烟田地表CO<sub>2</sub>和N<sub>2</sub>O日变化对连续绿肥翻压还田的响应

doi:10.7668/hbnxb.20195489

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为探究连续绿肥翻压还田管理模式下,豫中烟田地表二氧化碳(CO₂)和氧化亚氮(N₂O)通量日变化特征及其影响因素,确定两者最佳采集时间,2021年基于河南农业大学毛庄科教园区长期定位试验,于烟苗移栽后每隔30 d采用静态暗箱-气相色谱法进行24 h连续动态观测,测定施氮磷钾肥(NPK)和氮磷钾+种植并翻压黑麦草(NPKG)处理下烟田CO₂和N₂O日排放通量。结果表明,豫中烟田土壤为CO₂和N₂O的排放源,且排放趋势与大气温度变化轨迹相似,昼高夜低,昼、夜排放通量平均值达到显著差异水平。CO₂排放通量在移栽后30 d和60 d表现为不明显双峰形态,90 d表现为昼高夜低的单峰态;N₂O通量呈现昼高夜低的单峰态。NPKG处理CO₂和N₂O排放通量总体上显著高于NPK处理,3个典型日CO₂排放通量表现为90 d>60 d>30 d,N₂O排放通量为60 d>90 d>30 d。观测日内,土壤孔隙含水率(WFPS)和10 cm地温共同影响着CO₂和N₂O的排放速率,10 cm地温与CO₂和N₂O日排放通量均呈显著或极显著正相关。一天中9:00,21:00 CO₂和N₂O排放通量的矫正系数最接近1,且其与日平均排放通量无显著差异。CO₂通量与N₂O通量呈显著正相关关系,一定范围内,N₂O通量随CO₂通量增加呈线性态势增加。综上,连续绿肥翻压还田增加了烟田地表CO₂和N₂O排放通量,9:00,21:00左右为CO₂和N₂O最佳采集时间。烟草大田生育期3个取样日,NPK处理和NPKG处理地表CO₂排放通量均以90 d 最高,60 d次之;N₂O排放通量均以 60 d 最高,90 d次之。

关键词: 烟田, CO₂, N₂O, 日变化, 绿肥翻压还田

Abstract:

In order to explore the diurnal variation characteristics and influencing factors of surface CO₂ and N₂O emission fluxes in tobacco fields in central Henan under the management mode of continuous green manure incorporation,and to determine the optimal collection time of the two gases,in 2021,based on a long-term experiment in Maozhuang Science and Education Park of Henan Agricultural University,a 24-hour continuous dynamic observation was carried out by static dark box-gas chromatography every 30 days after tobacco seedlings were transplanted.The daily emission fluxes of CO₂ and N₂O in tobacco fields under nitrogen phosphorus potassium treatment(NPK)and NPK+planting and turning over ryegrass treatment(NPKG)were measured.The results showed that the tobacco field soil in central Henan was the source of CO₂ and N₂O emissions,and the emission trend was similar to the trajectory of atmospheric temperature change,which was high in day and low in night,and the average emission flux of day and night reached a significant difference level.The CO₂ emission flux showed an inconspicuous bimodal pattern at 30 and 60 days after transplanting,and a single peak state of high day and low night at 90 days after transplanting.The N₂O flux showed a single peak state of high day and low night.The CO₂ and N₂O emission fluxes of NPKG treatment were significantly higher than those of NPK treatment.The CO₂ emission fluxes of three typical days were 90 d>60 d>30 d,and the N₂O emission fluxes were 60 d>90 d>30 d.During the observation days,water-filled porosity of soil(WFPS) and 10 cm soil temperature jointly affected the emission rates of CO₂ and N₂O,and the 10 cm soil temperature was significantly or extremely significantly positively correlated with the daily emission fluxes of CO₂ and N₂O.The correction coefficients of daily CO₂ and N₂O emission fluxes at 9:00 and 21:00 were the closest to 1,and there was no significant difference compared with the daily average emission flux.There was a significant positive correlation between CO₂ flux and N₂O flux.Within a certain range,the N₂O flux increased linearly with the increase of CO₂ flux.In summary,continuous green manure returning increased the surface CO₂ and N₂O emission flux of tobacco field,and the best collection time of CO₂ and N₂O was around 9:00 and 21:00.During the three sampling days of tobacco growth period,the surface CO₂ emission flux of NPK treatment and NPKG treatment was the highest at 90 days after transplanting,followed by 60 days.The N₂O emission flux was the highest at 60 days after transplanting,followed by 90 days.

Key words: Tobacco field, CO₂, N₂O, Diurnal variation, Green manure returning to the field

中图分类号:

陈雨露, 王伟宁, 孙丰, 王豹祥, 汪健, 毕庆文, 冯宇阳, 聂晨旭, 叶协锋. 烟田地表CO₂和N₂O日变化对连续绿肥翻压还田的响应[J]. 华北农学报, 2025, 40(3): 104-113. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20195489.

CHEN Yulu, WANG Weining, SUN Feng, WANG Baoxiang, WANG Jian, BI Qingwen, FENG Yuyang, NIE Chenxu, YE Xiefeng. Responses of Diurnal Variation of Surface CO₂ and N₂O to Continuous Green Manure Incorporation in Tobacco Field[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2025, 40(3): 104-113. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20195489.

http://www.hbnxb.net/CN/Y2025/V40/I3/104

图/表 9

参考文献 44

[1]	范紫月, 齐晓波, 曾麟岚, 吴锋. 中国农业系统近40年温室气体排放核算[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(23): 9470-9482.doi: 10.5846/stxb202201290273.
	Fan Z Y, Qi X B, Zeng L L, Wu F. Accounting of greenhouse gas emissions in the Chinese agricultural system from 1980 to 2020[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(23): 9470-9482.
[2]	WMO《2023年全球气候状况》报告速览[N]. 中国气象报,2024-03-26(004).doi: 10.28122/n.cnki.ncqxb.2024.000507.
	WMO'2023 Global Climate Status'report[N]. China Meteorological News,2024-03-26(004).
[3]	Crippa M, Solazzo E, Guizzardi D, Monforti-Ferrario F, Tubiello F N, Leip A. Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions[J]. Nature Food, 2021, 2(3): 198-209.doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00225-9. pmid: 37117443
[4]	邹宇锋. 河套灌区不同覆膜灌溉方式对农田土壤水盐调控及春玉米产量的影响[D]. 咸阳: 西北农林科技大学, 2021. doi: 10.27409/d.cnki.gxbnu.2020.001448.
	Zou Y F. The regulation on water and salt of farmland soil and the effect of spring maize yield under different irrigation methods with mulching in Hetao Irrigation District[D]. Xianyang: Northwest A&F University, 2021.
[5]	陈荣龙. 灌溉措施对土壤剖面微塑料迁移的影响及污染调控[D]. 咸阳: 西北农林科技大学, 2024. doi: 10.27409/d.cnki.gxbnu.2023.001966.
	Chen R L. Effects of irrigation measures on microplastic transport in soil profiles and pollution con[D]. Xianyang: Northwest A&F University, 2024.
[6]	李荣, 鄢慧芳, 张龙, 苗芳芳, 勉有明, 侯贤清. 不同耕作措施对宁南地区土壤物理性质及作物产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(18): 3543-3555.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.18.005.
	Li R, Yan H F, Zhang L, Miao F F, Mian Y M, Hou X Q. Effects of different tillage practices on soil physical properties and crop yield in the region of Southern Ningxia[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(18): 3543-3555. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.18.005
[7]	厍润祥, 符小文, 张永杰, 安崇霄, 杜孝敬, 房彦飞, 张娜, 徐文修. 复播大豆农田不同耕作方式对土壤物理性质、硝态氮及产量的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2019, 34(6): 145-152.doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20190171.
	She R X, Fu X W, Zhang Y J, An C X, Du X J, Fang Y F, Zhang N, Xu W X. Effects of different tillage methods on soil physical properties,nitrate nitrogen and yield in re-sown soybean farmland[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2019, 34(6): 145-152.
[8]	柳付奎, 杜洋文, 杜拾平, 张荣洋. 配方施肥及施肥技术对薄壳山核桃生长及林地土壤的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2024, 53(9):97-107.doi: 10.15933/j.cnki.1004-3268.2024.09.010.
	Liu F K, Du Y W, Du S P, Zhang R Y. Effects of formula fertilization and fertilization methods on growth and woodland soil of Carya illinoensis[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 53(9):97-107.
[9]	王兴凯, 徐明岗, 王小利, 周怀平. 长期施肥对褐土有机碳矿化的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2019, 48(6): 81-86.doi: 10.15933/j.cnki.1004-3268.2019.06.012.
	Wang X K, Xu M G, Wang X L, Zhou H P. Effects of long-term fertilization on organic carbon mineralization of cinnamon soil[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 48(6): 81-86.
[10]	Zhou H J, Zhang M J, Yang J H, Wang J, Chen Y L, Ye X F. Returning ryegrass to continuous cropping soil improves soil nutrients and soil microbiome,producing good-quality flue-cured tobacco[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2023, 14: 1257924.doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1257924.
[11]	叶协锋, 杨超, 李正, 敬海霞. 绿肥对植烟土壤酶活性及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19(2): 445-454.doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2013.0222.
	Ye X F, Yang C, Li Z, Jing H X. Effects of green manure in corporation on soil enzyme activities and fertility in tobacco-planting soils[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2013, 19(2): 445-454.
[12]	赵冬雪, 王盼盼, 常春丽, 李金秋, 王晶英, 敖红. 绿肥套作对植烟土壤微生物群落功能多样性的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2019, 34(5): 201-207.doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.201751398.
	Zhao D X, Wang P P, Chang C L, Li J Q, Wang J Y, Ao H. The effects of intercropping green manure on functional diversity of microbial community in tobacco planting soil[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2019, 34(5): 201-207. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.201751398
[13]	查宏波, 赵芳, 桂龙凤, 陈华, 高顺波, 朱勋田, 刘武波, 高华磊, 王楠, 李应玥, 马诗曼, 杨武. 不同绿肥品种、种植时间对烤烟农艺性状、产质量及植烟土壤化学成分的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2024, 36(2): 1-6.doi: 10.19386/j.cnki.jxnyxb.2024.02.001.
	Zha H B, Zhao F, Gui L F, Chen H, Gao S B, Zhu X T, Liu W B, Gao H L, Wang N, Li Y Y, Ma S M, Yang W. Effects of different green manure varieties and planting time on agronomic characters,yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco and chemical composition of tobacco-planting soil[J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2024, 36(2): 1-6.
[14]	李金秋, 贺国强, 王晶英. 套作绿肥对烤烟生长及土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2020, 49(11): 45-53.doi: 10.15933/j.cnki.1004-3268.2020.11.006.
	Li J Q, He G Q, Wang J Y. Effects of intercropping green manure on growth of flue-cured tobacco and soil enzyme activities[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 49(11): 45-53.
[15]	鲁琪飞, 叶协锋, 韩金, 潘昊东, 张明杰, 王晶, 杨佳豪, 姚鹏伟, 李雪利. 添加有机物料对豫中烟田土壤呼吸的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2022, 43(7): 3825-3834.doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202109003.
	Lu Q F, Ye X F, Han J, Pan H D, Zhang M J, Wang J, Yang J H, Yao P W, Li X L. Effect of organic material amendments on soil respiration in tobacco fields of central Henan[J]. Environmental Science, 2022, 43(7): 3825-3834.
[16]	段豆豆, 韩梅. 翻压毛叶苕子对小麦土壤微生物多样性及温室气体排放的影响[J]. 青海农林科技, 2023(1): 13-20,26.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9967.2023.01.003.
	Duan D D, Han M. The effect of tilling hairy camas on microbial diversity and greenhouse gas emissions in wheat soils[J]. Science and Technology of Qinghai Agriculture and Forestry, 2023(1): 13-20,26.
[17]	张义宁. 绿肥腐解及其对旱作农田土壤温室气体排放与碳氮组分的影响[D]. 西安: 西北大学, 2021. doi: 10.27405/d.cnki.gxbdu.2021.000258.
	Zhang Y N. Decomposition of green manure and its impacts on soil greenhouse gas emission and C and N fractions in dry land farming systems[D]. Xi'an: Northwest University, 2021.
[18]	王谢, 杨琴, 刘禹池, 李芹, 杨勤, 陈冠陶, 岳丽杰, 张建华, 陈新平, 刘永红. 中国西南地区旱坡地碳减排研究进展与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(7):1635-1646.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2024.32029.
	Wang X, Yang Q, Liu Y C, Li Q, Yang Q, Chen G T, Yue L J, Zhang J H, Chen X P, Liu Y H. Carbon emission reduction in dry sloping land in Southwest China[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(7): 1635-1646. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2024.32029
[19]	秦小光, 蔡炳贵, 吴金水, 王国安, 刘东生. 土壤温室气体昼夜变化及其环境影响因素研究[J]. 第四纪研究, 2005, 25(3): 376-388.doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7410.2005.03.015.
	Qin X G, Cai B G, Wu J S, Wang G A, Liu D S. Diurnal variations of soil trace gases and related impacting factors[J]. Quaternary Sciences, 2005, 25(3): 376-388.
[20]	段豆豆. 麦后复种绿肥对土壤碳库及温室气体排放的影响研究[D]. 西宁: 青海大学, 2023. doi: 10.27740/d.cnki.gqhdx.2023.000896.
	Duan D D. Study on the effect of post-wheat replanting of green manure on soil carbon pool and greenhouse gas emissions[D]. Xining: Qinghai University, 2023.
[21]	张丽. 南方典型稻作系统绿肥和秸秆还田对温室气体排放特征和环境效应的影响[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2021.doi: 10.27244/d.cnki.gnjnu.2018.001033.
	Zhang L. Intergrative effects of green manure and straw incorporation on greenhouse gas emissions and environmental performance under the typical rice cropping systems in Southern China[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2021.
[22]	张少宏, 王俊, 方震文, 付鑫. 冬季绿肥对黄土高原旱作春玉米农田土壤温室气体排放的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2022, 43(9): 4848-4857.doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202111311.
	Zhang S H, Wang J, Fang Z W, Fu X. Effect of winter cover cropping on soil greenhouse gas emissions in a dryland spring maize field on the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Environmental Science, 2022, 43(9): 4848-4857.
[23]	王晶, 杨佳豪, 陈雨露, 姚鹏伟, 鲁琪飞, 陈树鸿, 陈炬廷, 位辉琴, 叶协锋. 连续翻压黑麦草对豫中植烟土壤剖面CO₂日排放变化的影响[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2024, 30(2):42-51.doi: 10.16472/j.chinatobacco.2023.T0114.
	Wang J, Yang J H, Chen Y L, Yao P W, Lu Q F, Chen S H, Chen J T, Wei H Q, Ye X F. Effects of continuous overturning of ryegrass on diurnal variation of CO₂ in tobacco-growing soil profile in central Henan Province[J]. Acta Tabacaria Sinica, 2024, 30(2): 42-51.
[24]	黄树贤, 张克强. 中华人民共和国政区大典·河南省卷[M]. 北京: 中国社会出版社,2017:30-43.
	Huang S X, Zhang K Q. Administrative ceremony of the People's Republic of China·Henan Province volume[M]. Beijing: China Social Press,2017: 30-43.
[25]	韩金. 不同土壤改良措施对豫中烟田净温室效应的影响[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2022.doi: 10.27117/d.cnki.ghenu.2022.000067.
	Han J. Effects of different soil improvement measures on net greenhouse effect of tobacco fields in central Henan[D]. Zhengzhou: Henan Agricultural University, 2022.
[26]	胡玉琼, 王跃思, 纪宝明, 王明星, 杜睿. 内蒙古草原温室气体排放日变化规律研究[J]. 南京气象学院学报, 2003, 26(1): 29-37.doi: 10.13878/j.cnki.dqkxxb.2003.01.005.
	Hu Y Q, Wang Y S, Ji B M, Wang M X, Du R. Diurnal variations of greenhouse gase emissions from a Nei Monggol grassland[J]. Journal of Nanjing Institute of Meteorology, 2003, 26(1): 29-37.
[27]	田慎重, 宁堂原, 迟淑筠, 王瑜, 王丙文, 韩惠芳, 李成庆, 李增嘉. 不同耕作措施的温室气体排放日变化及最佳观测时间[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(3): 879-888.doi: 10.5846/stxb201108021132.
	Tian S Z, Ning T Y, Chi S Y, Wang Y, Wang B W, Han H F, Li C Q, Li Z J. Diurnal variations of the greenhouse gases emission and their optimal observation duration under different tillage systems[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(3): 879-888.
[28]	仁增草, 武均, 蔡立群, 王正伟. 秸秆、生物质炭不同管理模式下旱作农田温室气体排放日变化研究[J]. 国土与自然资源研究, 2024(6): 42-47.doi: 10.16202/j.cnki.tnrs.2024.06.009.
	Ren Z C, Wu J, Cai L Q, Wang Z W. Diurnal variations of the greenhouse gases emissions under different management modes of straw and biochar[J]. Territory & Natural Resources Study, 2024(6): 42-47.
[29]	韩广轩, 周广胜, 许振柱, 杨扬, 刘景利, 史奎桥. 玉米地土壤呼吸作用对土壤温度和生物因子协同作用的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2007, 31(3): 363-371.doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2007.0044.
	Han G X, Zhou G S, Xu Z Z, Yang Y, Liu J L, Shi K Q. Responses of soil respiration to the coordinated effects of soil temperature and biotic factors in a maize field[J]. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2007, 31(3): 363-371.
[30]	Azam F, Gill S, Farooq S. Availability of CO₂ as a factor affecting the rate of nitrification in soil[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2005, 37(11): 2141-2144.doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.02.036.
[31]	贾朋, 魏龙, 王燕, 刘珊, 高常军, 周平, 李吉跃. 马占相思人工林土壤温室气体排放日变化规律研究[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2016, 37(6): 84-90.doi: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.2016.06.013.
	Jia P, Wei L, Wang Y, Liu S, Gao C J, Zhou P, Li J Y. Diurnal variations in greenhouse gas emissions from Acacia mangium plantation soil[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2016, 37(6): 84-90.
[32]	徐钰, 刘兆辉, 石璟, 魏建林, 李国生, 王梅, 江丽华. 北方设施菜地土壤N₂O排放通量日变化及最佳观测时间确定[J]. 中国农业气象, 2016, 37(5): 505-512.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2016.05.002.
	Xu Y, Liu Z H, Shi J, Wei J L, Li G S, Wang M, Jiang L H. Diurnal variation characteristic of nitrous oxide from greenhouse vegetable soil during emission peak and its optimal observation duration[J]. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 2016, 37(5): 505-512.
[33]	薄晶晶. 长武怀豆和黑麦草绿肥腐解过程及其对农田土壤温室气体排放的影响[D]. 西安: 西北大学, 2018.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2016.05.002.
	Bo J J. Decomposition and their effects on soil greenhouse gas emissions of Changwu soybean and ryegrass as green manures[D]. Xi'an: Northwest University, 2018.
[34]	鲁琪飞. 添加有机物料对豫中烟田净生态系统碳收支和固碳效应的影响[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2023. doi: 10.27117/d.cnki.ghenu.2023.000172.
	Lu Q F. Effects of adding organic materials on net ecosystem carbon budget and carbon sequestration of tobacco fields in central Henan[D]. Zhengzhou: Henan Agricultural University, 2023.
[35]	董鸣豪. 添加有机物料对土壤关键生物学特性和烤烟生长的影响[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2024. doi: 10.27117/d.cnki.ghenu.2023.000818.
	Dong M H. Effects of adding organic materials on important biological properties of soil and tobacco growth[D]. Zhengzhou: Henan Agricultural University, 2024.
[36]	雷宏军, 胡世国, 潘红卫, 臧明, 刘鑫, 李轲. 土壤通气性与加氧灌溉研究进展[J]. 土壤学报, 2017, 54(2): 297-308.doi: 10.11766/trxb201607060270.
	Lei H J, Hu S G, Pan H W, Zang M, Liu X, Li K. Advancement in research on soil aeration and oxygation[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2017, 54(2): 297-308.
[37]	张玉铭, 邢力, 李晓欣, 秦树平, 李燕楠, 韩建, 胡春胜. 作物根系对根际土壤N₂O产生与排放的调控机制研究进展[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2023, 31(8): 1322-1329.doi:10.12357/cjea.20230367.
	Zhang Y M, Xing L, Li X X, Qin S P, Li Y N, Han J, Hu C S. Research progress on the regulatory mechanisms of crop roots on N₂O production and emissions in rhizosphere soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2023, 31(8): 1322-1329.
[38]	张振贤, 华珞, 尹逊霄, 滑丽萍, 高娟. 农田土壤N₂O的发生机制及其主要影响因素[J]. 首都师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 26(3): 114-120.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9398.2005.03.024.
	Zhang Z X, Hua L, Yin X X, Hua L P, Gao J. Nitrous oxide emission from agricultural soil and some influence factors[J]. Journal of Capital Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2005, 26(3): 114-120.
[39]	潘昊东. 添加有机物料对豫中烟田温室气体排放和烤烟生长的影响[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2021. doi: 10.27117/d.cnki.ghenu.2021.000337.
	Pan H D. Effects of organic material amendments on greenhouse gas emissions and growth of flue cured tobacco in central Henan[D]. Zhengzhou: Henan Agricultural University, 2021.
[40]	Wang L, Jiang Y L. Research progress on greenhouse gas emissions from farmland soils[J]. Agricultural Science and Technology, 2012, 13(8):1738-1743.doi: 10.16175/j.cnki.1009-4229.2012.08.011.
[41]	陈全胜, 李凌浩, 韩兴国, 阎志丹, 王艳芬, 张焱, 熊小刚, 陈世苹, 张丽霞, 高英志, 唐芳, 杨晶, 董云社. 典型温带草原群落土壤呼吸温度敏感性与土壤水分的关系[J]. 生态学报, 2004, 24(4): 831-836.doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2004.04.027.
	Chen Q S, Li L H, Han X G, Yan Z D, Wang Y F, Zhang Y, Xiong X G, Chen S P, Zhang L X, Gao Y Z, Tang F, Yang J, Dong Y S. Temperature sensitivity of soil respiration in relation to soil moisture in 11 communities of typical temperate steppe in Inner Mongolia[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2004, 24(4):831-836.
[42]	李宏图, 罗建新, 彭德元, 燕慧, 袁雅威, 赵莉. 绿肥翻压还土的生态效应及其对土壤主要物理性状的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2013, 29(5): 172-175.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2013.05.032.
	Li H T, Luo J X, Peng D Y, Yan H, Yuan Y W, Zhao L. Effect of ploughed-back green manures on soil physical properties and its corresponding ecological benefit[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2013, 29(5): 172-175. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2012-2848
[43]	陈全胜, 李凌浩, 韩兴国, 阎志丹. 水分对土壤呼吸的影响及机理[J]. 生态学报, 2003, 23(5): 972-978.doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2003.05.019.
	Chen Q S, Li L H, Han X G, Yan Z D. Effects of water content on soil respiration and the mechanisms[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2003, 23(5): 972-978.
[44]	李虎, 邱建军, 王立刚. 农田土壤呼吸特征及根呼吸贡献的模拟分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2008, 24(4): 14-20.doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-6819.2008.04.003.
	Li H, Qiu J J, Wang L G. Characterization of farmland soil respiration and modeling analysis of contribution of root respiration[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2008, 24(4): 14-20.

移栽后时间/d Time after transplanting	指标 Index	取样时刻 Sampling time
移栽后时间/d Time after transplanting	指标 Index	9∶00	12∶00	15∶00	18∶00	21∶00	0∶00	3∶00	6∶00	9∶00
30	CO₂通量	0.014^*	0.007^**	0.010^*	0.002^**	0.016^*	0.005^**	0.013^*	0.023^*	0.017^*
	N₂O通量	0.054	0.003^**	0.020^*	0.011^*	0.052	0.002^**	0.006^**	0.014^*	0.026^*
	WFPS	0.008^**	0.099	0.122	0.003^**	0.863	0.003^**	0.362	0.875	0.002^**
60	CO₂通量	0.006^**	0.007^**	0.027^*	0.002^**	0.010^**	0.017^*	0.008^**	0.005^*	0.004^**
	N₂O通量	0.006^**	0.004^*	0.003^**	0.008^**	0.005^**	0.011^*	0.001^**	0.003^**	0.021^*
	WFPS	0.878	0.045^*	0.564	0.141	0.619	0.685	0.959	0.021^*	<0.001^**
90	CO₂通量	0.005^**	0.001^**	0.003^**	0.008^**	0.006^**	0.005^**	0.017^*	0.002^**	0.006^**
	N₂O通量	0.010^*	0.002^**	0.028^*	0.016^*	0.039^*	0.003^**	0.005^**	0.006^**	0.018^*
	WFPS	0.084	0.367	0.355	0.903	0.334	0.143	0.015^*	0.753	0.626

移栽后时间/d Time after transplanting	指标 Index	取样时刻 Sampling time
移栽后时间/d Time after transplanting	指标 Index	9∶00	12∶00	15∶00	18∶00	21∶00	0∶00	3∶00	6∶00	9∶00
30	CO₂通量	0.014^*	0.007^**	0.010^*	0.002^**	0.016^*	0.005^**	0.013^*	0.023^*	0.017^*
	N₂O通量	0.054	0.003^**	0.020^*	0.011^*	0.052	0.002^**	0.006^**	0.014^*	0.026^*
	WFPS	0.008^**	0.099	0.122	0.003^**	0.863	0.003^**	0.362	0.875	0.002^**
60	CO₂通量	0.006^**	0.007^**	0.027^*	0.002^**	0.010^**	0.017^*	0.008^**	0.005^*	0.004^**
	N₂O通量	0.006^**	0.004^*	0.003^**	0.008^**	0.005^**	0.011^*	0.001^**	0.003^**	0.021^*
	WFPS	0.878	0.045^*	0.564	0.141	0.619	0.685	0.959	0.021^*	<0.001^**
90	CO₂通量	0.005^**	0.001^**	0.003^**	0.008^**	0.006^**	0.005^**	0.017^*	0.002^**	0.006^**
	N₂O通量	0.010^*	0.002^**	0.028^*	0.016^*	0.039^*	0.003^**	0.005^**	0.006^**	0.018^*
	WFPS	0.084	0.367	0.355	0.903	0.334	0.143	0.015^*	0.753	0.626

温室气体 Greenhouse gas	移栽后时间/d Time after transplanting	处理 Treatment	0~10 cm地温 0—10 cm ground temperature		WFPS
温室气体 Greenhouse gas	移栽后时间/d Time after transplanting	处理 Treatment	相关方程 Correlation equation	相关系数 Correlation coefficient	相关方程 Correlation equation	相关系数 Correlation coefficient
CO₂	30	NPK	y=-55.09+3.84x	0.631 0^*	y=96.33-1.08x	0.014 3
		NPKG	y=-115.35+7.22x	0.662 0^**	y=174.63-2.73x	0.095 4
	60	NPK	y=16.21+3.27x	0.758 0^**	y=192.90-1.96x	0.125 6
		NPKG	y=13.88+4.62x	0.789 5^**	y=-151.59+8.32x	0.456 9^*
	90	NPK	y=-133.79+9.73x	0.480 5^*	y=291.53-5.84x	0.212 6
		NPKG	y=-249.53+16.19x	0.796 9^**	y=178.03+0.99x	0.004 1
N₂O	30	NPK	y=-6.62+0.42x	0.930 4^**	y=10.04-0.12x	0.022 4
		NPKG	y=-5.91+0.48x	0.807 3^**	y=10.72-0.09x	0.027 0
	60	NPK	y=-1.71+0.33x	0.863 3^**	y=17.61-0.24x	0.205 7
		NPKG	y=-2.57+0.44x	0.891 7^**	y=-4.90+0.43x	0.151 1
	90	NPK	y=-5.64+0.47x	0.618 0^*	y=13.38-0.22x	0.171 3
		NPKG	y=-4.01+0.52x	0.928 7^**	y=10.45+0.01x	0.000 1

温室气体 Greenhouse gas	移栽后时间/d Time after transplanting	处理 Treatment	0~10 cm地温 0—10 cm ground temperature		WFPS
温室气体 Greenhouse gas	移栽后时间/d Time after transplanting	处理 Treatment	相关方程 Correlation equation	相关系数 Correlation coefficient	相关方程 Correlation equation	相关系数 Correlation coefficient
CO₂	30	NPK	y=-55.09+3.84x	0.631 0^*	y=96.33-1.08x	0.014 3
		NPKG	y=-115.35+7.22x	0.662 0^**	y=174.63-2.73x	0.095 4
	60	NPK	y=16.21+3.27x	0.758 0^**	y=192.90-1.96x	0.125 6
		NPKG	y=13.88+4.62x	0.789 5^**	y=-151.59+8.32x	0.456 9^*
	90	NPK	y=-133.79+9.73x	0.480 5^*	y=291.53-5.84x	0.212 6
		NPKG	y=-249.53+16.19x	0.796 9^**	y=178.03+0.99x	0.004 1
N₂O	30	NPK	y=-6.62+0.42x	0.930 4^**	y=10.04-0.12x	0.022 4
		NPKG	y=-5.91+0.48x	0.807 3^**	y=10.72-0.09x	0.027 0
	60	NPK	y=-1.71+0.33x	0.863 3^**	y=17.61-0.24x	0.205 7
		NPKG	y=-2.57+0.44x	0.891 7^**	y=-4.90+0.43x	0.151 1
	90	NPK	y=-5.64+0.47x	0.618 0^*	y=13.38-0.22x	0.171 3
		NPKG	y=-4.01+0.52x	0.928 7^**	y=10.45+0.01x	0.000 1

温室气体 Greenhouse gas	移栽后时间/d Time after transplanting	处理 Treatment	线性模型(Rs=a+bT+cW) Linear model (Rs=a+bT+cW)	决定系数(R²) Coefficient of determination ( R²)
CO₂	30	NPK	Rs=-100.707+4.062T+1.308W	0.650 0^*
		NPKG	Rs=-86.836+6.997T-0.810W	0.670 0^*
	60	NPK	Rs=27.263+3.211T-0.243W	0.760 0^*
		NPKG	Rs=-165.903+3.906T+5.454W	0.967 0^**
	90	NPK	Rs=-59.849+8.692T-1.833W	0.496 0
		NPKG	Rs=-299.109+16.353T+1.985W	0.813 0^**
N₂O	30	NPK	Rs=-11.474+0.443T+0.139W	0.957 0^**
		NPKG	Rs=-7.583+0.490T+0.047W	0.815 0^**
	60	NPK	Rs=1.473+0.313T-0.070W	0.897 0^**
		NPKG	Rs=-6.460+0.427T+0.118W	0.902 0^**
	90	NPK	Rs=-5.408+0.467T-0.006W	0.629 0^*
		NPKG	Rs=-4.947+0.528T+0.038W	0.935 0^**

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

烟田地表CO₂和N₂O日变化对连续绿肥翻压还田的响应

Responses of Diurnal Variation of Surface CO₂ and N₂O to Continuous Green Manure Incorporation in Tobacco Field

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 44

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	孟天天, 刘亚楠, 张向前, 路战远, 陈立宇, 李金龙, 王伟妮, 郝永河. 缓释氮肥施用量对玉米抽雄—吐丝期光合特性及干物质积累的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2024, 39(2): 126-135.
[2]	张鹏, 吴佩聪, 单颖, 邹刚华, 丁哲利, 钱永德, 赵凤亮. 秸秆还田对热带土壤-水稻种植系统N₂O排放的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2021, 36(S1): 260-266.
[3]	孙晓华, 李晓静, 刘杰才, 孙婧, 张之为. 添加有机物对玉米秸秆发酵中氮素转化及微环境的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2020, 35(3): 119-125.
[4]	翟锡姣, 刘婷婷, 曹世宇, 卫旭阳, 郑少文. CO₂加富及不同灌溉次数对菜豆生长及光合特性的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2020, 35(2): 88-97.
[5]	李宝石, 刘文科, 李宗耕, 张玉彬, 查凌雁, 周成波, 邵明杰. 设施甜椒土垄和垄嵌基质栽培方式CO₂排放通量日变化比较[J]. 华北农学报, 2019, 34(S1): 190-196.
[6]	张志鹏, 李甜, 侯雷平, 孙胜, 邢国明. CO₂加富对甜瓜光合荧光的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2019, 34(6): 97-103.
[7]	刘小林, 林丽, 刘佳妮, 陈泽斌, 余磊, 刘桂华, 徐胜光. 光照和施氮量对水稻根、叶际N₂O排放的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2019, 34(5): 116-125.
[8]	张向前, 白岚方, 路战远, 郭晓霞, 孙峰成, 程玉臣, 贾凯, 王玉芬. 种植密度对春玉米灌浆期光合特性日变化和光响应曲线及产量的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2019, 34(4): 96-103.
[9]	夏璐, 赵蕊, 王怡针, 金海燕, 吴锡冬, 葛均筑, 臧凤艳, 李子芳, 王金龙. 干旱胁迫对夏玉米光合作用和叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2019, 34(3): 102-110.
[10]	张之为, 李晓静, 白金瑞, 陈帅, 范梦轩. 高温条件下CO₂对黄瓜SOD、POD和CAT活性及其基因表达的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2017, 32(4): 67-72.
[11]	潘璐, 李志鑫, 崔世茂, 宋阳, 杜宪, 田露文, 白杰. 高温、加富CO₂耦合对温室黄瓜光合作用及叶片衰老的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2017, 32(3): 168-173.
[12]	王志强, 王俊哲, 辛泽毓, 曲奕威, 林同保. 华北平原夏玉米农田CO₂通量与光合特性及主要环境因素的关系[J]. 华北农学报, 2015, 30(3): 117-122.
[13]	姜乐, 赵洪亮, 谢立勇, 王惠贞, 冯永祥. CO₂浓度增高对北方水稻籽粒灌浆特性的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2014, 29(3): 136-141.
[14]	张德健, 路战远, 张向前, 王玉芬, 智颖飙. 不同耕作条件下玉米光合特性的差异[J]. 华北农学报, 2014, 29(2): 161-164.
[15]	刘义国, 林琪, 王宁. 秸秆还田与氮供应对小麦灌浆期光合日变化的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2013, 28(5): 219-223.

温室气体 Greenhouse gas	移栽后时间/d Time after transplanting	处理 Treatment	取样时刻 Sampling time
温室气体 Greenhouse gas	移栽后时间/d Time after transplanting	处理 Treatment	9:00	12:00	15:00	18:00	21:00	0:00	3:00	6:00	9:00
CO₂	30	NPK	1.05^*	0.71	0.92^*	0.78	1.01^*	1.24	1.31	1.49	0.97^*
		NPKG	1.06^*	0.72	0.87	0.79	0.94^*	1.24	1.33	1.51	1.03^*
	60	NPK	0.99^*	0.80	0.91^*	0.88	0.99^*	1.04^*	1.22	1.30	1.04^*
		NPKG	0.92^*	0.81	0.93^*	0.86	1.02^*	1.14	1.17	1.28	1.05^*
	90	NPK	0.93^*	0.73	0.83	0.88	0.99^*	1.20	1.33	1.37	1.09^*
		NPKG	0.92^*	0.73	0.78	0.96^*	1.05^*	1.22	1.32	1.31	1.06^*
N₂O	30	NPK	1.04^*	0.82	0.74	0.86	0.96^*	1.25	1.29	1.39	1.04^*
		NPKG	1.07^*	0.86	0.76	0.91^*	0.98^*	1.15	1.18	1.32	1.03^*
	60	NPK	1.01^*	0.84	0.75	0.89^*	1.02^*	1.07^*	1.29	1.37	1.07^*
		NPKG	0.99^*	0.84	0.76	0.88	0.96^*	1.15	1.30	1.35	1.08^*
	90	NPK	1.00^*	0.89^*	0.77	0.86	1.03^*	1.10^*	1.26	1.29	1.03^*
		NPKG	1.01^*	0.88	0.82	0.94^*	1.05^*	1.07^*	1.16	1.19	1.00^*

温室气体 Greenhouse gas	移栽后时间/d Time after transplanting	处理 Treatment	取样时刻 Sampling time
温室气体 Greenhouse gas	移栽后时间/d Time after transplanting	处理 Treatment	9:00	12:00	15:00	18:00	21:00	0:00	3:00	6:00	9:00
CO₂	30	NPK	1.05^*	0.71	0.92^*	0.78	1.01^*	1.24	1.31	1.49	0.97^*
		NPKG	1.06^*	0.72	0.87	0.79	0.94^*	1.24	1.33	1.51	1.03^*
	60	NPK	0.99^*	0.80	0.91^*	0.88	0.99^*	1.04^*	1.22	1.30	1.04^*
		NPKG	0.92^*	0.81	0.93^*	0.86	1.02^*	1.14	1.17	1.28	1.05^*
	90	NPK	0.93^*	0.73	0.83	0.88	0.99^*	1.20	1.33	1.37	1.09^*
		NPKG	0.92^*	0.73	0.78	0.96^*	1.05^*	1.22	1.32	1.31	1.06^*
N₂O	30	NPK	1.04^*	0.82	0.74	0.86	0.96^*	1.25	1.29	1.39	1.04^*
		NPKG	1.07^*	0.86	0.76	0.91^*	0.98^*	1.15	1.18	1.32	1.03^*
	60	NPK	1.01^*	0.84	0.75	0.89^*	1.02^*	1.07^*	1.29	1.37	1.07^*
		NPKG	0.99^*	0.84	0.76	0.88	0.96^*	1.15	1.30	1.35	1.08^*
	90	NPK	1.00^*	0.89^*	0.77	0.86	1.03^*	1.10^*	1.26	1.29	1.03^*
		NPKG	1.01^*	0.88	0.82	0.94^*	1.05^*	1.07^*	1.16	1.19	1.00^*

温室气体 Greenhouse gas	移栽后时间/d Time after transplanting	处理 Treatment	排放通量平均值/(mg/(m²·h)) Average emission flux			占日排放量百分比/% Percentage of daily emissions
温室气体 Greenhouse gas	移栽后时间/d Time after transplanting	处理 Treatment	日 Daily	昼 Day	夜 Night	昼 Day	夜 Night
CO₂	30	NPK	64.22±2.14a	68.95±3.74a	54.76±2.77b	56	44
		NPKG	101.37±3.96a	107.73±3.43a	88.65±5.49b	55	45
	60	NPK	118.69±5.24ab	122.91±4.62a	110.25±6.54b	53	47
		NPKG	155.95±2.92b	163.54±2.07a	140.77±4.98c	54	46
	90	NPK	153.55±5.42a	164.03±5.85a	132.59±4.54b	55	45
		NPKG	200.45±4.63b	216.39±8.37a	168.57±3.64c	56	44
N₂O	30	NPK	6.42±0.16b	6.83±0.19a	5.61±0.11c	55	45
		NPKG	8.39±0.09b	8.76±0.15a	7.67±0.09c	53	47
	60	NPK	8.63±0.10b	9.07±0.07a	7.74±0.33c	54	46
		NPKG	11.03±0.22b	11.62±0.31a	9.84±0.08c	54	46
	90	NPK	8.14±0.22a	8.59±0.12a	7.25±0.54b	54	46
		NPKG	10.58±0.32a	11.02±0.48a	9.69±0.36b	53	47

温室气体 Greenhouse gas	移栽后时间/d Time after transplanting	处理 Treatment	排放通量平均值/(mg/(m²·h)) Average emission flux			占日排放量百分比/% Percentage of daily emissions
温室气体 Greenhouse gas	移栽后时间/d Time after transplanting	处理 Treatment	日 Daily	昼 Day	夜 Night	昼 Day	夜 Night
CO₂	30	NPK	64.22±2.14a	68.95±3.74a	54.76±2.77b	56	44
		NPKG	101.37±3.96a	107.73±3.43a	88.65±5.49b	55	45
	60	NPK	118.69±5.24ab	122.91±4.62a	110.25±6.54b	53	47
		NPKG	155.95±2.92b	163.54±2.07a	140.77±4.98c	54	46
	90	NPK	153.55±5.42a	164.03±5.85a	132.59±4.54b	55	45
		NPKG	200.45±4.63b	216.39±8.37a	168.57±3.64c	56	44
N₂O	30	NPK	6.42±0.16b	6.83±0.19a	5.61±0.11c	55	45
		NPKG	8.39±0.09b	8.76±0.15a	7.67±0.09c	53	47
	60	NPK	8.63±0.10b	9.07±0.07a	7.74±0.33c	54	46
		NPKG	11.03±0.22b	11.62±0.31a	9.84±0.08c	54	46
	90	NPK	8.14±0.22a	8.59±0.12a	7.25±0.54b	54	46
		NPKG	10.58±0.32a	11.02±0.48a	9.69±0.36b	53	47

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

烟田地表CO2和N2O日变化对连续绿肥翻压还田的响应

Responses of Diurnal Variation of Surface CO2 and N2O to Continuous Green Manure Incorporation in Tobacco Field

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 44

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

烟田地表CO₂和N₂O日变化对连续绿肥翻压还田的响应

Responses of Diurnal Variation of Surface CO₂ and N₂O to Continuous Green Manure Incorporation in Tobacco Field