论文

水分胁迫对水稻生长发育影响的补偿性及意义

  • 郑桂萍 ,
  • 殷大伟 ,
  • 刘丽华 ,
  • 汪秀志 ,
  • 王伯伦
展开
  • 1. 黑龙江八一农垦大学, 植物科技学院,黑龙江 大庆 163319;
    2. 沈阳农业大学, 农学院,辽宁 沈阳 110161
郑桂萍(1960-),女,山东人,教授,博士,主要从事作物生理生态研究.

收稿日期: 2009-10-01

  网络出版日期: 2014-10-14

基金资助

黑龙江省科技攻关项目(GC04B305)

Compensation and Significance of Water Stress on Growth of Rice

  • ZHENG Gui-ping ,
  • YIN Da-wei ,
  • LIU Li-hua ,
  • WANG Xiu-zhi ,
  • WANG Bo-lun
Expand
  • 1. Plant Science and Technology College, Heilongjiang August First Land Reclamation University, Daqing 163319, China;
    2. College of Agronomy, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110161, China

Received date: 2009-10-01

  Online published: 2014-10-14

摘要

采用负压式土壤湿度计严格监测土壤水势,于不同生育期进行不同强度的控水处理,研究土壤水分对寒地水稻生长发育、产量的影响及补偿效应,并从生态学和农学两方面探讨了胁迫后的可补偿性及意义.结果表明,分蘖期不同强度的控水处理使两个品种的叶龄进程变缓,复水后叶龄得到不同速度的补偿逐渐与对照接近;使两个品种的株高低于CK均达到极显著水平,但复水后株高迅速补偿生长,最终与对照间的差异不显著;但复水后茎数补偿较小,最终穗数仍低于CK,达极显著水平.长穗期不同强度的控水处理对株高的影响复水后不能得到补偿,两品种各个处理的最终株高低于CK,均达到显著或极显著水平,主要是控水处理显著或极显著降低了植株第2~4节间的长度;但两个品种的茎数于复水后出现超补偿现象,最终茎数和穗数均极显著地高于CK,但此期控水处理改变了物质的分配系数,使经济产量的降低幅度高于生物产量降幅的一倍以上,因此这种数量上的超补偿可以说具有生态学意义,但没有农学意义.今后应加强使补偿或超补偿更具有农学方面意义的研究.

本文引用格式

郑桂萍 , 殷大伟 , 刘丽华 , 汪秀志 , 王伯伦 . 水分胁迫对水稻生长发育影响的补偿性及意义[J]. 华北农学报, 2009 , 24(6) : 93 -99 . DOI: 10.7668/hbnxb.2009.06.019

Abstract

A pot experiment with different controlling water treatments (CWT) during different developmental stages for two cultivars of soil water potentials strictly monitored by soil negative pressure water potential tester was conducted to study the effects of soil water on the growth,grain yield and compensation of rice in cold region.The compensation and its significance under water stresswas also investigated from both ecological and agricultural perspective.The results were as followed: CWT on different levels during tillering period slowed down the growth of leaves for both cultivars,however leaves got compensation at different rates after water given back,gradually getting close to those under control.CWT on different levels during tillering period made plant height of both cultivars obviously lower than CK,however plant height increased quickly after water given back,and finally no obvious differences were seen compared to those under control.During tillering period,the compensation of culm number was little.Panicle number was still obviously lower than CK after water given back.CWT on different levels during panicleformation period showed no compensation on plant height after water given back.The final plant height of both cultivars under treatment was obviously or extremely obviously lower than CK,mainly because water control shortened the length of the 2nd section to the 4th section of plant.However,the culm number of both cultivars showed extra compensation after water given back during panicleformation period.The final culm number and panicle number were obviously larger than CK.Nevertheless,water control during panicleformation period changed the distribution coefficient of materials,making the decrease of economic yield twice asmuch as biological yield.Therefore,extra compensation on culm number and panicle number has ecological significance but no agricultural signifi cance.Deeper research are needed for making compensation more significant from the agricultural aspect.

参考文献

[1] 张启舜,沈振荣.中国农业持续发展的水危机及对策[J].作物杂志,1997(6):9-12.
[2] 沈振荣,李原园,裴源生.中国农业水资源面临的严峻挑[J].当代生态农业,2001(1):40-58,60.
[3] 王一凡,周毓珩.北方节水稻作[M].沈阳:辽宁科技出版社,2000:1-2.
[4] 吴良欢,视增容.水稻覆膜旱作节水节肥高产栽培技术[J].浙江农业大学学报,1999,25(1):41-42.
[5] 杨建昌,朱庆森.土壤水分对水稻籽粒增重过程的影响[J].江苏农学院学报,1994,15(3):9-14.
[6] 陈国林.水稻节水灌溉的生理生态效应研究[J].江西农业大学学报,1996,18(2):160-166.
[7] 陆建飞,丁艳锋.持续土壤水分胁迫对水稻生育与产量构成的影响[J].江苏农学院学报,1998,19(2):43-48.
[8] 彭世彰,郝树荣.节水灌溉水稻高产优质成因分析[J].灌溉排水,2000,19(3):3-7.
[9] 黄英金,漆映雪.灌浆成熟期气候因素对早籼稻米蛋白质及其四种组分含量的影响[J].中国农业气象,2002,5,23(2):9-31.
[10] 蔡一霞,朱庆森,王志琴,等.结实期土壤水分对稻米品质的影响[J].作物学报,2002,28(5):601-608.
[11] 黄文江,黄义德,王纪华,等.水稻旱作对其生长量和经济产量的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2003,21(4):15-19.
[12] 邵玺文,张瑞珍,齐春艳,等.拔节孕穗期水分胁迫对水稻生长发育及产量的影响[J].吉林农业大学学报,2004,26(3):237-241.
[13] 戴高兴,邓国富,周萌.干旱胁迫对水稻生理生化的影响[J].广西农业科学,2006,37(1):4-6.
[14] 宋娜,郭世伟,沈其荣.不同氮素形态营养及水分胁迫对分蘖期水稻水分吸收及光合特性的影响[J].南京农业大学学报.2006,29(4):64-69.
[15] 王克全,付强,季飞,等.黑龙江省西部半干旱区水稻水分生产函数及优化灌溉制度研[J].节水灌溉,2007(8):48-51.
[16] 魏虹,林魁,李凤民,等.补充供水对半干旱区旱地春小麦水分亏缺的补偿效应研究[J].兰州大学学报,1996,32(3):319-324.
[17] 施积炎,袁小凤,丁贵杰.作物水分亏缺补偿与超补偿效应的研究现状[J].山地农业生物学报,2000,19(3):226-233.
[18] 张烈君.水稻水分胁迫补偿效应研究[D].河海大学,2006.
[19] 王青梅.水稻旱后复水补偿效应的研究[D].河海大学,2007.
[20] 郝树荣,郭相平,王为木,等.水稻分蘖期水分胁迫及复水对根系生长的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2007,25(1):149-152.
[21] 盛承发.生长的冗余-作物对于虫害超越补偿作用的一种解释[J].应用生态学报,1990,1(1):26-30.
[22] Belsky A J.Overcompensation by plants:herbivo reoptimization of red herring[J].Evolutionary Ecology,1993,7:109-121.
[23] 夏国军.冬小麦穗的伤害补偿效应[J].麦类作物,1997,17(2):61-62.
[24] 王志明,刘国荣.长白落叶松对叶部病虫危害的补偿与超补偿效应的研究[J].林业科学研究,2006,19(5):625-628.
[25] Gajri P R,Prihar S S.Effect of small irrigation amounts on the yield of wheat[J].Agric Water Mamagement,1983,6:31-41.
[26] 关义新,戴俊英,徐世昌,等.玉米花期干旱及复水对植株补偿生长及产量的影响[J].作物学报,1997,23(6):740-745.
[27] 原保忠,王静,赵松岭.植物补偿作用机制探讨.生态学杂志[J].1998,17(5)∶45-49.
[28] 陈晓远,高志红,刘晓英,等.植物对土壤水分条件的适应性反应研究进展[J].韶关学院学报,2002,23(12):72-77.
文章导航

/