华北农学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 36-46. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20196258

所属专题: 生物技术 果树专题

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·生物技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

杜梨PbKRP2序列特征与表达特性分析

靳丛, 徐连理, 刘琦, 张晓小, 张宇双, 徐源, 陈钰祺, 任雅楠, 王纪忠   

  1. 淮阴工学院 生命科学与食品工程学院, 江苏 淮安 223003
  • 收稿日期:2025-06-30 出版日期:2026-05-06
  • 作者简介:

    靳 丛(1986—),男,河南南阳人,讲师,博士,硕士生导师,主要从事果树分子生物学研究。

  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(31801829); 江苏省自然科学基金青年基金项目(BK20170463); 江苏省大学生创新训练项目(S202511049090); 淮阴工学院博士科研启动基金项目(Z301B16532)

Analysis of Sequence Characteristics and Expression Patterns of PbKRP2 in Pyrus betulaefolia

JIN Cong, XU Lianli, LIU Qi, ZHANG Xiaoxiao, ZHANG Yushuang, XU Yuan, CHEN Yuqi, REN Yanan, WANG Jizhong   

  1. College of Life Sciences and Food Engineering, Huaiyin Institute of Technology, Huaian 223003, China
  • Received:2025-06-30 Published:2026-05-06

摘要:

KRP基因家族作为细胞周期调控的关键因子,通过抑制周期蛋白依赖性激酶(CDK)活性调节细胞分裂与核内复制进程,并参与植物非生物胁迫响应。为探索杜梨PbKRP2的结构特征和对环境胁迫的响应特性,采用逆转录PCR技术进行PbKRP2的基因克隆,并结合生物信息学方法对其序列特征、蛋白互作及亲缘关系等进行分析,通过荧光定量PCR技术检测杜梨PbKRP2的组织表达特性和在不同逆境胁迫下的表达模式。结果表明,该基因全长585 bp,包含4个外显子和3个内含子,编码194个氨基酸,含有25个潜在磷酸化位点和1个O-糖基化修饰位点,且在该蛋白C端具有周期蛋白依赖性激酶抑制因子家族特有的CDI结构域;进化树分析显示,杜梨PbKRP2与裸花东京樱花PyKRP2、桃PpKRP2和苹果MdKRP2的亲缘关系较为接近;蛋白质互作网络筛选发现,PbKRP2与10个蛋白存在潜在互作关系,互作蛋白静态结构分析发现,PbKRP2与其靶蛋白PbCDKB1;1和PbCYCD7;1形成空间互作构型;该基因启动子区存在多个响应环境因子与激素信号的顺式调控元件;实时荧光定量PCR结果表明,PbKRP2基因在茎和叶中表达量显著高于根、花瓣和果实,且该基因的转录水平在低温胁迫和ABA处理时持续上调,脱水和盐胁迫下显著下调。综上所述,通过解析PbKRP2的序列特性及其对非生物胁迫的差异化响应模式,为梨抗逆育种及果树遗传改良提供了候选基因。

关键词: 杜梨, PbKRP2基因, 基因克隆, 非生物胁迫, 表达分析

Abstract:

The Kip-related protein(KRP)gene family acts as a key regulator of the cell cycle,modulating cell division and endoreduplication by inhibiting cyclin-dependent kinase(CDK)activity,and participates in plant abiotic stress responses.To investigate the structural characteristics and environmental stress response profile of PbKRP2 in Pyrus betulifolia,the gene was cloned using reverse transcription PCR(RT-PCR).Bioinformatic analysis was conducted to elucidate its sequence features,predicted protein interactions,and phylogenetic relationships.Quantitative Real-time PCR(qRT-PCR)was employed to assess the tissue-specific expression characteristics of PbKRP2 and its expression patterns under various stress conditions.Results showed that PbKRP2 was 585 bp in length,contained 4 exons and 3 introns,and encoded a 194-amino acid protein.The predicted protein had 25 potential phosphorylation sites,a O-glycosylation site,and a conserved C-terminal cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor(CDI)domain.Phylogenetic analysis indicated that PbKRP2 was closely related to PyKRP2 in Prunus yedoensis var.nudiflora,PpKRP2 in Prunus persica,and MdKRP2 in Malus domestica.Protein interaction network screening identified potential interactions between PbKRP2 and 10 proteins.Analysis of the static structure of potential interacting proteins suggested that PbKRP2 formed spatial interaction conformations with its target proteins PbCDKB1;1 and PbCYCD7;1,respectively.The promoter region of PbKRP2 contained multiple cis-acting regulatory elements responsive to environmental factors and hormonal signals.qRT-PCR analysis demonstrated that PbKRP2 transcript levels were significantly higher in stems and leaves compared to roots,petals,and fruits.Furthermore,PbKRP2 transcription levels were consistently upregulated under low-temperature stress and abscisic acid(ABA)treatment,but significantly downregulated under dehydration and salt stress.In summary,these findings provide a candidate gene for stress-resistant breeding of pear and genetic improvement of fruit trees by elucidating the sequence characteristics of PbKRP2 and its differential response patterns to abiotic stresses.

Key words: Pyrus betulaefolia, PbKRP2 gene, Gene cloning, Abiotic stress, Expression analysis

中图分类号: 

引用本文

靳丛, 徐连理, 刘琦, 张晓小, 张宇双, 徐源, 陈钰祺, 任雅楠, 王纪忠. 杜梨PbKRP2序列特征与表达特性分析[J]. 华北农学报, 2026, 41(2): 36-46. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20196258.

JIN Cong, XU Lianli, LIU Qi, ZHANG Xiaoxiao, ZHANG Yushuang, XU Yuan, CHEN Yuqi, REN Yanan, WANG Jizhong. Analysis of Sequence Characteristics and Expression Patterns of PbKRP2 in Pyrus betulaefolia[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2026, 41(2): 36-46. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20196258.