Effects of Different Mulching Patterns on Root Activity and Leaf Senescence in Flue-cured Tobacco at Mature Period

  • YANG Zhi-xiao ,
  • ZHANG Xiao-quan ,
  • BI Qing-wen ,
  • WANG Jian ,
  • LI Gen ,
  • QIU Miao-wen ,
  • YANG Tie-zhao
Expand
  • 1. College of Agronomy,Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China;
    2. China Tobacco Hubei Industrial Company, Wuhan 430051, China;
    3. Nanxiong Tobacco Science Research Institute of Guangdong Province, Nanxiong 512400, China

Received date: 2008-12-03

  Online published: 2014-10-14

Abstract

The experiment was carried out to study the effects of three mulching patterns (straw mulching after plastic film uncovered,plastic film mulching,mulching by nothing)on root activity and leaf senescence in field condition with the flue-cured tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) cultivar K326 at mature period. The results showed that,compared with mulching by nothing,the root activity in the pattern of straw mulching after plastic film uncovered increased significantly,the chlorophyll content and soluble protein content of leaf were higher,the leaf protective enzyme activities were stonger and MDA content was lower,straw mulching after plastic film uncovered also could delay the flue-cured tobacco senescence,prolonged mature period and improved economic traits.The flue-cured tobacco root activity under the pattern of plastic film mulching was decreased,its leaf chlorophyll content and soluble protein content reduced remarkably,and there were a significant decline of leaf protective enzyme activities,a marked increase of leaf MDA content and a quick leaf aging.

Cite this article

YANG Zhi-xiao , ZHANG Xiao-quan , BI Qing-wen , WANG Jian , LI Gen , QIU Miao-wen , YANG Tie-zhao . Effects of Different Mulching Patterns on Root Activity and Leaf Senescence in Flue-cured Tobacco at Mature Period[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2009 , 24(2) : 153 -157 . DOI: 10.7668/hbnxb.2009.02.032

References

[1] 罗战勇,吕永华,李淑玲.广东省生态烟区的划分及其烟叶质量评价[J].广东农业科学,2004(1):18-20.
[2] 高茂盛,廖允成,尹振燕.麦秸还田对隔茬冬小麦根系及叶片衰老的影响[J].西北作物学报,2007,27(2):303-308.
[3] Thomas H,Smart C M.Crops that stay green[J].Annals of Applied Biology,1993,123:193-219.
[4] 郭天财,王晨阳,朱云集.后期高温对冬小麦根系和及地上部衰老的影响[J].作物学报,1998,24(6):957-961.
[5] Galka A.Effect of fertilizers and irrigation on soil moisture content and the dynamics of root mass in winter wheat[J].Sesia Nankowa,1991,27:235-245.
[6] 葛体达,隋方功,自莉萍.水分胁迫下夏玉米根叶保护酶活性变化及其对膜脂过氧化作用的影响[J].中国农业科学,2005,38(5):922-928.
[7] 赵世杰,李德全.现代作物生理学实验指南[M].北京:科学出版社,1999:305-306.
[8] 张志良.作物生理学实验指导[M].第2版.北京:高等教育出版社,1990:154-156.
[9] 李如亮.生物化学实验[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,1998:57-60.
[10] 邹琦.作物生理学实验指导[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000:173-174.
[11] 李合生,孙群,赵世杰.作物生理生化实验原理和技术(M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000:164-194.
[12] 葛体达,隋方功,李金政.干旱对夏玉米根冠生长的影响[J].中国农学通报,2005,21(1):103-109.
[13] 马新明,王志强,王小纯.氮素形态对不同专用型小麦根系及氮素利用率影响的研究[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(4):655-658.
[14] 刘洪展.郑凤荣,赵世杰.根外施氮对热胁迫下小麦叶片光合特性的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2006,24(2):52-56.
[15] 王法宏,任德昌,王旭清.施肥对小麦根系活性、延缓旗叶衰老及产量的效应[J].麦类作物学报,2001,21(3):51-54.
[16] 翟胜,梁银丽,王巨嫒.地表覆盖对温室黄瓜生长及生理特性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(6):1039-1044.
[17] 翟胜,梁银丽,王巨嫒.日光温室地面覆盖对嫁接与未嫁接黄瓜生长发育、产量及土壤环境的影响[J].应用生态学报,2005,12(6):2344-2348.
[18] 杜青平,孟紫强,袁保红.亚硫酸盐引起小麦幼苗细胞膜透性等改变的机制研究[J].西北作物学报,2003,23(6):938-941.
[19] 王旭清,王法宏,于振文.垄作栽培对冬小麦根系活力和旗叶衰老的影响[J].麦类作物学报,2005,25(1):55-60.
[20] 鱼欢,冯佰利,张英.不同覆盖模式下冬小麦叶片衰老和活性氧代谢研究[J].作物学报,2007,33(10):1729-1732.
[21] 付国占,李潮海,王俊忠.残茬覆盖与耕作方式对夏玉米叶片衰老代谢和籽粒产量的影响[J].西北植物学报,2005,25(1):155-160.
[22] 王军,谢玉华,罗慧红."前膜后草"覆盖处理对烟田土壤环境及烟株生长发育的影响[J].广东农业科学,2007,5:29-32.
[23] 张永清,苗果园,李惠明.冬小麦根系对不同生育时期渍水胁迫的生物学响应(J].麦类作物学报,2005,25(4):59-63.
[24] 王晨阳,马元喜,周苏玫.土壤渍水对冬小麦根系活性氧代谢及生理活性的影响[J].作物学报,1996,22(6):712-719.
Outlines

/