华北农学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (S2): 126-130. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2007.S2.032

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同板蓝根种质比较研究

谢晓亮1,2, 温春秀1, 吴志明1, 田伟1, 刘铭1, 刘玉军2   

  1. 1. 河北省农林科学院药用植物研究中心, 河北 石家庄 050051;
    2. 北京林业大学 生物科学与技术学院, 北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2007-04-28 出版日期:2007-12-31
  • 通讯作者: 刘玉军,(1962-),男,教授,博士生导师,主要从事药用植物资源开发利用研究.
  • 作者简介:谢晓亮,(1962-),男,河北清苑人,在读博士,研究员,主要从事中药材栽培、育种研究

Research on the Comparing Different Radix Isatidis Germplasm Resources

XIE Xiao-liang1,2, WEN Chun-xiu1, WU Zhi-ming1, TIAN Wei1, LIU Ming1, LIU Yu-jun2   

  1. 1. The Medicinal Plant Center of Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences,Shjiazhuang 050051,China;
    2. The College of Biological Science and Technology of Beijing Forestry University,Beijing 100083,China
  • Received:2007-04-28 Published:2007-12-31

摘要: 板蓝根是防治病毒性感冒的核心药材,目前我国栽培的板蓝根种质较多,归纳有大叶板蓝根、小叶板蓝根和四倍体板蓝根三大类型,针对这三种形态特征明显不同的板蓝根种质,进行了生物学特征、种子形态特征、农艺性状以及药用成分含量等的比较研究,通过比较发现,小叶板蓝根优于四倍体板蓝根,而四倍体板蓝根优于大叶板蓝根。

关键词: 板蓝根, 种质, 评价

Abstract: Radix isatidis is the important Chinese medicinal materials for anti virus. In this paper the different germplasm resources of Radix isatidis in China, which are big leaf and little leaf varieties with diplidy and the tetraploidy, are evaluated. We compared the biological characters , seed shape, agricultural characters, molecular evolution and chemical constituents of the three germplasm resources. From these comparings, we concluded that the little leaf Radix isatidis is better than the tetraploidy Radix isatidis , and the tetraploidy is better than the big leaf Radix isatidi.

Key words: Radix isatidis, Germplasm resources, Evaluation

中图分类号: 

引用本文

谢晓亮, 温春秀, 吴志明, 田伟, 刘铭, 刘玉军. 不同板蓝根种质比较研究[J]. 华北农学报, 2007, 22(S2): 126-130. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2007.S2.032.

XIE Xiao-liang, WEN Chun-xiu, WU Zhi-ming, TIAN Wei, LIU Ming, LIU Yu-jun. Research on the Comparing Different Radix Isatidis Germplasm Resources[J]. ACTA AGRICULTURAE BOREALI-SINICA, 2007, 22(S2): 126-130. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2007.S2.032.

使用本文

0
    /   /   推荐 /   导出引用

链接本文: http://www.hbnxb.net/CN/10.7668/hbnxb.2007.S2.032

               http://www.hbnxb.net/CN/Y2007/V22/IS2/126