华北农学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6): 146-151. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7091.2012.06.029

所属专题: 水稻

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

8个水稻抗条纹叶枯病分子标记有效性的验证及评价

姚姝, 张亚东, 朱镇, 陈涛, 赵庆勇, 周丽慧, 于新, 王才林   

  1. 江苏省农业科学院粮食作物研究所, 江苏省优质水稻工程技术研究中心, 国家水稻改良中心南京分中心, 江苏南京 210014
  • 收稿日期:2012-09-12 出版日期:2012-12-28
  • 作者简介:姚姝(1982-),女,江苏镇江人,研究实习员,硕士,主要从事水稻遗传育种研究。
  • 基金资助:
    转基因生物新品种培育重点项目(2009ZX08001-019B);江苏省农业科技自主创新基金(CX(11)1022)

Evaluation and Validation of Eight Molecular Markers Associated with Rice Stripe Resistance in Rice ( Oryza sativa)

YAO Shu, ZHANG Ya-dong, ZHU Zhen, CHEN Tao, ZHAO Qing-yong, ZHOU Li-hui, YU Xin, WANG Cai-lin   

  1. Institute of Food Crops, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing Branch of China National Center for Rice Improvement, Jiangsu High Quality Rice R&D Center, Nanjing 210014, China
  • Received:2012-09-12 Published:2012-12-28

摘要: 利用已报道的8个与水稻条纹叶枯病抗性基因Stv-bi连锁的标记,即SCAR标记ST-10;STS标记H11-8、H11-12;InDel标记M68.4和M79.1以及SSR标记Rm21-8、Rm21-15、H21,结合田间抗性鉴定,对24份水稻品种(系)(包括2份抗、感对照)以及2个抗感组合的F2分离世代进行抗病性分析、筛选和评价,旨在有效利用抗病资源选育抗病新品种,并对这8个分子标记的有效性和选择效率进行验证比较,筛选出高效的辅助选择分子标记。结果表明,仅有SCAR标记ST-10和STS标记H11-8的分子检测与田间表型鉴定的吻合率超过或接近90%,其余分子标记均低于80%,其中,3对SSR标记在抗感材料中几乎没有多态性。比较而言,SCAR标记ST-10更能有效地用于条纹叶枯病抗性材料的筛选,结合使用STS标记H11-8更能准确有效地检测Stv-bi基因的存在,进一步提高选择效率。

关键词: 水稻, 条纹叶枯病, 抗性基因, 分子检测, SCAR, Indel, STS, SSR

Abstract: In this study,we developed eight resistance-associated markers ST-10,H11-8,H11-12,M68. 4, M79. 1,Rm21-8,Rm21-15 and H21,as reported previously, to evaluate the resistance of RSD in 24 rice varieties ( including two anti-and sense-varieties) and two F2 populations obtained from a cross between different anti-and sense-varieties. To breed new RSD-resistant rice varieties,we also compared the effectiveness and selection efficiency of these eight markers,and screened the most efficient markers to assist breeding. Qur results showed that: only the consistency rate of markers ST-10 and H11-8 between molecular detection and field phenotypic identification was greater than or close to 90%; The rest of the molecular markers were lower than 80%; Of these, three SSR markers were almost no polymorphism. Compared to STS marker H11-8,SCAR marker ST-10 was more effective for screening RSD resistant varieties. The combined use of these two markers was more accurate and efficient to detect the Stv-bi gene and to further improve the selection efficiency.

Key words: Rice, Rice stripe disease, Resistance gene, Molecular detection, SCAR, Indel, STS, SSR

中图分类号: 

引用本文

姚姝, 张亚东, 朱镇, 陈涛, 赵庆勇, 周丽慧, 于新, 王才林. 8个水稻抗条纹叶枯病分子标记有效性的验证及评价[J]. 华北农学报, 2012, 27(6): 146-151. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7091.2012.06.029.

YAO Shu, ZHANG Ya-dong, ZHU Zhen, CHEN Tao, ZHAO Qing-yong, ZHOU Li-hui, YU Xin, WANG Cai-lin. Evaluation and Validation of Eight Molecular Markers Associated with Rice Stripe Resistance in Rice ( Oryza sativa)[J]. ACTA AGRICULTURAE BOREALI-SINICA, 2012, 27(6): 146-151. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7091.2012.06.029.