采用LSD法对夏玉米两品种(郑单98和鲁单981)及各水分处理间植株叶片δ13C进行方差分析,并将其与叶重、水分利用效率及产量间关系进行了定性分析,以期为改进旱地和节水农业栽培及选育抗性品种提供参考价值.研究发现:鲁单981较郑单98长势快、株高高、抗倒伏性差,但前者的产量却高于后者;两品种间植株叶片δ13C值差别不明显;不同作物品种相同水分处理间因遗传因素的影响导致其δ13C值有所差异,相同品种不同水分处理间也因环境因素的影响致使其δ13C值有所不同;两品种间植株叶片δ13C值与产量均表现出一致的负相关趋势,但与叶重、水分利用效率却均呈现出相反的相关趋势.其中,在与叶重的相关性中,郑单98表现出正相关性,而鲁单981表现出负相关性;在与水分利用效率的相关性中,郑单98呈负相关趋势,而鲁单981则呈正相关趋势.
In order to supply references to ameliorating dry land, water-saving agricultural cultivation and choosing resistant varieties, the paper analyzed ??13C variance of two maize variet ies ( Zhengdan 958 and Ludan 981) and water treatments in LSD, and carried on a qualitative analysis on its relationship with leaf weight, water use efficiency and yield. The study found that Ludan 981 had a faster growth, higher plant height and worse lodging resistance than Zhengdan 958, but the yield of the former was higher than the latter. The difference of ??13C value of leaves between the two variances was not obvious. Different varieties of the same water treatment lead to different ??13 C values as a result of genet ic factors, and the same variety of different water treatment resulted in different ??13C values due to environmental factors.The ??13C values of the two varieties showed a consistent trend of negative correlat ion with yield, but a opposite trend with leaf weight and water use efficiency.Among them, with emphasis on the relevance of leaf weight, the Zhengdan 958 showed positive correlation, but Ludan 981 showed negative correlat ion;with emphasis on the relevance of water use efficiency, the Zhengdan 958 was a negative correlation trend, but Ludan 981 was a positive correlation trend.
[1] 梁银丽,康绍忠,山仑.水分和氮磷水平对小麦碳同位素分辨率和水分利用效率的影响[J].植物生态学报,2000,24(3):289-292.
[2] 赵兴云,王建,钱君龙,等.天目山柳杉树轮δ13C年序列差异[J].应用生态学报,20067(3):362-367.
[3] 郑淑霞,上官周平.陆生植物稳定碳同位素组成与全球变化[J].应用生态学报,20067(4):733-739.
[4] Kloeppel B D,Gower S T,Treichel I W,et al.Foliar carbon isotope discrimination in Larix species and sympatric evergreen conifers:a global comparison[J].Oecologia99814:153-159.
[5] Farquhar G D,Ehleringer J R,Hubick K T.Carbon isotope discrimination in photosynthesis[J].Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Molecular Biology989,40:503-537.
[6] 陈英华,胡俊,李裕红,等.碳稳定同位素技术在植物水分胁迫研究中的应用[J].生态学报,2004,24(5):1027-1031.
[7] O'Leary M H,Carbon isotope fractionation in plants[J].Phytochemistry981,20:553-567.
[8] Lin Z F.Application of stable carbon isotope in plant physiology and ecology[J].Plant Physiology Communications990,3(3):1-6.
[9] Hattersley P W.δ13C values of C4 types in grasses[J].Aust J Plant Physilo982,9:139.
[10] Hattersley P W,Roksandic Z.δ 13 C values of C3 and C4 species of australian neurachne and its allies (Poaceae)[J].Aust J Bot983,31:317.
[11] 冯虎元,安黎哲,陈拓,等.马先蒿属植物稳定碳同位素组成与环境因子之间的关系[J].冰川冻土,2003,25(1):88-93.
[12] 朱永华,仵彦卿,吕海深,等.植物生长条件下荒漠土壤水分预报的数学模型[J].冰川冻土,2001,23(3):264-269.
[13] Lajtha K,Michener R H.Stable isotopes in ecology and environmental science[M].London:Blackwell Scientific Publications994:1-5.
[14] Farquhar G D,Hubick K T,Condon A G,et al.Carbon isotope fractionation and plant water-use efficiency[C]//Stable Isotope in Ecological Research.New York:Springer-Verlag989:21-40.
[15] Schuster W S F,Sandquist D R,Phillips S L,et al.Comparisons of carbon isotope discrimination in population of arid land plant species differing in lifespan[J].Oecologia992,91:332-337.
[16] Farquhar G D,Rechards R A.Isotopic composition of plant carbon correlates with water-use efficiency of wheat genotypes[J].Aust J Plant Physiology9841:539-552.
[17] Marshall J D,Zhang J.Carbon isotope discrimination and water-use efficiency in native plants of the north-central Rockies[J].Ecology994,75:1887-1895.
[18] Saranga Y,Flash I,Paterson A H,et al.Carbon isotope ratio in cotton varies with growth stage and plant organ[J].Plant Science99942(1):47-56.
[19] Hall A E,Mutters R G,Hubick K T,et al.Genotypic differences in carbon isotope discrimination by cowpea under wet and dry field conditions[J],Crop Sci990,30(2):300-305.
