The effects of phosphorus deficiency stress on enzyme activity in wheat was studied by determining antioxidant enzymes SOD,POD activities and MDA content and locating thegene controlling antioxidant enzymes SOD,POD activities and MDA content at the roots of the seedling stage using wheat substitution lines between Chi-nese Spring(CS)and Synthetic 6x. The results showed that SOD and POD activities increased,MDA content reduced under phosphorus deficiency stress. This explains that the increased of antioxidant enzyme activity might reduce MDA content and lower membrane lipid peroxidation level,to improve their resistance. Thegenes promoting SOD activity might be located on 3A,4A,5A and 7A chromosome of Synthetic 6x;and thegenes promoting POD activity might be located on 5A,1D and 2D chromosome,while thegenes inhibiting content might be located on 5A,2D,5D and 7D chromosome of Synthetic 6x.
MI Shao-yan
,
JING Jiao-jiao
,
BAI Zhi-ying
,
LI Cun-dong
. Effects of Phosphorus Deficiency Stress on Protective Enzyme Activities， MDA Content and Chromosome of Wheat Substitution Lines Seedling Roots[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2013
, 28(2)
: 91
-95
.
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7091.2013.02.017
[1] 王庆仁,李继云,李振声.高效利用土壤磷素的植物营养学研究[J]. 生态学报,1999,19(3):417-421.
[2] 严小龙,廖红,戈振扬,等.植物根构型特性与磷吸收效率[J]. 植物学通报,2000,17(6):511-519.
[3] 刘建中,李振声,李继云. 利用植物自身潜力提高土壤磷的生物有效性[J]. 生态农业研究,1994,2(1):16-23.
[4] 王庆仁,李继云,李振声. 植物高效利用土壤难溶态磷研究动态及展望[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,1998,4 (2):107-116.
[5] Fageria N K,Baligar V C.Phosphorus-use efficiency in wheatgenotypes[J]. Journal of Plant Utrition,1999,22: 331-336.
[6] 李继云,刘秀娣,周伟. 有效利用土壤养分元素的作物育种新技术研究[J]. 中国科学(B辑),1995,21 (1):41-48.
[7] 杨淑慎,高俊风.活性氧、自由基与植物的衰老[J]. 西北植物学报,2001,21(2):215-220.
[8] 施晓明,李淑芹,许景钢,等. 干旱胁迫下 DA-6 浸种对 大豆苗期叶片保护酶活性的影响[J]. 东北农业大学 2 期米少艳等: 低磷对小麦代换系幼苗根系保护 活性和丙二醛含量的影响及染色体效应 95 学报,2009,40(9):48-51.
[9] 汪耀富,韩锦峰,林学梧. 烤烟生长前期对干旱胁迫的生理生化响应研究[J]. 作物学报,1996,22(1):117-121.
[10] 马原松,王启明,吴诗光,等. 干旱胁迫下大豆苗期生 理生化指标的研究[J]. 安徽农业科学,2005,33(6): 974-976.
[11] Cao L M,Pan X H. Screening and identifying of ricegenotypes on the tolerance to low phosphorus environ-ment[J]. Acta Agric Univ Jiangxi,2000,22(2):162-168.
[12] Giannoplitis C N,Ries S,Wang Ag,et al. Superoxide dismutase. Ⅱ. Purification and quantitative relationship with soluble protein in seeding [J]. Plant Physiol,1977,59:15-318.
[13] 潘晓华,刘水英,李 锋,等.低磷胁迫对不同水稻品种叶片膜质过氧化及保护酶活性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学,2003,17(1):57-60.
[14] 万美亮,邝炎华,陈建勋.缺磷胁迫对甘蔗膜质过氧化及保护酶系统活性的影响[J]. 华南农业大学学报,1999,20(2):1-6.
[15] 郑金凤,董少鸣,李成璞,等.低磷胁迫对小麦代换系保护酶活性和丙二醛含量的影响及染色体效应[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2010,16(6):1366-1372.
[16] 郑金凤,白志英,李存东,等.低磷胁迫对小麦代换系产量性状的影响及染色体效应[J]. 植物遗传学报,2010,11(2):233-238.
[17] 李柏林,梅慧生. 燕麦叶片衰老与活性氧代谢的关系
[J]. 植物生理学报,1989,15(1):6-12.
[18] 张宪政.作物生理研究法[M]. 北京:农业出版社,1992.
[19] 赵世杰,许长城,邹琦,等. 植物组织中丙二醛测定方法的改进[J]. 植物生理学通讯,1994,30(3):207-221.
[20] 吴俊江,刘丽君,钟鹏,等. 低磷胁迫对不同基因型大豆保护酶活性的影响[J]. 大豆科学,2008,2(3): 437-741.
[21] 张娟,张正斌,谢惠民,等. 小麦叶片水分利用效率及相关生理性状基因的染色体定位[J]. 西北植物学 报,2005,25(8):1521-1527.
[22] 白志英,李存东,吴同燕,等. 干旱胁迫条件下小麦旗叶酶活性和丙二醛含量的染色体定位[J]. 植物遗传资源学报,2009,10(2):255-261.
[23] 张晓,杨丽莉,杨晓玲.转Leafy-ipt基因高羊茅草生育后期SOD,POD,MDA的变化[J]. 山西农业科学2008,36(9):26-28.
[24] 杜利霞,董宽虎,乔志宏,等.NaHCO_3胁迫对赖草几种生理指标的影响[J]. 山西农业科学,2012,40 (11):1160-1163.
[25] 席章营,吴克宁,王同朝,等.玉米抗旱性生理生化鉴定指标及利用价值分析[J]. 河南农业大学学报,2000,34(1):7-12.
[26] 潘廷国,柯玉琴,王元贞,等.盐逆境下甘蔗叶片膜脂 过氧化与保护酶的活性[J].福建农业大学学报,1995,24(2):129-132.
[27] 李慧,王妙媛,彭立新,等.NaCl 胁迫对胡卢巴幼苗抗氧化酶活性和丙二醛含量的影响[J]. 华北农学报,2012,27(2):185-188.
