论文

冬小麦蒸腾效率对土壤水分响应的生理机制探讨

展开
  • 1. 中国科学院,遗传与发育生物学研究所,农业资源研究中心,农业水资源重点实验室,河北省节水农业重点实验室, 河北石家庄 050021;
    2. 中国科学院,研究生院, 北京 100049;
    3. 河北省丰宁满族自治县林业局, 河北丰宁 068350;
    4. 华中农业大学,植物科学技术学院, 湖北武汉 430070
李玉欣(1984-),女,河北石家庄人,硕士,主要从事植物生理生态和生物节水研究.

收稿日期: 2009-12-24

  网络出版日期: 2014-10-14

基金资助

中国科学院创新方向性项目(KSCX2-YW-N-004);国家"863"项目(2006AA100221);中国科学院创新方向性项目(KSCX2-YW-N-042-01);国家自然基金(30870411)

Physiological Response of Transpiration Efficiency of Winter Wheat to Soil Moisture

Expand
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Agricultural Water Resources, Hebei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Water-Saving, Center for Agricultural Resources Research, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050021, China;
    2. Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
    3. Forest Bureau of Manzu Autonomous County of Fengning, Hebei Province, Fengning 068350, China;
    4. College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China

Received date: 2009-12-24

  Online published: 2014-10-14

摘要

通过盆栽试验,研究了两种生态型冬小麦(石家庄8号和洛旱2号)在三种土壤水分条件下(L:田间持水量的60%~6%;M:田间持水量的70%~7%;H:田间持水量的80%~8%)蒸腾效率的变化及其生理机制.结果表明:随着土壤水分的降低,植株叶片水势降低,根冠比增加,两个品种间没有显著差异.土壤水分的降低,使植株生物量减少,蒸腾耗水减少,但蒸腾效率提高.L处理下石家庄8号和洛旱2号植株水平的蒸腾效率分别提高119.0%和62.2%.植株叶片光合速率与蒸腾速率随土壤水分的减少不断下降,但叶片水平的蒸腾效率提高,且与植株水平蒸腾效率呈极显著正相关(R2=0.96).气孔导度随土壤水分的减少而降低,并与蒸腾速率呈极显著正相关(R2=0.97),表明蒸腾主要受气孔因素调节;光合速率随土壤水分减少而降低,但胞间CO2浓度升高,表明光合主要受非气孔因素调节,这种调节机制使得植株在干旱胁迫下更高效利用水分.试验结果初步揭示:光合与蒸腾调节机制的差异构成了试验品种在干旱下蒸腾效率提高的生理基础.

本文引用格式

李玉欣, 师长海, 乔匀周, 董宝娣, 廉诗启, 刘孟雨, 刘海培 . 冬小麦蒸腾效率对土壤水分响应的生理机制探讨[J]. 华北农学报, 2010 , 25(1) : 121 -125 . DOI: 10.7668/hbnxb.2010.01.024

Abstract

Pot experiment was conducted to study the response of transpiration efficiency of two ecotypes of winter wheat varieties(Shijiazhuang8;Luohan2) and its physiological mechanism to three different soil moisture conditions(L:60%-65% of field capacity;M:70%-75% of field capacity;H:80%-85% of field capacity).The results showed that leaf water potential decreased,and the root shoot ratio increased with the decreasing of soil moisture,but there was no significant difference between the two varieties.Lowering soil water content resulted in a reduction of biomass and water use for transpiration,however the transpiration efficiency at plant level was increased,it was increased by 119.0% and 62.2% for Shijiazhuang8 and Luohan2 in L treatment. With soil moisture decreasing,leaf photosynthetic rate and transpiration rate was reduced continuously,but transpiration efficiency at leaf level increased.There was a significantly positive correlation between the transpiration efficiency at plant level and at leaf level(R2=0.96).Stomatal conductance was reduced with the soil moisture lowing,and it significantly positive related to transpiration rate(R2=0.97),which indicated that transpiration was mainly regulated by stomatal factor;while photosynthetic rate reduced and intercellular CO2 concentration raised,which indicated that photosynthesis was mainly adjusted by non stomatal factors.Such regulating mechanism makes more efficient use of water in the plant under lower level of soil moisture conditions.The preliminary results suggested that the different regulatory way of photosynthesis and transpiration constitute the physiological basis of higher transpiration efficiency under low soil moisture conditions.

参考文献

[1] 山仑,邓西平,张岁岐.生物节水研究现状及展望[J].中国科学基金,2006(2):66-71.
[2] 王会肖,蔡燕,刘昌明.生物节水及其研究的若干方面[J].节水灌溉,2007(6):32-36.
[3] 房全孝,陈雨海,李全起,等.土壤水分对冬小麦生长后期光能利用及水分利用效率的影响[J].作物学报,2006,32(6):861-866.
[4] 李升东,王法宏,司纪升,等.不同基因型冬小麦在两种栽培模式下蒸腾速率、光合速率和水分利用效率的比较研究[J].麦类作物学报,2007,27(3):514-517.
[5] 陈兆波.生物节水研究进展及发展方向[J].中国农业科学,2007,40(7):1456-1462.
[6] 张娟,张正斌,谢惠民,等.小麦叶片水分利用效率及相关生理性状基因的染色体定位[J].西北植物学报,2005,25(8):1521-1527.
[7] Gang-Ping Xue,Scott Chapman,Antonio Reverter.Differential gene expression of wheat progeny with contrasting levels of transpiration efficiency[J].Plant Mol Biol,2006,61(6):863-881.
[8] 单长卷,田雷亮.冬小麦水分生理特性对水分胁迫的响应[J].吉林农业科学,2007,32(6):16-21.
[9] 董宝娣,张正斌,刘孟雨,等.小麦不同品种的水分利用特性及对灌溉制度的响应[J].农业工程学报,2007,23(9):27-33.
[10] 高延军,张喜英,陈素英,等.冬小麦品种间水分利用效率的差异及其影响因子分析[J].灌溉排水学报,2004,23(5):45-49.
[11] 李全起,陈雨海,周勋波,等.灌溉和种植模式对冬小麦播前土壤含水量的消耗及水分利用效率的影响[J].作物学报,2009,35(1):104-109.
[12] Richard A.Richards.Physiological traits used in the breeding of new cultivars for water-scarce environments[J].Agricultural Water Management,2006,80:197-211.
[13] 高鹭,胡春胜,陈素英.喷灌条件下不同灌水处理冬小麦的叶水势特征[J].土壤,2005,37(4):410-414.
[14] 闫映宇,赵成义,盛钰,等.膜下滴灌对棉花根系、地上部分生物量及产量的影响[J].应用生态学报,2009,20(4):970-976.
[15] 冯广龙,罗远培,刘建利等.不同水分条件下冬小麦根与冠生长及功能间的动态消长关系[J].干旱地区农业研究,1997,15(2):72-79.
[16] 管建慧,张永平,蒋阿宁.不同灌水处理对春小麦耗水特性及产量的影响[J].中国农学通报,2009,25(08):272-276.
[17] 王会肖,刘昌明.作物水分利用效率内涵及研究进展[J].水科学进展,2000,11(1):99-104.
[18] Fischer R A,Turner N C.Plant productivity in the arid and semi-arid zones[J].Ann Rev Plant Physiol,1978,(29):277-317.
[19] 刘国利,何树斌,杨惠敏.紫花苜蓿水分利用效率对水分胁迫的响应及其机理[J].草业学报,2009,18(3):207-213.
[20] 温达志.大气二氧化碳浓度增高与植物水分利用效率[J].热带亚热带植物学报,1997,5(3):83-90.
[21] 张国平,周伟军.植物生理生态学[M].浙江:浙江大学出版社,2003.
[22] 许大全.光合速率效率[M].上海:上海出版社,2002.
[23] 裴冬,孙振山,陈四龙,等.水分调亏对冬小麦生理生态的影响[J].农业工程学报,2006,22(8):68-72.
[24] Cockshull K E.Integration of energy conservation on crop productivity[J].Acta Hoticulturae,1988(229):113-123.
[25] Xu D Q,Terashima K,Crang R F E.Stomatal and nonstomatal accilimation to a C0_2 enriched atmosphere[J].Biotronics,1994(23):123-128.
[26] 魏小平,王根轩,吴冬秀.干旱和CO_2浓度升高对不同春小麦光合作用和气孔阻力及水分蒸腾效率的影响[J].兰州大学学报,2005,41(6):42-46.
[27] 卢振民.土壤水分含量对冬小麦气孔开启程度的影响[J].植物学报,1998,28(4):419-426.
[28] 高素华,毛飞,郭建平.干旱胁迫对冬小麦生理因素的影响[C]//徐祥德,吴正华.华北干旱预测研究进展.北京:气象出版社,1999:78-86.
文章导航

/