以普通玉米自交系丹232和爆裂玉米自交系N04为亲本构建259个F2: 3和220个BC2S1家系群体, 利用SSR标记构建分子标记遗传图谱, 利用复合区间作图方法对4个生育期性状进行QTL定位和效应分析。利用F2: 3群体共检测到4个抽雄期QTL、6个吐丝期QTL和3个散粉期QTL。单个QTL可解释的表型变异为6.7%~18.4%, 可解释的表型总变异为28.9%~50.3%, 11个QTL的增效基因来自生育期较长的亲本丹232, 其余2个QTL的增效基因来自生育期较短的亲本N04; BC2S1群体检测到8个与4个生育期性状相关的QTL, 单个QTL可解释的表型变异为4.5%~11.6%, 可解释的表型总变异为13.2%~18.5%, 增效基因来自两个亲本的QTL为3个和5个。两类群体检测出QTL的数目、位置、效应和贡献率均存在较大差异, 主要原因在于BC2S1群体抽样选择所引起的群体结构差异, F2: 3群体显示出较高的QTL检测能力, 但回交育种过程中应慎重依据F2: 3群体QTL定位结果进行标记辅助选择(MAS)。
Two hundred and fifty-nine F2: 3 and 220 BC2S1 families, derived from the same cross between Dan232, a dent corn inbred and N04, a popcorn inbred, were evaluated for four developmental stages, tassel emergence, male anthesis, silk emergence and clays from male anthesis to silk emergence(ASI).Quantative trait loci(QTL) were identified and their effects were evaluated using composite interval mapping(CIM) method. A total of 13 QTL were detected in the F2: 3 population, the numbers of QTL were 4, 6 and 3 for tassel emergence, male anthesis and silk emergence, respectively. Contribution to phenotypic variation of a single QTL varied from 6.7% to 18.4%, and total contributions of all QTL were from 28.9% to 50.3%.The favorable alleles of 11 QTL were from Dan232, the parent with much longer developmental stages, while the favorable alleles of other two QTL were from N04, the parent with much shorter developmental stages. In the BC2S1 population, eight QTL were detected totally, all two for each developmental stage. Contribution to phenotypic variation of a single QTL varied from 4.5% to 11. 6%, and total contribution of all QTL were from 13.2% to 18.5%. The favorable alleles of three and five QTL were contributed by the two parents, respectively. There were obvious difffences between the two populationn in numbers of detected QTL and their positions, effects and contributions. The main reason might be attributed to their different population structures clue to strict selections while developing the BC2S1 population. Although F2: 3 population had higher ability in QTL identffication, it should be taken great consideration to conduct MAS in backcross breeding according to the QTL mapping results in F2: 3 populations.
[1] Hallauer A R, Mirando F J B. Quantitative Genetics in Maize Breeding[M]. Iowa State University Press, Ames, 1981.
[2] Austin D F, Lee M. Genetic resolution and verification of quantitative trait loci for flowering and plant height with recombinant inbred lines of maize[J]. Genome, 1996, 39: 957-968.
[3] Beavis W D, Smith O S, Grant D, et al. Identification of quantitative trait loci using a small sample of topcrossed and F4 progeny from maize[J]. Crop Science, 1994, 34: 882-892.
[4] Edwards M D, Helentjaris T, Wright S, et al. Molecular-marker-facilitated investigations of quantitative trait loci in maize. 4. Analysis based on genome saturation with isozyme and restriction fragment length polymorphism markers[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 1992, 83: 765-774.
[5] Phillips R I, Kim T S, Kaeppler S M, et al. Genetic Dissection of Maturity Using RFLPs[C], Wilkinson D. Proceedings of the 47th Annual Corn and Sorghum Industry Research Conference, American Seed Trade Association, 1992: 136-150.
[6] Veldboom L R, Lee M, Woodman W L. Molecular-marker facilitated studies in an elite maize population. Ⅰ. Linkage analysis and determination of QTL for morphological traits[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 1994, 88: 7-16.
[7] 汤华, 严建兵, 黄益勤, 等. 玉米5个农艺性状的QTL定位[J]. 遗传学报, 2005, 32(2): 203-209.
[8] Vladutu C, McLaughlin J, Phillips R L. Fine mapping and characterization of linked quantitative trait loci involved in the transition of the maize apical meristem from vegetative to generative structures[J]. Genetics, 1999, 153(2): 993-1007.
[9] Salvi S, Tuberosa R, Chiapparino E, et al. Toward positional cloning of Vgt
[STBX] 1
[STBZ], a QTL controlling the transition from the vegetative to the reproductive phase in maize[J]. Plant Molecular Biology, 2002, 48: 601-603.
[10] Salvi S, Sponza G, Morgante M, et al. Conserved noncoding genomic sequences associated with a flowering-time quantitative trait locus in maize[J]. The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 2007, 104(27): 11376-11381.
[11] Strevens S J, Strevens E J, Lee K W, et al. Qrganogenesis of the staminate and pistillate inflorescences of pop and dent corn: relationship to leaf stages[J]. Crop Science, 1986, 26: 712.
[12] Ziegler K E, Ashman B. Popcorn[M], Hallauer A R. Specialty Corns. New York: CRC Press, 1994: 189-223.
[13] 毛传澡, 程式华. 水稻农艺性状QTL定位精确性及其影响因素的分析[J]. 农业生物技术学报, 1999, 7(4): 386-394.
[14] Fulton T M, Beck-Bunn T, Emmatty D, et al. QTL analysis of an advanced backcross of Lycopersion peruvinum to the cultivated tomato and comparisons with QTLs found in other wild species[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 1997, 95: 881-894.
[15] Ho J C, McCouch S R, Smith M E. Improvement of hybrid yield by advanced backcross yield analysis in elite maize[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2002, 105: 440-448.
[16] Huang X Q, Cster H, Ganal M W, et al. Advanced backcross QTL analysis for the identification of quantitative trait loci alleles from wild relative of wheat(Rriticum aestivumL.)[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2003, 106: 1379-1389.
[17] Septiningsih E M, Prasetiyono J, Lubis E, et al. Identification of quantitative trait loci for yield and yield components in an advanced backcross p. opulation derived from the Oryza sativavariety IR64 and the wild relative O. rufipogon[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2003, 107: 1419-1432.
[18] Tanksley S D, Nelson J C. Advanced backcross QTL analysis: a method for the simultaneous discovery and transfer of valuable QTLs from unadapted germplasm into elite breeding lines[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 1996, 92: 191-203.
[19] Ashman R B. Registration of three popcorn(Maize)parental lines, HP62-02, HP72-11, and HP68-07[J]. Crop Science, 1991, 31: 1402.
[20] Robbins W A, Ashman R B. Parent-offsping popping expansion correlations in progeny of dent corn popcorn and flint corn popcorn crosses[J]. Crop Science, 1984, 24: 119-121.
[21] 李玉玲, 吕德彬, 吴晓军, 等. 爆×普自交和回交后代连续选择效果研究[J]. 华北农学报, 2005, 20(1): 12-16.
[22] 李玉玲, 董永彬, 崔党群, 等. 利用三倍体胚乳遗传模型定位爆裂玉米膨化倍数QTL[J]. 中国农业科学, 2006, 39(3): 448-455.
[23] 李玉玲, 牛素贞, 董永彬. 利用高代回交方法定位爆裂玉米膨化倍数QTL[J]. 作物学报, 2007, 33(5): 831-836.
[24] Saghai-Maroof M A, Soliman K M, Jorgensen R A, et al. Ribosomal DNA spacer length polymorphisms in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population, and population dynamics[J]. The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 1984, 81: 8014-8018.
[25] Lincoln S, Daly M, Lander E. Constructing genetics maps with MAPMAKER/EXP 3. 0[M], Whitehead Institute
[JP3] Technical Report, Whitehead Institute, Cambridge, Massachusctts, USA, 1992.
[26] Zeng Z B. Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci[J]. Genetics, 1994, 136: 1457-1468.
[27] Churchill G A, Doerge R W. Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping[J]. Genetics, 1994, 138: 963-971.
[28] Stuber C W, Edwards M D, Wendel J F. Molecular marker facilitated investigations of quantitative trait loci in maize. Factors influencing yield and its component traits[J]. Crop Science, 1987, 27: 639-648.
[29] 杨俊品, 荣廷昭, 向道权, 等. 玉米数量性状基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2005, 31(2): 188-196.
