钾在烤烟体内是以离子形态存在,虽不参与组织构成,但它是多种碳氮代谢关键酶的活化剂,参与光合作用和呼吸作用等多种代谢活动及同化产物的合成与运输,同时,与烤烟的抗病性、抗逆性和品质密切相关[1]。烟草是喜钾植物,钾含量高低决定烟叶的燃烧性和持火力好坏,改善烟叶香气质和香气量,提高品质,钾含量是决定烤烟品质的一个重要指标[2]。目前,我国烟叶含钾量普遍偏低,远低于国外烟叶含钾量[3]。因此,提高烟叶含钾量对改善我国烟叶品质具有十分重要的意义。
我国水资源短缺且分布不均,可供农业灌溉用的淡水资源更少,且利用效率低,仅为发达国家农业用水利用率的60%左右[4]。我国钾矿资源缺乏,仅为世界平均水平的7%,农业生产所需钾肥大部分依赖进口,加之当季利用率偏低,仅40%~50%,远低于欧美国家[5]。因此,提高水肥的利用率是当前烤烟生产中急需解决的技术问题之一。在我国烤烟生产中普遍存在过量施用钾肥的现象,存在钾素盈余的状态,减少钾肥施用量还有很大空间。近年来,水肥耦合(一体化)技术已成为我国干旱半干旱地区提高作物产量和品质的重要手段,更是实现农业可持续发展的有效途径[6]。水分和养分是农业生产田间管理中两大最主要的生产要素,直接决定作物的产量和品质及水肥资源的利用效率[7]。研究表明,水肥耦合技术可促进作物对水分和养分的吸收[8]。与传统生产的水肥管理方式相比,水肥耦合技术不仅能够减少肥料施用量,提高肥料利用率[9-10],还可以节约水资源,提高灌溉用水利用率[11-12]。水钾耦合能够促进烟株的生长和干物质的积累[13],协调烟叶内在化学成分,提升烟叶的外在和内在品质[14]。
山地和坡耕地是贵州省黔东南州烤烟种植区的重要地形特征,普遍存在水资源时空分布不均和相对短缺的状况严重制约着烟叶产量及品质的提升。由于其特殊的自然条件和生态环境,在当地的烤烟生产中合适的水钾施用标准尚不完全清楚,水钾耦合生产技术中水钾的适宜用量急需明确。为此,在本地区开展水钾耦合的大田试验研究,以探究当地烤烟种植中最佳的水钾用量,为降低烤烟生产中水肥的用量及提高烤烟产量、品质和增加经济效益提供理论和实践依据。
试验地位于贵州省麻江县所辖龙山镇的龙山村, 107°43′E,26°27′W,海拔823 m,年降雨量1 200~1 500 mm,无霜期270~301 d,年平均气温14~16 ℃,属于亚热带季风湿润气候区。烤烟是当地种植的主要经济作物。
试验地土壤为中壤质黄壤,略偏酸性,pH值6.71,阳离子交换量12.15 cmol/kg。试验开始前耕层土壤本底有机质22.48 g/kg,全氮1.34 g/kg,全磷0.68 g/kg,全钾13.61 g/kg,碱解氮112.76 mg/kg,有效磷21.97 mg/kg,速效钾108.59 mg/kg。
供试烟苗由麻江县烟草公司统一提供,品种为云烟87。供试化学肥料为尿素(N 46%)、过磷酸钙(P2O5 12%)和硫酸钾(K2O 50%)。滴灌设施主要包括滴灌管、滴头和施肥器等,均为PE材质,滴灌管外径规格为16 mm,沿烟株行向铺设。
田间小区试验在2017年4月28日-8月16日期间开展,试验地前茬作物为水稻,冬季休闲。试验设置9个处理(表1),化学钾肥施用量设3个水平,即135,270,405 kg/hm2,分别用K1、K2和K3表示,灌水量设0.50(W1),1.00(W2),2.00 (W3)L/株3个水平。每个处理3次重复,随机区组排列,共27个小区,小区面积40 m2,并在四周设置保护行,行距为120 cm,株距为50 cm。本试验中WiK1、WiK2和WiK3(i=1或2或3)处理的施钾量分别为135,270,405 kg/hm2,各处理的化学氮肥和化学磷肥施用量一致(表1),磷肥和用作基肥的氮肥、钾肥在烟苗移栽前一次性施用。用作追肥的氮肥和钾肥分别在烤烟生长的还苗期和旺长期前期分2次施用,第1次和第2次追施量均分别为追肥量的15%和85%。氮肥和钾肥的基追比分别为6∶4和4∶6。烟株的灌水量及灌水时间主要依据烤烟生育期的需水情况来确定(表2)。试验烟苗于4月28日移栽,田间栽培管理措施与当地烤烟生产的管理措施一致。
表1 田间小区试验处理及施肥量
Tab.1 Field plot experiment treatments establishment and fertilizer rate of each treatment
处理Treatment灌水量/(L/株)Irrigation rate基肥施氮量/(kg/hm2)Basal nitrogen fertilizer施磷量/(kg/hm2)Phosphorusfertilizer基肥施钾量/(kg/hm2)Basal potassium fertilizer追肥施氮量/(kg/hm2)Nitrogen topdressing追肥施钾量/(kg/hm2)Potassium topdressingW1K10.507275544881W1K20.50727510848162W1K30.50727516248243W2K11.007275544881W2K21.00727510848162W2K31.00727516248243W3K12.007275544881W3K22.00727510848162W3K32.00727516248243
表2 各处理灌水时间和灌水定额
Tab.2 Irrigation time and irrigation rate of each treatment
生育期Growth stage灌水时间Irrigation time移栽后天数/d Times after transplanting灌水定额/(L/株) Irrigation rateW1KiW2KiW3Ki还苗期 Seedling stage5月13日150.050.100.20伸根期 Root elongation stage6月2日350.100.200.40旺长期前期 Earlier vigorous growth stage6月12日450.150.300.60旺长期后期 Later vigorous growth stage7月2日650.200.400.80
注:表中i=1或2或3。
Note: i=1 or 2 or 3 in the table.
1.4.1 主要农艺性状 选取在每小区中选取长势中等的烤烟10株并挂牌标记,分别于7月5日(旺长期)和7月30日(成熟期)调查每小区烟株的主要农艺性状,开展包括株高、叶片数、最大叶面积、茎围、节间距和根体积等项目的调查。具体调查方法参照《烟草农艺性状调查方法(YC/T 142-1998)》[15]中的方法。烤烟株高、叶长、叶宽和节间距采用软尺(带毫米刻度)测定,用游标卡尺测量烟茎直径d,再利用公式C=πd计算得到烤烟茎围,烤烟的叶面积采用叶长×叶宽×0.6 345计算得到,烟株根体积采用排水法测定。
1.4.2 烟叶化学成分、外观质量和感官品质鉴定 随机抽取各小区不同等级烟叶(上部叶、中部叶和下部叶)样品各1.5 kg,进行外观质量和感官品质鉴定,并分析不同等级烟叶的常规化学成分。烟叶总糖采用铜还原-直接滴定法,还原糖采用沸水浸提-铜还原-直接滴定法测定(YC/T 159-2002[16])。烟叶钾、氯和烟碱的测定参考YC/T 173-2003[17]、YC/T 162-2011[18]和YC/T160-2002[19] 中的方法,同时计算还原糖/总氮(糖氮比)、总氮/烟碱(氮碱比)、还原糖/烟碱(糖碱比)和钾/氯(钾氯比)。烘烤后原烟样品感官评吸指标的鉴定参考标准方法 NY/YCT 008-2002 和 YC/T138-1998[20], 按烟叶香气质、香气量、余味、杂气、刺激性、燃烧性和灰色7项评吸质量指标和相应权重打分并计算评吸总分。烟叶外观质量量化打分参考标准YC/T 138-1998,按烟叶颜色、成熟度、叶片结构、身份、油分和色度6项外观质量指标和相应权重打分并计算外观质量总分。
1.4.3 产量和产值的统计方法 烟叶的采收、编竿、烘烤、分级和计产均以小区为单位进行,烟叶按国家分级标准《烤烟(GB2635-1992)》[21]分级,记录每小区各等级烟叶产量,并计算各小区烟叶产量及上等烟比例和中等烟比例,产值按各自产量、上等烟和中等烟比例及其市场价格进行计算。
试验数据先经办公软件Excel 2010整理,再用SPSS 23. 0统计软件进行统计分析。
由表3可以看出,从各灌水水平和各施钾水平的均值来看,可以看出不论何种施钾水平,灌水量由W1水平增加至W2水平时,烟株各项农艺性状逐渐得到改善;灌水量增加至W3水平时,和W2水平的各处理比较,烟株各项农艺性状数值或略有增加或稍有降低。在灌水水平不同时,施钾量由K1水平增至K2水平再变至K3水平时,烟株各项农艺性状的变化趋势与以上变化相似。
在烟株生长的旺长期,灌水量对烟株株高、节间距和根体积影响的效应均达显著性差异水平(P<0.05),对最大叶面积影响的效应达极显著性差异水平(P<0.01);施钾量和水钾耦合对烟株株高、最大叶面积和根体积影响的效应均达显著性差异水平。在成熟期,灌水量对烟株株高、茎围和节间距影响的效应均达显著性差异水平,对最大叶面积和根体积影响的效应均达极显著性差异水平;施钾量和水钾耦合对烟株株高、茎围和根体积影响的效应均达显著性差异水平;对最大叶面积影响的效应均达极显著性差异水平。
表3 不同处理烟株的农艺性状
Tab.3 Agronomic characters of flue-cured tobacco plant under different fertilizer treatment
生育期Growth stage处理Treatment株高/cmPlant height最大叶面积/cm2Maximum leaf area叶片数/片Leaf number茎围/cmStem girth节间距/cmInternodal length根体积/cm3Root volume旺长期W1K188.35±3.61b1 257.92±17.06c18.54±1.03b6.36±0.71a4.11±0.46b148.13±9.79aVigorous W1K292.19±4.12b1 318.17±20.51ab19.22±1.51ab6.51±0.83a4.30±0.61ab150.21±10.41agrowth W1K398.64±6.08a1 330.53±23.93ab19.63±1.43a6.35±0.94a4.23±0.70ab147.55±11.75astageW2K195.07±5.17ab1 287.36±30.12b19.89±1.82a6.52±0.58a4.35±0.63ab148.37±12.07aW2K2100.51±5.20a1 362.57±34.09a20.37±1.90a6.61±0.65a4.59±0.58a151.65±13.82aW2K3103.15±3.91a1 331.25±32.31ab20.57±1.74a6.43±0.76a4.28±0.47ab153.43±10.93aW3K190.41±6.03b1 291.03±24.05b19.79±2.05a6.26±0.81a4.40±0.39ab149.71±12.65aW3K2101.63±7.11a1 397.38±26.37a19.95±1.65a6.67±0.59a4.57±0.60a152.84±11.87aW3K3104.32±5.34a1 400.16±24.82a20.36±1.86a6.58±0.75a4.55±0.48a152.89±13.24a平均值 W193.06b1 302.21c19.13b6.41a 4.21b 148.63b W299.58a1 327.06b20.28a 6.52a4.41a 151.15a W398.79a1 362.86a20.03ab6.50a 4.51a 151.81aK191.28b1 278.77a 19.41b6.38a4.29a 148.74bK298.11a1 359.37a 19.85ab6.60a4.49a 151.57a K3102.04a 1 353.98a20.19a6.45a 4.35a 151.29aW∗∗∗nsns∗∗K∗∗nsnsns∗W×K∗∗nsnsns∗成熟期W1K1101.57±4.13c1 396.12±31.80c20.67±2.07b7.58±0.97a4.90±0.50a171.24±15.66bMature W1K2106.32±5.35b1 432.30±34.06b21.33±1.76ab7.61±0.86a4.98±0.37a175.47±16.53bstageW1K3105.75±4.62b1 425.78±28.85b21.00±1.81ab7.65±0.77a5.11±0.53a174.29±14.09bW2K1110.16±6.03ab1 411.61±30.01b21.33±1.92ab8.02±0.59a5.23±0.42a183.63±15.45abW2K2116.95±7.15a1 548.13±36.74a22.66±2.13a8.14±1.03a5.37±0.45a185.94±17.17abW2K3115.87±4.89a1 491.37±30.18ab21.33±2.36ab8.35±1.20a5.21±0.56a190.61±15.08aW3K1109.24±5.73ab1 435.72±35.41b21.41±2.43ab7.76±0.89a5.22±0.49a192.05±16.98aW3K2118.51±6.40a1 579.29±41.53a21.66±2.51ab8.21±1.05a5.35±0.61a195.79±15.04aW3K3114.68±6.27a1 512.61±30.62a21.33±2.68ab8.17±1.01a5.26±0.38a197.48±17.02a平均值 W1104.55b1 418.07c21.00a7.61b 5.00b 173.67a W2114.33a1 483.70b21.77a 8.17a 5.27a186.73b W3114.14a1 509.21a21.44a 8.05a5.28a195.11cK1106.99b 1 414.48c 21.11a7.79b5.12a 182.31bK2113.93a1 519.91a 21.88a 7.99a 5.23a 185.73abK3112.10a1 476.59b 21.22a 8.06a 5.19a 187.46aW∗∗∗ns∗∗∗∗K∗∗∗ns∗ns∗W×K∗∗∗ns∗ns∗
注:表中所有数据均用平均值±标准差表示;不同小写字母表示0.05水平差异显著;ns.没有显著性差异,*和**分别表示差异达0.05和 0.01 水平。表4-6同。
Note: Values are means±standard error; Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference between treatments at 0.05 level; ns.Non-significant; *and** indicate significant at 0.05 and 0.01 probability levels,respectively. The same as Tab.4-6.
2.2.1 水钾耦合与烟叶主要化学成分 从表4可以看出,从各灌水水平和各施钾水平的均值来看,对于上部烟叶,不论何种灌水水平,烟叶总糖、还原糖和含钾量均随施钾量增加而增加,含氯量先降低再增加;不论何种施钾水平,烟叶总糖、还原糖、烟碱、总氮、钾和含氯量随灌水量增加而增加。灌水量对烟叶总糖、还原糖、烟碱、总氮和含氯量影响的效应均达显著性差异水平(P<0.05);施钾量对烟叶总糖、还原糖、烟碱、总氮、含钾量和钾氯比影响的效应均达显著性差异水平;水钾耦合对烟叶还原糖、烟碱和总氮影响的效应均达显著性差异水平,对总糖影响的效应达极显著性差异水平(P<0.01)。
对于中部烟叶,不论何种灌水水平,烟叶烟碱和总氮随施钾量增加而增加,总糖、还原糖、含钾量、糖碱比和钾氯比随施钾量增加先增加后降低,含氯量先降低再增加;不论何种施钾水平,烟叶烟碱和总氮含量随灌水量增加而增加,总糖、还原糖、含钾量、糖碱比、两糖比和钾氯比随施钾量增加先增加后降低,含氯量先降低再增加。灌水量对烟叶总糖、还原糖、烟碱、总氮、钾、含氯量、糖碱比和钾氯比影响的效应均达显著性差异水平;施钾量和水钾耦合对烟叶总糖、还原糖、烟碱、总氮、钾、含氯量和钾氯比影响的效应均达显著性差异水平。
对于下部烟叶,不论何种灌水水平,烟叶总糖、还原糖、烟碱、总氮随施钾量增加而增加,钾氯比随施钾量增加先增大后减小;不论何种施钾水平,烟叶总糖、还原糖、总氮、钾、含氯量和钾氯比随灌水量增加而增加,烟碱随灌水量增加先增加后降低,钾氯比呈增加的变化趋势。施钾量和水钾耦合对烟叶总氮、烟碱、还原糖、总糖和含钾量影响的效应均达显著性差异水平;灌水量对烟叶总糖、还原糖、烟碱、总氮、钾、含氯量和钾氯比影响的效应均达显著性差异水平。
表4 不同处理烟叶的主要化学成分
Tab.4 Main chemical component contents of flue-cured tobacco leaf
烟叶等级Leaf grade 处理Treatment总糖/(g/kg)Total sugar还原糖/(g/kg)Reduced sugar烟碱/(g/kg)Alkaloid总氮/(g/kg)Total nitrogenK/(g/kg)TotalpotassiumCl/(g/kg)Chlorideion糖碱比Sugar-alkaloid ratio氮碱比Nitrogen-alkaloid ratio两糖比Reduced sugar-total sugar ratio钾氯比Potassium-chlorine ratioB2F W1K1199.71±10.12d175.17±11.61d21.41±1.17c17.81±2.32b18.03±1.35b4.12±0.37a8.18±1.02a0.83±0.12a0.88±0.10a4.38±0.50a上部叶W1K2198.14±11.31d181.36±13.12c22.32±2.15b17.73±3.14b18.57±1.67b4.35±0.51a8.13±1.13a0.79±0.08a0.92±0.12a4.27±0.46abW1K3200.06±15.47d180.42±12.23c22.73±2.07b18.07±1.97ab18.89±2.11a4.21±0.43a7.94±0.84a0.79±0.11a0.90±0.15a4.49±0.51aW2K1210.37±14.18c191.06±13.58b23.05±3.14ab18.15±1.86ab18.42±1.65ab4.43±0.54a8.29±0.92a0.79±0.08a0.91±0.17a4.16±0.42abW2K2221.52±16.71b198.65±15.64ab24.21±2.68a18.86±1.52a18.90±1.38a4.18±0.38a8.21±0.87a0.78±0.07ab0.90±0.08a4.52±0.47aW2K3225.23±17.06a201.96±16.27ab24.95±2.19a19.14±1.76a19.12±1.94a4.32±0.31a8.09±0.76a0.77±0.06ab0.90±0.09a4.43±0.38aW3K1220.26±13.25b197.58±16.89ab23.70±2.34ab18.62±1.68a18.31±1.81b4.56±0.41a8.34±0.85a0.79±0.09a0.90±0.07a4.02±0.32bW3K2227.69±16.28a207.32±17.28a26.08±2.36a19.21±2.05a19.34±1.75a4.37±0.35a7.95±0.68a0.74±0.06b0.91±0.06a4.43±0.41aW3K3231.85±18.63a210.29±16.74a25.64±2.41a19.47±1.71a19.41±1.62a4.43±0.46a8.20±0.96a0.76±0.05ab0.91±0.09a4.38±0.56a平均值 W1199.30c178.98c22.15b17.87b18.50a4.23b8.08a0.81a0.90a4.38aW2219.04b197.22b24.07a18.72a18.81a4.31ab8.20a0.78a0.90a4.37aW3226.60a205.06a25.14a19.10a19.02a4.45a8.16a0.76a0.90a4.27aK1210.11c187.94b22.72b18.19c18.25b4.37a8.27a0.80a0.89a4.18aK2215.78b195.78a24.20a18.60b18.94ab4.30a8.09a0.77a0.91a4.41aK3219.05a197.56a24.44a18.89a19.14a4.32a8.08a0.77a0.90a4.43aW∗∗∗∗ns∗nsnsnsnsK∗∗∗∗∗nsnsnsns∗W×K∗∗∗∗∗nsnsnsnsnsnsC3FW1K1218.61±12.35b187.56±16.25c20.72±1.61c16.71±1.35b18.96±1.61b4.05±0.36a9.05±1.20a0.81±0.07a0.86±0.07a4.68±0.37b中部叶W1K2227.92±16.71ab203.01±19.68b21.14±1.58b16.92±1.71b19.35±1.85b3.98±0.38a9.60±1.03a0.80±0.06a0.89±0.08a4.86±0.51bW1K3231.25±18.62a210.13±20.64ab21.81±2.10b17.13±1.59b19.71±1.68b4.12±0.45a9.63±1.06a0.79±0.08a0.91±0.09a4.78±0.46bW2K1222.64±15.39b200.17±18.61b21.05±2.31b17.02±1.67b19.31±2.16b4.15±0.51a9.51±1.23a0.81±0.07a0.90±0.10a4.65±0.42bW2K2239.51±17.64a218.74±19.03a22.47±2.41ab17.40±1.29b23.12±2.21a3.76±0.37a9.73 ±1.51a0.77±0.06a0.91±0.11a6.15±0.62aW2K3233.87±18.21a210.78±20.19ab23.19±1.98a18.23±1.43a22.64±3.10a3.87±0.35a9.09±1.30a0.79±0.08a0.90±0.07a5.85±0.60aW3K1220.69±20.30b189.09±17.36c21.51±2.17b17.21±1.92b19.68±2.37b4.21±0.42a8.79±0.95a0.80±0.08a0.86 ±0.07a4.67±0.47bW3K2237.86±21.43a216.28±20.03a22.82±2.34ab18.52±1.64a22.57±2.01a3.89±0.31a9.48±0.87a0.81±0.07a0.91±0.09a5.80±0.65aW3K3236.08±21.67a214.37±19.27a24.16±2.09a18.64±1.49a22.39±2.52a4.18±0.44a8.87±0.78a0.77±0.05a0.91±0.08a5.36±0.57a平均值W1225.93b200.23b21.22b16.92b19.34b4.05a9.43a0.80a0.89a4.78b
表4(续)
烟叶等级Leaf grade 处理Treatment总糖/(g/kg)Total sugar还原糖/(g/kg)Reduced sugar烟碱/(g/kg)Alkaloid总氮/(g/kg)Total nitrogenK/(g/kg)TotalpotassiumCl/(g/kg)Chlorideion糖碱比Sugar-alkaloid ratio氮碱比Nitrogen-alkaloid ratio两糖比Reduced sugar-total sugar ratio钾氯比Potassium-chlorine ratioW2232.01a209.90a22.24a17.55ab21.69a3.93b9.44a0.79a0.90a5.55aW3231.54a206.58a22.83a18.12a21.55a4.09a9.05b0.79a0.89a5.28abK1220.65b192.27b21.09c16.98b19.32b4.14a9.12a0.81a0.87a4.67bK2235.10a212.68a22.14b17.61ab21.68a3.88b9.61a0.80a0.90a5.60aK3233.73a211.76a23.05a18.00a21.58a4.06a9.20a0.78a0.91a5.33abW∗∗∗∗∗∗∗nsns∗K∗∗∗∗∗∗nsnsns∗W×K∗∗∗∗∗∗nsnsns∗X2FW1K1223.42±16.13c187.59±15.20c21.62±2.35c15.27±1.61c18.27±1.72c4.55±0.38a8.68±0.76a0.71±0.05a0.84±0.07a4.17±0.41b下部叶W1K2237.61±21.05b200.05±17.35b22.05±2.29b15.45±1.34c19.32±2.05ab4.32±0.41a9.07±0.91a0.70±0.06a0.84±0.08a4.47±0.38aW1K3235.73±20.37b198.87±18.69b23.12±3.16ab16.13±1.29b19.57±1.86ab4.37±0.52a8.60±1.12a0.70±0.07a0.84±0.06a4.48±0.43aW2K1230.06±19.58b196.61±12.72b23.76±2.51a16.16±1.52b19.05±1.91b4.67±0.43a8.27±0.73a0.68±0.05a0.85±0.05a4.08±0.47bW2K2241.37±25.61b208.83±19.17ab24.17±2.07a16.83±1.47ab21.48±2.23a4.27±0.47a8.64±0.84a0.70 ±0.06a0.87±0.08a5.03±0.51aW2K3245.73±20.02ab216.31±20.11a24.89±1.98a17.52±1.56a21.05±1.75a4.82±0.51a8.69±0.86a0.70±0.04a0.88±0.07a4.37±0.42abW3K1231.19±21.14b197.06±16.43b22.10±2.30b16.54±1.78b19.76±1.49ab4.78±0.40a8.92±0.81a0.75±0.07a0.85±0.08a4.13±0.50W3K2245.65±22.33ab211.73±20.94a23.81±1.74a17.81±1.83a22.07±2.07a4.56±0.39a8.89±0.89a0.75±0.06a0.86±0.06a4.84±0.61aW3K3251.07±20.46a216.59±20.28a24.75±2.32a18.01±1.53a21.78±1.63a4.81±0.46a8.75±0.90a0.73±0.08a0.86±0.07a4.53±0.45a平均值W1232.25b195.50b22.26b15.62b19.05b4.41a8.78a0.70a0.84a4.37aW2239.05a207.25a24.27a16.84ab20.53a4.59a8.54a0.69a0.87a4.49aW3242.64a208.46a23.55ab17.45a21.20a4.72a8.85a0.74a0.86a4.50aK1228.22b193.75b22.49c15.99b19.03b4.67a8.62a0.71a0.85a4.13bK2241.54a206.87a23.34b16.70ab20.96a4.38a8.87a0.72a0.86a4.78aK3244.18a210.59a24.25a17.22a20.80a4.67a8.68a0.71a0.86a4.46abW∗∗∗∗∗∗nsnsns∗K∗∗∗∗∗nsnsnsnsnsW×K∗∗∗∗∗nsnsnsnsns
2.2.2 水钾耦合与烟叶评吸质量 对烘烤后不同处理烟叶的评吸质量(表5)品鉴表明,从各灌水水平和各施钾水平的均值来看,对于上部烟叶,不论何种灌水水平,烟叶的杂气香气质、余味、杂气和总得分F均随施钾量增加而增加增大,刺激性和香气量的得分随施钾量增加呈先增加后降低的变化趋势,燃烧性得分先降低再增加,对灰色影响不明显;不论何种施钾水平,烟叶香气质、香气量、余味、杂气、刺激性、灰色和总得分随灌水量增加而增加,燃烧性得分先增加后降低。灌水量对烟叶香气质、香气量、余味、杂气、燃烧性、灰色和总得分影响的效应均达显著性差异水平(P<0.05);施钾量和水钾耦合对烟叶香气质、余味、杂气和总得分影响的效应均达显著性差异水平。
对于中部烟叶,不论何种灌水水平,烟叶香气质、香气量、余味、杂气和刺激性得分随施钾量增加呈先增加后降低的变化趋势;不论何种施钾水平,烟叶香气质、香气量和刺激性得分随灌水量增加呈先增加后降低的变化趋势,余味和杂气得分随施钾量增加而增加。灌水量和水钾耦合对烟叶香气质、香气量、余味、杂气和总得分影响的效应均达显著性差异水平;施钾量对烟叶香气质、香气量、余味、杂气、刺激性、燃烧性和总得分影响的效应均达显著性差异水平。
对于下部烟叶,不论何种灌水水平,烟叶香气质、香气量、余味、杂气、刺激性和总得分随施钾量增加呈先增加后降低的变化趋势,燃烧性得分随施钾量增加而增大;不论何种施钾水平,烟叶香气质、杂气、燃烧性和总得分随灌水量增加呈先增加后降低的变化趋势,香气量、余味和刺激性得分随灌水量增加而增大。灌水量和水钾耦合对烟叶香气质、香气量、余味、刺激性和总得分影响的效应均达显著性差异水平;施钾量对烟叶香气质、香气量、余味、刺激性、灰色和总得分影响的效应均达显著性差异水平。
表5 不同处理烟叶的评吸品质
Tab.5 The smoking quality of flue-cured tobacco leaf
烟叶等级Leaf grade 处理Treatment香气质Smoke quality(15)香气量Smoke amount (20)余味Lasting smoke(25)杂气Foreign smoke(18)刺激性Stimulation(12)燃烧性Combustibility(5)灰色Grey(5)得分Score(100)B2F W1K111.12±1.20b16.01±1.71b19.75±2.11a10.17±1.20c8.06±0.72a3.00±0.31b3.00±0.29b71.11 上部叶W1K211.54±1.16ab16.57±1.58ab19.87±2.32a10.42±1.31b8.31±0.84a3.00±0.42b3.00±0.00b72.71 W1K311.65±1.32ab16.80±1.62a19.90±1.84a10.67±1.46b8.51±0.92a3.50±0.50a3.00±0.12b74.03 W2K111.78±1.35ab17.12±1.81a20.04±1.96a10.72±1.15b8.62±0.81a3.50±0.37a3.50±0.00a75.28 W2K212.06±1.41ab17.41±1.52a20.61±2.17a11.16±1.30ab8.80±0.75a3.50±0.44a3.50±0.25a77.04 W2K312.43±1.36a17.55±1.67a20.71±1.78a11.21±1.22a8.69±0.79a3.50±0.00a3.50±0.31a77.59 W3K111.91±1.18ab17.32±1.73a20.00±1.96a10.35±1.34b8.81±0.93a3.50 ±0.29a3.50±0.29a75.39 W3K212.56±1.41a17.76±2.04a20.72±1.81a11.63±1.56a8.93±0.77a3.40±0.20a3.50±0.00a78.50 W3K312.72±1.53a17.18±1.61a20.65±1.65a11.71±1.61a8.76±0.68a3.50±0.30a3.50±0.32a78.02 平均值 W111.44b16.46b 19.84b 10.42b 8.29a3.17b 3.00b 72.62b W212.09a 17.36a 20.45a 11.03a 8.70a 3.50a 3.50a 76.64aW312.40a 17.42a 20.46a 11.23a 8.83a 3.47ab 3.50a 77.30aK111.60b 16.82a19.93b 10.41b 8.50a3.33a 3.33a 73.93b K212.05ab 17.25a 20.40a 11.07a 8.68a3.30a 3.33a 76.08a K312.27a 17.18a 20.42a 11.20a 8.65a 3.50a 3.33a 76.55aW∗∗∗∗ns∗∗∗K∗ns∗∗nsnsns∗W×K∗ns∗∗nsnsns∗C3FW1K111.03±1.23c17.32±1.83a21.10±1.68b13.77±1.51a9.02±1.07b3.50±0.31b3.00±0.00b78.74中部叶W1K211.37±2.14bc17.66±1.59a21.35±2.43ab13.68±1.34a9.33±0.85ab4.00±0.37a3.50±0.30a80.89W1K311.68±1.17b17.85±1.64a21.60±1.67ab13.57±1.28a9.42±0.79ab4.00±0.00a3.50±0.00a81.62W2K111.71±1.35b17.76±1.82a21.69±1.89ab13.54±1.19a9.31±1.21ab3.50±0.29b3.50±0.31a81.01W2K212.89±1.51a18.75±1.97a22.53±2.36a14.21±1.60a9.87±1.04a4.00±0.30a3.50±0.29a85.75W2K312.67±1.38a18.31±1.68a22.16±2.17a14.10±1.54a9.71±0.95a4.00±0.31a3.50±0.00a84.45W3K111.14±1.62c17.68±1.35a21.72±2.62ab13.63±1.47a9.11±0.763.50±0.00b3.50±0.30a80.28W3K212.78±1.20a18.59±1.72a22.62±2.38a14.32±1.35a9.81±0.91a4.00±0.30a3.50±0.29a85.62W3K312.56±1.39a18.47±1.86a22.15±2.51a14.17±1.56a9.64±1.03a4.00±0.30a3.50±0.00a84.49平均值 W111.36b 17.61b 21.35b 13.67b 9.26a 3.83a 3.33a 80.42b W212.42a18.27a 22.13a13.95a 9.63a 3.83a 3.50a 83.74a W312.16a18.25a 22.16a 14.04a 9.52a 3.83a 3.50a 83.46a K111.29b 17.59b 21.50b 13.65b 9.15b 3.50b 3.33a 80.01b K212.35a18.33a 22.17a 14.07a 9.67a 4.00a 3.50a 84.09a K312.30a18.21a 21.97ab 13.95a 9.59a 4.00a3.50a 83.52a W∗∗∗∗nsnsns∗K∗∗∗∗∗∗ns∗W×K∗∗∗∗nsnsns∗X2FW1K110.14±1.23b16.01±2.16b18.03±1.95b10.81±1.41b7.56±0.56b3.00±0.29b3.00±0.30b68.55 下部叶W1K210.41±2.05b16.22±1.70b18.16±1.63b11.12±1.27ab7.71±0.72ab3.00±0.30b3.50±0.00a70.12 W1K310.71±1.15ab16.10±1.51b18.07±1.75b11.33±1.32ab7.84±0.80ab3.50±0.30a3.50±0.29a71.05 W2K110.52±1.32ab16.53±1.45b18.31±1.81b11.62±1.18a7.83±0.74ab3.50±0.28a3.00±0.25b71.31 W2K212.01±1.41a17.64±2.27a19.09±1.68a11.84±1.20a8.37±0.67a3.50±0.00a3.50±0.30a75.95 W2K311.78±1.61a17.28±1.42a19.10±2.12a11.55±1.06a8.22±0.93a3.50±0.30a3.50±0.00a74.93 W3K110.24±1.51b16.52±1.39b19.11±2.37a11.21±1.53ab7.79±0.86ab3.00±0.00b3.00±0.30b70.87 W3K211.69±1.35a17.70±1.84a19.55±1.29a11.48±1.14a8.40±0.65a3.50±0.28a3.50±0.30a75.82 W3K311.15±1.27ab17.36±1.63a19.14±1.59a11.13±1.25ab8.32±0.84a3.50±0.30a3.50±0.00a74.10 平均值 W110.42b16.11b 18.09b 11.09a 7.70b 3.17a 3.33a69.91b W211.44a 17.15a18.83a 11.67a 8.14a 3.50a 3.33a74.06aW311.03a 17.19a19.27a 11.27a 8.17a 3.33a 3.33a73.60aK110.30b16.35b 18.48b11.21a 7.73b 3.17a 3.00b 70.24bK211.37a 17.19a18.93a 11.48a 8.16a 3.33a 3.50a 73.96aK311.21a 16.91a 18.77ab 11.34a 8.13a 3.50a 3.50a 73.36aW∗∗∗ns∗nsns∗K∗∗∗ns∗ns∗∗W×K∗∗∗ns∗nsns∗
表6 不同处理烟叶的外观质量特征
Tab.6 The appearance quality of flue-cured tobacco
烟叶等级Leaf grade处理Treatment颜色Color(10)成熟度Maturity(10)叶片结构Leaf structure(10)身份Body(10)油分Oil(10)色度Color intensity(10)总分Score(60)B2FW1K17.15±0.58c7.23±0.63b7.56±0.71c7.69±0.85b7.14±0.76b7.85±0.81b44.62 上部叶W1K27.35±0.81bc7.50±0.78b7.85±0.75bc8.32±0.78a7.53±0.61ab7.90±0.57b46.45 W1K37.65±0.64b7.76±0.80ab8.08±0.96b8.61±0.83a7.76±0.58a7.98±0.67b47.84 W2K17.50±0.73b7.32±0.71b7.76±0.68bc7.78±0.74b7.32±0.67b8.06±0.84b45.74 W2K28.42±0.67a8.17±0.76a8.56±0.82a8.56±0.81a7.85±0.82a8.54±0.73a50.10 W2K38.45±0.78a8.32±0.85a8.53±0.71a8.74±0.92a8.15±0.79a8.62±0.86a50.81 W3K17.50±0.49b8.16±0.61a7.98±0.80b8.39±0.87a7.41±0.54b8.00±0.75b47.44 W3K28.33±0.72a8.17±0.89a8.00±0.76b8.43±0.76a7.68±0.70ab8.42±0.98a49.03 W3K38.51±0.75a8.49±0.93a8.00±0.65b8.56±0.59a7.55±0.85ab8.65±0.79a49.76 平均值W17.38b7.50b 7.83b 8.21a 7.48a7.91b 46.30bW28.12a7.94ab 8.28a 8.36a 7.77a 8.41a 48.88a W38.11a 8.27a 7.99ab 8.46a 7.55a 8.36ab48.74a K17.38b 7.57b 7.77b 7.95b 7.29a7.97b 45.93b K28.03ab 7.95ab 8.14a8.44ab 7.69a 8.29ab48.53ab K38.20a8.19a 8.20a 8.64a 7.82a 8.42a 49.47a W∗∗∗nsns∗∗K∗ns∗∗ns∗∗W×K∗ns∗∗ns∗∗C3FW1K17.65±0.70b8.03±0.94b7.89±0.67c8.14±0.85b8.21±0.62b7.96±0.78b47.88 中部叶W1K28.33±0.85a8.31±0.86ab8.11±0.72b8.56±0.47ab8.45±0.73ab8.46±0.85ab50.22 W1K38.41±0.93a8.42±0.75a8.35±0.86ab8.79±0.55ab8.56±0.68a8.67±0.91ab51.20 W2K17.78±0.76b8.21±0.78ab7.92±0.718.23±0.64b8.34±0.59ab8.17±0.6948.65 W2K28.61±0.83a8.56±0.77a8.61±0.54a9.12±0.89a8.65±0.65a8.95±0.63a52.50 W2K38.58±0.91a8.68±0.83a8.73±0.47a9.23±1.06a8.76±0.79a8.96±0.66a52.94 W3K18.20±0.73ab8.30±0.69ab7.87±0.65c8.21±0.73b8.25±0.82ab8.23±0.72ab49.06 W3K28.57±0.87a8.71±0.52a8.56±0.61a9.43±0.82a8.54±0.90a8.79±0.67a52.60 W3K38.64±0.68a8.77±0.46a8.81±0.75a9.45±0.81a8.68±0.92a8.81±0.86a53.16 平均值W18.13a 8.25a 8.12b 8.50a 8.41a 8.36a 49.77bW28.32a 8.48a 8.42ab 8.86ab 8.58a 8.69a 51.36a W38.47a 8.59a 8.41a 9.03a 8.49a 8.61a 51.61a K17.88b8.18b 7.89b 8.19b 8.27a 8.12b 48.53b K28.50a 8.53ab 8.43ab 9.04a 8.55a 8.73a 51.77aK38.54a 8.62a 8.63a 9.16a 8.67a 8.81a 52.43aWnsns∗∗nsns∗K∗∗∗∗ns∗∗W×Knsns∗∗nsns∗X2FW1K16.78±0.56b7.21±0.62a7.34±0.67b7.35±0.58a7.81±0.53b7.75±0.70b44.24 下部叶W1K27.23±0.61ab7.43±0.81a7.55±0.56ab7.64±0.63a7.96±0.88ab8.22±0.81ab46.03 W1K37.31±0.73ab7.47±0.75a7.68±0.61ab7.57±0.71a8.02±0.92ab8.35±0.75ab46.40 W2K17.12±0.63ab7.23±0.82a7.41±0.58ab7.32±0.69a8.12±0.75ab8.13±0.67ab45.33 W2K27.65±0.68a7.81±0.70a7.86±0.72a7.69±0.48a8.46±0.79a8.67±0.53a48.14 W2K37.62±0.75a7.69±0.84a7.78±0.65a7.58±0.61a8.51±0.65a8.71±0.74a47.89 W3K17.24±0.74ab7.16±0.67a7.35±0.78ab7.26±0.52a8.20±0.58ab8.16±0.82ab45.37 W3K27.71±0.82a7.79±0.55a7.79±0.81a7.78±0.70a8.53±0.47a8.57±0.91a48.17 W3K37.64±0.67a7.68±0.49a7.57±0.79ab7.54±0.84a8.51±0.81a8.61±0.82a47.55 平均值W17.11b 7.37a 7.52a 7.52a 7.93b 8.11b 45.56b W27.46a 7.58a 7.68a 7.53a 8.36a 8.50a 47.12a W37.53a 7.54a 7.57a 7.53a 8.41a 8.45a 47.03a K17.05b 7.20b 7.37a 7.31b 8.04b 8.01b 44.98b K27.53a 7.68a 7.73a 7.70a 8.32a 8.49a 47.45a K37.52a 7.61a 7.68a 7.56ab 8.35a 8.56a 47.28a W∗nsnsns∗∗∗K∗∗ns∗∗∗∗W×K∗nsnsns∗∗∗
2.2.3 水钾耦合与烟叶外观质量 表6为不同处理烟叶的外观质量特征,由表6可以看出,从各灌水水平和各施钾水平的均值来看,对于上部烟叶,不论何种灌水水平,烟叶外观质量的各项指标得分及总分均随施钾量增加而增大;不论何种施钾水平,烟叶颜色、结构、油分、色度和总分随灌水量增加呈先增大后降低的变化趋势,成熟度和身份得分随灌水量增加而增大。施钾量和水钾耦合对烟叶颜色、结构、身份、色度和总分影响的效应均达显著性差异水平(P<0.05);灌水量对烟叶颜色、成熟度、结构、色度和总分影响的效应均达显著性差异水平(P<0.05)。
对于中部烟叶,不论何种灌水水平,烟叶外观质量的各项指标得分及总分均随施钾量增加而增大;不论何种施钾水平,烟叶结构、油分和色度随灌水量增加呈先增大后降低的变化趋势,颜色、成熟度、身份得分和总分随灌水量增加而增大。施钾量对烟叶颜色、成熟度、结构、身份、色度和总分影响的效应均达显著性差异水平;灌水量和水钾耦合对烟叶结构、身份和总分影响的效应均达显著性差异水平。
对于下部烟叶,不论何种灌水水平,烟叶油分和色度得分均随施钾量增加而增大,烟叶颜色、成熟度、结构、身份和总分随施钾量增加呈先增大后降低的变化趋势;不论何种施钾水平,烟叶成熟度、结构、色度和总分随灌水量增加呈先增大后降低的变化趋势,颜色和油分得分随灌水量增加而增大。施钾量对烟叶颜色、成熟度、身份、油分、色度和总分影响的效应均达显著性差异水平;灌水量和水钾耦合对烟叶颜色、油分、色度和总分影响的效应均达显著性差异水平。
由表7可以看出,从各灌水水平和各施钾水平的均值来看,不论何种灌水水平,烟叶产量、上等烟和中上等烟比例均随施钾量增加而增加,不论何种施钾水平,烟叶产量、上等烟和中上等烟比例均随灌水量增加而增加。灌水量和水钾耦合对烟叶产量和上等烟比例影响的效应均达显著性差异水平(P<0.05);施钾量对烟叶产量和上等烟比例影响的效应均达显著性差异水平(P<0.05)。
表7 不同处理烟叶的产量
Tab.7 Yield of tobacco under different fertilizer treatment
处理Treatment产量/(kg/hm2)Yield上等烟比例/%Proportion of superior leaves中上等烟比例/%Proportion of mid-high grade leavesW1K12 286.25±161.62c47.57±3.56c89.72±7.61bW1K22 434.68±153.07ab48.15±4.12c90.35±9.26bW1K32 487.81±171.34ab50.01±4.37b91.51±8.54abW2K12 350.73±167.46b51.23±5.61ab91.08±7.82abW2K22 567.09±114.61a52.42±3.78a92.73±8.58aW2K32 559.54±120.75a52.25±3.92a92.14±7.29aW3K12 376.16±135.78b51.28±4.31ab91.39±8.35abW3K22 589.71±148.49a52.69±4.62a92.65±8.17aW3K32 577.37±120.63a52.34±3.47a92.71±7.42a平均值 MeanW12 402.91b48.58b90.53aW22 492.45a51.97a91.98aW32 514.41a52.10a92.25aK12 337.71b 50.03b90.73aK22 530.49a51.09ab 91.91aK32 541.57a 51.53a 92.12a W∗∗nsK∗∗nsW×K∗∗ns
烟叶成熟期各水肥处理下产量与株高及根体积的相关关系见图1。烤烟产量与株高和根体积具有显著正相关关系(R2分别为0.669 8和0.427 2)。在当前的试验条件下,株高从101.57 cm 开始到118.51 cm,株高每增加1 cm大约可以增加15.20 kg/hm2的烟叶产量;根体积从172.24 cm3开始到197.48 cm3,根体积每增加1 cm3大约可以增加7.65 kg/hm2 的烟叶产量。线性拟合效果表现为株高优于根体积。由以上可知,在一定范围内通过合理调控烤烟适宜的株高和根体积很有可能会获得较理想的烤烟产量。
图1 烟叶产量与株高、根体积的相关关系
Fig.1 Relationships between tobacco yield and plant height and root volume
水肥因子是农业生产中影响农作物生长的重要因素,只有当水肥耦合效应达到最优时,才能实现水肥资源的高效利用和作物的高产优质[22]。研究表明,在相同的钾肥施用量下,一定的供水范围内,烤烟株高、有效叶数、最大叶面积、茎围和节间距等农艺性状随灌水量增加而逐渐改善,产量也随之增加,供水过多或过少均不利于烤烟的生长[23-24]。在相同的灌水量相同时下,适宜一定的施钾量范围内,烤烟叶的叶面积、茎围、节间距、茎围和株高随施钾量的增加而增加,产量呈增加的变化趋势 [14,25]。本试验中,当施钾量相同时一定时,随着灌水量的增加,烟株的农艺性状随着灌水量的增加而逐渐得到改善,但当灌水量为1.00,2.00 L/株时,处理间差异不显著(P>0.05)。当灌水量相同时,随着施钾量的增加,烟株农艺性状得到显著改善,烟叶产量呈增加的变化趋势(P<0.05),但施钾量为270,450 kg/hm2的处理间差异不显著。这说明烟株生长中灌水量和施钾量并非越多越有利。在一定的灌水量和施钾范围内,水钾耦合处理烟株的农艺性状和烟叶产量均逐渐增加,各处理中以W2K2、W2K3、W3K2和W3K3处理表现较好,优于其他处理,可能是W2K2、W2K3、W3K2和W3K3处理中水钾之间的相互促进作用强于其他处理。一方面,适量土壤含水量有利于增加烟株根系表面积和体积,提高根系活力[26];适量的水分有利于土壤中钾的移动,保持适当浓度梯度进行传导,可显著提高烟株钾素的吸收量[27]。另一方面,施钾可改变烟株形态建成,增加根长、根总表面积和根系体积,提高根系活力和根系ATP酶活性[28],增强了烟株吸收养分和水分的能力,为烟株生长和提高产量奠定水肥物质基础。研究表明,只有合理的水肥配比才能有利于作物的生长发育和提高产量[29]。适量灌水和施钾一体化处理即水钾耦合处理有利于烟株体内碳氮代谢关键酶的活性的提高,促进烟株的光合作用,提高光合速率[30],显著提高烟叶产量;同时促进烟株体内同化产物的合成和运输,提高呼吸效率,减少干物质和能量的消耗[31]。
烟叶品质的好坏取决于其外观质量和评吸质量的好坏及内在化学成分的协调性与否。水分和钾素是影响烟叶品质的两大重要因素[14,32]。研究表明,在土壤含水量一定的条件下,适量供应钾肥能够提高烟叶中总糖和还原糖的含量,稍微增加钾和总氮含量,降低烟碱和氯含量[33-34]。而韦成才等[35]研究表明,增施钾肥可显著提高烟叶总糖、还原糖、钾、总氮、烟碱和钾氯比,并降低氯含量。以上研究结果存在一定差异的主要原因可能与施用钾肥的类型及试验地区的生态环境不同有关。本研究中,不论上部叶、中部叶还是下部叶中总糖、还原糖、钾、总氮、烟碱和氯含量及钾氯比与韦成才等[35]的研究结果较为一致。施钾能引起烟叶内主要化学成分变化的原因是钾在烟株体内以离子形态存在并参与含碳化合物和含氮化合物的代谢合成、光合作用、呼吸作用、能量代谢及物质的转运等生理生化过程[36]。
在钾肥施用量一定时,供水过量或过低,都会烟叶内各种化学成分比例失调,当水分供给量适宜时,烟叶内各种化学成分比例协调,品质较好[37]。供水量适宜与否还影响到烟叶外观质量和评吸品质,供水适宜时,烟叶结构好、厚薄适中、色泽均匀鲜明、油分足、成熟落黄好,评吸品质好,供水不足或过量,均会使烟叶外观质量和评吸质量变劣[14]。其原因可能是水分供应充足与否影响调节烟株体内碳氮代谢的关键酶的活性,影响烟叶中各化学物质含量的高低及其比例,进而影响烟叶的质量[38-39]。有研究表明,烟叶的评吸质量随降水量的增加而提高,降水量充足,烟叶香气量足、香气质好、杂气和刺激性轻、而余味舒适[40]。李鹏飞等[41]的研究表明,在烤烟生长的成熟期,调节土壤的水分含量,有利于协调烟叶的主要化学成分和挥发性香气物质的形成。本试验中,在设定的施钾量和灌水量范围内,烟草综合品质整体上随灌水量和钾施用量的增加而提高,灌水量以1.00,2.00 L/株的处理较好,施钾量以270,405 kg/hm2的处理较好。适量钾和灌水一体化处理能使烟叶中化学成分更趋协调,更能提高烟叶品质,可能是W2K2、W2K3、W3K2和W3K3处理中水钾之间的耦合效应优于其他处理,使烟株处于更加理想的水肥供应状态,有效提高了烟株体内调节碳、氮代谢关键酶的活性,烟叶中积累了丰富的糖类物质,降低了烟碱和氯含量,同时促进了烟株对钾的吸收,使化学成分更协调,品质更好[38]。
在相同的施钾量水平下,增加灌水量有利于促进烟株的生长发育、改善烟叶的外观质量、提高烟叶产量,使烟叶中的主要化学成分更为协调和评吸质量更优,但灌水量为1.00,2.00 L /株时,处理间差异不显著;在相同的灌水量相同时水平下,增施加钾肥施用量也有利于烟株的生长发育、改善烟叶的外观质量,使烟叶中的主要化学成分更为协调和评吸质量更优。烟叶产量随施钾量的增加先增加后略微减小,施钾量为270,405 kg/hm2时,处理间差异不显著;在本试验条件下,从提高产量和节约水肥资源的角度考虑,以W2K2(1.00 L/株,270 kg/hm2)和W3K2(2.00 L/株,270 kg/hm2)水钾耦合处理效果较好,为较适宜的水肥组合。
[1] 张士荣, 王军, 张德龙, 丁效东. 有机肥C/N优化及钾肥运筹对烤烟钾含量及香气品质的影响[J].华北农学报, 2017,32(3):220 -228. doi:10.7668/hbnxb.2017.03.034.
Zhang S R, Wang J, Zhang D L, Ding X D. The effect of K application on K content and aroma quality of leaves of flue-cured tobacco under the optimization of C/N with organic fertilizer[J].Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica,2017,32(3):220-228.
[2] 刘国顺.烟草栽培学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2003.
Liu G S. Tobacco cultivation science[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2003.
[3] 闫宁,刘新民,杜咏梅,张伟峰,顾毓敏,高远,卢晓华,唐宇,蔡宪杰,程森.我国初烤烟叶钾含量现状与变化趋势分析[J].江西农业学报,2018, 30(1): 86-90. doi:10.19386/j.cnki.jxnyxb.2018.01.19.
Yan N, Liu X M, Du Y M, Zhang W F, Gu Y M, Gao Y, Lu X H, Tang Y, Cai X J, Cheng S. Current situation and variation trend of potassium content in flue-cured tobacco in China[J].Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2018,30(1):86-90.
[4] 夏军,刘春蓁,任国玉.气候变化对我国水资源影响研究面临的机遇与挑战[J].地球科学进展,2011,26(1):1-12.doi:10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2011.01.001.
Xia J, Liu C Z, Ren G Y. Opportunity and challenge of the climate change impact on the water resource of China [J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2011, 26(1): 1-12.
[5] 赵玉芬,尹应武.我国肥料使用中存在的问题及对策[J].科学通报,2015,60(36):3527-3534.doi:10.1360/N972015-00672.
Zhao Y F, Yin Y W. Key scientific problems on establishing green fertilizer ensurance system[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2015, 60(36): 3527-3534.
[6] 易文裕,程方平,熊昌国,袁志英.农业水肥一体化的发展现状与对策分析[J].中国农机化学报,2017, 38(10): 111-115,120. doi:10.13733/j.jcam.issn.2095-5553.2017.10.023.
Yi W Y, Cheng F P, Xiong C G, Yuan Z Y. Development status and countermeasures of integrative water and fertilizer in agriculture[J].Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 2017, 38(10): 111-115, 120.
[7] 蒋静静,屈锋,苏春杰,杨剑锋,余剑,胡晓辉.不同肥水耦合对黄瓜产量品质及肥料偏生产力的影响[J].中国农业科学,2019,52(1):86-97. doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.01.009.
Jiang J J, Qu F, Su C J, Yang J F, Yu J, Hu X F. Effects of different water and fertilizer coupling on yield and quality of cucumber and partial factor productivity of fertilizer[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(1): 86-97.
[8] Wang H D, Wu L F, Cheng M H, Fan J L, Zhang F C, Zou Y F, Chau H W, Gao Z J, Wang X K. Coupling effects of water and fertilizer on yield, water and fertilizer use efficiency of drip-fertigated cotton in Northern Xinjiang, China[J].Field Crops Research, 2018, 219:169-179. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2018.02.002.
[9] 杨静宜.滴灌条件下不同水肥耦合对西芹生长生理、养分吸收、产量及品质的影响[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学, 2018.
Yang J Y. Effects of different water and fertilizer rates on growth physiological, nutrient absorption, yield and quality of celery under drip irrigation condition [D].Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2018.
[10] 张鹏.水钾耦合效应对花生生长发育及养分吸收的影响[D].沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2016.
Zhang P. Coupling effects of irrigation and potassium on peanut growth and nutrient uptake [D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University, 2016.
[11] 胡中科,庄文化,刘超,刘铁刚,李卓.紫色土地区水钾耦合对油菜产量及水分利用效率的影响研究[J].水土保持研究, 2014, 21(4): 87-91. doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2014.04.019.
Hu Z K, Zhuang W H, Liu C, Liu T G, Li Z. Effect of coupling of water and potassium on rape yield and water use efficiency in purple soil areas[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2014, 21(4): 87-91.
[12] 张辉, 朱绿丹, 安霞, 董月,焦庆清,张永春.水分和钾肥耦合对甘薯光合特性和水分利用效率的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2016, 32(6):1294-1301.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.016.
Zhang H, Zhu L D, An X, Dong Y, Jiao Q Q, Zhang Y C. Effects of water coupled with K on the photosynthetic characteristics of sweet potato and its water use efficiency[J].Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 32(6): 1294-1301.
[13] 丁亚会,肖海强,王大海,管恩森,龙怀玉.水钾一体化对烤烟钾素吸收及生长的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(5): 1238-1248. doi:10.11674/zwyf.16391.
Ding Y H, Xiao H Q, Wang D H, Guan E S, Long H Y. Effect of potassium fertigation on potassium absorption and growth of flue-cured tobacco[J].Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2017, 23(5): 1238-1248.
[14] 韦歆娜.非充分灌溉水钾耦合对南雄烤烟产量及品质的影响[D].广州: 华南农业大学, 2016.
Wei X N. Effect of non full irrigation water and potassium coupling on yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco in Nanxiong [D].Guangzhou: South China Agricultural University, 2016.
[15] 国家烟草专卖局,YC/T 142-1998.烟草农艺性状调查方法[S].北京:中国标准出版社,1998.
State Tobacco Monopoly Administration, YC/T 142-1998. Investigating methods of agronomical character of tobacco[S]. Beijing: China Standards Press, 1998.
[16] 国家烟草专卖局,YC/T 159-2002.烟草及烟草制品 水溶性糖的测定 连续流动法[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2002.
State Tobacco Monopoly Administration, YC/T 159-2002. Tobacco and tobacco products determination of water soluble sugars continuous flow method [S]. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2002.
[17] 国家烟草专卖局,YC/T 173-2003.烟草及烟草制品 钾的测定 火焰光度法[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 2003.
State Tobacco Monopoly Administration, YC/T 173-2003. Tobacco and tobacco products, determination of potassium flame photometry [S]. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2003.
[18] 国家烟草专卖局, YC/T 162-2011.烟草及烟草制品氯的测定 连续流动法[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2011.
State Tobacco Monopoly Administration, YC/T 162-2011.Tobacco and tobacco products, determination of chloride continuous flow method [S]. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2011.
[19] 国家烟草专卖局,YC/T 160-2002.烟草及烟草制品 总植物碱的测定 连续流动法[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2002.
State Tobacco Monopoly Administration, YC/T 160-2002. Tobacco and tobacco products, determination of total alkaloids continuous flow method [S]. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2002.
[20] 国家烟草专卖局,YC/T 138-1998.烟草及烟草制品 感官评价方法[S].北京:中国标准出版社,1998.
State Tobacco Monopoly Administration, YC/T 138-1998. Tobacco and tobacco products, the sensory evaluation methods[S]. Beijing: China Standards Press, 1998.
[21] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,GB2635-1992.烤烟国家分级标准[S].北京:中国标准出版社,1992.
General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People′s Republic of China, GB2635-1992. National classification standard of tobacco[S]. Beijing: China Standards Press.
[22] 张富仓,高月,焦婉如,胡文慧.水肥供应对榆林沙土马铃薯生长和水肥利用效率的影响[J].农业机械学报,2017, 48(3): 270-278. doi:10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2017.03.034.
Zhang F C, Gao Y, Jiao W R, Hu W H. Effects of water and fertilizer supply on growth, water and nutrient use efficiencies of potato in sandy soil of Yulin area[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2017, 48(3): 270-278.
[23] 肖海强.不同负压供水及施钾模式对烤烟生长的影响[D].长沙:湖南农业大学,2014.
Xiao H Q. Effect of different negative pressure water supplying and potassium fertilizer models on growth of flue-cured tobacco[D].Changsha: Hunan Agricultural University, 2014.
[24] 肖海强,刘学勇,龙怀玉,杨虹琦,赵百东,管恩森,王大海,岳现录.土壤水势对烤烟生长及其耗水特性的影响[J].中国烟草科学,2015,36(1):35-41. doi:10.13496/j.issn.1007-5119.2015.01.008.
Xiao H Q, Liu X Y, Long H Y, Yang H Q, Zhao B D, Guan E S, Wang D H, Yue X L. The effects of soil water potential on the growth and water consumption of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2015, 36(1): 35-41.
[25] 吴涛,白羽祥,王戈,杨焕文,徐照丽,李正风.钾肥用量对烤烟光合特性和产质量的影响[J].浙江农业科学,2017,58(7):1136-1139.doi:10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20170713.
Wu T, Bai Y X, Wang G, Yang H W, Xu Z L, Li Z F. Effect of potassium application rate on photosynthetic characteristics, yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco[J].Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences,2017,58(7):1136-1139.
[26] 杨苹,程智敏,陈叙生,向金友,蔡毅,黄胜,唐明,杨懿德.土壤水分调控对烤烟根系、植株形态及生理特性的影响[J].贵州农业科学, 2017,45(9):21-23.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3601.2017.09.006.
Yang P, Cheng Z M, Chen X S, Xiang J Y, Cai Y, Huang S, Tang M, Yang Y D. Effect of soil moisture regulation on flue-cured tobacco root system, plant morphology and physiological characteristics[J].Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 2017,45(9): 21-23.
[27] 霍娜,王宏庭.水分对土壤钾素植物有效性的影响研究进展[J].山西农业科学,2014,42(12):1330-1334.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-2481.2014.12.28.
Huo N, Wang H T. Research progress of soil potassium availability on soil moisture[J].Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 42(12): 1330-1334.
[28] 武恒燕, 席奇亮, 李晓辉, 薛刚,杨铁钊.不同基因型烤烟的根系特性及其对根际土壤钾含量的影响研究[J].中国农业科技导报,2018, 20(7):137-145.doi:10.13304/j.nykjdb.2017.0675.
Wu H Y, Xi Q L, Li X H, Xue G, Yang T Z. Study on root characteristics and their influences on rhizosphere potassium content of different flue-cured tobacco genotypes[J].Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018, 20(7): 137-145.
[29] 扁青永,王振华,胡家帅,何新林,李朝阳.水肥供应对南疆沙区滴灌红枣生理、生长及产量的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2018, 36(4):165-171.doi:10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2018.04.24.
Bian Q Y, Wang Z H, Hu J S, He X L, Li Z Y. Effects of water and fertilizer supply on physiology, growth and yield of drip-irrigation jujube in the southern Xinjiang sandy area[J].Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2018, 36(4):165-171.
[30] 黄松青,危跃,屠乃美,易镇邪,官春云.控释肥对烤烟光合特性和产质量与氮钾利用率的影响[J].中国烟草科学,2015,36(1):54-60. doi:10.13496/j.issn.1007-5119.2015.01.011.
Huang S Q, Wei Y, Tu N M, Yi Z X, Guan C Y. Effects of controlled release fertilizer on photosynthetic characteristics, yield and quality and use efficiency of N and K of tobacco[J].Chinese Tobacco Science, 2015, 36(1): 54-60.
[31] 介晓磊,化党领,谭金芳,刘世亮.中国烟草钾营养研究现状分析(Ⅰ)烟草钾营养的各学科研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2005,21(10):212-217.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2005.10.058.
Jie X L, Hua D L, Tan J F, Liu S L. The review of potassium nutrition in tobacco in China[J].Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin,2005,21(10):212-217.
[32] 车安斌,尚军,冉清,董均方,陈建斌.土壤水分对烤烟生长发育和产质量的影响[J].贵州农业科学,2012,40(8):75-77.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3601.2012.08.023.
Che A B, Shang J, Ran Q, Dong J F, Chen J B. Effect of soil moisture on growth, yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 40(8):75-77.
[33] 刘会杰,赵铭钦,闻刚,姜慧娟,彭洁.种植密度和施钾量对烤烟品质的影响[J].西南农业学报,2013,26(2): 653-658.doi:10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2013.02.056.
Liu H J, Zhao M Q, Wen G, Jiang H J, Peng J. Effects of planting density and K application level on quality of flue-cured tobacco[J].Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences,2013,26(2):653-658.
[34] 郑东方,许嘉阳,许自成,郭利,曹丽君,孟黎明,黄五星,彭功银,高传奇.钾肥和腐殖酸互作对烤烟有机钾盐指数的影响[J].土壤学报,2015,52(3):637-649.doi:10.11766/trxb201406170290.
Zheng D F, Xu J Y, Xu Z C, Guo L, Cao L J, Meng L M, Huang W X, Peng G Y, Gao C Q. Effects of interaction between potassium and humic acid on index of organic potassium salt in flue-cured tobacco [J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2015, 52(3): 637-649.
[35] 韦成才,张立新,高梅,张喜峰,马英明,王平平.不同钾肥对陕西典型生态区烤烟化学成分和经济性状的影响[J].中国烟草科学, 2014,35(3):7-11.doi:10.13496/j.issn.1007-5119.2014.03.002.
Wei C C, Zhang L X, Gao M, Zhang X F, Ma Y M, Wang P P. Effect of different types of potassium fertilizers on chemical components and economic values of flue-cured tobacco in typical ecological zones of Shaanxi province[J]. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2014, 35(3): 7-11.
[36] Ramage C M, Williams R R. Mineral uptake in tobacco leaf discs during different developmental stages of shoot organogenesis[J]. Plant Cell Reports, 2003, 21(11):1047-1053.doi:10.1007/s00299-003-0628-3.
[37] 张丰收,程传策,陈雪,徐世晓,刘玲玲,薛刚,杨丙钊.水分处理对毕节雨养烟区烟株农艺性状、生理生化指标及烟叶化学成分的影响[J].河南农业科学,2016,45(5):34-39. doi:10.15933/j.cnki.1004-3268.2016.05.007.
Zhang F S, Cheng C C, Chen X, Xu S X, Liu L L, Xue G, Yang B Z. Effects of different water treatment to tobacco on agronomic traits, chemical constituents, physiological and biochemical indexes in rained area of Bijie[J].Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences,2016,45(5):34-39.
[38] 喻奇伟.水钾耦合对烤烟钾含量及碳氮代谢的影响[D].郑州:河南农业大学,2008.
Yu Q W. Effect of water and potassium fertilizer coupling on the potassium contents and carbon and nitrogen metabolism to flue-cured tobacco[D]. Zhengzhou: Henan Agricultural University, 2008.
[39] 邸慧慧,史宏志,王廷晓,王太运,刘国顺,谢德平,王广胜.灌水量对烤烟中性香气成分含量的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2009,28(5):128-131.doi:10.13522/j.cnki.ggps.2009.05.032.
Di H H, Shi H Z, Wang T X, Wang T Y, Liu G S, Xie D P, Wang G S. Effects of irrigation on content of neutral aroma constituents in flue-cured tobacco[J].Journal of Irrigation and Drainage,2009,28(5):128-131.
[40] 周翔,董建新,张教侠,梁洪波,邓启强,吴元华,尹东升,王暖春,牛鹏,郭永良,付忠杰,王文杰.降水与烤烟感官评吸质量的关系[J].中国烟草科学,2009,30(2):53-56.doi:10.13496/j.issn.1007-5119.2009.02.012.
Zhou X, Dong J X, Zhang J X, Liang H B, Deng Q Q, Wu Y H, Yin D S, Wang N C, Niu P, Guo Y L, Fu Z J, Wang W J. Relationship between precipitation and sensory quality of flue-cured tobacco leaves in Shandong [J].Chinese Tobacco Science, 2009, 30(2): 53-56.
[41] 李鹏飞,周冀衡,张建平,杨虹琦,黄勇.烤烟成熟期土壤水分状况对烟叶挥发性香气物质及主要化学成分的影响[J].中国烟草学报,2009,15(3):44-48.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-5708.2009.03.009.
Li P F, Zhou J H, Zhang J P, Yang H Q, Huang Y. Effect of soil moisture on aroma and main chemical compositions in mature stage flue-cured tobacco leave[J].Acta Tabacaria Sinica,2009,15(3):44-48.
曾掌权(1976-),男,湖南益阳人,副研究员,博士,主要从事农林土壤生态研究。