26/KRK26，其中KRK26/KRK26受损最重。通过相关分析，嫁接烤烟形态指标与抗性指标间存在正相关关系。不同嫁接烟株的生长特性对干旱的响应存在明显差异，综合看来，嫁接烟株抗旱能力强弱依次为KRK26/Anyan 2、KRK26/K326、KRK26/KRK26。

关键词: 嫁接, 干旱胁迫, 酶活性, 烤烟, 抗旱性

Abstract: In order to study the effect of drought stress on physiological characteristics of grafting flue-cured tobacco,using KRK26 as scion, KRK26,K326 and Anyan 2 as rootstock,analysing and discussing root morphology, plant morphology and physiological indexes of resistance in pot culture under different treatment. The results indicated that under drought stress conditions at early period, the relative content of chlorophyll (SPAD readings) decreased, while the content of proline, superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities, catalase (CAT) activities and peroxidase (POD) activities in flue-cured tobacco demonstrated an increasing trend. The root length,surface area,plant height,stem girth, node spacing and LAI of the grafted tobacco plants showed a decreasing trend,the content of proline continued to increase in both grafted seedlings and non-grafted seedlings with the aggravation of drought stress when tobacco leaves were turning to mature, whereas, the SPAD readings, SOD activities, CAT activities and POD activities all demonstrated a decreasing trend. The speed of decreasing in different root grafted was slower than that in own root grafted. Compared with KRK26/K326 and KRK26/KRK26, KRK26/Anyan 2 had greater parameters under drought stress, but the SPAD readings did not have significant difference. All the results showed that less damage was made to KRK26/Anyan 2 than KRK26/K326 and KRK26/KRK26 under drought stress, and KRK26/KRK26 suffered the most serious damage. According to correlation analysis, there was a certain correlation between morphological indexes and resistance indexes of grafting flue-cured tobacco. In conclusion, there were obvious differences among grafted tobacco in physiological characteristics, and there response to soil drought. The order of drought resistance was KRK26/Anyan 2, KRK26/K326 and KRK26/KRK26 in turn from strong to weak, based on the main root morphology,plant morphology,physiological characteristics under drought stress.

Key words: Grafting, Drought stress, Enzyme activity, Flue-cured tobacco, Drought resistance

中图分类号:

S572.01

谢冰, 向金友, 饶在生, 曹跃强, 唐明, 袁继超, 易蔓. 干旱胁迫对嫁接烤烟生长及生理特性的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2017, 32(6): 161-169. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2017.06.024.

XIE Bing, XIANG Jinyou, RAO Zaisheng, CAO Yueqiang, TANG Ming, YUAN Jichao, YI Man. Influence of Drought Stress on the Growth and Physiological Characteristics of the Grafting Flue-cured Tobacco[J]. ACTA AGRICULTURAE BOREALI-SINICA, 2017, 32(6): 161-169. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2017.06.024.

http://www.hbnxb.net/CN/Y2017/V32/I6/161

参考文献

[1] 刘国顺.烟草栽培学[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 2003:212-221.
[2] Bihmidine S, Cao M X, Kang M, et al. Expression of chlorovirus MT325 aquaglyceroporin (aqpv1) in tobacco and its role in mitigating drought stress[J]. Planta, 2014, 240(1):209-221.
[3] Liu X, Liu S, Wu J, et al. Overexpression of Arachishypogaea NAC3 in tobacco enhances dehydration and drought tolerance by increasing superoxide scavenging[J]. Plant physiology and Biochemistry, 2013, 70:354-359.
[4] Zhai S M, Gao Q, Liu X X, et al. Overexpression of a Zea mays phospholipase C1 gene enhances drought tolerance in tobacco in part by maintaining stability in the membrane lipid composition[J]. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture, 2013, 115(2):253-262.
[5] 梅芳,杨铁钊,刘剑君,等.嫁接对烤烟氮代谢关键酶活性及叶绿素含量的影响[J].西北农业学报, 2012, 21(5):132-135.
[6] 韩锦峰,汪耀富,岳翠凌,等.干旱胁迫下烤烟光合特性和氮代谢研究[J].华北农学报, 1994, 9(2):39-45.
[7] Xie H, Yang D H, Yao H, et al. iTRAQ-based quantitative proteomic analysis reveals proteomic changes in leaves of cultivated tobacco(Nicotiana tabacum)in response to drought stress[J]. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2016, 469(3):768-775.
[8] 王鹏翔.干旱胁迫对烤烟形态结构,主要生理指标及化学成分的影响[D].贵阳:贵州大学, 2008:6-23.
[9] Alameda D, Anten N P, Villar R. Soil compaction effects on growth and root traits of tobacco depend on light, water regime and mechanical stress[J]. Soil & Tillage Research, 2012, 120:121-129.
[10] Seraji R A N, Navaey H N, Ali S O, et al. Evaluating resistance to drought stress in flue-cured tobacco varieties via stress susceptibility indexes in dry farming condition[J]. International Journal of Farming and Allied Sciences, 2014,3(4):373-376.
[11] Ahmad P, Hameed A, Abd-Allah E F, et al. Biochemical and Molecular Approaches for Drought Tolerance in Plants[M]//Physiological Mechanisms and Adaptation Strategies in Plants Under Changing Environment.New York:Springer,2014:1-29.
[12] Drake M P, Vann M C, Fisher L R. Influence of nitrogen application rate on the yield, quality, and chemical components of flue-cured tobacco, part Ⅱ:Application method[J]. Tobacco Science, 2015,52:26-34.
[13] 邓桂秀,田飞,赵继平,等.成熟期干旱胁迫对烤烟产量和品质的影响[J].贵州农业科学, 2012, 40(9):93-96.
[14] 张永春,黄镇,关国经,等.不同农业生态调控措施对烟草青枯病的影响[J].中国烟草科学, 2007,28(4):49-52.
[15] 段玉琪,陈冬梅,晋艳,等.不同肥料对连作烟草根际土壤微生物及酶活性的影响[J].中国农业科技导报, 2012(3):122-126.
[16] Sanchez-Rodriguez E, Romero L, Manuel Ruiz J. Role of grafting in resistance to water stress in tomato plants:ammonia production and assimilation[J]. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2013, 32(4):831-842.
[17] 梅芳,杨铁钊,刘剑君,等.不同接穗与砧木组合对烤烟香气物质含量的影响[J].烟草科技, 2013(1):73-76.
[18] 刘剑君,朱宝川,梅芳,等.嫁接对烤烟烟碱和钾含量的影响[J].中国烟草学报, 2013(6):59-64.
[19] 霍勇锦,徐紫薇,王燃,等.干旱胁迫下嫁接对烟草抗氧化酶活性,膜脂过氧化及胁迫响应基因表达的影响[J].烟草科技, 2016(8):14-20.
[20] 陈学军,刘勇,肖炳光,等.巴西,津巴布韦烤烟品种综合评价[J].植物遗传资源学报, 2010, 11(4):503-508.
[21] 任庆成,陈秀华,张生杰,等.不同烤烟品种抗旱生理特征比较研究[J].西北植物学报, 2009, 29(10):2019-2025.
[22] Zhang X W, Feng Q F, Yang A G, et al. Analysis of tobacco(Nicotiana tabacum L.)germplasm distribution and utilization in China[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2016, 17(3):507-516.
[23] 周宇飞,王德权,陆樟镳,等.干旱胁迫对持绿性高粱光合特性和内源激素ABA,CTK含量的影响[J].中国农业科学, 2014,47(4):655-663.
[24] 宗学凤,王三根.植物生理研究技术[M].重庆:西南师范大学出版社, 2011.
[25] Zeng J M, Yao H, Li T F, et al. Chlorophyll content determination and its relationship with SPAD readings in flue-cured tobacco[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2009, 7(1):56-62.
[26] 王建国.干旱胁迫及海水栽培对茄子生长和生理特性的影响[D].南京:南京农业大学, 2008:21-46.
[27] 张珂珂.嫁接黄瓜幼苗对高温,干旱的生理反应及适应性研究[D].重庆:西南大学, 2010:12-35.
[28] Liang X, Zhang L, Natarajan S K, et al. Proline mechanisms of stress survival[J]. Antioxidants & redox signaling, 2013, 19(9):998-1011.
[28] Liang X W, Zhang L, Natarajan S K, et al. Proline mechanisms of stress survival[J]. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, 2013, 19(9):998-1011.
[29] Ravet K, Pilon M. Copper and iron homeostasis in plants:the challenges of oxidative stress[J]. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, 2013, 19(9):919-932.
[30] Park S, Lee D E, Jang H, et al. Melatonin-rich transgenic rice plants exhibit resistance to herbicide-induced oxidative stress[J]. Journal of Pineal Research, 2013, 54(3):258-263.
[31] Francoz E, Ranocha P, Nguyen-Kim H, et al. Roles of cell wall peroxidases in plant development[J]. Phytochemistry, 2015, 112:15-21.
[32] Zhang X H, Cai H Y, Wang Y F, et al. Effects of drought stress on growth and resistant physiology of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Tobacco Agriculture Science, 2005, 1(2):122-126.
[33] 王新建,何威,杨淑红,等.干旱胁迫下4种楸树嫁接苗叶绿素含量的变化[J].经济林研究, 2008, 26(1):20-24.
[34] 景蕊莲,胡荣海.作物抗旱性的根系研究[J].国外农学-麦类作物, 1995(3):37-39.
[35] 綦伟,厉恩茂,翟衡,等.部分根区干旱对不同砧木嫁接玛瓦斯亚葡萄生长的影响[J].中国农业科学, 2007, 40(4):794-799.
[36] 尚晓颍,刘化冰,张小全,等.干旱胁迫对不同烤烟品种根系生长和生理特性的影响[J].西北植物学报, 2010,30(2):357-361.
[37] Cvikrova M, Gemperlova L, Martincova O, et al. Effect of drought and combined drought and heat stress on polyamine metabolism in proline-over-producing tobacco plants[J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2013, 73:7-15.
[38] 蒋选利,李振歧,康振生.过氧化物酶与植物抗病性研究进展[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版, 2001, 29(6):124-129.
[39] 周冀衡,王彦亭,余佳斌,等.干旱条件下氮肥形态对烤烟叶片内源保护酶活性的影响[J].中国烟草科学, 2001, 22(2):5-8.
[40] Gao F S,Wang L,Xu K.Comprehensive evaluation of relationship between rootstocks and yield and quality in grafting tomato[J]. China Agriculture Science, 2014, 47(3):605-612.

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容